Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "nous poietikos" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Philosopher’s Theoretical Life vs. Auto-deification? Possible readings of Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”, book X.
    Autorzy:
    Kamińska, Sonia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621946.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
    Tematy:
    nous poietikos
    interpretacje mistyczne i racjonalistyczne
    Arystoteles
    psychologia
    Bóg/Bóstwo
    nieśmiertelność
    dusza rozumna
    unio mystica
    Opis:
    This is a continuation of “Rational vs. Mystical Readings of Aristotle’s Nous Poietikos. Introduction to the Subject and Overview of Central Positions” where I gave a synopsis of the readings of nous poietikos. I ordered them by introducing a division into “mystical” and “rational”. The mystical ones are rooted in a view that nous poietikos does not belong to particular human beings, but is identical with Deity/divine sphere. According to the rational readings nous poietikos is our cognitive tool and through its activity we can learn about the Deity and emulate it. In this paper, I aim to check which of these models is better suited for Aristotle, in other words: would Aristotle approve of any of them? By comparing the ways of life appointed by them I wish to put theory into practice. In order to solve a mystery from De Anima, I refer to Nicomachean Ethics.
    Źródło:
    Analiza i Egzystencja; 2017, 39; 37-47
    1734-9923
    2300-7621
    Pojawia się w:
    Analiza i Egzystencja
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Rational vs. Mystical Readings of Aristotle’s Nous Poietikos Introduction to the Subject and Overview of Central Positions
    Autorzy:
    Kamińska, Sonia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1621948.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
    Tematy:
    nous poietikos
    mystical and rational readings
    Aristotle
    psychology
    God/Deity
    immortality
    intellectual soul
    unio mystica
    Opis:
    In my paper, I will give an overview of the readings of nous poietikos, the active intellect from De Anima. Sadly, Aristotle describes it in a cryptic way, which resulted in many different theories. I will order them by introducing a division into “mystical” and “rational”. The mystical ones are rooted in a view that nous poietikos does not belong to particular human beings, but is identical with Deity or a divine sphere. According to the rational readings it is our cognitive tool and through its activity we can learn about the Deity and emulate it. The mystics are: Eudemus, Avicenna, Averroes, from the newer philosophers E. Zeller and from the contemporary ones – V. Caston. The rationalists are: Theophrastus, Thomas Aquinas, the XIXth century Aristotelian revival and from the contemporary thinkers – A. Kosman.
    Źródło:
    Analiza i Egzystencja; 2017, 39; 19-35
    1734-9923
    2300-7621
    Pojawia się w:
    Analiza i Egzystencja
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The alleged activity of active intellect: A wild goose chase or a puzzle to be solved?
    Autorzy:
    Kamińska, Sonia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/690658.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Copernicus Center Press
    Tematy:
    nous
    nous poietikos
    nous pathetikos
    soul
    intellect
    God
    Deity
    actuality
    potentiality
    philosophy of mind
    Aristotle
    Thomas Aquinas
    Franz Brentano
    Victor Caston
    Opis:
    Trying to describe the activity of Aristotle’s active intellect, we will sooner or later realize that we cannot find its right description, because Aristotle did not provide for one. He left us with many irreconcilable statements and questions with no answers. In the famous text Aristotle’s Two Intellects: a Modest Proposal Victor Caston claims that Aristotle did not describe the activity, because there simply is no such activity and we should therefore identify nous poietikos with God, because God too does nothing. Trying to find this lacking description is like going on a wild goose chase – Caston argues. In my text I will show that his solution, albeit tempting, is in fact a kind of “dissolution” and that a wild goose chase, although for many doomed to failure, can be fruitful. I will do so by presenting three groups or clusters of views on active intellect which – I believe – are philosophically significant. Caston’s proposal will be one of them, but not the privileged one. These three types of interpretations will hopefully provide us with an imagery that will help us somewhat come to terms with Aristotle’s succinctness.
    Źródło:
    Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce; 2014, 54; 79-126
    0867-8286
    2451-0602
    Pojawia się w:
    Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    What can grow from the divine seed? The divinity of human beings according to Aristotle
    Autorzy:
    Kamińska, Sonia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640920.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
    Tematy:
    animation
    Aristotle
    Brentano
    creationism
    Deity
    divine seed
    divinity
    Eberl
    embryogenesis
    god / God
    human being
    nous
    nous pathetikos
    nous poietikos
    soul
    St
    Thomas
    theion sperma
    traducianism
    Zeller
    Opis:
    This text aims to show that the core of human divinity according to Aristotle is exercising the divine mind for its own sake. Being happy and thus divine is auto-teleological, and must not be reduced to any sort of instrumental value. This reading of Aristotle excludes the theist interpretations of Prime Mover as well as the attempts at identifying the human mind with God, mainly because both these (different) interpretations seem to make auto-teleological bios theoretikos impossible. The first do this by introducing the divine provision which makes people act for God’s sake and not for their own sake. The others reduce the special status of humans by taking away the divine part, in my opinion being the sine qua non condition of the concept of human divinity. All the interpretations of human divinity which I have presented above can be useful nowadays in the ethical, (bio)ethical, social or even political discourse. This shows that the history of philosophy is not only about the past, but also about the future.
    Źródło:
    Studia Religiologica; 2012, 45, 3; 173-182
    0137-2432
    2084-4077
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Religiologica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies