Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "criminal court" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 113
Tytuł:
Book review: Patrycja Grzebyk, Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression (Routledge Research in International Law), Routledge, 2013, pp. 394
Autorzy:
Karolina, Wierczyńska
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706903.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
book review, International Criminal Court, ICC, agression, criminal responsibility
Opis:
Book review of Patrycja Grzebyk, Criminal Responsibility for the Crime of Aggression (Routledge Research in International Law), Routledge, 2013.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2013, 33; 382-285
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przegląd orzeczeń i decyzji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego (czerwiec – grudzień 2018 r.)
Review of case of law of the International Criminal Court
Autorzy:
Gacka, Patryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498791.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Tematy:
International Criminal Court
transgenerational harm
international jurisdiction
Opis:
This is a review of cases of the International Criminal Court. The first part contains introductory information about the ICC, its organization and cognition. The ICC’s case law from 2018 was reviewed, including the following cases: The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, Decision on the Matter of the Transgenerational Harm Alleged by Some Applicants for Reparations Remanded by the Appeals Chamber in its Judgment of 8 March 2018 (ICC-01/04-01/07) of 19 July 2018 and Request under regulation 46(3) of the Regulations of the Court, Decision on the „Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) of the Statute (ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18) of 6 September 2018 r.”
Źródło:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda; 2018, 1, 1-2; 123-129
2657-7984
2657-800X
Pojawia się w:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odpowiedzialność osób zarządzających w transnarodowych korporacjach w prawie karnym – aspekty międzynarodowe i transnarodowe
Liability of Directors of Transnational Corporations under Criminal Law in the International and Transnational Context
Autorzy:
Boczek, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782397.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
transnational corporation
International Criminal Court
contribution
international accountability
Opis:
Owing to increasing globalisation, transnational corporations play an important role in international trade. Those wealthy and very complex entities have a major impact on reality and often engage in activities which involve illegal practices such as the environmental pollution, forced labour and other serious infringement of employees’ right or even crimes against humanity. Carrying on business which is primarily profit-oriented may result in violations of fundamental human rights, if this is required for a corporation to financially exploit a business opportunity. It is difficult in practice to hold these entities and their corporate directors to account. Regulations regarding criminal responsibility of managers of transnational corporations can be found in national and international laws. However, criminal proceedings do not give satisfactory results. The main problem lies in powers, flexibility and close links of those corporations with local authorities. The paper points to different solutions applied throughout the world, and describes the best-known criminal proceedings against corporate managers.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Karnego; 2020, 30, 4; 75-96
0208-5577
2353-9712
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przegląd orzeczeń i decyzji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego
Review of case law of the International Criminal Court
Autorzy:
Gacka, Patryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498879.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Tematy:
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny
uniewinnienia
International Criminal Court
acquittals
Opis:
This is a review of cases of the International Criminal Court relating to one specific legal issue, namely an acquittal of the accused as well as previously convicted persons. To this end, two specific cases of The Prosecutor v. Jean Pierre-Bemba and The Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo and Charles Blé Goudé have been discussed.
Źródło:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda; 2019, 2, 1(3); 73-77
2657-7984
2657-800X
Pojawia się w:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The scope and importance of cooperation between UNESCO and the ICC for the protection of cultural property
Autorzy:
Czepek, Vita
Karska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/48549176.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-06-22
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
International Criminal Court
UNESCO
protection of cultural property
international crimes
Opis:
Intentional destruction and theft of cultural property during armed conflicts are now prohibited by international law. In line with international regulations, deliberate attacks against cultural property, both during international and non-international armed conflicts, may constitute serious violations of the norms of humanitarian law and their perpetrators should be tried and penalized. At the international level, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is the most appropriate body to take action to protect cultural property during armed conflicts. The International Criminal Court (ICC), on the other hand, has the jurisdiction to prosecute and penalize perpetrators of crimes against cultural property, classified as war crimes. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to answer the question of the extent to which the cooperation between the ICC and UNESCO may affect the protection of cultural property during armed conflicts. In order to answer this question, analysis was performed of the scope of the protection of cultural property by the ICC and UNESCO, as well as of the legal basis for cooperation between these institutions.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2022, 95; 74-94
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Problems surrounding arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court: a decade of judicial practice
Autorzy:
Dłubak, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706952.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
international law
international criminal law
international criminal justice
International Criminal Court
ICC
arrest warrant
Opis:
Certain aims of international criminal justice, such as prosecution and the punishment of perpetrators of international crimes, can be achieved through the international institutions created to administer justice. However, one of the essential requirements is to ensure the suspect’s presence at trial. The measures provided for in the Rome Statute to facilitate the International Criminal Court in fulfilling this condition and initiating proper proceedings include the issuance of arrest warrants and subsequent requests for arrest and surrender. Although a binding legal obligation exists under the Rome Statute with respect to States Parties, nonetheless inter-state cooperation has proven extremely difficult to obtain. There are many reasons for this, however problems of a legal and political nature are identified as the two main areas of obstacles. There are some measures that can be taken in order to prevent the occurrence of problems relating to arrest warrants. The Office of the Prosecutor and the Pre-Trial Chambers have certain powers that can positively affect the execution of arrest warrants. These organs aim to establish a positive cooperation network, both with the States Parties and non-Party States. By using the powers of external bodies, the ICC may attempt to establish favourable circumstances which would increase the effectiveness of arrest warrants.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 209-237
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selection of Defendants before the ICC: Between the Principle of Opportunism and Legalism
Autorzy:
Kuczyńska, Hanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706913.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-25
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
ICC
International Criminal Court
principle of legalism
principle of opportunism
Prosecutor
Opis:
International criminal tribunals had to make a choice between the principles of opportunism and legalism or decide to use a mixture of these both. They had to decide whether a prosecutor should become “the minister of justice” (as in the principle of legalism) or “the first judge” (evaluating in the frames of principle of opportunism the reasonable basis for prosecuting). This article addresses prosecutorial discretion before the ICC with respect to selecting defendants. Firstly, it analyzes the main differences between opportunism and legalism of prosecution. It also presents models of accusation functioning before the historical and existing international criminal tribunals – which usually opted for opportunism of prosecution. Before the ICC the conditions on which the Prosecutor may initiate an investigation are set in Art. 53(1) of the Statute: “The Prosecutor shall, having evaluated the information made available to him or her, initiate an investigation unless he or she determines that there is no reasonable basis to proceed under this Statute.” It is interesting to observe that this phrase may be interpreted in many various ways, depending on the model of accusation the author belongs to: those coming from the Anglo-Saxon tradition have tendency to search for elements of opportunism; those from civil law states assume that the model of accusation operates according to the principle of legalism. There is also a number of mixed options presented, according to which the ICC operates according to a mixture of these two principles. Finally, the article presents different rules adopted by the ICC Prosecutor (or proposed), which govern the choice of the defendants.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2014, 34; 187-224
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Lubanga Reparations Decision: A Missed Opportunity?
Autorzy:
Swart, Mia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706877.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
Lubanga
International Criminal Court
ICC
international law
international criminal law
reparations
war crime
justice
Opis:
In March 2012 the ICC delivered its first and long-awaited judgment in Prosecutor v Lubanga. Trial Chamber I found Thomas Lubanga guilty as co-perpetrator of the war crimes of conscripting and enlisting children into the armed forces. The guilty verdict was followed by a reparations decision on 7 August 2012. This article examines the extent to which the ICC has successfully fulfilled its mandate to formulate reparations principles. The position of reparations within international law generally is discussed. This is followed by an explanation of how the ICC reparation regime functions. The bifurcated reparations mandate of the ICC is also explained. The focus of the article is on a critical assessment of the Lubanga reparations decision. The Court’s treatment of the harm requirement and the requirement of causation is examined. It is argued that the Court’s failure to clarify the requirements of “harm” and “causation” meant that it did not fulfil its mandate to formulate reparations principles.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2012, 32; 169-188
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The crime of genocide and crimes against humanity in light of the current regulation of the rome statute
Autorzy:
Krysiak, Anna Róża
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2170324.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Fundacja Instytut Nauki o Polityce
Tematy:
crime of genocide
crimes against humanity
Rome Statute
International Criminal Court
Opis:
The purpose of this paper is to analyse the current conceptual scope of the crime of genocide against the background of the evolving interpretation of the rovisions of the Rome Statute, as well as attempt to formulate de lege ferenda conclusions for considering future legislative changes in light of the weaknesses of the current regulation.
Źródło:
Polish Journal of Political Science; 2020, 6, 3; 44-61
2391-3991
Pojawia się w:
Polish Journal of Political Science
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przegląd orzeczeń i decyzji Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego (grudzień 2019 r. – marzec 2020 r.)
Review of case of law of the International Criminal Court (December 2019 - March 2020)
Autorzy:
Gacka, Patryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/498891.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Fundacja im. Aliny i Leszka Allerhandów
Tematy:
Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny
Afganistan
amnestia
karygodność
International Criminal Court
Afghanistan
amnesty
gravity
Opis:
W przeglądzie orzeczeń MTK od grudnia 2019 r. do marca 2020 r. omówieniu poddano trzy decyzje Izby Odwoławczej MTK. Pierwsza z nich odnosi się do szczególnie spornej autoryzacji postępowania przygotowawczego w sytuacji Afganistanu. Następne dwie dotyczą zaś kolejno spraw Al Hassana („karygodność zbrodni” w zw. z art. 17 SMTK) oraz Saifa Gaddafiego (wyrok sądu krajowego, amnestia a dopuszczalność postępowania przed MTK.
In the review of case law of the International Criminal Court from December 2019 to March 2020, three decisions of the ICC Appeals Chamber are being examined. The first one refers to a particularly disputable issue of the authorization of an investigation in the situation of Afghanistan. The next two concern the case of Al Hassan (“gravity of crime” criterion in art. 17 ICCSt.) and the case of Saif Gaddafi (judgment of a domestic court, amnesty versus case admissibility before the ICC).
Źródło:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda; 2020, 3, 1(5); 141-153
2657-7984
2657-800X
Pojawia się w:
Głos Prawa. Przegląd Prawniczy Allerhanda
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 113

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies