Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "freedom of speech" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Freedom of Speech in Europe and in the United States of America. A Few Remarks on the History of the Idea and its New Challenges
Autorzy:
Wacławczyk, Wiesław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026753.pdf
Data publikacji:
2006-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Europe
history
freedom of speech
United States of America
international relations
Opis:
One can hardly overestimate the meaning of freedom of speech in the European tradition. It dates back to the times of the ancient Greece, although it was only John Milton who wrote the first tract devoted to the subject in question. In his Areopagitica (1644), Milton skillfully defended the principle of a free flow of ideas by stressing out that an open and undisturbed clash of various information and opinions is a condition of discovering truth in life. The best-known and most frequently quoted fragment of Areopagitica reads: “And though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the ! eld, we do injuriously, by licencing and prohibiting to misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the wors, in a free and open encounter. Her confuting is the best and surest suppressing”.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2006, 35; 7-15
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Press concentration, convergence and innovation: Europe in search of a new communications policy
Autorzy:
Lichtenberg, Lou
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/471067.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008-09
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Komunikacji Społecznej
Tematy:
press concentration
communications policy
information diversity
freedom of speech
innovation of press industry
Opis:
Printed press all over Europe have to face many similar problems; there are general indica- tions that print has to deal with structural stagnations. Circulation is declining; advertisers seem to be less interested in printed products. Print has also to deal with raising costs and with more competition. Due to those developments publishing companies preferred more a policy of saving costs particularly through economies of scale. That stimulated press concentration, declining ties with readers and ad- vertisers, and decreasing interest in innovation. For the benefit of media diversity governments are separately and collectively in the European Community in search for a new communications policy to deal with those problems in a more structured way. Next to a distant, passive role of the govern- ment, gradually in several European countries it is recognised that for a real freedom of speech it would be necessary that the government also fulfi ls a care duty, to commit to a policy aimed at uphold- ing and enhancing the diversity of the media.
Źródło:
Central European Journal of Communication; 2008, 1, 1; 49-61
1899-5101
Pojawia się w:
Central European Journal of Communication
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Agenda-setting versus Freedom of Speech
Autorzy:
Wojtkowski, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026780.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
freedom of speech
mass media
agenda-setting
Opis:
The most important issue of this paper is contained mostly, though vaguely, in the title. What is agenda-setting and how it is related with freedom of speech domain? In further part I will try to present those, theoretically distant problems. I will also try to present how political and business organizations can affect on daily agenda, so in fact how thy can create access to free speech. There are some situations in mass media world, when those practices can be considered as internal or external censorship. In this paper I specific cases, all selected from American political and media systems. I think that US system is full of contradictions, from law confl icts (state vs federal law, First Amendment), owners of mass media competition (corporations, FCC) and finally state controlled media on the contrary to free speech (censorship).
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2010, 39; 241-252
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
What American people can tell – freedom of speech in United States
Autorzy:
Dziduszko-Rościszewska, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2026778.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010-12-31
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
freedom of speech
politics
United States
democracy
Opis:
Freedom of possessing and expressing own ideas and opinions and their dissemination is one of the fundamental rights, that entitled to each person. In addition to this, the freedom enables searching and getting information. Thanks to it, the right to express your own identity, selfrealization and aspiring to truth are guaranteed. It is one of the basic premise and the necessary condition to realize the idea of democracy. In the United States, the cradle of civil rights and modern democracy, the freedom of expression is guaranteed in the First Amendment to American Constitution (Bill of Rights), enacted in 1789 (came into force in 1791). On its virtue, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of (…) the freedom of speech, or of the press (…).” Although the record suggested that this freedom is absolute, (not restricted of any legislation), the later jurisdiction of the US Supreme Court (by case law) isolated categories of utterances that have not been contained by the First Amendment. ! e essential issues are answers on the following questions: in the name of what values Congress can limit the First Amendment? And where is the border of freedom of speech? One of the expressions that are not protected by the law is fi ghting words and hate words. The second are libel and slanders that are understood as a infringement of somebody’s rights.
Źródło:
Polish Political Science Yearbook; 2010, 39; 253-272
0208-7375
Pojawia się w:
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Prawne i etyczne ograniczenia wolności słowa
Legal And Ethical Limitations of the Freedom of Speech
Autorzy:
Mrozek, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512474.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Tematy:
freedom of speech
press law
censorship
journalism deontology
codes of journalism ethics
Opis:
The article attempts to analyse the legal and ethical limitations of the freedom of speech. (1) The author concentrates on origins of the institution of censorship (ancient Rome, medieval Poland). He points out that in the Kingdom of Poland one could find rescripts, edicts and royal proclamation, which prohibited to import, sell, or read heretical books, under the threats of the confiscation of property, banishment, and even the death penalty. Then the author discusses the issue of censorship in the People’s Republic of Poland (the Law of 31 August 1981). The first part is concluded with the phenomenon of neo-censorship which is a form of self-censorship inside an editorial office toward editorial press materials. (2) The author discusses limitations of the freedom of speech by deontological norms, which are embraced by the IFJ Declaration of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists (FIJ) of 1954, the AJRP Code of Ethics of 1991, EC Resolution 1003 (1993), Media Ethics Charter of 1995, the rules of journalism ethics in Polish Television of 1996, the Journalism Code of Conduct of Polish Media Conference of 2002, the Code of Conduct in the Polish Radio of 2004, the Code of Good Practice for Press Publishers of 2005, and the AJRP Code of Ethics of 2011. (3) At the end the author discusses the ethical code for Internet users (netiquette).
Źródło:
Studia Ełckie; 2012, 14; 361-372
1896-6896
2353-1274
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ełckie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Preferencje polityczne a wolność słowa
Political preferences and freedom of speech
Autorzy:
Wichura, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/514586.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Śląski. Wydział Nauk Społecznych
Tematy:
freedom of speech
freedom of expression
the media in Poland
Opis:
In Poland, the way to make the constitutional basis of freedom of speech and freedom of the media opened up with breakthrough systemic taking place in 1989. Today it is sanctioned under the Constitution of 1997 (article 14 expresses the freedom of media and article 54 regulates freedom of expression) and a matter of law on the National Council of Radio and Television. The need for free media market, free flow of information and opinions and the need to protect it with a functioning system of judicial instruments – domestic and international – is now the standard functioning of democratic states. If what is more free speech – mainly implemented by means of mass communication is a real value and perform proper function in society – the mass media must be able to operate without restrictions or influence by external actors. Only then they will be able to inform the public about the socio-political events in the most objective way. Everyone has the right to express their thoughts, whether in private life, whether in public life. In addition, each sentence of the people must be respected, even if someone disagrees with him. This rule is reflected not only in Polish law (both in terms of the Constitution and ordinary laws) but also in the program documents, demands and actions of all major Polish political scene at the party. On the basis of the current legal regulations, political parties have the ability to access public radio and television, which have an impact on the implementation of the constitutional right of freedom of expression in practice. For this example, an object of study focused on two levels of analysis, in relation to the p arliamentary elections of 2011 and in the context of political ideology. The analysis of empirical data on two key issues: the use of freedom of speech by the media in Poland and protection of the constitutional right of free speech by the Polish political parties.
Źródło:
Political Preferences; 2012, 3; 77-89
2449-9064
Pojawia się w:
Political Preferences
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ewolucja prawa prasowego w Drugiej Rzeczypospolitej. Zakres i recepcja
The Evolution of Press Law in the Second Polish Republic. Scope and Reception
Autorzy:
Habielski, Rafał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/484268.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii
Tematy:
prasa
polityka
wolność słowa
cenzura
press
politics
freedom of speech
censorship
Opis:
Prawo prasowe przechodziło w latach 1918–1930 ewolucję adekwatną do zmieniającej się sytuacji politycznej. Działaniom na rzecz jego unifikacji towarzyszyły, zwłaszcza po 1926 roku, próby nadania mu kształtu dającego władzy gwarancję kontroli systemu prasowego oraz zakresu wolnooeci słowa dostosowanego do postanowień zawartych w Konstytucji 1935 r. Praktyki te spotkały się ze sprzeciwem tytułów opozycyjnych oraz sceptycyzmem okazywanym im przez organizacje dziennikarzy i wydawców.
Press law and its usage underwent evolution in the period of 1918–1939 as a consequence of political changes. The unification of the press law was accompanied, especially after 1926, by attempts to create such a law, which would guarantee the control of the press system and the scope of the freedom of speech adapted to the rulings of the 1935 Constitution. This practice was criticized by opposition title and received with skepticism by journalists’ and editors’ organizations.
Źródło:
Studia Medioznawcze; 2013, 4 (55); 79-92
2451-1617
Pojawia się w:
Studia Medioznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Book review: Uladzislau Belavusau: Freedom of Speech: Importing European and US Constitutional Models in Transitional Democracies, Routledge 2013, pp. 304
Autorzy:
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706927.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
book review, international law, freedom of speech, European Convention on Human Rights
Opis:
Book review of Uladzislau Belavusau: Freedom of Speech: Importing European and US Constitutional Models in Transitional Democracies, Routledge 2013.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 371-377
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Europejski Trybunał Ochrony Praw Człowieka w Strasburgu wobec naruszeń prywatności w mediach Cz. 1. Ewolucja orzecznictwa
The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg in view of breaching privacy in media. Part I. Evolution of jurisdiction
Autorzy:
Zaremba, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/484749.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii
Tematy:
ochrona prywatności
wolność słowa
swoboda ekspresji
debata publiczna
celebrytyzacja polityki
prawo prasowe
prawo mediów
Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności
protection of privacy
freedom of speech
freedom of expression
public debate
celebritization of politics
press law
media law
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Opis:
Artykuł zawiera omówienie stanowiska Trybunału Europejskiego w kwestii granic prawnej ochrony prywatności przed naruszeniami ze strony mediów. To stanowisko ewoluowało przez lata, a jako kluczowe etapy tego rozwoju wskazano wyroki w sprawach Tammer, von Hannover (1) oraz Axel Springer i von Hannover (nr 2). Test sformułowany w tych dwóch wyrokach stanowi ukoronowanie dorobku orzeczniczego Trybunału dotyczącego relacji art. 8 i art. 10 Konwencji europejskiej.
The article contains a discussion of the stand of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the legal boundaries of protecting privacy from violations on account of media. This standpoint evolved through the years, and as the key stages of this development, verdicts in the cases Tammer, von Hannover (1) and Axel Springer and von Hannover (nr 2) are recalled. The test created in these two verdicts is the crown achievement of the Courts jurisdiction work concerning the relations of article 8 and article 10 of the Convention.
Źródło:
Studia Medioznawcze; 2014, 2 (57); 137-148
2451-1617
Pojawia się w:
Studia Medioznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Europejski Trybunał Ochrony Praw Człowieka w Strasburgu wobec naruszeń prywatności w mediach. Część 2. Znaczenie stanowiska Trybunału dla debaty publicznej w Polsce
European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg towards privacy violation in the media. Part 2. Impact of the case law on public debate in Poland
Autorzy:
Zaremba, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/485039.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Dziennikarstwa, Informacji i Bibliologii
Tematy:
ochrona prywatności
wolność słowa
swoboda ekspresji
debata publiczna
celebrytyzacja polityki
prawo prasowe
prawo mediów
Konwencja o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności
privacy
freedom of speech
freedom of expression
public debate
celebritization of politics
press law
media law
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Opis:
W dobie celebrytyzacji życia politycznego oraz intymizacji przekazu medialnego zyskuje na znaczeniu problematyka granic prawnej ochrony prywatności przed naruszeniami ze strony mediów. W pierwszej części artykułu („SM” 2014, nr 2) zostało zaprezentowane stanowisko Trybunału Europejskiego w kwestii wspomnianych granic. W tej części przychylne mediom orzecznictwo Trybunału zostało zestawione ze znacznie bardziej restrykcyjnymi przepisami krajowymi obowiązującymi w tej materii. Poddano też analizie skutki, jakie podejście tego organu może mieć dla debaty publicznej w Polsce. Przede wszystkim zwrócono uwagę na fakt, że ułatwia ono obywatelom formułowanie ocen na temat postaw moralnych osób publicznych, w tym zwłaszcza polityków.
In the era of the celebritization of political life and the so-called intimization of media content issue of the boundaries of legal protection against violations of privacy by the media is becoming increasingly important. In the fi rst part of this article („SM” 2014, nr 2), the position of the European Court of Human Rights in the matters mentioned above is presented. In this part the favorable media Court’s position has been contrasted with much more restrictive relevant national rules. The possible effects of the Court’s approach on the public debate in Poland are analyzed. Attention has been drawn to the fact that this approach makes it easier for citizens to formulate judgments about moral attitudes of public fi gures, especially politicians.
Źródło:
Studia Medioznawcze; 2014, 3 (58); 15-23
2451-1617
Pojawia się w:
Studia Medioznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Free Speech Today
Autorzy:
QC, Lord Lester of Herne Hill
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706685.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
freedom of speech, human right, European Court of Human Rights, ECHR, European Convention on Human Rights, defamation, hate speech
Opis:
The article is an amended version of the Marek Nowicki Memorial Lecture presented at Warsaw University in 2014. It discusses the contemporary meaning of the right to free expression, concentrating on the basic principles of free speech as well as the limits of the right. In this context, the article pays special attention to British, Polish and European practice (particularly with respect to cases that are relevant for Poland). The specific topics tackled by the author include: free speech and the problem of criminalization of certain acts (e.g. the offence of defamation of public officials), hate speech, freedom of expression and the right of an individual to protect his or her good reputation (including the issue of libel laws), freedom of expression and the right to privacy (including the right to prior restraint on publication), free speech and internet, and the right to privacy versus national security.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 129-144
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
GODNOŚĆ OSOBY LUDZKIEJ JAKO ŹRÓDŁO PRAW CZŁOWIEKA I OBYWATELA
The dignity of the human person as the basis for human and civil rights
Autorzy:
MROZEK, JACEK JANUSZ
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/546342.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie
Tematy:
natural law
human rights
citizen rights
freedom of speech
press law
Opis:
At the beginning of the article the inalienable and inborn dignity was discussed, which is an expression of natural law and it is primitive source of all other rights. Then, an analysis, of human rights based on the natural law and the rights of the citizen, which have its origin in the constitutional norms, was done.
Źródło:
Civitas et Lex; 2014, 1; 41-47
2392-0300
Pojawia się w:
Civitas et Lex
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zakaz cenzury prewencyjnej w świetle zasady wolności słowa
Autorzy:
Jaworski, Lech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2231128.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Freedom of speech
censorship
press
constitution
Press Law
Broadcasting Act
human rights
Opis:
Censorship is a special case of media control. In the authoritarian system it is preventive censorship as well as press licensing that constitute a characteristic symptom of this control. In law, the notion of censorship has not been defined: therefore one has to refer to doctrines and jurisdiction. In the Polish law, a clear ban on preventive censorship, understood as making publishing or broadcasting a certain message dependent on the prior consent of a public authority, was included in Article 54 Section 2 of the Constitution. This regulation constitutes, in the area that it regulates, a development and confirmation of the freedom of the press and other media rule expressed in Article 14 of the Constitution. Additional provisions of the press’s freedom of speech in the context discussed here are formulated in Article 3 of the Press Law. Although it does not refer directly to preventive censorship, the ban it expresses is supposed to prevent the actual infringement on the freedom of the press by preventing its print and distribution. As for the issues discussed here, what may be controversial is the approach limiting the introduction of preventive censorship only to public administration institutions. The Constitutional Tribunal in its verdict from 20 July 2011, referring to the use of publication ban within proceedings to secure claims in claims against mass media concerning the protection of personal rights (Article 755 Paragraph 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure) stated that the judicial power is not the administrative power. Therefore, the courts’ activity cannot be considered as using censorship, but rather as monitoring the law being obeyed in the preventive meaning. And as for the regulations included in the European Convention on Human Rights, its Article 10 (as well as its other regulations) does not directly refer to the issue of controlling or obstructing publications, especially press releases. This question, however, has been the subject of many rulings of the European Court of Human Rights.
Źródło:
Themis Polska Nova; 2014, 1(6); 143-164
2084-4522
Pojawia się w:
Themis Polska Nova
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Debata o dekomunizacji na Ukrainie w 2015 roku: jak politycy „wygrali” z intelektualistami
The Debate on De-Communization in Ukraine in 2015: How Politicians ‘Won’ Against Intellectuals
Autorzy:
Stryjek, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1373592.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-05-12
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
de-communization
public debate
mass media
discourse
intellectual field
human rights
freedom of speech
dekomunizacja
debata publiczna
środki masowego przekazu
dyskurs
pole intelektualne
prawa człowieka
wolność słowa
Opis:
This article analyses the de-communization laws passed in Ukraine in May 2015 and the public debate they evoked. The author presents the circumstances in which the laws were passed and describes the thought processes of their drafters from the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance. Three discourses are distinguished in the debate: the expert, the national-liberal, and the deconstructivist. With the exception of representatives of the national-liberal discourse, the debaters were critical of the laws and expected either their rejection by the president or their fundamental amendment. In the end, however, the laws passed into force in their first version. Drawing conclusions from this failure of the participants in the debate, the author analyses the relations between the intellectual field and the political field in Ukraine and also the internal relations of the former—between its participants within the country and abroad. In conclusion, the author ponders the strategy that should be adopted by Ukrainian intellectuals for the purpose of increasing their influence on the decision-making of politicians.
Źródło:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo; 2015, 59, 2; 117-145
2300-195X
Pojawia się w:
Kultura i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Demonstracyjne okazywanie lekceważenia w miejscu publicznym Narodowi Polskiemu, Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej lub jej konstytucyjnym organom a wolność wyrażania poglądów
Autorzy:
Gołda-Sobczak, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216259.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-06-30
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
Tematy:
Misdemeanor
the Polish Nation
the Republic of Poland
the constitutional authorities of the Republic of Poland
disregard
insult
freedom of speech
public debate
axiology of the European Court of Human Rights
wykroczenie
Naród Polski
Rzeczpospolita Polska
konstytucyjne organy Rzeczypospolitej lekceważenie
znieważenie
wolność słowa
debata publiczna
aksjologia Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
Opis:
Public manifestation of disregard for the Polish nation, the Republic of Poland and its constitutional authorities is a misdemeanor. Such disregard is not within the scope of the freedom of public debate. Such disregard is not within the concept of insult.
Źródło:
Themis Polska Nova; 2015, 1(8); 168-188
2084-4522
Pojawia się w:
Themis Polska Nova
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies