Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "disciplinary liability" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 35
Tytuł:
Disciplinary liability: the content, principles and types
Autorzy:
Sereda, Valeriy Vyacheslavovych
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1861796.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
Tematy:
administrative liability
disciplinary liability
disciplinary offence
disciplinary penalty
Opis:
The author suggests to consider disciplinary liability as generic notion, and general and special disciplinary liability can be considered as specific notions. It is stressed that all these types of liability should be based on the principles of legality, validity, expediency, justice, proportionality, inevitability with the mandatory securing the rate of its occurrence and the observance of the presumption of suspect’s innocence.
Źródło:
Security Dimensions; 2014, 12(12); 164-168
2353-7000
Pojawia się w:
Security Dimensions
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie pociągnięcia do odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej posła będącego jednocześnie adwokatem
Legal opinion on the disciplinary responsibility of a D eputy who is also an advocate
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11542848.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
advocate
disciplinary liability
Deputy
Opis:
The author claims that the Deputy who is also an advocate may be subject to professional disciplinary responsibility for actions that are not inherent in the exercise of the mandate, including public appearances on radio and TV, press releases and websites. They state that the Principles of Ethical Conduct and the Dignity of the Profession of the Bar do not limit freedom of expression parliamentarian and does not impose a restriction of powers and the duty of parliament to come into contact with electorate.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 2(42); 220-228
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jawność postępowań dyscyplinarnych
The Openness of Disciplinary Proceedings
Autorzy:
Korzeniewska-Lasota, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/512452.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne Adalbertinum
Tematy:
disciplinary proceedings
disciplinary liability
open proceedings
Opis:
The principle of open proceedings is a guarantee of reliable judicial process. The considerations aim at answering the question whether this principle of open proceedings is applicable to discipli-nary trials. Starting by a short characteristic of the specificity of disciplinary proceedings, the authoress passes to justifying a need of the applicability of the principle of open proceedings into all the models of disciplinary liability in order to ensure the procedural fairness and constitutional identity for the accused.
Źródło:
Studia Ełckie; 2012, 14; 511-524
1896-6896
2353-1274
Pojawia się w:
Studia Ełckie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Disciplinary and Criminal Liability of Judges in Poland. A Criminalistics Study of Cases of Disciplinary and Criminal Liability of Judges in the Years 2010–2018
Autorzy:
Hrehorowicz, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1831424.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
disciplinary liability
criminal liability
judges
legal ethics
Opis:
The article presents basic findings about the disciplinary and criminal liability of common courts judges in Poland. These findings are presented from a criminalistics perspective. The article provides data on the following issues: the basics of the disciplinary and criminal liability of judges, the number of disciplinary cases of judges in the years 2010–2018 and the number of criminal cases of judges in the years 2001–2017, categories of the disciplinary violations and crimes committed, decisions taken in cases of disciplinary violations, and imposed penalties. The article is based on an examination of Supreme Court verdicts issued in disciplinary cases of judges and data provided by the Ministry of Justice
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2020, 11; 293-320
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jakie przepisy procesowe należy stosować w postępowaniu prowadzonym na podstawie art. 33 ust. 6 ustawy Prawo łowieckie
What kind of procedural rules should be used in the proceedings based on Article 33 Sec. 6 of Hunting Law
Autorzy:
Kościelniak-Marszał, Miłosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/697727.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Opolski
Tematy:
hunting law
Polish hunting association
disciplinary liability
Opis:
Under art. 33 it. 6 of Hunting law cases of different nature are heard before a regional court. It is the subject matter of specific proceedings that is decisive in determining which procedural regulations will apply as the above provision refers to different legal relations. The first one refers to the membership in the Polish Hunting Association, which is granted in a way that allows us to recognize it as a civil law occurrence, and therefore the request before a common court for the protection of the membership may be considered a civil action. The second one is related to disciplinary liability which due to repressive nature of sanctions falls within penal liability in its broad sense. In this case, the proceedings before a common court exercised as a result of making an appeal against the decision ending disciplinary proceedings within the structures of the Polish Hunting Association constitute continuation of the disciplinary procedure. The nature of this liability calls for the court appeal control to be conducted on the basis of the same rules pertaining to the law of criminal procedure, on which disciplinary proceedings within the organization were based, and for the procedure ensuring the defendant as far-reaching proceedings security as possible to be applied.
Źródło:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne; 2017, 15, 3; 77-86
2658-1922
Pojawia się w:
Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pojęcie i cechy charakterystyczne odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej w prawie polskim
Autorzy:
Ceglarska-Piłat, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1788190.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna
postępowanie dyscyplinarne
odpowiedzialność zawodowa
disciplinary liability
professional liability
disciplinary proceedings
Opis:
However for last 40 years disciplinary liability was generally out of scope of doctrine, recently it is noted constant increase of interest of that part of law. There are many reasons for that, including involving new professional groups and respective strictness and inconsistence of disciplinary provisions. The latter is aggravated by heterogenicity in various corporations and governing by substatutory regulations. Unfortunatelly, an unification of criminal law, being applied mutatis mutandi, is only partial remedy. In that elaboration author analyzed regulations between various corporations to extract basic and common rules and to denominate differences. The complexity augments fact that not only acts have binding effect, but also delegated regulations. That creates sophisticated network of law and professional knowledge, with additional problem of overlapping lex generalis and lex specialis in uncommon proportion. Above mentioned differences concern not only substantive law but also, if not even wider, procedural one. Interestingly, what author depicts, there is even not identical wording used in description of analogical names or definitions. Disciplinary liability, as cumulative to the criminal one, tends to protecting rights of accused person, as generally rule ne bis in idem is not in force. It concerns basic rights, like dignity and equality under the law. It is necessary strict cooperation and open discussion between professionals and legislator, as proper disciplinary liability rules need both protect society and allow to realize freely duties of practitioners.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze; 2015, 2 (202); 99-139
0039-3312
2719-4302
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zasada skargowości w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym NIK. Odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna mianowanych kontrolerów
Principle of Complaint in the NIK Disciplinary Procedure. Disciplinary Liability of Nominated Auditors
Autorzy:
Róg, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/417140.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-08
Wydawca:
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli
Tematy:
principle of complaint
disciplinary procedure
disciplinary liability
niminated auditors
disciplinary commission
Opis:
Due to the amendments to the Act on the Supreme Audit Office of 23 December 1994, apart from the fundamental change of the audit procedure, chapter 4a was added that set out basic regulations related to the disciplinary procedure. While with regard to issues that are not regulated in the Act on NIK, it refers to respective application of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The disciplinary procedure related to nominated auditors of NIK has been discussed in various studies, but none of them has referred to the contents of the complaints principle on the basis of the Act on NIK. In his article, the author presents his views on the contents and consequences of the complaints principle in the disciplinary procedure with regard to nominated auditors, which is of vital importance in the judicature practice of the Disciplinary Commission and the Appeal Disciplinary Commission at NIK.
Źródło:
Kontrola Państwowa; 2016, 61, 4 (369); 22-32
0452-5027
Pojawia się w:
Kontrola Państwowa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontratyp aksjologiczny z art. 275 ust. 1a ustawy – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce jako przejaw patologii legislacyjnej w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym wobec nauczycieli akademickich
Exclusion of disciplinary liability under Article 275 section 1a Act of 20 July 2018 The Law on Higher Education and Science – as a manifestation of legislative pathology in disciplinary proceedings against academic teachers
Autorzy:
Czarnecki, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27316317.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
wyłączenie odpowiedzialności
prawo dyscyplinarne
nauczyciel akademicki
odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarna
uczelnia wyższa
exclusion of disciplinary liability
disciplinary law
academic teacher
disciplinary liability
university
Opis:
Przedmiotem artykułu jest rozwiązanie legislacyjne przewidziane w art. 275 ust. 1a ustawy z 20 lipca 2018 r. – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce o treści: „Nie stanowi przewinienia dyscyplinarnego wyrażanie przekonań religijnych, światopoglądowych lub filozoficznych”, które wprowadzono w dniu 10 grudnia 2021 r. Autor omawia okoliczności towarzyszące wprowadzeniu tej regulacji wobec nauczycieli akademickich, a następnie prezentuje cel jej wprowadzenia, zarówno krytykując nieprecyzyjne przesłanki zastosowania tego rozwiązania legislacyjnego, jak i omawiając praktyczne problemy proceduralne stosowania wskazanego przepisu. Natomiast w konkluzjach domaga się uchylenia wprowadzonego przepisu. Autor krytykuje nowe rozwiązanie, gdyż pozwala ono wyłączyć odpowiedzialność dyscyplinarną nauczycieli akademickich, a w końcowej części swoje rozważania ilustruje danymi statystycznymi na temat stosowania art. 275 ust. 1a omawianej ustawy.
The main subject of consideration in the article is the legislative solution provided for in Art. 275 sec. 1a of the Act of July 20, 2018. Law on Higher Education and Science with the following content: “It is not a disciplinary offense to express religious, ideological or philosophical beliefs”, which was introduced on December 10, 2021. The author exhaustively discusses the essence and axiology of disciplinary proceedings against academic teachers, and then presents the purpose of introducing the indicated regulation, criticizing both the imprecise premises for the application of this legislative solution, as well as discussing practical procedural problems, in the conclusions demanding the repeal of the introduced provision. The new provision may in practice drastically limit the disciplinary liability of academic teachers, and in the final part it illustrates its considerations with statistical data on the application of Art. 275 sec. 1a of the Act in question.
Źródło:
Forum Polityki Kryminalnej; 2023, 2(6); 1-30
2720-1589
Pojawia się w:
Forum Polityki Kryminalnej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mediacja w postępowaniu dyscyplinarnym prowadzonym wobec członków społeczności akademickiej
Mediation in Disciplinary Proceedings Against Members of the Academic Community
Autorzy:
Bek, Dominika
Sitarz, Olga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518798.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
Tematy:
restorative justice
mediation
disciplinary liability
academic teacher
student
Opis:
This article considers mediation in disciplinary matters against academic teachers, PhD students and students. The analysis was carried out against the background of the new Act of 20 July 2018 – Law on Higher Education and Science and the Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of September 25, 2018 on the detailed mode of conducting mediation, explanatory proceedings and disci- plinary proceedings in matters of disciplinary liability of academic teachers, and also the way of disciplinary penalties and their seizure. In the first part of the ar- ticle, through the confrontation of the function and the importance of disciplinary responsibility with the functions of mediation proceedings, the legitimacy of the adopted legislative solutions in this area was assessed – introduction of media- tion to disciplinary proceedings against academic teachers and the lack of such a solution in the case of disciplinary liability of students and doctoral students. Then, there is a detailed analysis of the provisions relating to the mediation pro- ceedings allowed for the display of noticed errors and defects in legal regulations.
Źródło:
Forum Prawnicze; 2018, 5 (49); 34-49
2081-688X
Pojawia się w:
Forum Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza członków organów dyscyplinarnych jako przesłanka objęcia ich obowiązkowym ubezpieczeniem odpowiedzialności cywilnej. Uwagi na tle projektu ustawy Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce
Liability for damages of members of disciplinary bodies as a prerequisite for their compulsory coverage by a third party liability insurance. Comments in the context of the draft Act on Higher Education and Science
Autorzy:
Nizioł, Krystyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/927554.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-06-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
higher education
disciplinary liability
compulsory third party lia bility insurance
Opis:
Members of disciplinary bodies (disciplinary ombudsmen and members of disci plinary commissions) are at risk of being held liable for compensatory damages arising in connection with their duties (i.e. for procedural failures in disciplinary proceedings). The lack of regulations concerning the liability for compensation by the members of disciplinary bodies is also a factor which is unfavourable for those who suffered damage as a result of disciplinary proceedings. As can be seen from the resolution of the Supreme Court of 27 September 2012 analysed in this study, for procedural violations committed in the course of discipli nary proceedings, members of disciplinary bodies are personally liable, jointly and severally with the higher education institution in which they are employed. The conclusions of the analysis of the case law therefore also point to the need to address this problem in a systematic manner. This objective has been partially achieved in the draft of the new Act on Higher Education and Science, which includes for the first time a provision on the optional coverage of members of disciplinary bodies with a third party liability insurance. Nevertheless, it could be argued that this regulation ought to be improved by introducing a compulsory third party liability insurance of members of disciplinary bodies, specifying, preferably in the imple- menting regulation, the minimum amount guaranteed, and elements such as the scope of the third party insurance and the date of commencement of the insurance cover (e.g. the day preceding the commencement of the function of disciplinary ombudsman or member of a disciplinary committee). Such a solution is supported by the analysis of regulations concerning obligatory third party insurance applica- ble to selected professions which has been carried out in the present study. In the case of these professions, the solution that was applied is the one that clarifies the regulations related to the obligatory third party insurance covering the performance of these professions.
Źródło:
Studia Prawa Publicznego; 2018, 2 (22); 9-27
2300-3936
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawa Publicznego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 35

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies