Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "habilitation proceedings" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Habilitacje w Polsce Ludowej. Część 1. Warunki i przebieg habilitacji w prawie szkół wyższych
Habilitation degrees in the Polish People’s Republic. Part 1. The requirements and conditions of habilitation proceedings under the law on schools of higher education
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927074.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
the People’s Poland
habilitation procedure
the Polish People’s Republic
habilitation proceedings
conditions entitling to open habilitation proceedings
Opis:
Until 1965 the requirements and conditions of habilitation proceedings in Poland were governed by the law on schools of higher education. The solutions adopted under that law showed a relatively high degree of stability. In the fi rst years after WWII the habilitation qualifi cation was based on the solutions governing in Poland in the 1930s, with only slight changes introduced in the fi rst month after the end of the war. The fi rst reform of higher education of 1947 left the right to confer habilitation degrees with schools of higher education then in existence and retained the existing order of the habilitation proceedings. However, it implemented a number of rather signifi cant amendments in the area of the requirements needed to be fulfi lled at each stage of these proceedings. The right to lecture remained inherent to the habilitation qualifi cation and degree. What changed was the scope of infl uence of the minister of education supervising schools of higher education regarding habilitation proceedings and the appointment of the Main Council of Higher Education with the right of fi nal say and consent to the opening of the habilitation qualifi cation and to run the habilitation proceedings. Habilitation was abandoned by the reform of 1951 and replaced, following the Soviet model, with a higher degree of a doctor of science. Further changes followed in 1958 when it was restored by relevant provisions of the Act on higher education. It was then that more than forty years after Poland regained independence, the habilitation degree was for the fi rst time tied to a successful completion of the habilitation proceedings and earning the degree of a ‘docent’. The Main Council of Higher Education continued to function but its role in habilitation proceedings was reduced to issuing opinions before the minister of higher education decided on habilitation matters. Apart from schools of higher education, the right to confer habilitation degrees was granted to the Polish Academy of Sciences and academic institutions operating outside schools of higher education.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 1 (17); 25-61
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Habilitacja jako warunek awansu naukowego w Polsce w latach 1990–2018
Habilitacja as a condition of scientific advancement i Poland in the years 1990-2018
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/911259.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
right to confer the academic degree of doktor habilitowany in the years 1990–2018
right to conduct ‘habilitation’ proceedings
conditions for instituting and conducting ‘habilitation’ proceedings
resolutions on the conferral or refusal to confer the academic degree of doktor habilitowany
Opis:
The right to conduct habilitacja (“habilitation”) proceedings under Polish law is not a new solution. These proceedings were conducted both in the interwar period, in the first years of the People’ s Poland, and during the Polish People’s Republic. The solutions adopted in those periods differed. Until the end of People’s Poland, the proceedings ended with the right to lecture (veniam legendi) but with no possibility of obtaining a scientific degree, in the years 1951–1958, following the example of Soviet solutions, the proceedings allowed to obtain a scientific degree of doctor of sciences, from 1958 to obtain a degree of a docent (assistant professor), and from 1968 – the degree of doktor habilitowany. The differences in legal solutions adopted at that time were also clearly visible in the conditions which higher education institutions had to meet in order to obtain the right to conduct the proceedings and confer titles, and candidates to be promoted to a higher degree of doktor habilitowany. Although the possibility of acquiring the degree of doktor habilitowany was retained from 1990 onwards, the legal conditions for the conduct of habilitacja proceedings did not resemble the solutions of previous years. And so, as in the Act of 1965, as well as after 1990 the conferral of academic degrees was excluded from the law on higher education, but this law itself was subject to much more modest regulation. It was not until the Act of 2003 that solutions were introduced to gradually tighten the conditions imposed on organisational units applying for the right to confer the academic degree of doktor habilitowany and on persons applying for the initiation of habilitacja proceedings, as well as on the course of such proceedings. The year 2011 brought revolutionary changes in this respect. The amending law introduced a new order in the process leading to the conferral of the academic degree of doktor habilitowany. It covered not only the requirements which organisational units applying for the right to ‘habilitate’ in the fields of science and scientific disciplines had to satisfy, but also a re-definition of these conditions. The course of the ‘habilitation’ proceedings and the participation in it of the Central Commission and the board of the relevant organisational unit, as well as the person applying for the degree of doktor habilitowany were significantly changed.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2019, 3, 27; 29-72
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontrola instancyjna postępowania habilitacyjnego : Podstawy prawne, przebieg i weryfikacja procedur
Instance Audit of Habilitation Procedure – Legal Basis, Course and Verification Procedures
Autorzy:
Tabernacka, Magdalena
Klat-Górska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2042191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10
Wydawca:
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
Tematy:
postępowanie habilitacyjne
nadanie stopnia doktora habilitowanego
kontrola postępowania
ocena dorobku naukowego
decyzja organu
habilitation proceedings
post-doctoral degree granting
audit standards
evaluation of scientific achievements
decision of the body
Opis:
Postępowanie w sprawie nadania stopnia doktora habilitowanego jest szczególnym rodzajem postępowania administracyjnego o odrębnej procedurze. Ma ona wpływ na specyfikę kontroli jego przebiegu oraz wyniku. W praktyce rysuje się wiele wątpliwości prawnych związanych z poszczególnymi stadiami postępowania. Dotyczą one m.in. prawa wypowiedzi, wpływu wyniku etapów wcześniejszych na kolejne, a także zakresu uzasadnienia decyzji w sprawie nadania lub odmowy nadania tego stopnia naukowego. Ostatnia reforma szkolnictwa wyższego wprowadziła istotne zmiany, mające wpływ także na postępowania prowadzone na podstawie poprzednio obowiązujących przepisów.
As a result of the latest reform of higher education, post-doctoral degree granting is proceeded in accordance with two legal regulations. One of them follows the “old” proceedings – based on the Act of 14th March 2003 on scientific degrees and titles and those related to arts, as well as the Act of 27th July 2005 – Law on higher educa tion. The other follows the “new” way which is compliant with the Act of 20th July 2018 – Law on higher education and science. Since post-doctoral proceedings that follow the “old” manner are still audited, and due to the lack of provisions, in the new reform, on the cases where significant changes have been introduced as for scientific areas qualification, numerous legal issues may arise in auditing of post-doctoral de grees granting or rejecting. Furthermore, regardless of the manner of post-doctoral degree proceedings, it is a procedure with special organisational and legal conditions. It seems worthwhile analysing these conditions, and the audit instruments for proce dural standards application in such cases, as imposed by the legislator.
Źródło:
Kontrola Państwowa; 2020, 65, 5 (394); 14-32
0452-5027
Pojawia się w:
Kontrola Państwowa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Habilitacje w Polsce Ludowej. Część 2. Warunki i przebieg habilitacji w prawie o stopniach i tytułach naukowych
Habilitation degrees in the Polish People’s Republic. Part 2. Requirements and conditions of habilitation proceedings under the law on academic degrees and titles
Autorzy:
Wojtczak, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927233.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
academic degree of docent
academic degree of doktor habilitowany
requirements before candidates in habilitation proceedings
requirements before institutions applying for the right to confer docent and doktor habilitowany degrees
relevant bodies
Opis:
Habilitation proceedings ending with a conferral of an academic degree were first introduced in the Polish People’s Republic by virtue of the Act on higher education of 1958. The academic title of docent, which the Act also provided for, was later endorsed by the Act of 1965 on academic titles and academic degrees. Another academic degree of ‘habilitated doctor’ (doktor habilitowany) functioned from 1968 and continued through subsequent legislative acts in force until 1990 as well as through the years after later reforms. The changes in higher education implemented in 1965–1990 were not fi nal and continued to be modifi ed in the following areas: (1) the branches and science and disciplines in which the academic degrees of docent or doktor habilitowany could be conferred; (2) the requirements which institutions (establishments of higher education, research units of the Polish Academy of Sciences and other research entities) had to fulfi l before earning the rights to confer the academic degrees referred to above; (3) establishment of the lists of institutions entitled to confer these academic degrees. The solutions then adopted were by no means triggered by the intention to replace the academic degree of docent with a degree of doktor habilitowany. On the contrary, the majority of changes, of which those happening after 1985 were even more politically biased, did not refl ect any legal need but aimed at restricting the autonomy of schools of higher  education in the scope of conferring academic degrees. This tendency extended to the conditions of commencing habilitation proceedings and the very course of the proceedings. As of 1985 one of the requirements of the key factors qualifying successful candidates was an ‘impeccable civic attitude.’ After 1985, most of the activities which had been till then conducted by committees appointed Faculty councils, were to be taken up by the relevant councils, although the latter were allowed to appoint from time to time committees to perform some of the activities related to habilitation proceedings. The Act of 1965 abandoned the requirement of the candidate’s habilitation lecture, re-established in 1985.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2017, 2 (18); 43-81
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Osiągnięcie naukowe albo artystyczne stanowiące znaczny wkład w rozwój określonej dyscypliny w rozumieniu ustawy prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce
Scientific or Artistic Achievement That Constitutes a Significant Contribution to the Development of a Specific Discipline Within the Meaning of the Act on Higher Education and Science
Autorzy:
Gurdek, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/3200849.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-11-15
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Humanitas
Tematy:
osiągnięcie naukowe albo artystyczne
postępowanie habilitacyjne
przesłanki nadania stopnia doktora habilitowanego
ustawa Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce
scientific or artistic achievement
habilitation proceedings
conditions for awarding the degree of habilitated doctor
the Law on Higher Education and Science
Opis:
Warunki nadania stopnia doktora habilitowanego określone zostały w art. 219 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2018 roku – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Jednym z nich jest posiadanie w dorobku osiągnięć naukowych albo artystycznych, stanowiących znaczny wkład w rozwój określonej dyscypliny. Ustawodawca wskazał w ust. 1 pkt 2 lit. a, b, c, że co najmniej jedno z tych osiągnięć musi przybrać postać odpowiednio opublikowanej monografii lub cyklu odpowiednio opublikowanych, powiązanych tematycznie artykułów naukowych lub zrealizowanego oryginalnego osiągnięcia projektowego, konstrukcyjnego, technologicznego lub artystycznego. Nie odniósł się natomiast do pozostałych osiągnięć naukowych albo artystycznych. W niniejszym opracowaniu przeprowadzona została dogłębna analiza terminu „osiągnięcie naukowe albo artystyczne” stanowiące znaczny wkład w rozwój określonej dyscypliny. Legislator bowiem, w przeciwieństwie do poprzednio obowiązujących regulacji, nie zawarł w ustawie, wprost wyrażonej, definicji tego zwrotu.
The conditions for awarding the degree of habilitated doctor are set out in Art. 219 of the Act of July 20, 2018, Law on Higher Education and Science. One of them is scientific or artistic achievements that make a significant contribution to the development of a specific discipline. The legislator indicated in para. 1 point 2 lit. a, b, c, that at least one of these achievements must take the form of an appropriately published monograph, or a series of properly published, thematically related scientific articles or an original design, construction, technological or artistic achievement. However, he did not refer to other scientific or artistic achievements. In this study, an in-depth analysis of the term ‘scientific or artistic achievement’ which makes a significant contribution to the development of a specific discipline has been carried out. This is because the legislator, contrary to the previously binding regulations, did not include in the act an explicitly expressed definition of this phrase.
Źródło:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa; 2022, 2(XXII); 135-151
1644-9126
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies