Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "execution of a sentence" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Security threats in prisons
    Autorzy:
    Malec, Norbert
    Hryszkiewicz, Dominik
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/45223471.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022-03-29
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Policji w Szczytnie
    Tematy:
    prison
    execution of a prison sentence
    security of prisoners
    Opis:
    From the point of view of crime prevention, the issue of social rehabilitation of an offender in conditions of institutional isolation is of major importance. Imprisonment and the conditions for its implementation are the most controversial of the existing measures. For many years, the usefulness of this punishment for the correct and effective process of reintegration have been considered. Solutions to problems related to imprisonment are sought not only in the practical implementation of a sentence in individual countries but also internationally. In the deliberations on penal policy issues, there is a lot of pessimism when it comes to the effectiveness of imprisonment as a means of social readaptation. Postulates are formulated for conducting a deep analysis regarding the issue of prison isolation in all its aspects, including the aspect of broadly understood security of persons in detention facilities. The need to review the theoretical output and empirical research regarding the execution and role of the penalty of imprisonment from the point of view of its effectiveness and effects of its enforcement in the aspect of broadly understood security should be fully recognised.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Policyjny; 2021, 144(4); 279-293
    0867-5708
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Policyjny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zakład karny i wykonanie kary pozbawienia wolności w opinii społeczności lokalnej
    Prison and Imprisonment in the Opinion of Local Community
    Autorzy:
    Mościskier, Andrzej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699182.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    1984
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    zakład karny
    wykonanie kary
    kara
    pozbawienie wolności
    opinia społeczna
    społeczność lokalna
    penitentiary
    execution of a sentence
    imprisonment
    public opinion
    local community
    Opis:
    Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
         Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
    Źródło:
    Archiwum Kryminologii; 1984, XI; 245-267
    0066-6890
    2719-4280
    Pojawia się w:
    Archiwum Kryminologii
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Orzecznicze i doktrynalne czynniki ochrony praw człowieka w stosowaniu przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności po 1 stycznia 2012 r.
    Judicial and doctrinal aspects of human rights protection in the application of an interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence after 1 January 2012 Wprowadzenie Przerwa w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności określa jeden z najważniejszych prze
    Autorzy:
    Juszka, Karol
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1828652.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-09-21
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    Przerwa w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności
    postępowanie wykonawcze
    Sąd Najwyższy
    sądy powszechne
    Interruption of imprisonment
    interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence
    enforcement proceedings
    Supreme Court
    common courts
    Opis:
    Celem artykułu jest prezentacja czynników dotyczących przestrzegania praw człowieka w stosowaniu instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego i sądów powszechnych od 1 stycznia 2012 r. Przedmiotową problematykę zaprezentowano za pomocą regulacji kodeksowej instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności. Zakres artykułu obejmuje wszystkie etapy stosowania tytułowej instytucji. W celu zwiększenia efektywności ochrony praw człowieka w stosowaniu instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności należy monitorować stosowanie tej instytucji w praktyce. W zależności od wyników tego monitoringu przedstawiciele doktryny i orzecznictwa mogą przedstawić propozycje de lege ferenda zmian ustawowej konstrukcji instytucji przerwy wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności a także zmian w stosowaniu niniejszej instytucji w ramach obowiązujących przepisów.
    The aim of this article is to present the factors concerning the observance of human rights in the institution of the interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence. Analysis will be presented by showing judicial and doctrinal aspects in the judgments issued by the Supreme Court and common courts since 1 January 2012. The presentation is concentrated on the code regulation of the titular institution. The presentation and analysis of this subject will be provided through successive stages of the interruption in the execution of the custodial sentence. In order to increase the efficiency in the protection of human rights in practice in the titular institution, monitoring of the application of the interruption of imprisonment should be used. Depending on the results of this kind of monitoring, representatives of the doctrine and judiciary can present de lege ferenda proposals which may include the modification of the legislative construction of the institution in question, and proposals of measures to be taken in its practical application within the framework of the provisions in force.
    Źródło:
    Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny; 2021, 3; 65-78
    1898-2166
    Pojawia się w:
    Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Podstawy obligatoryjnego odroczenia wykonania kary pozbawienia wolności
    Autorzy:
    Tekliński, Jarosław
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788317.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-02-06
    Wydawca:
    Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
    Tematy:
    choroba psychiczna
    ciężka choroba
    odroczenie wykonania kary pozbawienia wolności
    prawo krne wykonawcze
    skazany
    Służba Więzienna
    zaburzenie psychiczne
    zdrowie psychiczne
    mental illness
    severe illness
    postponement of the execution of a prison sentence
    executive criminal law
    person sentenced
    Prison Service
    mental disorder
    mental health
    Opis:
    Jedną z podstawowych zasad prawa karnego wykonawczego jest zasada bezzwłocznego wszczęcia postępowania wykonawczego (art. 9 § 1 k.k.w.). Bezzwłoczne wykonanie orzeczenia, szczególnie tego, które stanowi o bezwzględnej karze pozbawienia wolności, służy realizacji zasady humanitaryzmu i poszanowania godności ludzkiej skazanego (art. 4 § 1 k.k.w.). Odroczenie wykonania kary jest jednym z nielicznych odstępstw od zasady wyrażonej w art. 9 § 1 k.k.w., przy czym zważywszy na jej wyjątkowy charakter, przepisy statuujące ustawowe przesłanki jej stosowania nie podlegają wykładni rozszerzającej. Dzieje się tak za sprawą tego, że odroczenie wykonania kary bez istnienia ważkich przyczyn narusza zarówno wspomnianą zasadę bezzwłocznego wykonania wyroku, jak i konstytucyjną zasadę osądzenia sprawy bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki (art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP), czy rozpatrzenia sprawy w rozsądnym terminie (art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Człowieka i Podstawowych Wolności). Niniejszy artykuł stanowi próbę kompleksowego spojrzenia na problematykę materialnych podstaw obligatoryjnego odroczenia wykonania kary pozbawienia wolności. Analiza obowiązującego porządku prawnego, przeprowadzona przez pryzmat oceny zarówno orzecznictwa, jak i poglądów doktryny, doprowadza autora do konkluzji, że obecna regulacja jest wadliwa i de lege ferenda wymaga pilnych zmian, w kierunku przez niego zaproponowanym.
    One of the basic principles of executive criminal law is the principle of immediate enforcement proceedings (art. 9 § 1 k.k.w.). Immediate enforcement of the verdict, especially the one which provides for the absolute penalty of imprisonment, is for the implementation of the principle of humanity and respect for the human dignity of the convicted person (art. 4 § 1 k.w.w.).Postponement of the execution of a sentence is one of the few exceptions to the rule expressed in art. 9 § 1 k.k.w., however, considering its exceptional character, provisions stating the statutory conditions for its application are not subject to an extended interpretation. This is due to the fact that postponing the execution of a penalty without serious grounds violates both the aforementioned principle of immediate enforcement of the sentence and the constitutional principle of trial without unreasonable delay (article 45 section 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland) or consideration of the case within a reasonable period (article 6 section1 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms). This article is an attempt to look at the issue of material basis for obligatory postponement of imprisonment. The analysis of the current legal order, carried out through the prism of assessing both case-law and doctrinal views, leads the author to the conclusion that the current regulation is flawed and de lege ferenda requires urgent changes in the direction proposed by him.
    Źródło:
    Studia Prawnicze; 2018, 4 (216); 165-202
    0039-3312
    2719-4302
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Prawnicze
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies