Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "moral understanding" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    A Role of some Existential Attributes of a Person in a Formation of the Social Environment
    Rola wybranych atrybutów egzystencjonalnych w kształtowaniu środowiska społecznego
    Autorzy:
    KALUGA, Volodomyr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/456146.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2011
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Rzeszowski
    Tematy:
    sexuality
    existence
    moral
    understanding
    seksualność
    życie
    moralność
    zrozumienie
    Opis:
    Sexuality is one of the key conditions of a man in the world. At the same time though it hasn't been paid much attention to while studying the peculiarities of human existence. The article in question is aimed at researching the essence of sexuality.
    Seksualność jest jednym z kluczowych aspektów egzystencji człowieka. W aspekcie tym nie poświecono temu zjawisku dotąd należytej uwagi. W artykule przedstawiono poszukiwania autora w badaniu istoty seksualności.
    Źródło:
    Edukacja-Technika-Informatyka; 2011, 2, 2; 119-124
    2080-9069
    Pojawia się w:
    Edukacja-Technika-Informatyka
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    GILSON ON THE RATIONALITY OF CHRISTIAN BELIEF
    Autorzy:
    Hancock, Curtis L.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507442.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    philosophy
    fideism
    faith and reason
    parables
    moral understanding
    grace and nature
    metaphysical distinction
    evidence
    authority
    Opis:
    The underlying skepticism of ancient Greek culture made it unreceptive of philosophy. It was the Catholic Church that embraced philosophy. Still, Étienne Gilson reminds us in Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages that some early Christians rejected philosophy. Their rejection was based on fideism: the view that faith alone provides knowledge. Philosophy is unnecessary and dangerous, fideists argue, because (1) anything known by reason can be better known by faith, and (2) reason, on account of the sin of pride, seeks to replace faith. To support this twofold claim, fideists, like Tertullian and Tatian, quote St. Paul. However, a judicious interpretation of St. Paul’s remarks show that he does not object to philosophy per se but to erroneous philosophy. This interpretation is reinforced by St. Paul’s own background in philosophy and by his willingness to engage intellectuals critical of Christianity in the public square. The challenge of fideism brings up the interesting question: what would Jesus himself say about the discipline of philosophy? Could it be that Jesus himself was a philosopher (as George Bush once declared)? As the fullness of wisdom and intelligence, Jesus certainly understood philosophy, although not in the conventional sense. But surely, interpreting his life through the lens of fideism is unconvincing. Instead, an appreciation of his innate philosophical skills serves better to understand important elements of his mission. His perfect grasp of how grace perfects nature includes a philosophy of the human person. This philosophy grounded in common-sense analysis of human experience enables Jesus to be a profound moral philosopher. Specifically, he is able to explain the principles of personal actualization. Relying on ordinary experience, where good philosophy must start, he narrates moral lessons—parables—that illumine difficulties regarding moral responsibility and virtue. These parables are accessible but profound, showing how moral understanding must transcend Pharisaical legalism. Additionally, Jesus’ native philosophical power shows in his ability to explain away doctrinal confusions and to expose sophistical traps set by his enemies. If fideism is unconvincing, and if the great examples of the Patristics, the Apostles, and Jesus himself show an affinity for philosophy, then it is necessary to conclude that Christianity is a rational religion. Accordingly, the history of Christian culture is arguably an adventure in faith and reason. Since God is truth and the author of all truths, there is nothing in reality that is incompatible with Christian teaching. As John Paul II explains effectively in the encyclical, Fides et Ratio, Christianity is a religion that is rational and can defend itself. This ability to marshal a defense makes Christianity a religion for all seasons.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2012, 1; 29-44
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    GILSON O RACJONALNOŚCI WIARY CHRZEŚCIJAŃSKIEJ
    GILSON ON THE RATIONALITY OF CHRISTIAN BELIEF
    Autorzy:
    Hancock, Curtis L.
    Chodna-Błach, Imelda
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507652.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    philosophy
    fideism
    faith
    reason
    parables
    moral understanding
    grace
    nature
    metaphysical distinction
    evidence
    authority
    Opis:
    The underlying skepticism of ancient Greek culture made it unreceptive of philosophy. It was the Catholic Church that embraced philosophy. Still, Étienne Gilson reminds us in Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages that some early Christians rejected philosophy. Their rejection was based on fideism: the view that faith alone provides knowledge. Philosophy is unnecessary and dangerous, fideists argue, because (1) anything known by reason can be better known by faith, and (2) reason, on account of the sin of pride, seeks to replace faith. To support this twofold claim, fideists, like Tertullian and Tatian, quote St. Paul. However, a judicious interpretation of St. Paul’s remarks shows that he does not object to philosophy per se but to erroneous philosophy. This interpretation is reinforced by St. Paul’s own background in philosophy and by his willingness to engage intellectuals critical of Christianity in the public square. The challenge of fideism brings up the interesting question: what would Jesus himself say about the discipline of philosophy? Could it be that Jesus himself was a philosopher (as George Bush once declared)? As the fullness of wisdom and intelligence, Jesus certainly understood philosophy, although not in the conventional sense. But surely, interpreting his life through the lens of fideism is unconvincing. Instead, an appreciation of his innate philosophical skills serves better to understand important elements of his mission. His perfect grasp of how grace perfects nature includes a philosophy of the human person. This philosophy grounded in common-sense analysis of human experience enables Jesus to be a profound moral philosopher. Specifically, he is able to explain the principles of personal actualization. Relying on ordinary experience, where good philosophy must start, he narrates moral lessons—parables—that illumine difficulties regarding moral responsibility and virtue. These parables are accessible but profound, showing how moral understanding must transcend Pharisaical legalism. Additionally, Jesus’ native philosophical power shows in his ability to explain away doctrinal confusions and to expose sophistical traps set by his enemies. If fideism is unconvincing, and if the great examples of the Patristics, the Apostles, and Jesus himself show an affinity for philosophy, then it is necessary to conclude that Christianity is a rational religion. Accordingly, the history of Christian culture is arguably an adventure in faith and reason. Since God is truth and the author of all truths, there is nothing in reality that is incompatible with Christian teaching. As John Paul II explains effectively in the encyclical, Fides et Ratio, Christianity is a religion that is rational and can defend itself. This ability to marshal a defense makes Christianity a religion for all seasons.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2013, 2; 131-143
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dziedzictwo prawne Leona Petrażyckiego w nowoczesnej doktrynie prawnej Ukrainy
    Autorzy:
    W, Kostytsky, Wasyl
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902756.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-08-03
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    Petrazycki
    psychological theory of law
    law and ethical experiences
    balance of emotion and intellect in law
    sociology of law
    theological and sociological understanding of law
    law and morals
    sources of law
    official and intuitive law according to Petrazycki
    legal awareness as representation of law
    phenomenology of law according to Petrazycki
    desirable and actual law
    law and public welfare
    law policy according to Petrazycki
    types of positive law according to Petrazycki
    political power and psychological theory of law
    subjective and objective law
    moral imperative as a source of law
    Ukrainian scholars’ opinions on Petrazycki’s work
    psychologiczna teoria prawa
    prawo i przeżycia etyczne
    stosunek emocjonalnego iracjonalnego prawa
    socjologia prawa
    teologiczne isocjologiczne rozumienie prawa
    prawo i moralność
    źródła prawa
    oficjalne i intuicyjne prawo wg Petrażyckiego
    świadomość prawna jako odbicie prawa
    fenomenologia prawa wg Petrażyckiego
    pożądane i obowiązujące prawo
    prawo i dobro wspólne
    polityka prawa wg Petrażyckiego
    rodzaje pozytywnego prawa wg Petrażyckiego
    władza państwowa i psychologiczna teoria prawa
    subiektywne i obiektywne prawo
    Imperatyw moralny jako źródło prawa
    ukraińscy naukowcy o twórczości Petrażyckiego
    Opis:
    The paper aims to study the work of Leon Petrazycki and analyze modern Ukrainian scholars’ opinions on Petrazycki’s scientific achievements. This study focuses on Petrazycki’s work, his psychological theory, in particular, in view of our own perspective on the law and within the framework of our theological and sociological theory, which considers the law as a social life phenomenon and regards moral imperative of the Almighty God as the basis of law. Every civilization communicates moral imperative through sacred writings (the Ten Commandments in Christian Bible, six hundred and seven rules in Jewish Torah, seventy-two rules in Muslim Quran). It is within the framework of this moral imperative that the society and the state develop the law. The paper addresses the modern absurdity and at the same time antinomy of law, lying in the fact that there is more and more law in the society but less and less law in life of an individual due to the fact that states rapidly upscale rulemaking, but laws are becoming less accessible to an individual. This study draws on conceptual issues of Petrazycki’s theoretical heritage, fundamental principles of his psychological theory, as well as connection between law and morality, described by Petrazycki, which are the spiritual heritage of society. The most important issues of Petrazycki’s work, in our opinion, are studying the nature of law, balance of emotion and intellect, official and intuitive, desirable and actual components in law, as well as subjective and objective law, law policy and power. The paper reveals that assessment of Petrazycki’s work in modern Ukrainian legal studies is ambivalent: from sharply critical (Prof. P. Rabinovich), compliant with Russian (O. Timoshina (St. Petersburg)) approach and critical yet positive perception of Petrazycki’s psychological theory (S. Maksymov, O. Merezhko, M. Kuz, O. Stovba) to admiration for Petrazycki’s genius, whose work was ahead of his time (I. Bezklubyi, N. Huralenko, V. Dudchenko, O. Rohach, M. Savchyn, V. Tymoshenko). Thus, the research findings suggest that Petrazycki’s work belongs not only to the past, but also to the present and future of jurisprudence, sociology, psychology, economics. Further in-depth analysis of Petrazycki’s heritage will contribute to more accurate diagnosis of urgent legal issues in social development of modern Ukraine, real assertion of personocentrism as a postulate of contemporary theoretical jurisprudence and guidelines for public authorities, as well as practical solution to many controversial scientific and legal issues.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2018, 74; 163-184
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies