Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "coherence of criminal law" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
Zakaz prowadzenia pojazdów mechanicznych
Driving disqualification
Autorzy:
Mieczkowska, Dorota
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/476981.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
communication crime
driving ban
amendments to the Criminal Code
art. 42 § 3 and 4 k.k.
coherence of criminal law
Opis:
This article presents a driving ban in the context of the amendments of the Criminal Code from 1997. The changes concerning the penal measure have tightened criminal responsibility by introducing, among other a driving ban imposed on forever (art. 42 § 3 and 4 k.k.) and which led to increase of the number of legal grounds for adjudication under a mandatory ban. Obligatory character of the penal measure adversily affects the freedom of decision of the court leading to automatic and schematic delivering judgement. Regulations of de facto lifelong driving ban is inconsistent with other provisions of the Criminal Code, including possibility of seizure of conviction (art. 107 § 6 k.k.).
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2014, 1(14); 123-142
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Differentiation of solutions in view of the public prosecutor’s supervision over preparatory proceedings in criminal and tax off ence cases based on selected provisions of the code of criminal procedure and the penal fiscal code from the perspective of good law characteristics
Autorzy:
Kluczyński, Mariusz Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/45220300.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-11-18
Wydawca:
Akademia Policji w Szczytnie
Tematy:
clarity of law
good law
differentiation of solutions
coherence of law
Public Prosecutor’s supervision
Code of Criminal Procedure
Penal Fiscal Code
Opis:
This article is an attempt to show the consequences of differences in regulations on Public Prosecutor’s supervision over proceedings as provided for by the Penal Fiscal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, from the perspective of good law characteristics. On the basis of selected regulations, the author attempts to demonstrate that the marginal supervision of the Public Prosecutor over the investigation in the penal fiscal proceedings as provided for in the legislation contradicts the clarity, coherence and effectiveness of law. The differentiation between solutions adopted in this respect gives rise to problems with normative regulations based on the Penal Fiscal Code and makes the regulations inconsistent with other legislation: the Act of 28 January 2016 — Law on the Prosecutor’s Office and the Act of 17 June 2004 — on complaint regarding infringement of the party’s right to examine the case in preparatory proceedings conducted or supervised by a prosecutor and court proceedings without unreasonable delay. Further, in the content of the article the author refers to selected legislation applicable also to investigation regulated by the penal fiscal proceeding regulations. They serve as an example to demonstrate the thesis that the differentiation introduced in this respect in the legislation is entirely unreasonable as compared to the related regulations of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The analysis of those regulations proves that there is no system-related or legal argumentation that would justify this kind of exceptions. In the conclusions drawn on the basis of the analyses carried out in the article, the author states that the introduction of different regulations in the Penal Fiscal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure as regards the Public Prosecutor’s supervision over the investigation conducted by the financial authority responsible for preparatory proceedings and some exceptions in respect of investigations does not fulfil the requirements of good law.
Źródło:
Przegląd Policyjny; 2021, 143(3); 356-366
0867-5708
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Policyjny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies