Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "mutual trust" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
Tytuł:
The next big opportunity to build competitiveness: intelligent logistics outsourcing
Następna wielka szansa dla budowania konkurencyjności: inteligentny logistyczny outsourcing
Autorzy:
Bajec, P.
Jakomin, I.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/374234.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Politechnika Śląska. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
Tematy:
outsourcing logistyczny
inteligentny outsourcing
innowacje
zaufanie
wymiana wiedzy
logistics outsourcing
intelligent outsourcing
innovation
mutual relationship
trust
knowledge sharing
Opis:
The cost savings and efficiencies associated with outsourcing have been a major factor in corporation's ability to control costs and maintain profitability. There is no question, outsourcing has worked. But new challenges are emerging and high expectations associated with outsourcing are increasingly hard to meet. How can we move forward? The way forward requires a new approach that goes beyond traditional outsourcing and has matured beyond cost reduction to become a way for organisations to better access talent and capabilities, gain more flexibility, reinvent their business model and drive innovation. Thus, business leaders are presented with a unique opportunity – intelligent logistics outsourcing to recast their organizations for the next wave of growth. This new intelligent outsourcing recognizes that the real power of outsourcing is in the innovations, mutual deeper relationship between a provider and its client, measurement and governance. To implement it, a new operating model must be adopted.
Oszczędności kosztów oraz skuteczność outsourcingu są głównymi czynnikami, które pomagają korporacji kontrolować koszty i utrzymać opłacalność. Bezsprzecznie outsourcing się sprawdza. Pojawiające się nowe wyzwania oraz wysokie wymagania związane z outsourcingiem sprawiają, że trudno im sprostać. Jak więc można zrobić krok naprzód w tej kwestii? Potrzebne jest nowe podejście do tematu, które wychodzi poza ramy tradycyjnego outsourcingu, takie, które przekroczyło poziom samego obniżania kosztów i stało się sposobem, dzięki któremu organizacja ma większe szanse na sukces, ma więcej możliwości, więcej elastyczności, może na nowo odkryć swój model funkcjonowania i wdrożyć innowacje. Zatem liderzy biznesu dostają nową unikalną szansę – inteligentny logistyczny outsourcing, który pomoże im zreorganizować ich organizacje i da im nowe możliwości rozwoju. Ten nowy inteligentny rodzaj outsourcingu rozpoznaje realną moc innowacji outsourcingowych, wzajemne pogłębione relacje pomiędzy dostarczycielem usług i beneficjentem, dostrzega istotę pomiarów i zarządzania. Aby go wdrożyć, należy przyjąć nowy model operacyjny.
Źródło:
Transport Problems; 2011, 6, 3; 41-50
1896-0596
2300-861X
Pojawia się w:
Transport Problems
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
TRUST IN POLISH-RUSSIAN RELATIONS. IS IT POSSIBLE?
Autorzy:
Włodkowska-Bagan, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/643111.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
Tematy:
trust
distrust
mistrust
Polska
Russia
Polish-Russian relations
mutual perception
Opis:
To trust or not to trust? Virtually all the actors of international relations, both state and non-state ones have to face this Hamletian dilemma. Understandably, trust constitutes the foundation of all social interactions and systems, including those extending the borders of nation-state. The question of trust in the Polish- Russian relations is crucial enough to be asked not only by scientists but also by societies and decision makers. The aim of the article is to identify the causes of mistrust in relations between neighbors – Poland and Russia.
Źródło:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies; 2015, 1 (7)
2299-4335
Pojawia się w:
The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The validity of the principle of mutual trust between the EU Member States in mutual assistance for the recovery of public claims
Autorzy:
Olszanowski, Jan
Piątek, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/684967.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
mutual assistance between EU Member States
principle of mutual trust
recovery of public claims
Opis:
The cooperation between the EU Member States for the recovery of public claims has been gradually strengthened through expanding the subjective scope to new categories of public claims, establishing forms of cooperation, most notably the possibility to recover claims arising in one state by authorities of another state, and establishing separate institutional frameworks of cooperation. The EU legislature placed great emphasis on the most transparent development of relationships between the EU Member States, and thus the validity of the principle of trust. The article analyses the current international cooperation in the recovery of public claims in view of the principle of mutual trust between the Member States that forms the basis for such cooperation.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2016, 6; 91-102
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Principle of Mutual Trust in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Analysis of Selected Case Law
Autorzy:
Losy, Oskar
Podolska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962422.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
European criminal law
Area of Freedom
Security and Justice
principle of mutual trust
mutual recognition
Opis:
The paper concerns the principle of mutual trust and its interpretation by the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as two other important European courts: the European Court of Human Rights and the German Constitutional Court. The paper presents the important change of direction in interpretation of the principle of mutual trust by the CJEU. Initially, the belief in the existence of mutual trust between member states was firm. Over time, however, it has turned out that even in the EU – which follows from a number of judgments of the ECtHR – violations of human rights sometimes happen. This dramatically undermines trust in foreign judicial systems. This led the CJEU to the conclusion that the principle of mutual trust is rebuttable and that in some circumstances limitations to the principles of mutual recognition and mutual trust can be made. This conclusion can be treated as an answer in the specific ‘judicial dialogue’ of the CJEU with the ECtHR and the German Constitutional Court – the two latter courts seemed to notice earlier that mutual trust between member states cannot be blind and unconditional.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2018, 8; 185-204
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Interpretation of Art. 54 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement
Autorzy:
Losy, Oskar
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/962411.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
European criminal law
Area of Freedom
Security and Justice
ne bis in idem principle
mutual trust
mutual recognition
Opis:
The paper discusses the problem of the ne bis in idem principle stipulated in the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Article 54 of the CISA makes the application of the principle ne bis in idem subject to the condition of execution of the penalty. An analogous condition is not provided for in the Charter. These differences caused doubts regardingthe application of the ne bis in idem principle and were subject of the question for preliminary ruling in the Spasic case (C-129/14 PPU). The paper contains a critical review of the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this judgment. In addition, the article also contains an analysis of the CJEU’s decision in Case C-398/12 M. in which the CJEU has analysed the meaning of “final disposal” of the judgment in the context of the ne bis in idem principle. Based on the above judgments, the article presents arguments indicating that the reasoning of the CJEU on the conditions for the application of the ne bis in idem principle in judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU is not consistent.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2019, 9
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Bottom-up Look at Mutual Trust and the Legal Practice of the Aranyosi Test
Autorzy:
Peristeridou, Christina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40447322.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
detention conditions
European Arrest Warrant
mutual trust
Aranyosi
Opis:
This contribution offers an insight into the legal practice of the Aranyosi test during the EAW proceedings in seven Member States, an outcome of the research conducted during the ImprovEAW Project. Only the executing judicial authorities of some Member States do trigger the test. Member States are roughly differentiated between those having facilities with usually bad or usually good detention conditions, promoting antagonistic relationships instead of equal partnership. The lack of streamlining of the communication when supplementary information is requested, the lack of common standards and approach towards guarantees lead to further misunderstandings and frustration. The findings of this research have revealed the importance of departing from a pure legal understanding of mutual trust and follow a more empirical, experiential or bottom-up concept. Mutual trust is not only a legal concept, but it underpins the legal culture of the cooperation and collegial attitudes of authorities towards one another. This expression of mutual trust remains quite undiscovered: how is miscommunication affecting mutual trust? Do judicial authorities of legal systems express collegiality to one another? How do cultural aspects and preconceived ideas regarding the quality of other legal systems influence mutual trust? Accordingly, some suggestions have been made to improve the cooperation and the establishment of rapport when supplementary information is requested. Finally, I advocate for a more neutral view towards the Aranyosi test. As opposed to considering it as a supervisory mechanism, I have explored the idea of approaching it as a risk management tool: it tackles risks created by mutual trust. Such approach helps both sides to take responsibility to avert ad hoc risks, instead of experiencing Aranyosi as a testing moment. Such approach centres the real problem, i.e. the risks created by mutual trust for individuals and it can stimulate more proactive policy-making in this regard.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 51-72
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Erosion of the Principle of Mutual Recognition. European Arrest Warrant and the Principle of Mutual Recognition in the Light of the Recent CJEU Rulings
Autorzy:
Sakowicz, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40452269.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
EU criminal law
mutual recognition
mutual trust
European Arrest Warrant
fundamental rights
EU law
the Court of Justice of the European Union
Opis:
An effective implementation of mutual recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice requires mutual trust between the Member State. Mutual trust has been eroded in some Member States due to the rule of law crisis. However, it is not only the rule of law crisis, but also the departure of the Member States from the shared values of respect for fundamental rights, as well as the differences in the prosecutorial systems of individual Member States, that have caused changes in the perception of the principle of mutual recognition. This paper will examine the evolving approach to the principle of mutual recognition based on the recent Court of Justice of the European Union rulings on the European arrest warrant. The analysis concludes that the CJEU attaches more importance to the protection of the principle of mutual recognition, the prosecution of perpetrators of crime, and the unwavering presumption of respect for fundamental rights by the Member states than to the effective protection of fundamental rights.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 54, 3; 11-50
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies