Temat: dopamine democracy - Katalog OPAC zbiorów

Skocz do pozycji: 1.

Tytuł:: How to Handle Humility? Audaciously: A Response to Mark Tschaepe
Autorzy:: Solymosi, Tibor
Bywater, Bill
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451557.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2019-10-31
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:: neuropragmatism
dopamine democracy
digital devices
social media
information and news
education
Opis:: We address Mark Tschaepe’s response to Tibor Solymosi, in which Tschaepe argues that neuropragmatism needs to be coupled with humility in order to redress “dopamine democracy,” Tschaepe’s term for our contemporary situation of smartphone addiction that undermines democracy. We reject Tschaepe’s distinction between humility and fallibility, arguing that audacious fallibility is all we need. We take the opportunity presented by Tschaepe’s constructive criticism of neuropragmatism to reassert some central themes of neuropragmatism. We close with discussion of Bywater’s method of apprenticeship, as an imaginative education for creative democracy, thereby rejecting Tschaepe’s claim that neuropragmatism lacks a pedagogical method.
Źródło:: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2019, 3, 3(9); 145-159
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Skocz do pozycji: 2.

Tytuł:: Affording Our Culture: “Smart” Technology and the Prospects for Creative Democracy
Autorzy:: Solymosi, Tibor
Powiązania:: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/451283.pdf
Data publikacji:: 2018-12-28
Wydawca:: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Filozofii
Tematy:: digital devices
social media
democracy
neuropragmatism
dopamine
affordances
neuroscience
Opis:: John Dewey, as Sidney Hook characterized him, was the philosopher of science and freedom. Dewey, as Larry Hickman has demonstrated, was also a philosopher of technology. And, as most people familiar with Dewey know, he was a philosopher of education and democracy. The complex of technology, science, freedom, education and democracy requires re-examination, not only because of our contemporary cultural political situation but also because of our growing insights into the human condition thanks to the technosciences of life, especially human life. Dewey’s philosophical method of reconstruction, equipped with insights from evolutionary neuroscience and ecological psychology, offers means of reconceiving and thus reevaluating our conception of tools and technology within our cultural context. I begin to take up Mark Tschaepe’s challenge to neuropragmatism to counter what he calls “dopamine democracy” – Plato’s critique of democracy resurrected in neural garb coupled with a critical examination of how social media and other so-called “smart” technologies undermine healthy democratic life. Central to this neuropragmatist approach are cultural affordances – opportunities for action humans have created initially for specific purposes and later retrofitted for other ends-in-view. Dewey’s reconstruction – as method as well as the reconstruction of technology, science, freedom, education and democracy as an entangled complex – is thus imagined as our best strategy for achieving the culture of creative democracy.
Źródło:: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture; 2018, 2, 4(6); 46-69
2544-302X
Pojawia się w:: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Dostawca treści:: Biblioteka Nauki

Artykuł

Zmień widok

na półce

Informacja

Wyszukujesz frazę "dopamine democracy" wg kryterium: Temat

Źródło danych

Dostawca treści

Kolekcja

Rok wydania

Wydawca

Temat

Autor

Typ dokumentu

Język