Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "enlargement of European Union" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Challenges and Perspectives of Polish Foreign Policy Towards the Post-Yugoslav Region
    Autorzy:
    Podgórzańska, Renata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2032374.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    Polish foreign policy
    Post-Yougoslav region
    enlargement of European Union
    post-Cold War period
    Opis:
    In the new, post-Cold War reality Polish foreign policy faced challenges stemming from the need to set targets that would reflect the interests of Poland, as well as take into account the changes in the international environment. Gradually, the assumptions and directions of foreign policy were rebuilt, with an aim to ensure the safety of the country in both internal and external dimension, to provide the territorial integrity, strengthen the sovereignty and create optimal conditions for the development of the state and society. After 1989, as a consequence of the concentration of efforts of Polish diplomacy on the implementation of strategic directions of foreign policy, others had a secondary meaning. Polish vital interests were located in the Euro-Atlantic area, in the immediate vicinity, as well as in Central and Eastern Europe, which is why in the first place all strengths and resources were engaged there in order to implement the strategic tasks of foreign policy; the Western Balkans remained on the sidelines, in the territory of former Yugoslavia. Nevertheless, this did not mean the total marginalization of the post- -Yugoslav region, and the perception of the events associated with the disintegration of the Yugoslav federation as not directly, but only indirectly connected with Polish interests.
    Źródło:
    Reality of Politics; 2013, 4; 178-197
    2082-3959
    Pojawia się w:
    Reality of Politics
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Uwarunkowania regionalne współpracy państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. Niemcy wobec aspiracji europejskich państw Bałkanów Zachodnich
    Regional conditions of cooperation of the European Union member states. Germany on the European aspirations of the Western Balkan states
    Autorzy:
    Malinowski, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/505699.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
    Tematy:
    enlargement of the European Union
    German foreign policy
    Western Balkans
    rozszerzenie Unii Europejskiej
    polityka zagraniczna Niemiec
    Bałkany Zachodnie
    Opis:
    The article discusses four theses regarding the attitude of Germany to the Western Balkans: 1. The main motive for Germany’s commitment to expanding the EU to Western Balkans is to complete the unification of Europe and the transfer of prosperity and stability. Germany treats enlargement policy as a test of the EU’s credibility and its ability to act extensively; 2. Without Germany, the process of enlargement to Western Balkans would not be possible; Germany gives him critical mass; 3. The unstable position of Germany regarding the date of accession of the Western Balkan states to the EU results from the necessity to take into account other priorities in European policy (reform of the euro zone) and from adverse internal conditions showing a significant potential for paralyzing EU enlargement policy (refugee crisis, changes in the German party system); 4. The current increasing EU action for the Western Balkans results from the conviction – both of the European Commission and Germany – that this is necessary in the face of the growing involvement of Russia and China.
    W artykule przedyskutowano cztery tezy dotyczące stosunku Niemiec do Bałkanów Zachodnich: 1. Głównym motywem zaangażowania Niemiec na rzecz rozszerzenia UE o Bałkany Zachodnie jest dokończenie jednoczenia Europy oraz transfer dobrobytu i stabilizacji. Niemcy traktują politykę rozszerzenia jako sprawdzian wiarygodności Unii i jej zdolności do działania zewnętrznego; 2. Bez Niemiec proces rozszerzania na Bałkany Zachodnie nie byłby możliwy; Niemcy nadają mu masę krytyczną; 3. Zmienne stanowisko Niemiec w sprawie terminu przystąpienia państw Bałkanów Zachodnich do UE wynika z konieczności uwzględnienia innych priorytetów w polityce europejskiej (reforma strefy euro) oraz z niekorzystnych uwarunkowań wewnętrznych, wykazujących spory potencjał paraliżowania polityki rozszerzania UE (kryzys uchodźczy, zmiany w niemieckim systemie partyjnym); 4. Obecne zwiększające się działania UE na rzecz Bałkanów Zachodnich wynikają z przeświadczenia zarówno Komisji Europejskiej, jak i Niemiec, że są one konieczne w obliczu zwiększającego się zaangażowania Rosji i Chin.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2018, 4; 33-49
    1733-2680
    2451-0610
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Proces rozszerzenia Unii Europejskiej jako cel operacyjny polskiej prezydencji w Radzie Unii Europejskiej
    The European Union enlargement process as an operational objective of the Polish Presidency in the Council of the European Union
    Autorzy:
    Węc, Janusz Józef
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/506358.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
    Tematy:
    European Union
    European integration
    Polish Presidency of the EU Council
    The European Union enlargement process
    Opis:
    On balance the performance of the first Polish EU Council Presidency in the matter of the enlargement process of the European Union seems to be positive. The Polish Presidency effectively implemented the five main functions of a Presidency: the agenda-setting, brokerage, management, coordination and internal representation in the contacts with the governments of member states and the institutions of the European Union. The most important aspect was that it managed to implement almost all the operational objectives typically required for the enlargement process. Despite the objections and doubts expressed by the governments of many member states, conditioned mainly by the debt crisis of the Eurozone and the need for internal and external consolidation of the European Union, the Polish Presidency managed to maintain the concept of enlargement as an important element on the EU’s agenda. On 5 December 2011, on the initiative of the Polish Presidency, the General Affairs Council agreed a new approach to the accession negotiations involving the earliest possible opening of the most contentious negotiation chapters, including fundamental rights and policies pertaining to the area of freedom, security and justice. Employing the agenda-setting function, the Polish Presidency was the co-author of the Group Presidency programme and the author of the country’s Presidency programme and both documents provided the foundation for Poland’s activity in the process of enlargement of the European Union. The most important achievements of the Polish Presidency resulting from the implementation of the brokerage, coordination and management functions concerned Croatia, Iceland, Serbia and Montenegro. The Polish government finalised the work on the text of the accession treaty with Croatia and brought about the signing of the treaty on 9 December 2011. It also accepted the agreements referring to the status of Croatia in the transition period; that is, until the treaty becomes fully effective. The Polish Presidency also gave a significant impetus to the accession negotiations with Iceland, by opening seven negotiation chapters and concluding six. The achievement of the Polish Presidency towards the endeavours of the countries of the Western Balkans to gain accession to the European Union was the opening of procedures leading to Serbia being granted candidate country status, although the formal decision was taken on 28 February 2012 by the General Affairs Council under the chairmanship of the Danish Presidency. In addition, the politically crucial enlargement conclusions of the General Affairs Council for Montenegro, on the basis of which the European Council announced that a decision would be taken on the commencement of accession negotiations in June 2012, were achieved during the Polish Presidency. Taking into account that some member states were critical of the steps taken to normalise relationships between Serbia and Kosovo, the balanced conclusions of the Council, in the part referring to Serbia, should also be taken as a success for the Polish Presidency. Although the Polish Presidency suffered a few failures it is worth emphasising that they resulted mainly from the attitude of other member states such as Greece or the negligence of the third party countries in the enlargement process – in the cases of Turkey, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo. The Polish government, like the others since 2009, failed to overcome the opposition of Greece to the commencement of accession negotiations with Macedonia, although other member states fully supported the concept. The Polish Presidency, like the Belgian and Hungarian Presidencies, was unable to open any new chapter in the accession negotiations with Turkey. However, the reasons were the lack of progress in the implementation of the process of reforms by the Turkish government, the still unsolved controversial issues with Cyprus, the growing assertiveness of Turkey in the foreign policy arena and the unfavourable attitude towards the accession of Turkey to the Union by some member states. Nonetheless, the Polish Presidency achieved an agreement with other member states for a positive agenda in the relations between the Union and Turkey, which led to a relatively balanced text relating to Turkey in the conclusions of the General Affairs Council on 5 December 2011. The reason for the lack of achievement in the enlargement process with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo was the limited progress in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria made by these countries. Therefore, these countries still remain only as states which aspire to be members of the European Union. Balancing all the stated successes and failures it should be emphasised that the Polish Presidency gave new impetus to the enlargement process of the European Union. This was visible in the proposal by the Polish government and its acceptance by the General Affairs Council of a new methodology for conducting future accession negotiations, the significant advancement of the accession negotiations with Iceland, the opening of the procedure for granting candidate country status to Serbia and establishing the political requirements for the commencement of accession negotiations with Montenegro. In addition, the Polish government signed the accession treaty with Croatia and accepted the agreements regarding the country’s status in its relationships with the European Union in the transition period until the accession treaty is fully implemented.
    Źródło:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe; 2013, 4; 73-87
    1733-2680
    2451-0610
    Pojawia się w:
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies