- Tytuł:
- Józef M. Bocheński jako tomista
- Autorzy:
- Zembrzuski, Michał
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1966205.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2020-12-30
- Wydawca:
- Naukowe Towarzystwo Tomistyczne
- Tematy:
-
Tomasz z Akwinu
tomizm
J.M. Bocheński
filozofia tomistyczna w Polsce - Opis:
- The aim of the paper is to present the following, how Thomism was understood by Bocheński, next, path of Thomistic inspirations he had followed, and finally we show Thomism Bocheński had explored when teaching his own philosophical abbreviation (ABC tomizmu). Analysis based on these issues would allow to identify the specific features of Thomism studied and explored by Bocheński. Hence, the question we might pose does not to regard the fact whether Bocheński was a Thomist or not but, what sort of Thomism he represented. Bocheński should rather be considered to be a traditional Thomist than existential one because in his philosophical work he barely treated the problem of act of existence and importance of this particular problem. However, he refrained from adopting the method fundamental for traditional Thomism, which is strict adherence (fidelity) to source texts of Aquinas. Bocheński, in being open to achievements of contemporary philosophy, especially logic, was closer to Louvain Thomism. But, he never decided to implement modern scientific trends to philosophy of Aquinas, the tendency which was foreign to the very essence of philosophy, at least in its shape understood by Bocheński. In his philosophical views Bocheński was closer to Aristotle and the Aristotelian tradition. And because he preferred to follow Aristotelian realism he consequently kept that stance. His interest in analysis the utterances of Thomism from a perspective of logic allow to classify Bocheński to analytical Thomism, but we should remember that in times contemporary to Bocheński, the very notion of analytical Thomism had not been coined. The aforementioned conclusions allow to recognize originality of Thomistic thought represented by Bocheński and also, to admit that Bocheński’s thought cannot be classified univocally to a particular school of Thomism.
- Źródło:
-
Rocznik Tomistyczny; 2020, 1, 9; 265-289
2300-1976 - Pojawia się w:
- Rocznik Tomistyczny
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł