Temat: normativity of meaning - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: Preskryptywna eksplikacja tezy o normatywności znaczenia i trudności z nią związane
Prescriptive explication of the normativity of meaning thesis
Autorzy:: Kaluziński, Bartosz
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/18689101.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2015
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:: normativity of meaning
semantic prescriptivism
prima facie obligations
Kripke
Boghossian
Opis:: The aim of this paper is to analyse prescriptive interpretations of the thesis that meaning is normative, which was introduced by Saul Kripke and later developed by Paul Boghossian. We are going to show that meaning prescriptivism is counter-intuitive and has implausible consequences. Attempts to save prescriptive interpretations by appealing to prima facie obligations or „normativity of judgment” are unsuccessful.
Źródło:: Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris; 2015, 28, 1; 94-115
1689-4286
Pojawia się w:: Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Speaking, Inferring, Arguing. On the Argumentative Character of Speech
Autorzy:: Corredor, Cristina
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1797154.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2020
Wydawca:: Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne
Tematy:: arguing
inferring
argumentative value
inferential meaning
illocutionary
normativity of speech
Austin
Grice
Opis:: Within the Gricean framework in pragmatics, communication is understood as an inferential activity. Other approaches to the study of linguistic communication have contended that language is argumentative in some essential sense. My aim is to study the question of whether and how the practices of inferring and arguing can be taken to contribute to meaning in linguistic communication. I shall suggest a two-fold hypothesis. First, what makes of communication an inferential activity is given with its calculability, i.e. with the possibility to rationally recover the assigned meaning by means of an explicit inference. Secondly, the normative positions that we recognize and assign each other with our speech acts comprise obligations and rights of a dialectical character; but this fact does not entail nor presuppose an argumentative nature in language or speech. Both inferring and arguing are needed, however, in the activity of justifying and assessing our speech acts.
Źródło:: Studia Semiotyczne; 2020, 34, 2; 43-64
0137-6608
Pojawia się w:: Studia Semiotyczne
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Informacja