Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "good (bonum)" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Wykluczenie bonum prolis w Kodeksie Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 roku i Kodeksie Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich
Exclusion of bonum prolis in the 1983 Code of Canon Law and in the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches
Autorzy:
Bałdyga, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2008110.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
dobro potomstwa
exclusio boni prolis
bonum prolis
in vitro a dobro potomstwa
godna prokreacja
metody wykluczenia bonum prolis
good of the offspring
in vitro and good of the offspring
a worthy procreation
methods of exclusion of bonum prolis
Opis:
Problematyka dotycząca zrodzenia i wychowania potomstwa zawsze stanowiła przedmiot szczególnej troski Kościoła. Przejawiało się to m.in. w prawnej regulacji tego zagadnienia. Uprawnienie-obowiązek zrodzenia i wychowania potomstwa łączyło się nieodzownie z ogólną wizją małżeństwa, jego celami i przedmiotem małżeńskiej zgody, stąd też wraz z ewolucją rozumienia samego małżeństwa w historii kanonistyki, zmieniało się także rozumienie terminu bonum prolis (dobro potomstwa). Normy zawarte w kodeksach Jana Pawła II (KPK/83 i KKKW) dotyczące zagadnienia wykluczenia dobra potomstwa, o których była mowa we wstępie niniejszego artykułu, w swojej treści są identyczne. Jedynie treść kan. 776 § 1 KKKW, stanowi swoiste dopełnienie treści kan. 1055 § 1 KPK/83, w którym mowa o strukturze małżeństwa. Z kolei kan. 1061 § 1 KPK/83, będący swoistą definicją małżeństwa dopełnionego i ważnie zawartego, nie znajduje swojego odpowiednika w KKKW. Zrodzenie i wychowanie potomstwa jest naturalnym celem i uwieńczeniem małżeństwa. Akty małżeńskie, powinny być ukierunkowane na prokreację i dokonywane w sposób ludzki i naturalny. Stąd też wykluczenie aktów małżeńskiego współżycia, otwartych na zrodzenie potomstwa, podjęte pozytywnym aktem woli skutkuje nieważnością samego małżeństwa.
The issue of procreation and education of offspring has always been the object of special concern for the Church. It appears, among others in legal regulation of this problem. The right and the duty to procreate and educate offspring was inevitably connected with general vision of marriage, it is purposes and property of matrimonial consent. Therefore, with the evolution of understanding of marriage itself in the history of canon law, the term of bonum prolis (good of the offspring) was also changed. Legal norms regarding the issue of exclusion of the good of the offspring contained in the 1983 Code of Canon Law (CIC/83) and in the 1990 Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (CCEO), which was mentioned in the introduction of this article, are identical in their bodies. Only can. 776 § 1 CCEO is a kind of complement of can. 1055 § 1 CIC/83, which speaks about structure of marriage. In turn, can. 1061 § 1 CIC/83, which is a specific definition of consummated and valid marriage, has no equivalent in CCEO. The procreation and education of offspring is the natural purpose and the culmination of marriage. Marital acts should be directed towards procreation and must be performed in a natural and human fashion. Hence, the exclusion of acts of conjugal living which are open to procreation of offspring, taken with a positive act of the will results in the invalidity of the marriage itself.
Źródło:
Kościół i Prawo; 2018, 7, 1; 181-200
0208-7928
2544-5804
Pojawia się w:
Kościół i Prawo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Własności istnieniowe bytu w interpretacji tomizmu konsekwentnego
Existential Properties in the Interpretation of Consequent Thomism
Autorzy:
Andrzejuk, Artur
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075810.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
transcendentalia
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
realność (res)
odrębność (aliquid)
jedność (unum)
prawda (verum)
dobro (bonum)
piękno (pulchrum)
transcendentals
Thomas Aquinas
Thomism
reality (res)
separateness (aliquid)
unity (unum)
truth (verum)
good (bonum)
beauty (pulchrum)
Opis:
The problem of properties of being as being as such, has been undertaken in metaphysics almost from the beginning of its cultivation. The stages of this story are marked by figures such as Aristotle, Avicenna, Philip Chancellor, Albert the Great, and Thomas Aquinas, followed by Duns Scotus, Peter Olivi, Francis Suárez, Thomas Campanella and others. We are interested in the Thomistic theory of transcendentals, however, as far as Thomas Aquinas did not write a separate treatise on transcendentals, neither did he elaborate the entire concept in his writings, this theory is more the work of Thomists than Aquinas himself. Therefore, it seems reasonable to pay attention to his antagonists (like Duns Scotus) and followers (like Suarez) who have influenced the Thomist vision of the transcendentals. The philosophical theory of transcendentals, since they constitute the most important properties of being, depends directly on the concept of existence itself. Otherwise, it will be formulated in essentialist metaphysics (eg in traditional Thomism), differently in different versions of transcendentalizing Thomism, and still different in existential Thomism, where transcendentals are directly related to the existence of being. The basis of the transcendental accounts, at least in existential Thomism, are the statements of Aquinas himself, scattered throughout his various writings, although the starting point is usually the text from the Quaestione disputate de veritate, where Aquinas most broadly formulates the general concept of existential property. Starting from the Aristotelian definition of being, Thomas writes that certain concepts can be applied to being, but they do not add anything new to the concept, but point only to a modus entis. These modi entis are also referred to as modi essendi (“the mode of existence”) or even aliquid in ente (“something in being”). In the following passages Aquinas says that they are “interchangeable” with being. In this way, he wants to emphasize that we are dealing with various aspects of being as being, and not with additional, more detailed beings, qualifications. They can be certain “measures”, “ways” or “determinants” of being, or existence (modi entis or modi essendi) or “consequences”, “consequences” (consequentiae) in relation to themselves (in se) or in relation to to something else (ad aliud). Interesting are the views on the philosophy of cognition from the perspective of the transcendental property of truth (Tomasz Pawlikowski), on ethics from the perspective of transcendental good (Artur Andrzejuk), and on the aesthetics from the perspective of the property of beauty (Piotr Jaroszyński). Research on reality, separateness and unity seems to be more difficult, because in the history of philosophy no specific philosophical disciplines have been associated with them, but their problems are dispersed in various philosophical directions and also have a different (though sometimes fundamental) function in them. Tadeusz Klimski and Jan Kiełbasa’s works can be an example of dealing with such an issue.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 131-157
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Siódme: „Nie kradnij”. O średniowiecznym odkrywaniu rynku na marginesie książki Paola Prodiego
“Seventh: You shall not steal” – notes on the medieval „discovering” of the market in the margin of Paulo Prodi’s book
Autorzy:
Bukała, Marcin W.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2075798.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-12-30
Wydawca:
Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
Tematy:
rynek
forum
VII Przykazanie
kradzież
Paolo Prodi
Średniowiecze
cywilizacja Zachodu
Arystoteles
Franciszek Accursius
Rajmund z Penyafort
Klarus z Florencji
Tomasz z Akwinu
Max Weber
historia
historia idei
etyka
teologia
forum sumienia
prawo
prawo kanoniczne
etyka gospodarcza
idee ekonomiczne scholastyków
kupiectwo
władza ekonomiczna
słuszna cena
powszechne oszacowanie
dobro wspólne (bonum commune)
market
VII Commandment
theft
Middle Ages
civilisation of the West
Aristotle
Francis Accursius
Raymond of Penyafort
Clarus of Florence
Thomas Aquinas
history
history of ideas
ethics
theology
forum of conscience
law
canon law
ethics of economic life
scholastic economic ideas
merchants
economic power
just price
common estimation
common good (bonum commune)
Opis:
In the article, the topic of the medieval „discovering” of the market is discussed, with the references to the Paolo Prodis’ book Settimo non rubare. Furto e mercato nella storia dell’Occidente. The author of the book, following Harold Berman, finds the changes in the 11th and 12th century Church, as the decisive mile stones in the development of the civilization of Western Christianity. The mentioned „papal revolution” led to the historical distinction between the spiritual and the political sphere, and later, to the autonomy of economic one. Accordingly, the Italian historian rejects the thesis that Enlightenment was the new beginning in the European history. In the P. Prodi’s analysis, the Latin term forum plays the crucial role. The word signified the place, square, especially the place where court proceedings occurred. Therefore, in the later abstract sense forum signified criteria or rules of judgement: both in the juridical meaning (forum civile, f. canonico, f. consciantiae), and the economic one, in which forum meant exactly „the market”. The “discovering” of the market rules was a consequence the development of the theoretical reasoning about mercantile activity. It was essentially related to the concepts of the just price (iustum pretium) and the common estimation (communis aestimatio). According to P. Prodi the common character of the estimation was of essential importance, as well as the new version of the Roman rule Res tantum valet, quantum vendi potest, with the medevial addendum: scilicet communiter. The author criticised the view, that the process of defining of the market was mainly the result of reception of Aristotelian Ethics and Politics. He underlined that in the penitential handbooks of the 12th and 13th century the focus was significantly shifted from the vice of avarice to the commandment „You shall not steal”; moreover the significant violation of the rules of fair market exchange begun to be considered as a sin against this commandment. In the article, the significance of the application of the notion forum commune by Thomas Aquinas (in the treatise on credit sale) was underlined. The interconnection between the concept of the market and the idea of common good was expressed in the juxtaposition of terms: forum commune – bonum commune. M. W. Bukała observes that the thesis about the limited influence of Aristotelian thought on the examined issue can be additionally confirmed by the analysis of the Article on mercantile profit in Summa Theologiae by St. Thomas (II-II, q. 77, a. 4), where Aquinas distances himself from the Philosopher’s view. The P. Prodi discourses were amended by the significant distinction: not every violation of ethics of economic life was considered as the theft by the medieval moralists – e.g.: the determinatio of the casus of buying grain with the deferred delivery for an undercut price, in canon „Naviganti” (X 5.5.19, 2do), and in the related comments of the 13th century canonist, Clarus Florentinus. Moreover, the Jacques Le Goff’s critique of the Prodi’s approach was undermined.
Źródło:
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2018, 7; 177-192
2300-1976
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Tomistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Próba określenia "bonum familiae" jako elementu istotnego i autonomicznego w strukturze małżeństwa
An Attempt to Describe the Bonum Familiae as an Essential and Autonomous Property in the Structure of Marriage
Autorzy:
Kraiński, Wiesław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/551430.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Bernardinum
Tematy:
“bonum familiae”
the good of the family
marriage
family
Opis:
In the structure of marriage, as the Canon Law sees it, the bonum familiae is not an autonomous property. However, one may inquire whether its importance is on a par with the bonum coniugum and the bonum prolis. Without doubt, the bonum familiae is a compound of essential marital elements and properties. Although this notion does not apply, strictly speaking, to legal cases, it is present in the widely understood domain of the ecclesial legislation. After all, the Code of Canon Law as well as the legal proceedings of the Church authorities does have very paramount pastoral character. The contents of the term bonum familiae is related to the norms of the law which have strong moral and pastoral implications. Therefore, the notion, which the law recognises applies, and may be perceived as quasi-legal.
Źródło:
Studia Pelplińskie; 2013, 46; 135-144
0239-4456
Pojawia się w:
Studia Pelplińskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Etyka przedsiębiorczości w późnośredniowiecznej scholastyce – wprowadzenie do problematyki
Entrepreneurial Ethics in the Late Medieval Scholastics – Introduction to the Research Topic
Autorzy:
Bukała, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/468916.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN
Tematy:
entrepreneurial ethics
economic ethics
scholastic philosophy and theology
medieval history
social and economic history
just merchant (iustus mercator)
common good (bonum commune)
entrepreneurship (industria)
merchant guides
Opis:
The paper concerns the idea of entrepreneurial ethics in scholastic texts. The sources, methods of research, and general historical preliminaries are discussed. In the methodology of the research Max Weber’s categories of economic exchange, entrepreneurship and entrepreneur are invoked. Medieval notions and concepts, such as iustus mercator, industria, and bonum commune are analyzed in the context of these socio-economic categories. Texts from the middle of the XIIIth century to the middle of XVth century are taken into consideration, in particular such canonists and theologians as Chiaro of Florence (Casus fratris Claris), Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Lesines, Henry of Ghent, Peter Olivi, Matthew of Cracow, Bernardine of Siena, and Antonine of Florence. The merchant’s guide by Benko Kutruljević(Benedetto Cotrugli) is considered too, as an example of reception of scholastic thought at a more practical level. In the topic discussed the particularity of Latin Christianity in the late medieval period, in comparison to other epochs and civilizations, is linked to the new idea of work and to certain cultural phenomena, including: the ethical focus of scholastic doctors, the idea of volunteer poverty, and Christian concept of the gift (referred to particularly in the Sermon on the Mount: Luke 6, 20–45). The system of terms and notions – by which entrepreneurship and economic activity were defi ned – influenced in some way the mentality and social practice. In practice, the evaluation of entrepreneurial activity was related to different systems of norms, which was expressed by the notion of forum. This could be: Roman law (forum civilis), canons, and practical theology (forum Dei). In the final case of forum Dei, the individual confession, introduced by the Church in the XIIIth century, was of crucial significance.
Źródło:
Prakseologia; 2009, 149; 107-132
0079-4872
Pojawia się w:
Prakseologia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies