Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "eparchia (diecezja)" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Conventus eparchialis. Status prawno-instytucjonalny według Kodeksu Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich
Conventus Eparchialis. The Legal-Institutional Status According to the Code of Canons the Eastern Churches
Autorzy:
Stesenko, Serhiy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1807887.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-11-15
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
conventus eparchialis (zgromadzenie eparchialne)
synod
sobór
Kos´ciół
partykularny
biskup eparchialny
eparchia (diecezja)
conventus eparchialis (eparchial convention)
council
particular Church
eparchial bishop
eparchy (diocese)
Opis:
Life of the Church from the very beginning was characterized by participation of the local community in solving the current problems connected with its existence. The eastern Canon Law appoints conventus eparchialis (eparchial convention) as the most important one among the organs supporting the eparchial bishop in managing the eparchy (diocese), in this way indicating its role and task in the life of the particular Church. The origin of the term conventus (convention) should be seen in the Greek source term synodos, from which it was derived. The very Greek word synodos means “to take together a common route to an appointed aim”. Hence the discussed concept contains two elements in it: convention and solving common problems. An eparchial convention is summoned by the bishop – its pastor. It unites the eparchial bishop, the clergy, monks and nuns in one living and active organism – communio fidelium. It has its own structure that reflects its constitutive elements. It has a representative character and presents the synthesis of God’s People of the given particular Church. An eparchial bishop has an opportunity to meet his Church at an eparchial convention, and a particular Church has the right to express its opinion in front of its bishop. Apart from the pastoral dimension an eparchial convention also prepares particular legislation. It is supposed to be finalized in the form of an actual document with a legal character, through which it contributes to creating the good of the Church, for which it was summoned. The eparchial bishop also remains the only legislator, as it is he that promulgates the texts of acts, declarations and decrees that are binding for all the faithful living in his eparchy. The institution of the eparchial convention emphasizes joint work, in which, through coparticipation, common responsibility is born for building an ecclesiastical community – a particular Church.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych; 2010, 20, 2; 177-189
1507-7896
2544-5227
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wychodzenie z cienia. Wzrost znaczenia eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1713
Stepping out of the shadow. Growing importance of Przemyśl-Sambor diocese in 1596-1713
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Wojciechowski, Leszek
Ryba, Mieczysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/23352292.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-10-31
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
diecezja przemyska
eparchia przemyska
prawosławna diecezja przemyska
unicka diecezja przemyska
diecezja przemyska greckokatolicka
unia brzeska
prawosławie
Opis:
Unia brzeska była katalizatorem przyspieszającym wyłonienie się diecezji przemyskiej z peryferyjnych mroków metropolii kijowskiej. Zmiany które zaszły po unii brzeskiej wzmocniły pozycję biskupa przemyskiego w hierarchii Kościoła wschodniego. Początkowo dotyczyło to biskupa prawosławnego, ale potem z jego wzmocnionej roli korzystali na przemian biskupi unicki i prawosławny. Wzrost znaczenia biskupa przemyskiego przejawiał się w jurysdykcyjnym przekroczeniu granic diecezji przemyskiej i sprawowaniu funkcji biskupich w sąsiednich diecezjach. Było to spowodowane brakiem w nich własnego biskupa prawosławnego lub unickiego. Przełomem było uzyskanie przez prawosławnego biskupa Antoniego Winnickiego nominacji na metropolitę kijowskiego. Odtąd przez kilkanaście lat metropolita rezydował na terenie diecezji przemyskiej. Znaczenia tej diecezji doceniono obserwując długoletnie zmagania o przyjęcie przez tę diecezję unii kościelnej. Ostatecznie, po stu latach sporów, unie przyjęto w latach 1691–1693, a diecezja przemyska została zjednoczona (z części prawosławnej i unickiej). Ukoronowaniem stopniowego wzrostu znaczenia diecezji przemyskiej i jej biskupów była nominacja Jerzego Winnickiego na metropolitę kijowskiego. Zarówno biskup Antoni, jak i jego bratanek – biskup Jerzy Winnicki, łączyli godność władyki przemyskiego z funkcją metropolity kijowskiego. Łączność ta zachodziła w latach 1667–1679 i (1708-) 1710–1713. Dzieje eparchii przemyskiej z okresu sporów prawosławno-unickich oczekują na nowoczesną syntezę. Powinny się w niej znaleźć (oprócz samych spraw konfliktu prawosławnych z unitami) podstawowe dane dotyczące diecezji (organizacyjne, statystyczne, analizy prozopograficzne).
The Union of Brest was a catalyst spurring Przemyśl Diocese’s emergence from darkness on the periphery of Kiev metropolis. Changes, effected after the Union of Brest, have strengthened the position of Przemyśl bishop in the hierarchy of the Eastern Church. Initially that was the case only of the Orthodox bishop, however later, the strengthened position brought benefits to both Orthodox and Uniate bishops in turn. Increased importance of the Bishop of Przemyśl has manifested in his jurisdiction extending beyond the limits of Przemyśl diocese and performing the functions of a bishop in neighbouring dioceses. This resulted from absence of own Orthodox or Uniate bishops in those dioceses. The breakthrough point was Orthodox Bishop Anthony Winnicki’s appointment as Metropolitan of Kiev. Since then, for several years the metropolitan has resided in Przemyśl diocese. The importance of the diocese is best appreciated when looking at the many years of struggle to accept the Church Union. Ultimately, following a hundred years of disputes, the Union was accepted in 1691–1693, and Przemyśl diocese was united (having previously been divided into Orthodox and Uniate parts). The crowning moment of gradual increase in importance of Przemyśl diocese and its bishops was Jerzy Winnicki’s appointment as Metropolitan of Kiev. Both Bishop Anthony and his nephew – Bishop Jerzy Winnicki have combined the title of Prince-Bishop of Przemyśl and Metropolitan of Kiev. Such a conjunction occurred in 1667–1679 and (1708-) 1710–1713. History of Przemyśl eparchy in the period of Orthodox-Uniate disputes awaits a contemporary synthesis. It should include (besides the issues related to Orthodox vs Uniate conflict in itself) basic information about the diocese (organizational, statistical and prosopographical analyses).
Źródło:
Rola Kościoła w dziejach Polski. Kościoły w Rzeczypospolitej; 552-583
9788394837433
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unicka eparchia przemyska. Uwagi w związku z książką Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
On history of Przemyśl Uniate eparchy. Comments with regard to book by Wioletta Zielecka-Mikołajczyk “Where East met West”. History and organization of Przemyśl-Sambor Uniate diocese in 1596-1772, Toruń 2021.
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/22784042.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-13
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
artykuł recenzyjny
diecezja przemyska greckokatolicka
eparchia przemyska
unicka diecezja przemyska
Kościół unicki
unia brzeska
Opis:
Artykuł recenzyjny książki Wioletty Zieleckiej-Mikołajczyk, Gdzie Wschód spotkał się z Zachodem. Dzieje i organizacja unickiej diecezji przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1772, Toruń 2021
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2022, 29, 29; 263-305
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Duchowieństwo unickie eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1596–1609
Greek-Catholic clergy of Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy from 1596 to 1609
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064711.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
duchowieństwo
unici
diecezja przemyska
eparchia przemysko-samborska
unia brzeska
Greek-Catholic clergy
Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy
Union of Brest
Opis:
Orthodox bishop of Przemysl and Sambor Michał Kopysteński (1591-1609) did not join the union of Brest in 1596. Therefore, the Przemyśl-Sambor Emparchy did not have Greek-Catholic bishop until 1609, when Atanazy Krupecki was nominated.The article presents the history of the first phase of the church union in Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy (1596-1609). This issue has been poorly explored in historiography. Many historians thought that before 1609, the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor had no Greek-Catholic priests and Greek-Catholics. This view has been verified. Also the myth that the Greek-Catholic Church initially consisted only of bishops, and was deprived of ecclesiastical structures and followers was challenged. The Church Union of Brest was supposed to combine the two Churches - Catholic and Orthodox. As a result of non-acceptance of the Union by the two bishops and a large part of the Orthodox faithful, there were formed two parallel structures of the Eastern Church: Orthodox and Greek-Catholic. This complex legal and religious situation forced the Orthodox popes of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy to face the choice between the Ortodox Church or acceptance of ecclesiastical union. The latter was equivalent with the conversion from the Orthodox to the Greek Catholic denomination. Following the adoption of the Union of Brest state authorities outlawed the Orthodox Church, and recognized as the only legitimate one the Greek-Catholic Church. Pope recognizing the authority of the Metropolitan of Kiev, which was of Greek-Catholic denomination, had to object to his hitherto Orthodox bishop. Moreover, the bishops and priests who did not accept the union of church, were excommunicated by metropolitan of Kiev. An important role in determining denomination of a particular parish had landowners of lands where churches were located. The landowner (the king, the nobles and the clergy) was called. "Ktitor", and had the right to choose a pope. After 1596, decisions on filling the church by the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic priests were taken in accordance with the principle of cuius regio, eius religio. Union developed gradually throughout the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy thanks to the support of ktitors. This graduall evolutionary development of the union was followed by natural generational changes that took place in the individual parishes. No information was found on Orthodox priests forcibly removed and replaced by the Greek-Catholics. From 1598 to 1609 Greek-Catholic popes are confirmed in seven decanates of the eparchy, mostly in the towns and villages belonging to the king and Stanisław Stadnicki from Żmigród. Identified were 22 known by name Greek-Catholic priests, plus four popes who were probably of Greek-Catholic denomination. Recognized popes accounted for only about 2% of all priests (both Greek-Catholics and Orthodox) from the eparchy. However, for all Greek-Catholic churches operating at that time this is a significant percentage of the Greek-Catholics parishes. These figures have not been known in historiography yet. During this period, the vast majority of churches and clergy of the Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy remained Orthodox. Nevertheless, only 19 known by the name Orthodox priests and eight who were probably Orthodox were identified as a result of a query. The number of identified Greek-Catholic and Orthodox priests are comparable, although on the Orhodox should be much more information in the sources. There was also found information about 12 known by name popes who lived by 1596 but there was no hints about their attitude to the union and 18 popes from the period after 1596, whose denomination can not be determined. Orthodox churches served by popes known by name were of a minor percentage of the total number of operating the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches. So far, historians have failed to determine the number of churches that existed in that period in the Przemyśl-Sambor eparchy and all data are based on estimations. Therefore, creation of an inventory of the Orthodox and Greek-Catholic churches is an important research proposal. Another objective should be to determine the number of priests serving in those churches. The article shows religious specificity of Przemyśl-Sambor Eparchy over 13 years (1596-1609). Most of the processes had not been completed in that period, so they should be considered in the long term. The final adoption of the church union between 1691 and 1693 ended disputes among Orthodox and Greek-Catholics in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2013, 20; 135-167
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies