Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "final date" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
    Tytuł:
    Compliance with the Time Limit of Article 129 (4) of the Act of 27 April 2017 the Environmental Law in the Case-Law of the Supreme Court
    Autorzy:
    Szczechowicz, Jarosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1375050.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Policji w Szczytnie
    Tematy:
    final date
    submitting a claim
    compensation
    motion for a summons to a conciliation hearing
    constitutional rights
    Opis:
    The study discusses issues related to maintaining the deadline for suing claims due to restrictions on the use of real estate provided for in Article 129 (1–3) of the Environmental Protection Law. Provided for in the provisions of Articles 129–136 of the Environmental Protection Law liability for damages was formed as a statutory obligation to compensate for damages resulting to property owners (holders of perpetual usufruct) from the introduction of legal regulations that narrow down the possibilities of using these properties. The conditions for liability are: entry into force of a regulation or act of local law resulting in a limitation on the way the property is used, damage suffered by the owner of the property, the holder of perpetual usufruct or the person holding property law, and a causal link between the restriction on the use of the property and the damage. Claims for damages derived from these sources meet the requirements of Articles 361–363 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Poland. They are property claims, subject to limitation (art. 117 § 1 of the Civil Code), however — without being tort claims — they are subject to limitation on general principles arising from Article 118 of the Civil Code. An important legal issue is whether, and if so, to what extent, it is possible to apply by analogy provisions on suspension or interruption of the limitation period to the preclusion period contained in Article 129 (4) of the Environmental Protection Law. The starting point for reflection on this issue are the arguments originating from the current case law of the Supreme Court. Based on the views and arguments of the Supreme Court, the author tries to answer the question on the conditions that meet the three-year period provided for in Article 129 (4) of the Environmental Protection Law asserting claims for restrictions on the use of real estate
    Źródło:
    Internal Security; 2020, 12(1); 299-305
    2080-5268
    Pojawia się w:
    Internal Security
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    „Bezterminowy” kredyt bankowy – interpretacja prawna umowy o kredyt na cele mieszkaniowe z odroczoną spłatą należności w ramach kontroli cywilno-sądowej
    “Indefinite-term” bank loan – legal interpretation of deferred-payment housing loan agreement within the framework of civil and court control
    Autorzy:
    Nadolska, Aleksandra
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215754.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    long-term bank credit (or long-term housing Loans)
    repayment date of the loan (or the date of final payment of obligations under a loan agreement); deferred payment of receivables
    creditworthiness
    consumer (client) protection
    validity of a legal act
    Opis:
    The loan agreement is concluded for a definite period of time and that fact is not precluded by the absence of a fixed date of repayment of liabilities thereunder. The definite nature of the obligation is not tantamount to the parties’ determining a specific date. This article is aimed at demonstrating that the date of final payment of obligations under a loan agreement can be marked by a specific (future and certain) event consisting in the borrower’s repayment of their debt. This leads to the conclusion that long-term housing loans with a deferred payment of a part of the debt, as granted by PKO B.P. S.A. in the period 1997–1998, cannot be considered invalid solely on that basis. Also of importance for the assessment of the matter at hand are: the specificity of the financial market, the point of time when the loan agreement was concluded (high inflation), the then consumer protection paradigm, as well as the analysis of social and economic costs of banking operations.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2017, 2(54); 29-46
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies