Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "contact dermatitis" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19
Tytuł:
A Survey of Work-Related Skin Diseases in Different Occupations in Poland
Autorzy:
Kurpiewska, J.
Liwkowicz, J.
Benczek, K.
Padlewska, K.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/90443.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy
Tematy:
occupational skin diseases
contact dermatitis
prevalence of contact dermatitis
Opis:
Occupational skin disorders, in particular inflammations, dryness and erythema, in 80% of cases affect the skin of hands. The most frequent diagnosis, in over 90% of cases of occupational skin diseases, points to an irritant or allergic contact dermatitis. Our aim was to study the prevalence of self-reported skin symptoms on hands and forearms in different populations. The study was conducted on 581 healthcare workers, 61 hair stylists, 149 beauticians, 90 food services workers, 90 cleaners, 181 metal factory workers and 69 textile workers. Healthcare workers had greatest exposure. Eighty-six percent of dentists, 67% of midwives, 51% of nurses and 41% of physicians reported skin disorders. Problems with latex gloves were declared by 30% of healthcare workers. Thirty-four percent of food services workers, 24% of textile workers, 30% of metal factory workers, 21% of hair stylists and beauticians, and 64% of cleaners reported skin manifestations during the time of employment, which they thought could be work-related.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics; 2011, 17, 2; 207-214
1080-3548
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Occupational exposure to propranolol: A rarely recognised cause of allergic contact dermatitis
Autorzy:
Ali, Faisal R.
Shackleton, David B.
Kingston, Timothy P.
Williams, Jason D.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2177357.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-05-13
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
allergic contact dermatitis
occupational contact dermatitis
propranolol
beta blocker
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2015, 28, 3; 639-640
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Direct and airborne contact dermatitis in a beekeeper from the Małopolska region
Autorzy:
Basista, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2180078.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-09-01
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
allergic contact dermatitis
propolis
beekeepers
occupational diseases
occupational allergy
airborne contact dermatitis
Opis:
The paper describes an atypical case of simultaneous airborne and direct contact dermatitis in a beekeeper from the Małopolska region. This is the third such case described in a beekeeper in the world and the fi rst in Poland. I suggest that propolis should be regarded as both a direct and airborne contact allergen in beekeepers.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2012, 25, 4; 499-500
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola środków ochrony skóry w profilaktyce zawodowego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry
Skin protection measures in prevention of occupational irritant contact dermatitis
Autorzy:
Kurpiewska, J.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/142570.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Stowarzyszenie Inżynierów i Techników Przemysłu Chemicznego. Zakład Wydawniczy CHEMPRESS-SITPChem
Tematy:
kontaktowe zapalenie skóry
środki ochrony skóry
krem barierowy
contact dermatitis
barrier creams
occupational contact dermatitis
Opis:
Kontaktowe zapalenie skóry stanowi 70% do 95% zgłaszanych przypadków chorób skóry i jest spowodowane kontaktem z czynnikiem drażniącym i/lub alergizującym w miejscu pracy lub w domu. Problem ten można ograniczyć lub zminimalizować przez stosowanie środków ochrony skóry. W artykule opisano zawody i substancje mogące spowodować wystąpienie kontaktowego zapalenia skóry z podrażnienia (KZSP). Podane przykłady potwierdzają tezę, że stosowanie środków ochrony skóry zapobiega lub zmniejsza intensywność objawów KZSP. Należy jednocześnie pamiętać, aby preparatów ochronnych nie używać jako podstawowego zabezpieczenia przed substancjami wysokiego ryzyka. Bardzo ważny jest staranny dobór odpowiednich środków ochrony skóry w zależności od czynników narażenia.
Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common skin disease caused by various irritants in the workplace and at home. High-risk occupations for chronic ICD and the major irritants are presented in this article. Skin protection products may help people to prevent or reduce the intensity of skin irritation. It should be remembered that these products can not be used as a protection against high-risk substances and very important is selection of the measure appropriate to exposure.
Źródło:
Chemik; 2015, 69, 2; 95-101
0009-2886
Pojawia się w:
Chemik
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Severe facial reaction to thiurams in surgeons
Autorzy:
Coppeta, Luca
Papa, Francesca
Pietroiusti, Antonio
De Zordo, Ludovico M.
Perrone, Stefano
Barone, Silvia
Magrini, Andrea
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2162627.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-02-28
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
occupational dermatitis
allergy
contact dermatitis
concomitant contact sensitization
occupational allergens
thiurams
Opis:
Contact dermatitis is a major problem in the healthcare environment and in other sectors. Healthcare professionals may be exposed to a large number of chemical agents, including the accelerators for rubber vulcanization process. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis among operators in the sector ranges 13–30%. This paper describes the case of a 46-year-old male cardiac surgeon affected by a severe skin reaction localized on the face in the absence of hand dermatitis, presumably resulting from the use of a surgical patch applied to the face. Patch tests were performed and the result was negative for latex and positive (+++) for thiuram mix. A thiuram-free tape was prescribed and the operator’s dermatitis improved significantly. Thus, it would be very important to pay attention to skin disorders in health workers and thiuram as an occupational allergen. Med Pr. 2019;70(1):121–4
Źródło:
Medycyna Pracy; 2019, 70, 1; 121-124
0465-5893
2353-1339
Pojawia się w:
Medycyna Pracy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Airborne contact dermatitis and asthma in a nail art operator
Autorzy:
Vaccaro, Mario
Guarneri, Fabrizio
Barbuzza, Olga
Cannavò, Serafinella P.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2178806.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-01-01
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
occupational asthma
acrylates
airborne allergic contact dermatitis
nail art
Opis:
Nail art (creation and decoration of artificial nails) is a growing fashion trend. Proportionally to its popularity, the number of allergic reactions to the materials used has recently increased. We report the case of a nail art operator who developed occupational allergy to acrylates, manifested with the unusual simultaneous presence of asthma and dermatitis. Cutaneous lesions only affected areas not covered by individual protection devices or clothes, even if such areas were not in direct contact with acrylates, suggesting airborne allergic contact dermatitis. While respiratory problems were solved with the correct use of a mask at the workplace, facial dermatitis proved impossible to avoid or control and, for this reason, the patient had to change her work.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2014, 27, 1; 137-140
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Allergy to orthopedic metal implants — A prospective study
Autorzy:
Kręcisz, Beata
Kieć-Świerczyńska, Marta
Chomiczewska-Skóra, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2180074.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012-09-01
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
orthopedic implants
allergy to metals
contact dermatitis
patch tests
Opis:
Objectives: Evaluation of the allergenic properties of the metal knee or hip joint implants 24 months post surgery and assessment of the relation between allergy to metals and metal implants failure. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in two stages. Stage I (pre-implantation) - 60 patients scheduled for arthroplasty surgery. Personal interview, dermatological examination and patch testing with 0.5% potassium dichromate, 1.0% cobalt chloride, 5.0% nickel sulfate, 2.0% copper sulfate, 2.0% palladium chloride, 100% aluminum, 1% vanadium chloride, 5% vanadium, 10% titanium oxide, 5% molybdenum and 1% ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate were performed. Stage II (post-surgery) - 48 subjects participated in the same procedures as those conducted in Stage I. Results: Stage I - symptoms of "metal dermatitis" were found in 21.7% of the subjects: 27.9% of the females, 5.9% of the males. Positive patch test results were found in 21.7% of the participants, namely to: nickel (20.0%); palladium (13.3%); cobalt (10.0%); and chromium (5.9%). The allergy to metals was confi rmed by patch testing in 84.6% of the subjects with a history of metal dermatitis. Stage II - 10.4% of the participants complained about implant intolerance, 4.2% of the examined persons reported skin lesions. Contact allergy to metals was found in 25.0% of the patients: nickel 20.8%, palladium 10.4%, cobalt 16.7%, chromium 8.3%, vanadium 2.1% Positive post-surgery patch tests results were observed in 10.4% of the patients. The statistical analysis of the pre- and post-surgery patch tests results showed that chromium and cobalt can be allergenic in implants. Conclusions: Metal orthopedic implants may be the primary cause of allergies. that may lead to implant failure. Patch tests screening should be obligatory prior to providing implants to patients reporting symptoms of metal dermatitis. People with confi rmed allergies to metals should be provided with implants free from allergenic metals.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2012, 25, 4; 463-469
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Occupational allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in workers exposed to polyurethane foam
Autorzy:
Kieć-Świerczyńska, Marta
Świerczyńska-Machura, Dominika
Chomiczewska-Skóra, Dorota
Nowakowska-Świrta, Ewa
Kręcisz, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2178820.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-05-17
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
polyurethanes
isocyanates
4’-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI)
diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA)
occupational contact dermatitis
Opis:
Objectives: To evaluate sensitization to chemicals present in work environment after an outbreak of contact dermatitis in workers of vehicle equipment factory, exposed to polyurethane foam, based on 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI). Material and Methods: From among 300 employees, 21 individuals reporting work-related skin and/or respiratory tract symptoms underwent clinical examination, patch testing, skin prick tests, spirometry and MDI sIgE measurement in serum. Patch tests included isocyanates series, selected rubber additives, metals, fragrances, preservatives, and an antiadhesive agent. Results: Clinical examination revealed current eczema in the area of hands and/or forearms in 10 workers. Positive patch test reactions were found in 10 individuals, the most frequent to diaminodiphenylmethane and 4-phenylenediamine (7 persons). Reactions to an antiadhesive agent were assessed as irritant (5 workers). Except for sensitization to common aeroallergens, no significant abnormalities were found in the remaining tests. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis was diagnosed in 7 workers, irritant contact dermatitis in 10 and coexisiting allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in 3 workers. Conclusions: In workers manufacturing products from polyurethane foam, attention should be paid to the risk of developing contact dermatitis. Skin problems in our study group were attributable probably to insufficient protection of the skin.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2014, 27, 2; 196-205
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Concomitant contact allergy to formaldehyde and methacrylic monomers in students of dental medicine and dental patients
Autorzy:
Lyapina, Maya
Dencheva, Maria
Krasteva, Assya
Tzekova, Mariana
Kisselova-Yaneva, Angelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2178892.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-10-01
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
allergic contact dermatitis
formaldehyde
methacrylic monomers
co-reactivity
dental students
dental patients
Opis:
Objectives: A multitude of acrylic monomers is used in dentistry. Formaldehyde is a ubiquitous chemical agent, which is an ingredient of some dental materials and may be released from methacrylate-based composites. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the incidence and the risk of cross-sensitization to some methacrylic monomers (methylmethacrylate – MMA, triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate – TEGDMA, ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate – EGDMA, 2,2-bis-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacrylo-xypropoxy)phenyl]-propane – Bis-GMA, 2-hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate 2-HEMA, and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate) and formaldehyde in students of dentistry, dental professionals and dental patients. Material and Methods: A total of 139 participants were included in the study, i.e., occupationally exposed dental professionals, students of the 3rd, 4th and 6th year of dental medicine, and occupationally unexposed dental patients. They were patch-tested with methacrylic monomers and formaldehyde. The results were subjected to statistical analysis (p < 0.05). Results: From the allergic to formaldehyde students of the 3rd and 4th year of dental medicine, 46.2% were also sensitized to MMA. Among the group of patients, the incidence of cross-sensitization to formaldehyde and methacrylic monomers was as follows: to TEGDMA – 20.6%, to ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate – 20.7%, to 2-HEMA – 20.7% and to tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate – 24.1%. Contact allergy to MMA was diagnosed among 22.7%, and to TEGDMA – among 27.1% of the students of the 3rd and 4th year of dental medicine. In the group of occupationally unexposed dental patients the prevalence of contact allergy to ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate was 20.7%, to Bis-GMA – 27.6%, to 2-HEMA – 44.9% and to tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate – 38.0%. Conclusions: The students of the 3rd and 4th year of dental medicine could be outlined as a group at risk of sensitization to MMA and TEGDMA and of cross-sensitization to MMA and formaldehyde. Probably, due to the ubiquitous occurrence of formaldehyde and the wide use of composite resins and bonding agents containing TEGDMA, ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate, 2-HEMA and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate in dentistry, the group of dental patients could be at risk of cross-sensitization to formaldehyde and some methacrylic monomers.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2014, 27, 5; 797-807
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Molecular profile of sensitization in subjects with short occupational exposure to latex
Autorzy:
Lamberti, Monica
Buonanno, Rosaria
Ritonnaro, Chiara
Giovane, Giancarlo
Crispino, Vincenzo
Feola, Antonia
Medici, Nicola
Sannolo, Nicola
Di Carlo, Angelina
Di Domenico, Marina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2177165.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-17
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
occupational exposure
ImmunoCAP
natural rubber latex
skin prick test
contact dermatitis
gloves
Opis:
Objectives We examined the prevalence of latex allergy in subjects with occupational exposure to latex allergens for less than 5 years, determining the disease spectrum in symptomatic workers. We identified the most frequent molecular allergens by Immuno- CAP (ICAP), correlating the findings with skin prick test (SPT) results. Material and Methods Seven hundred twenty-three healthcare students using latex gloves on a regular basis were invited to participate in a baseline questionnaire screening. An ICAP serum test was performed only when a possible latex allergy was indicated by the questionnaire. Results The total number of participants responding to the baseline survey was 619. Glove-related symptoms were indicated by 4% (N = 25) of the students. The most common symptom was contact dermatitis (N = 18, 72%). In 12 subjects, ICAP revealed a real sensitization to latex, with a recombinant latex allergen profile showing a high frequency for rHev b 6.01 specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) (N = 9, 67%). In these individuals, skin symptoms were more prevalent than other types (88%). Conclusions The combined positivity for rHev b 6.01, rHev 8 and rHev b 5 determined by ICAP identified 92% of latex-allergic subjects with short-term exposure to latex.
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2015, 28, 5; 841-848
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Niepożądane reakcje skórne spowodowane kontaktem z materiałem drewnianym
Adverse cutaneous reactions induced by exposure to woods
Autorzy:
Chomiczewska-Skóra, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2168411.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-10-29
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
drewno
zapalenie skóry kontaktowe alergiczne
zapalenie skóry z podrażnienia
wood
allergic contact dermatitis
irritant dermatitis
Opis:
W następstwie narażenia na pył drewna lub materiał drewniany w innej postaci może dochodzić do niepożądanych reakcji skórnych. Obejmują one kontaktowe zapalenie skóry o etiologii alergicznej i z podrażnienia oraz znacznie rzadziej pokrzywkę kontaktową, reakcje fotoalergiczne i fototoksyczne. Opisywano też przypadki rumienia wielopostaciowego. Kontaktowe zapalenie skóry, zarówno alergiczne, jak i z podrażnienia, najczęściej jest spowodowane kontaktem z egzotycznymi gatunkami drewna, takimi jak różne odmiany palisandru czy drewno teak. Występuje ono zwykle u osób zajmujących się zawodowo lub hobbistycznie ręczną albo mechaniczną obróbką drewna. W związku z narażeniem na pył drewna nierzadko obserwuje się powietrznopochodny charakter zmian skórnych. Znane są również przypadki alergicznego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry w następstwie styczności z gotowymi wyrobami drewnianymi, takimi jak biżuteria czy instrumenty muzyczne. Celem pracy jest prezentacja niepożądanych reakcji skórnych związanych z ekspozycją na materiał drewniany, wywołujących je czynników i możliwych źródeł narażenia, na podstawie dostępnego piśmiennictwa. Med. Pr. 2013;64(1):103–118
Various adverse cutaneous reactions may occur as a result of exposure to wood dust or solid woods. These include allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis and, more rarely, contact urticaria, photoallergic and phototoxic reactions. Also cases of erythema multiforme-like reactions have been reported. Contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, is most frequently provoked by exotic woods, e.g. wood of the Dalbergia spp., Machaerium scleroxylon or Tectona grandis. Cutaneous reactions are usually associated with manual or machine woodworking, in occupational setting or as a hobby. As a result of exposure to wood dust, airborne contact dermatitis is often diagnosed. Cases of allergic contact dermatitis due to solid woods of finished articles as jewelry or musical instruments have also been reported. The aim of the paper is to present various adverse skin reactions related to exposure to woods, their causal factors and sources of exposure, based on the review of literature. Med Pr 2013;64(1):103–118
Źródło:
Medycyna Pracy; 2013, 64, 1; 103-118
0465-5893
2353-1339
Pojawia się w:
Medycyna Pracy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Occupational contact allergy to omeprazole and ranitidine
Autorzy:
Herrera-Mozo, Inmaculada
Sanz-Gallen, Pere
Martí-Amengual, Gabriel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2164096.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-05-16
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
occupational exposure
occupational contact dermatitis
proton pump inhibitors
ranitidine
omeprazole
active pharmaceutical ingredients
Opis:
Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibition and ranitidine is an H2 histamine receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflex disease, peptic ulcer disease, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and as a protector of the gastric mucosae. We report a case of occupational contact allergy to omeprazole and ranitidine. A 48-year-old man, with no pre-existing history of atopy or lifestyle factors. He neither had any medical history of consumption of drugs such as ranitidine and omeprazole. He worked for 19 months in the pharmaceutical company that manufactured ranitidine base. He presented rash in the face and eczema on the dorsum of the hands with itching. The study by prick tests with ranitidine gave negative response. Patch testing with ranitidine base and ranitidine hydrochloride gave positive response. A month later, when the patient was asymptomatic he returned to the pharmaceutical company, being switched from this previous job to the reactor manufacturing omeprazole. A few days after that, he presented erythematous eruptions involving face and neck with itching. Prick tests, path tests and in vitro laboratories studies with omeprazole gave positives. In this case the patient presented hypersensitivity type I at omeprazole and hypersensitivity type IV at omeprazole and ranitidine. Our aportation indicates the importance of careful analysis of the occupational exposure histories of patients with the suspected type I or type IV hypersensitivity to allergens, to determine whether work exposure is the cause. Med Pr 2017;68(3):433–435
Źródło:
Medycyna Pracy; 2017, 68, 3; 433-435
0465-5893
2353-1339
Pojawia się w:
Medycyna Pracy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pilot study of contact sensitization to rubber allergens and bisphenol A amongst dental students
Autorzy:
Lyapina, Maya G.
Krasteva, Assya
Dencheva, Maria
Tzekova, Mariana
Nikolov, Georgy
Yaneva-Deliverska, Mariela
Kisselova-Yaneva, Angelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2161876.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-05-08
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
allergic contact dermatitis
dentistry students
carba mix
mercapto mix
thiuram mix
Bisphenol A
Opis:
Objectives The aim of this study has been to evaluate the rate of contact sensitization to some rubber allergens and to bisphenol A (BPA) amongst students of dental medicine and dental patients. Material and Methods A total of 50 participants were included in the study: 40 students of dental medicine exposed to the studied rubber allergens and BPA-based dental materials during the course of their education; 10 dental patients without occupational exposure to the latter substances served as a control group. All of them were patch-tested with the studied rubber allergens and bisphenol A. Results Highest was the sensitizing action of carba mix, followed by benzoyl peroxide and mercapto mix. The sensitization rate for carba mix was significantly higher for dental students as well as for the whole studied population, if compared to the one for thiuram mix (Chi² = 12.9, p < 0.001; Chi² = 13.9, p < 0.001), bisphenol A (Chi² = 8.9, p < 0.001; Chi² = 11.9, p < 0.001), toluenesulfonamide formaldehyde resin (Chi² = 10.7, p < 0.001; Chi² = 13.9, p < 0.001) and benzoyl peroxide (Chi² = 4.7, p = 0.03; Chi² = 5.8, p = 0.016), and for dental patients, if compared to the one for mercapto mix (Chi² = 7.07, p = 0.008). Concomitant positive skin patch-test reactions to carba mix and to benzoyl peroxide, and to all the studied allergens were established. Conclusions Carba mix could be outlined as a sensitizer of paramount importance for dental students as well as for dental patients. Benzoyl peroxide was the second ranked sensitizer for dental students. Positive skin patch-test reactions to bisphenol A and toluenesulfonamide formaldehyde resin were established only among the group of dental students. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2017;30(3):397–405
Źródło:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2017, 30, 3; 397-405
1232-1087
1896-494X
Pojawia się w:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Contact allergy to nickel: Patch test score correlates with IL-5, but not with IFN-gamma nickel-specific secretion by peripheral blood lymphocytes
Autorzy:
Czarnobilska, E
Jenner, B.
Kaszuba-Zwoinska, J.
Kapusta, M.
Obtulowicz, K.
Thor, P.
Spiewak, R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/49735.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Wsi
Tematy:
allergic contact dermatitis
patch test
contact allergy
lymphocyte
interleukin 5
interferon gamma
risk estimation
nickel
peripheral blood
chronic disease
Źródło:
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine; 2009, 16, 1; 37-41
1232-1966
Pojawia się w:
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konserwanty jako istotne czynniki etiologiczne alergicznego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry
Preservatives as important etiologic factors of allergic contact dermatitis
Autorzy:
Kręcisz, Beata
Chomiczewska-Skóra, Dorota
Kieć-Świerczyńska, Marta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2165387.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-07-02
Wydawca:
Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
Tematy:
metyloizotiazolinon
alergiczne kontaktowe zapalenie skóry
konserwanty
testy płatkowe
zawodowe zapalenie skóry
methylisothiazolinone
allergic contact dermatitis
preservatives
patch tests
occupational dermatitis
Opis:
Wstęp Konserwanty zawarte w kosmetykach i wielu innych produktach przemysłowych mogą być przyczyną alergicznego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry. Celem pracy było określenie częstości uczulenia na wybrane konserwanty u kolejnych pacjentów Instytutu Medycyny Pracy im. prof. J. Nofera w Łodzi diagnozowanych z powodu kontaktowego zapalenia skóry oraz ustalenie, czy osoby uczulone na formaldehyd reagują jednocześnie na donory formaldehydu. Materiał i metody U 405 osób (308 kobiet, 97 mężczyzn), diagnozowanych w latach 2011–2013, przeprowadzono serię testów płatkowych z 13 środkami konserwującymi (mieszanina parabenów, formaldehyd, Quaternium 15, mieszanina chlorometyloizotiazolinon/metyloizotiazolinon, metyloizotiazolinon, metylodibromo- glutaronitryl, diazolinydylomocznik, imidazolidynylomocznik, DMDM hydantoina, 2-bromo-2-nitropropano-1,3-diol, butylokarbaminian jodopropynylu, chlorek benzalkonium, pirosiarczan sodowy – prod. Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Szwecja). Wyniki U 405 pacjentów stwierdzono 74 dodatnie wyniki testów płatkowych, w tym 52 u kobiet. Uczulenie na przynajmniej jeden z badanych konserwantów zaobserwowano u 47 osób (11,6%), w tym 34 kobiet (11%) i 13 mężczyzn (13,4%). Najczęściej uczulał metyloizotiazolinon (4,7%, w tym 5,2% kobiet, 3,1% mężczyzn), a najrzadziej parabeny, 2-bromo-2-nitropropano-1,3-diol i imidazolidynylomocznik (0,2%). Czternaście osób (3,4%), w tym 10 kobiet (3,2%) i 4 mężczyzn (4,1%), było uczulonych na formaldehyd lub/i donory formaldehydu. Aż u 11 z nich (78,6%) uczulenie miało charakter jednoważny. U 13 osób (3,2% ogółu badanych) uczulenie na konserwanty mogło mieć charakter zawodowy. Wnioski Środki konserwujące, szczególnie pochodne izotiazolinonu, są istotnymi czynnikami przyczynowymi alergicznego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry, w tym o pochodzeniu zawodowym. Osoby uczulone na formaldehyd mogą reagować jednocześnie na niektóre donory formaldehydu, ale reakcja ta zachodzi stosunkowo rzadko. Med. Pr. 2015;66(3):327–332
Background Preservatives present in cosmetics and other industrial products can cause allergic contact dermatitis. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of allergy to selected preservatives in consecutive patients examined due to contact dermatitis in the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, and to establish whether individuals sensitized to formaldehyde react simultaneously to formaldehyde releasers. Material and Methods A group of 405 patients (308 females and 97 males) was examined in 2011–2013. In all participants patch tests with a series of 13 preservatives (paraben mix, formaldehyde, Quaternium 15, chloromethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone mix, methyldibromoglutaronitrile, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, benzalkonium chloride, sodium metabisulfite, produced by Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden) were performed. Results Of the 405 patients 74 (including 52 females) showed positive results of patch tests. Contact allergy to at least 1 preservative was noted in 47 (11.6%) patients, including 34 (11%) females and 13 (13.4%) males. Methylisothiazolinone proved to be the most frequent sensitizer – 4.7% (5.2% females, 3.1% males) while parabens, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol and imidazolidinyl urea (0.2%) were found to be the least frequent. Fourteen (3.4%) participants, 10 women and 4 men, were allergic to formaldehyde and/or formaldehyde releasers. In 11 (78.6%) of them monovalent hypersensitivity was observed. In 13 (3.2% of the examined group) patients allergy to preservatives might have been of occupational origin. Conclusions Preservatives, particularly isothiazolinones, are significant causal factors of allergic contact dermatitis, including occupational cases. Individuals sensitized to formaldehyde may react simultaneously to formaldehyde releasers, however, such reactions are relatively rare. Med Pr 2015;66(3):327–332
Źródło:
Medycyna Pracy; 2015, 66, 3; 327-332
0465-5893
2353-1339
Pojawia się w:
Medycyna Pracy
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 19

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies