Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "degressive proportionality" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
The allocation of seats in the European Parliament and the principle of degressive proportionality
Autorzy:
Peternek, Piotr
Kośny, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/584967.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
European Parliament
degressive proportionality
optimization
Opis:
One of the key issues in the process of preparing for an election to the European Parliament is to determine the number of seats for each country. The Treaty of Lisbon, signed by Member States of the European Union, has obliged the European Parliament to establish rules guaranteeing that the distribution of seats should be done according to, inter alia, the principle of degressive proportionality. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the principle of degressive proportionality is actually implemented, and to propose a compromise – a mathematical solution, guaranteeing that the distribution of seats is consistent with the requirements of the Lisbon Treaty.
Źródło:
Mathematical Economics; 2015, 11(18); 99-113
1733-9707
Pojawia się w:
Mathematical Economics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Degressive proportionality – notes on the ambiguity of the concept
Autorzy:
Dniestrzański, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/584986.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
degressive proportionality
apportionment problem
European Parliament
Opis:
This article discusses the problem of the definition of degressive proportionality. This term is used in many areas of economics but its meaning is not standardized. It is understood differently when related to tax issues compared to distribution of seats in the European Parliament. The differences are small but significant. The article provides and analyzes the different meanings of the concept of degressive proportionality and proposes to introduce two new concepts – concave degressive proportionality and convex degressive proportionality.
Źródło:
Mathematical Economics; 2013, 9 (16); 21-28
1733-9707
Pojawia się w:
Mathematical Economics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Disproportions in proportional distributions
Autorzy:
Misztal, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/585026.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
electoral threshold
degressive proportionality
over-representation
proportionality
Opis:
In the case of degressive proportionality, a large over-representation of small countries is a deliberate concession of larger countries to ensure that less populated states are adequately represented (the principle of European solidarity). It is worth emphasizing how important is the role played by election thresholds, which prevent excessive fragmentation of the parliament. Thus, they act as a stabilizing factor in the political scene, which in Polish conditions cannot be overestimated. A weakness of the thresholds is the fact that they distort the proportionality of the results and cause over-representation of certain parties. In extreme cases they can lead to the dictatorship of one party even if it is provided with low popularl support.
Źródło:
Mathematical Economics; 2013, 9 (16); 89-104
1733-9707
Pojawia się w:
Mathematical Economics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sprawiedliwość podziału degresywnie proporcjonalnego
Autorzy:
Łyko, Janusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/434716.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
degressive proportionality
fair division
European Parliament
elections
Opis:
The principle of degressively proportional distribution of seats in the European Parliament has been legally sanctioned under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty. Thus there appeared a solution which defied the perception of justice of distribution according to culturally shaped proportional allocation rules. Previous methods of determining the composition of collegiate bodies generally used the rule of proportional to the population of each constituency, composition of the legal body representing the society. On this basis, there are many socially accepted methods which have been tried and tested. In the field of electoral law regulations the rule of degressive proportionality is a new solution, and as such it still lacks tradition and already shaped approval that may justify its use. This article aims to find justification for this solution as opposed to the socially accep- table methods of distribution of goods and debts. In order to arrive at this argument the article reaches back to Aristotle’s philosophical concept, as well as solutions taken from the Talmud. It turns out that the degressive proportionality falls within the accepted concepts of equitable distribution. It offers an intermediate solution between equal and proportional allocation. There are also legitimate reasons for the use of degressively proportional rule in the process of allocating seats in the European Parliament. The problem is only the lack of unambiguity of the rule and the lack of precise reasoning to determine the boundary conditions at the level set in the Lisbon Treaty. This creates a very high degree of freedom of interpretation, leaving room for political negotiations on the acceptance of specific proposals. This situation has led to the point that, since the legal acceptance of the principle of degressive proportionality, the rule has not been applied in practice. Proposals for the composition of the European Parliament presented at the beginning of 2013 for the term 2014-2019 indicate that over the next five years exceptions to this rule will be approved. The second part of the paper presents proposals on solving the problem that can be found in the literature, as well as two other directions for seeking fair allocation. They cannot be deprived of discretion, as, of course, it is not possible to obtain conclusive decisions without the introduction of additional postulates. These postulates aim at clarifying the determination of the boundary conditions in such a way as to reduce the number of possible solutions or introduce an additional rule that will allow for an unambiguous (for a given population) specification of composition of the European Parliament. This is possible thanks to, inter alia, the ability to generate all feasible solutions. In this situation the solution of the problem is to select one out of a finite number of known divisions according to an established criterion. This frees the process of selecting the composition of the European Parliament from political considerations, and moves the weight of the debate to the ground of determining the said additional criterion. The current problem concerning the distribution of seats in the European Parliament is of course more general. The conditions that caused sanctioning of such a solution are of economic and social origin. It is expected that in the future the number of problems associated with allocation of goods, that are solved in this way, will be greater than they are currently. Undoubtedly, inequalities in various aspects of social existence favor the issue.
Źródło:
Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu; 2013, 2 (23); 180-189
2080-5977
Pojawia się w:
Ekonomia - Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wroclawiu
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Axiomatization of divisor methods and weakly degressive proportionality
Autorzy:
Dniestrzański, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/421295.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
degressive proportionality
fair division
axiomatization of divisor methods
Opis:
The paper analyzes the differences between weakly degressive proportionality and proportional allocations represented by divisor methods. The analysis is accomplished by the axiomatization of divisor methods in line with Balinski and Young.
Źródło:
Didactics of Mathematics; 2017, 14(18); 19-26
1733-7941
Pojawia się w:
Didactics of Mathematics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Progresywna proporcjonalność jako cecha systemu wyborczego
Autorzy:
Haman, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1198604.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
proportionality
degressive proportionality
progressive proportionality
electoral system
proporcjonalność
degresywna proporcjonalność
progresywna proporcjonalność
system wyborczy
Opis:
Systemy proporcjonalnego podziału mandatów między partie, na podstawie wyników wyborów, a przed wyborami między okręgi wyborcze na podstawie danych demograficznych, oceniane są zwykle ze względu na zgodność ostatecznych podziałów z kryterium proporcjonalności. W pewnych sytuacjach odejście od prostej proporcjonalności w kierunku proporcjonalności degresywnej lub progresywnej jest jednak celowe i nie powinno być traktowane w kategoriach błędu. Kwestia ta była już analizowana w odniesieniu do degresywnie proporcjonalnego podziału mandatów, przede wszystkim w kontekście podziału mandatów między delegacje narodowe w Parlamencie Europejskim. W tym artykule koncentruję się natomiast na kwestii proporcjonalności progresywnej podziału mandatów między partie i proponuję sposób mierzenia siły progresji podziału. Nową miarę stosuję do opisu systemów wyborczych w krajach europejskich, a także do oceny wpływu wielkości okręgu wyborczego oraz zastosowanej metody podziału proporcjonalnego (metoda d’Hondta lub Sainte-Laguë) na progresję podziału mandatów, a więc na to, na ile dany system przy podziale mandatów premiuje partie duże.
Systems of proportional division of seats between parties, based on the results of the election, and between constituencies on the basis of demographic data, are usually judged on the basis of the compatibility of the final divisions with the criterion of proportionality. In certain situations, moving away from a straightforward proportionality towards degressive or progressive proportionality is intentional and should not be considered as a form of error. This issue has already been analyzed with regard to the degressively proportional distribution of seats, primarily in the context of the distribution of seats between the national delegations in the European Parliament. In this paper, however, I focus on the question of the progressive proportionality of division of seats between parties and propose a tool for measuring the strength of progressivity of division. I use the new measure to describe electoral systems in European countries, as well as to assess the impact of the size of the constituency and the apportionment method used (d'Hondt or Sainte-Laguë) on the progressivity of the distribution of seats.
Źródło:
Decyzje; 2017, 27; 69-88
1733-0092
2391-761X
Pojawia się w:
Decyzje
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies