Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "fundamental freedoms and rights" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 35
Tytuł:
Role of the Police in the Slovak Republic and the Operational Duty
Autorzy:
Marczyová, Klaudia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Policji w Szczytnie
Tematy:
police
operational duty
the Police Force
service actions
fundamental rights and freedoms
Opis:
The fundamental rights and freedoms, as the highest values in a democratic society, need to be adequately protected, thus states create the mechanisms to protect them. This mechanism of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms also includes the police, especially the Police Force, whose primary task is to protect the life, health, fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens and individuals in the Slovak Republic. The role of the Police Force defining the basic aspects forms the content of this study, with a further focus on the tasks performed by the police. Following the above, the study focusses on the activity of police officers, carrying out service actions and interference with fundamental rights and freedoms. The procedure of the police in carrying out service actions tends to be the subject of further examination due to their appropriateness and legality. This issue is considered highly serious in the society, and recently it has been a subject of not only scientific discussions in the Slovak Republic. Currently, the Academy of the Police Force in Bratislava is carrying out a research project which focussing on service actions with the cooperation of the police experts. The core material is presented in the paper, which aims to point out the basic organisation and activities of the Police Force as the authority responsible for the protection of fundamental rights. The emphasis is put on the selected issues of the police while interfering in human rights and freedoms. Chronologically, from general to specific matters, the paper introduces fundamental rights and freedoms and the police interventions into this area. Theoretical research is supplemented by practical cases, conclusions and possible recommendations for the police practice by the use of several methods, in particular analysis, abstraction and deduction.
Źródło:
Internal Security; 2020, 12(2); 83-99
2080-5268
Pojawia się w:
Internal Security
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Restrictions of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms During the Pandemic in Slovakia
Ograniczenia podstawowych praw i wolności podczas pandemii na Słowacji
Autorzy:
Dobrovičová, Gabriela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2074903.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
boundaries of fundamental rights and freedoms
pandemic
state of emergency
constitutionality of measures restricting fundamental rights and freedoms
sublegal legislation
granice podstawowych praw i wolności
pandemia
stan wyjątkowy
konstytucyjność środków ograniczających podstawowe prawa i wolności
ustawodawstwo subprawne
Opis:
Artykuł analizuje braki w regulacji prawnej ochrony zdrowia publicznego ujawnione w kryzysie wywołanym pandemią COVID-19. Działania antypandemiczne podejmowane w kontekście ochrony życia i zdrowia nie spełniały wymagań jakościowych stawianych legislacji pozwalającej na proporcjonalne ograniczanie podstawowych praw i wolności. Wyznaczanie granic podstawowych praw i wolności zastrzeżonych dla ustawodawcy zostało niedopuszczalnie pozostawione pozaprawnemu stanowieniu prawa.
The article analyses the shortcomings in the legal regulation of public health protection revealed in the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Anti-pandemic measures taken in the context of life and health protection did not meet the quality requirements imposed on legislation allowing for proportionate restrictions of fundamental rights and freedoms. Setting the boundaries of fundamental rights and freedoms reserved to the legislature has been inadmissibly left to sublegal lawmaking.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2022, 3(67); 281-291
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as an International Treaty and a Source of Individual Rights
Autorzy:
Gadkowski, Aleksander
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2027869.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
human rights law
international protection of human rights
fundamental rights
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
European Court of Human Rights
Opis:
The aim of this paper is to present the legal nature of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as a special treaty under international human rights law. The article focuses on the twofold nature of the Convention. First, it presents the Convention as an international treaty, and thus as a source of specific obligations of states-parties. Second, it presents the Convention as the source of fundamental individual human rights. The article also discusses the role of ECtHR case law in the context of fundamental individual human rights.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2021, 13; 77-96
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rethinking Conscientious Objection to Mandatory Vaccination
Autorzy:
Tucak, Ivana
Berdica, Josip
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/43539285.pdf
Data publikacji:
2024
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
justice
European Court of Human Rights
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
conscientious objection
Opis:
Among the member states of the Council of Europe, there is a consensus on the importance of vaccination as a successful and effective preventive health intervention. Every state aims to achieve herd immunity, i.e., a high vaccination rate of the population that will prevent the circulation of contagious diseases in the population and thus protect those who cannot be vaccinated due to age or poor health. However, despite the general recognition of the importance of vaccination, there is no consensus on a “single model” of how best to achieve the goals of mass immunization. Countries have different public health policies, so while the vaccination policy of some members of the Council of Europe is limited to a recommendation, others have made vaccination compulsory. Today, there are many opponents of vaccination and those who are hesitant. This paper will focus on those who refuse to be vaccinated based on a moral understanding of how to act in certain circumstances. The paper will explore whether countries imposing mandatory vaccination, with financial or other sanctions imposed in the case of non-compliance, should recognize the right to conscientious objection. This includes the right of adults to refuse vaccination, and respecting the religious and philosophical beliefs of parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. The article consists of two main parts. The first part will explore the legal-theoretical and legal-philosophical dimensions of the relationship between justice and conscience, with special emphasis on the interpretation of this relationship provided by the American political philosopher John Rawls. The second part of the paper will examine the issue of compulsory vaccination and conscientious objection through the prism of the rights provided for in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.  
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2024, 57, 2; 269-292
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stosowanie Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności przez organy władzy publicznej Republiki Federalnej Niemiec. Studium przypadku
Application of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the German state bodies. A case study
Autorzy:
Bainczyk, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/505254.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
The German Federal Constitutional Court
national jurisdiction
Opis:
The order of the Second Senate of the German Federal Constitutional Court (the FCCt) of 14 October 2004 is a good example for a functioning of European legal community in an interpretation by German courts. Analyzing of effects of the European Court on Human Rights’ (the ECHR) decision in the Görgülü case on application of law by the state bodies, the FCCt emphasizes an openness of the German legal order towards the European law but parallel forms some legal restrictions on it, as it also does in European Union cases. On one hand in the German legal system, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) in the interpretation of the ECHR has the status of a federal statute, and it must be taken into account in the interpretation of domestic law, including fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees. The authorities and courts of the Federal Republic of Germany are therefore obliged, under certain conditions, to take account of the Convention as interpreted by the ECHR in making their decisions. On the other hand this commitment takes effect only within the democratic and constitutional system of the Basic Law. The standard of protection of basic rights guaranteed by the Basic Law forms an important part of this constitutional system. What is more the state bodies must take into consideration effects of the ECHR’s decision on the national legal system. It means that taking into account decisions of the ECHR is possible only within the scope of the applicable law of procedure and the state bodies must evaluate decision’s effects, in particular in family law, the law concerning aliens, and also in the law on the protection of personality. It is worth to mention that an influence of the Görgülü case may be seen also in German legislation. In 2006 the German Code of Civil Procedure was changed. According to the section 580 of the above mentioned Code an action for retrial of the case may be brought: 8. Where the European Court of Human Rights has established that the Convention or its protocols have been violated, and where the judgment is based on this violation.
Źródło:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 2; 25-43
1733-2680
2451-0610
Pojawia się w:
Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Limitation of the principle of openness in Polish judicial-administrative proceedings during the pandemic and the standards of a fair hearing: the reasons for possible complaints brought before the European Court of Human Rights
Autorzy:
Szafrańska, Weronika
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48899351.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-11-13
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
closed session
administrative courts
Covid-19
principle of openness
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Opis:
Along with the development of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the Polish legislator, by introducing restrictions on the principle of openness in administrative court proceedings, finally decided to exclude the possibility of conducting hearings in court buildings. Currently, it is only possible to proceed in closed session or in the form of a remote hearing – i.e. with the use of technical devices enabling simultaneous direct transmission of vision and sound. The aim of the article is to assess the “Covid regulations” introduced into the Polish legal system, limiting the right of the parties to open hearing of a case pending before administrative courts in terms of the regulations on the right to a fair trial contained in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2022, 91; 368-386
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zrzeczenie się obywatelstwa polskiego w kontekście konstytucyjnego obowiązku solidarności z innymi
Polish Citizenship Waiving and Constitutional Duty of Solidarity
Autorzy:
Kowalski, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/38887932.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
obywatelstwo
zrzeczenie się obywatelstwa
solidaryzm społeczny/solidarność społeczna
obowiązki obywatela
zasady konstytucyjne
wolności i prawa podstawowe
głowa państwa
kolizja interesów
interes indywidualny i wspólny
citizenship
waiving of citizenship
social solidarity
citizen's duties
constitutional rules
fundamental freedoms and rights
the head of state
clash of interests
particularistic and common interests
Opis:
The mutuality of rights and duties of individual and state, resulting from citizenship, is strengthened by constitutional rule of social solidarity which forms one of the bases of Polish political system. Loss of citizenship entails consequences for individual as well as the state, a citizen of which he is. Therefore, waiving of Polish citizenship depends on both the citizen's decision and President's assent, that is supreme representative of state who represents the state in both foreign and domestic relations. The reason why President assents to waiving of citizenship is that the rule of social solidarity says about the relation between the individual and the society and consequently the state which is formed by the society. If citizenship and social solidarity mean definite bonds between the individual and the state – a citizen of which he is – the President, as the supreme representative (the head of state) should assent to break the bonds. There is not complete freedom of President's assent, though. This is so because making the decision, the President should take into account constitutional regulations concerning both the human freedom (his constitutional right to decide about his own life) and social solidarity (constitutional duties resulting from living in a society). Taking the above into consideration, the President ought to make a decision based on conflicted interests carefully balanced (on the one hand particularistic interest of individual and public interest on the other hand).
Źródło:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL; 2006, 2, 1; 115-128
1896-6365
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Wydziału Nauk Prawnych i Ekonomicznych KUL
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Evaluative Concepts of the European Convention on Human Rights: Current Issues of Application as Exemplified by Article 6
Autorzy:
Kosovych, Vitaliy
Pashuk, Taras
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2082808.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-03-15
Wydawca:
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
evaluative concepts
judgments of the ECtHR
guarantees for adjudication
Opis:
The article is devoted to the study of the correct application of the evaluative concepts contained in the norms of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Attention is drawn to certain difficulties in the application of the evaluative norms in the Convention: despite their objective necessity and usefulness, they create a room for the law enforcement entity’s own discretion up to subjectivism in resolving specific cases; they serve as an objective obstacle to the unification of the case law of the ECtHR and this creates preconditions for unequal implementation of ECtHR judgments in the national legal order; they cause the risk of errors in the application of the provisions of the Convention by the competent authorities of the Contracting States. It is established that the application of legal norms containing evaluative concepts is challenging not only owing to the specific properties of the evaluative concepts themselves, but also due to the peculiarities of adjudication by the ECtHR when applying the evaluative norms. The relevant case law of the ECtHR as well as examples of national legislation are analysed in support of these theoretical conclusions. Since the lack of uniform application of the evaluative norms of the Convention causes divergent use of the ECtHR’s judgments in the domestic judicial system, it is advised to follow a number of rules for reasoning of decisions by the domestic court. These rules will serve as a certain guarantee against ambiguous implementation of ECtHR judgments at the national level.
Źródło:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem; 2022, 14, 1; 43-57
2080-1084
2450-7938
Pojawia się w:
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The 1991 constitution of independent Transnistria
Autorzy:
Viktoria, Serzhanova,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/894917.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-18
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
the Constitution
the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic
political system
the form of government
fundamental principles of the constitution
fundamental rights and freedoms
the system of state authorities
Opis:
The legal status of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, which declared its independence in 1990, since that time has unchangingly remained ambiguous. The state has factually existed for almost thirty years so far, although it has not hitherto been recognised by any member of the international community. Its status from the constitutional law viewpoint is contradictory to the one analysed in the light of the international law, according to which Transnistria still formally remains a Moldavian autonomous region of a special status. This paper, being a part of the wider research carried out over Transnistria’s legal status, aims at establishing its primary political system’s grounds. Therefore, it comprises the analysis of the origin and development of Transnistrian first independent basic law, which appeared to be the foundation of the abovementioned solutions. The paper undertakes an attempt to not only analyse, but also evaluate the political system’s primary principles and development of Transnistria as a newly created state in the first years of its functioning. The subject of the work is particularly focused on the shape and content of the first constitution of Transnistria of 1991, which bound during the first four years of the state’s independence till the presently binding constitution of 1995 entered into force, along with observing of how its functioning in practice shaped the constitutional and political reality.
Źródło:
Przegląd Europejski; 2017, 4 (46); 132-146
1641-2478
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Europejski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
References to Natural Law in the Constitutions of Modern States
Odwołania do prawa naturalnego w konstytucjach państw współczesnych
Autorzy:
Maroń, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1920490.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-10-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
natural law
constitution
comparative legal studies
fundamental human rights and freedoms
prawo naturalne
konstytucja
komparatystyka prawnicza
podstawowe prawa i wolności człowieka
Opis:
The article is a comparative study of constitutional references to natural law, with a particular emphasis on the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The findings presented in the study are both of qualitative and quantitative nature. References to natural law, recognized in the constitutions of 48 countries in the world, relate almost exclusively to fundamental human rights and freedoms. Usually, the constitution-maker assigns the title “natural” or “inherent” to all fundamental rights of person or to some of them. In none of the Basic Laws, natural law has been included into formal sources of law, nor its hierarchical relation to positive law shown. No constitution specifies a definite concept of natural law. The authors of the constitutions, speaking generally about natural rights, have not wanted to engage in philosophical and legal disputes accompanying the category of ius naturale.
Artykuł stanowi komparatystyczne studium konstytucyjnych odwołań do prawa naturalnego, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Konstytucji RP. Przedstawione w opracowaniu ustalenia są natury zarówno jakościowej, jak i ilościowej. Rozpoznane w konstytucjach 48 państw świata odniesienia do prawa naturalnego dotyczą niemal wyłącznie podstawowych praw i wolności człowieka. Zwykle ustrojodawca miano praw „naturalnych” lub „przyrodzonych” przypisuje albo wszystkim prawom fundamentalnym jednostki, albo poszczególnym z nich. W żadnej z ustaw zasadniczych prawa naturalnego nie zaliczono do formalnych źródeł prawa, jak i nie wskazano jego relacji hierarchicznej do prawa pozytywnego. W żadnej też z konstytucji nie określono konkretnej koncepcji prawa naturalnego. Twórcy konstytucji mówiąc ogólnie o prawach naturalnych nie chcieli angażować się w spory filozoficzno-prawne towarzyszące kategorii ius naturale.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego; 2020, 5 (57); 269-282
2082-1212
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 35

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies