Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "disciplinary procedure" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Zasada skargowości w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym NIK. Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna mianowanych kontrolerów
    Principle of Complaint in the NIK Disciplinary Procedure. Disciplinary Liability of Nominated Auditors
    Autorzy:
    Róg, Łukasz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/417140.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-08
    Wydawca:
    Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
    Tematy:
    principle of complaint
    disciplinary procedure
    disciplinary liability
    niminated auditors
    disciplinary commission
    Opis:
    Due to the amendments to the Act on the Supreme Audit Office of 23 December 1994, apart from the fundamental change of the audit procedure, chapter 4a was added that set out basic regulations related to the disciplinary procedure. While with regard to issues that are not regulated in the Act on NIK, it refers to respective application of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The disciplinary procedure related to nominated auditors of NIK has been discussed in various studies, but none of them has referred to the contents of the complaints principle on the basis of the Act on NIK. In his article, the author presents his views on the contents and consequences of the complaints principle in the disciplinary procedure with regard to nominated auditors, which is of vital importance in the judicature practice of the Disciplinary Commission and the Appeal Disciplinary Commission at NIK.
    Źródło:
    Kontrola Państwowa; 2016, 61, 4 (369); 22-32
    0452-5027
    Pojawia się w:
    Kontrola Państwowa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zasada bezpośredniości w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym w NIK – gwarancja rzetelnego postępowania i sprawiedliwego procesu
    Principle of Directness in the NIK’s Disciplinary Procedure – A Guarantee of Due Procedure and Just Trial
    Autorzy:
    Padrak, Rała
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/416931.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2015-10
    Wydawca:
    Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
    Tematy:
    Supreme Audit Office
    Disciplinary responsibility
    disciplinary procedure
    Opis:
    As a result of the amendments to the Act of the 23rd December 1994 on the Supreme Audit Office introduced in 2011, the NIK’s disciplinary procedure has been regulated directly by the Act on NIK. Chapter 4a of the Act “Disciplinary responsibility of nominated auditors” regulates the types of wrongdoing and disciplinary punishment, as well as the basic issues related to the process of starting and conducting the disciplinary procedure. The legislator, however, has not decided to regulate the disciplinary procedure in an exhaustive manner in the Act on NIK, whose Article 97p refers to the relevant regulations of the Code of Criminal Procedure in cases that have not been regulated in the Act on NIK. The article attempts to present the principle of directness in the disciplinary procedure at the Supreme Audit Office and to discuss situations in which it is possible to refrain from this principle.
    Źródło:
    Kontrola Państwowa; 2015, 60, 5 (364); 57-69
    0452-5027
    Pojawia się w:
    Kontrola Państwowa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Zakaz reformationis in peius w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym NIK – procedury stosowane wobec mianowanych kontrolerów
    The Reformationis in Peius in the NIK Disciplinary Procedure – Proceedings Applied to Nominated Auditors
    Autorzy:
    Padrak, Rafał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/416445.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-02
    Wydawca:
    Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
    Tematy:
    disciplinary procedure
    reformationis in peius prohibition
    right to defence
    Supreme Audit Office
    trial guarantee of the accused
    Opis:
    In criminal proceedings, this prohibition is to ensure that a decision from a court of appeal is not amended to a worse one, if the ruling is in favour of the accused. The European Court of Human Rights is for respecting the reformationis in peius prohibition, and for not toughening the ruling by the appeal court. The Constitutional Tribunal has emphasised many times that “Due to the fact that the right to defence is ingrained in the constitutional principle of the democratic state of law, it relates not only to criminal proceedings, but also to other proceedings taking place in the area of responsibility that is of repressive nature”. Hence, the right to defence applies to those subject to disciplinary proceedings at NIK as well. In his article, the author discusses the regulations that allow for using the reformationis in peius prohibition in these proceedings.
    Źródło:
    Kontrola Państwowa; 2018, 63, 1 (378); 24-40
    0452-5027
    Pojawia się w:
    Kontrola Państwowa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Przebieg rozprawy odwoławczej – postępowanie dyscyplinarne w Najwyższej Izby Kontroli
    The Course of Appeal Trial – Disciplinary Proceedings in the Supreme Audit Office
    Autorzy:
    Padrak, Rafał
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/416388.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-10
    Wydawca:
    Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
    Tematy:
    disciplinary proceedings
    appeal procedure
    adjudicating trial
    Supreme Audit Office
    senior auditors
    Opis:
    In the Act of 23rd December 1994 on the Supreme Audit Office, the appeal procedure has been regulated in a very general way, in the chapter entitled Disciplinary Liability of Appointed Auditors. With regard to the manner and course of the procedure, it has been stated that the adjudication team of the Disciplinary Committee for Appeals makes a ruling after the case has been heard. The Act on NIK does not contain provisions that would regulate the course of the adjudicating trial, but it rather refers to appropriate application of other regulations. In his article, the author discusses the stages of the appeal trial: initial proceedings, the disciplinary procedure, opinions of the parties. The article also presents the regulations related to a break and adjournment of the appeal trial applied in the disciplinary procedure at NIK.
    Źródło:
    Kontrola Państwowa; 2016, 61, 5 (370); 45-62
    0452-5027
    Pojawia się w:
    Kontrola Państwowa
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies