Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "nature and grace" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Holistyczny charakter duchowości chrześcijańskiej
Holistic Character of Christian spirituality
Autorzy:
Zyzak, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/571373.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
Tematy:
duchowość holistyczna
sacrum i profanum
natura i łaska
holistic spirituality
sacred and profane
nature and grace
Opis:
The author of the article discusses the impact of spirituality on the human health from a holistic point of view. For this purpose he introduces the holistic idea of spirituality, which is based on integral anthropology, understanding a human being as spiritual-corporal unity. The text underlines the connection between nature and grace, sacred and profane, individual and community.
Autor artykułu omawia wpływ duchowości na zdrowie człowieka w ujęciu holistycznym. W tym celu rozwija holistyczne pojęcie duchowości, które bazuje na integralnej antropologii, ujmującej człowieka jako jedność duchowo-cielesną. Tekst podkreśla związek natury i łaski, wymiaru profanum i sacrum, a także indywiduum i wspólnoty.
Źródło:
Polonia Sacra; 2019, 23, 1(55); 147-167
1428-5673
Pojawia się w:
Polonia Sacra
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Teleologia i teologia. Nowożytne przemiany w rozumieniucelowości natury ludzkiej na przykładzie Kajetana i Lutra
Teleology and theology. Modern transformations in the understandingof the finality of human nature on the example of Cajetan and Luther
Autorzy:
Persidok, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1009260.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-03-05
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
teleologia, Luter, Kajetan, natura i łaska, antropologia teologiczna
teleology, Luther, Cajetan, nature and grace, theological anthropology
Opis:
The problem of the ultimate goal of man belongs to the most important issues of Western theological anthropology. Traditionally, it was perceived according to the model of a harmonious relation between nature and grace: man is by nature unable to find fulfillment elsewhere than in supernatural communion with God. The ultimate goal of his nature is the supernatural goal, which is reflected in his “natural desire to see God” – the hidden driving force of his entire activity. This conviction, shared by both patristic and medieval theology, at the dawn ofmodernity undergoes profound transformation, and in time it becomes lost. The purpose of this study is to present these changes in understanding the finality of human nature on the example of two important representatives of early modern theology: Cardinal Kajetan and Martin Luther. The first of them, excessively succumbing to the influence of Aristotle's philosophy, introduced into theology a conceptof "pure nature", indifferent to any supernatural complement. The second, parting from the conviction about the total destruction of human nature by sin, in the place of harmony between human nature and its supernatural goal introduced the relation of a violent opposition. On the example of these two extremely different thinkers, one can observe how in modern theology takes place the destruction of the classical notion of finality and the separation between the supernatural goal and human nature with its internal dynamism.
Źródło:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne; 2018, 31, 1; 168-184
0209-3782
2719-7530
Pojawia się w:
Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
GILSON ON THE RATIONALITY OF CHRISTIAN BELIEF
Autorzy:
Hancock, Curtis L.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507442.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
International Étienne Gilson Society
Tematy:
philosophy
fideism
faith and reason
parables
moral understanding
grace and nature
metaphysical distinction
evidence
authority
Opis:
The underlying skepticism of ancient Greek culture made it unreceptive of philosophy. It was the Catholic Church that embraced philosophy. Still, Étienne Gilson reminds us in Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages that some early Christians rejected philosophy. Their rejection was based on fideism: the view that faith alone provides knowledge. Philosophy is unnecessary and dangerous, fideists argue, because (1) anything known by reason can be better known by faith, and (2) reason, on account of the sin of pride, seeks to replace faith. To support this twofold claim, fideists, like Tertullian and Tatian, quote St. Paul. However, a judicious interpretation of St. Paul’s remarks show that he does not object to philosophy per se but to erroneous philosophy. This interpretation is reinforced by St. Paul’s own background in philosophy and by his willingness to engage intellectuals critical of Christianity in the public square. The challenge of fideism brings up the interesting question: what would Jesus himself say about the discipline of philosophy? Could it be that Jesus himself was a philosopher (as George Bush once declared)? As the fullness of wisdom and intelligence, Jesus certainly understood philosophy, although not in the conventional sense. But surely, interpreting his life through the lens of fideism is unconvincing. Instead, an appreciation of his innate philosophical skills serves better to understand important elements of his mission. His perfect grasp of how grace perfects nature includes a philosophy of the human person. This philosophy grounded in common-sense analysis of human experience enables Jesus to be a profound moral philosopher. Specifically, he is able to explain the principles of personal actualization. Relying on ordinary experience, where good philosophy must start, he narrates moral lessons—parables—that illumine difficulties regarding moral responsibility and virtue. These parables are accessible but profound, showing how moral understanding must transcend Pharisaical legalism. Additionally, Jesus’ native philosophical power shows in his ability to explain away doctrinal confusions and to expose sophistical traps set by his enemies. If fideism is unconvincing, and if the great examples of the Patristics, the Apostles, and Jesus himself show an affinity for philosophy, then it is necessary to conclude that Christianity is a rational religion. Accordingly, the history of Christian culture is arguably an adventure in faith and reason. Since God is truth and the author of all truths, there is nothing in reality that is incompatible with Christian teaching. As John Paul II explains effectively in the encyclical, Fides et Ratio, Christianity is a religion that is rational and can defend itself. This ability to marshal a defense makes Christianity a religion for all seasons.
Źródło:
Studia Gilsoniana; 2012, 1; 29-44
2300-0066
Pojawia się w:
Studia Gilsoniana
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies