Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "emperor Constantine" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
Was Constantine the Great Aware of the Constantinian Shift?
Autorzy:
Bralewski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682230.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
emperor Constantine the Great
Constantinian shift
Late Roman Empire
Opis:
In this article, I try to answer the following question: was Constantine himself aware of the revolution that he was carrying out? Did he realise that his actions were going to change the course of the history of the Empire? An analysis of sources seems to indicate that emperor Constantine the Great saw in his reign a fundamental change not only in the history of the Imperium Romanum, but also of the entire world. He believed that this change had an eschatological dimension. Constantine’s reign, at least in its propagandist framing, was to be the turning point in the fight against evil. It appears that the ruler was fully aware that by putting an end to the persecutions of Christians he was restoring universal peace. Thus, the shift with which he is associated amounted, on the one hand, to restoring the pax Christiana and the beginning of the Kingdom of God on earth, and on the other to eliminating evil from the world. Therefore, Constantine, in believing that he had become God’s tool for fighting evil, must have also been convinced that he played an incredibly important role in God’s plan of salvation; especially since the Kingdom of God, apparently realised on earth through Constantine’s military victories, was to only finally prevail when evil and death had been defeated forever.
Źródło:
Studia Ceranea; 2019, 9; 157-169
2084-140X
2449-8378
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ceranea
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wokół soboru nicejskiego (325): na kanwie monografii autorstwa Henryka Pietrasa SJ
On the Council of Nicea (325) in the light of the monograph by Henryk Pietras SJ
Autorzy:
Bralewski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612215.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Sobór Nicejski
cesarz Konstantyn
Ariusz
arianizm
symbol wiary
donatyzm
Council of Nicaea
emperor Constantine
Arius
Arianism
symbol of faith
Donatism
Opis:
The Council convened by emperor Constantine the Great to Nicea in the year 325 still arouses keen interest of researchers around the world. Against the background of international scholarship, the achievements of Polish academics look quite modest. That is why one should especially appreciate the publication of a book (written in Polish) on the subject by Henryk Pietras, an acclaimed Polish patrologist. The monograph is noteworthy for a number of reasons and compels the reader to a thorough reflection on a cornucopia of facts that have been already discussed by numerous academics and subject to manifold interpretations. Its special merit lies first and foremost in an erudite analysis of sources conducted by the Author, which is competent enough to exhort all the interested to (at least) re-think their views. It is necessary to admit that the Academic is right, when he argues that the Council (firstly convened to Ancyra, and subsequently to Nicea) was not organized for the reason of discussing the Arian controversy. In reality, it seems that the primary reason for the meeting was the Donatist schism, which the Patrologist underestimated, and additionally the problem of reaching an agreement on a date of the Passover celebration. Certainly, the Council was not of an anti-Arian nature, but Arius was condemned by the ecclesiastic meeting as the one who rejected a laboriously reached compromise as for the form of the credo and renounced the term homoousios.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2016, 65; 75-98
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Boże zwycięstwo (ενθεοσ νικη) – „ideologia tryumfu” w Historii kościelnej Euzebiusza z Cezarei
God’s victory (ενθεοσ νικη) – „ideology of triumph” in Ecclesiastical history by Eusebius of Cesarea
Autorzy:
Bralewski, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/613809.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
„ideologia zwycięstwa”
teologia zwycięstwa
Euzebiusz z Cezarei
Historia kościelna
cesarz Konstantyn
“ideology of victory”
theology of victory
Eusebius of Caesarea
Ecclesiastical History
emperor Constantine
Opis:
“Ideology of victory” occupied a very important place in Ecclesiastical History by Eusebius of Caesarea. The victory which he described had a sacred dimension. It was God’s triumph in a war which mankind declared on God himself. Its turning point was the appearance of the Word of God, Wisdom, Jesus Christ, who taught people how to worship God the Father and who was given the power, the eternal reign of the everlasting kingdom. Together with his advent, according to Eusebius, a new Christian people came into being. Since it adopted the lifestyle and customs based on piety originating from the beginnings of mankind, it was not, in fact, a new nation. Christians fought a war against evil spirits, which were hostile to people and which hated God, my means of pure love. Christ, as God’s commander in chief, the Lord and the King, led this battle. Eusebius stated that He armed his army with piety and defeated the enemies completely. Victories achieved by Christians over the enemies of God, inspired by the evil spirit and dominated by hubris, had several dimensions: sacral-military, martyr’s and doctrinal. The first one corresponded to the Roman tradition and was connected with the choice of the divine patron, to whose power military victories were attributed. Emperor Constantine played a special role in it, as, on the one hand, he chose the Christian God to be his ally and, on the other hand, was himself chosen by God and became a God’s tool. Having defeated God’s enemies, the Emperor put an end to the war between God and mankind and eliminated all the hatred to Him from the world. From the perspective of martyrdom, Christians seemingly suffered a defeat, while their prosecutors saw the triumph of their own gods in the suffering and death of Christians. In fact, martyrs, under the sign of Christ, the great and undefeated athlete, triumphed giving their life for God, which was God’s victory. As a reward for their sacrifice they received the wonderful wreath of immortality. In the third, doctrinal dimension the truth preached by Christians triumphed over false teachings and predominated over them by virtue of their holiness and wisdom and divine and philosophical principles, on which it was based.
Źródło:
Vox Patrum; 2015, 63; 331-351
0860-9411
2719-3586
Pojawia się w:
Vox Patrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Współczesny kapłan wobec powinności świadczenia o Zmartwychwstałym na przykładzie wiersza Cesarz Konstantyn (Ksiądz Seweryn) Czesława Miłosza
The modern priest towards the duties of speaking in the arisen’s favour as exemplified by the poem ‘Constantine the Emperor (Father Seweryn)’ by Czesław Miłosz
Autorzy:
Otlewski, Sławomir ks.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/626668.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Gdański. Wydział Filologiczny
Tematy:
interpretacja wiersza Czesława Miłosza "Cesarz Konstantyn"
kapłan katolicki we współczesnym świecie
interpratation of the poem ‘Constantine the Emperor’ by Czesław Miłosz
Catholic priest in modern world
Opis:
Constantine the Emperor was the head of the religions and cults approved by the Roman Empire’s law. Thanks to him the persecutions of the Christians came to a halt (the Edict of Milan from the year 313 AD). To standardize the date of Easter and the text of the Creed in the Roman Catholic Church the Emperor convened in the year 325 AD the first in the Christianity’s history council called the First Council of Nicaea. The title character of the poem is a priest who is suffering from being torn apart due to the doubts about faith. The author of the work uses the poetical language to convey the truths of the faith. The deliberations that God calls the ‘undeserving’ Constantine to fulfil the great mission lead the subject to reflections on the destiny of us all.
Źródło:
Język - Szkoła - Religia; 2012, 7, 1; 165-172
2080-3400
Pojawia się w:
Język - Szkoła - Religia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Treatise "De Administrando Imperio" by Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus: Date of the Paris. gr. 2009 Copy, Years of Compiling of the Original Codex, and a Hypothesis about the Number of Authors
Autorzy:
Shchavelev, Aleksei
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/682310.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
„De Administrando Imperio”
Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus
emperor’s palatial library
manuscript Paris. gr. 2009
scribe Michael Roizaite
caesar John Ducas
Opis:
The article proposes a new version of the history of the famous Byzantine political treatise De Administrando Imperio. The text of this treatise was written after 952 and before November 959 personally by Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus for his eldest son Romanus II. The emperor worked in tandem with an “Anonymous Collaborator”. The text of the treatise was based on the private notes and excerpts of emperor Constantine VII and various other historical and geographical data. Such a scheme of cooperation of Constantine VII himself and a second “Anonymous Collaborator” was described in the title of Vita Basilii Imperatoris. The same mode of compiling was mentioned in Constantine VII’s private letter to Theodoros the archbishop of Cyzicus. The original codex of the treatise was kept in the emperor’s palatial library, where one of the readers made a few marginalia on its pages; one of them is dated to after 979. Between 1059 and 1073 a scribe Michael Roizaite made a copy of this text for Caesar John Ducas. Apparently, John Ducas needed it as a handbook for future emperors Michael VII and Constantine X, whom he taught together with Michael Psellos.
Źródło:
Studia Ceranea; 2019, 9; 681-704
2084-140X
2449-8378
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ceranea
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies