Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "chrzest Rusi" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Dzieło misyjne Cyryla i Metodego na Rusi-Ukrainie
    Autorzy:
    Kozak, Stefan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1789214.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-11-28
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    chrzest Rusi
    Cyryl
    Metody
    Ruś Kijowska
    Baptism of the Ruthenians
    Cyril
    Methodius
    Kievan Rus
    Opis:
    In 988, prince Volodymyr took up the great epochal challenges of faith and grace, making the salvifi c secret of the Baptism of the Ruthenians and other Slav peoples inhabiting the vast lands of Kievan Rus. This is the most important breakthrough moment of the act of conversion and the process of Christianization, opening the Christian epoch throughout Russia and including Kievan Rus in the civilization of countries of the early Middle Ages. It is hard to overestimate the importance of these „plural” monasteries, council schools and libraries for the further development of Kievan Rus. After all, they were the driving force of the missionary work of Cyril and Methodius, they promoted and disseminated the religion and Christian principles of life and co-existence, created works conducive to the formation of Rusin’s personality of „new times” and at the same time satisfying the whole of his religious, social and cultural needs. The missionary work of Cyril and Methodius in Rus – Ukraine gave Kyiv Christianity the hallmarks of universality, thus opening up the possibility of bringing together and playing the role of a bridge between Christian East and West and drawing a full hand on the heritage of civilization and culture. Literature, art and science of both the East and the West. It is no coincidence, therefore, that Kiev fulfi lled an honorable role of „the mother of Ruthenian cities,” and at the same time as Constantinople was perceived as the „New Jerusalem”. It is the fruit of the idea of the apostolicity of Kiev realized by the rulers of Rus-Ukraine for over two centuries, which experienced its „Golden Age” of development.
    Źródło:
    Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia; 2019, 7; 77-84
    2299-7237
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Ucrainica Varsoviensia
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wokół chrztu Rusi Kijowskiej do czasów Włodzimierza I Wielkiego
    On the baptism of Kievan Rus’ up to the reign of Vladimir I the Great
    Autorzy:
    Sprutta, Justyna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29519411.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Ruś Kijowska
    Bizancjum
    chrystianizacja Rusi
    kult pogański
    księżna Olga
    książę Włodzimierz I Wielki
    chrzest
    Kievan Rus’
    Byzantium
    Christianization of Rus’
    pagan cult
    Princess Olga
    Prince Vladimir I the Great
    baptism
    Opis:
    Ewangelizacja Rusi Kijowskiej zaczęła się już za panowania księżnej Olgi, która przyjęła chrzest, według powszechnego poglądu, w Konstantynopolu. Jednakże rzeczywistym chrzcicielem Rusi był dopiero jej wnuk, książę Włodzimierz I Wielki. To on doprowadził do chrztu swe księstwo, ale nie zdołał wytrzebić z niego pogaństwa. Na decyzję o przyjęciu chrztu przez tego księcia bardziej jednak zdawały się wpływać czynniki polityczne niż religijne. Prestiż Rusi jako kraju chrześcijańskiego usiłowano podnieść, przypisując jej ewangelizację samemu apostołowi Andrzejowi. Z nim też, jak i z Mojżeszem, królami Dawidem i Salomonem oraz ze św. Pawłem i św. Jerzym porównywano księcia Włodzimierza, natomiast księżną Olgę ze św. Marią Magdaleną i św. Heleną, w obojgu widząc chrzcicieli Rusi. Okolicznościami najbardziej sprzyjającymi przyjęciu chrztu przez ruskiego władcę było udzielenie tego sakramentu księżnej Oldze, wcześniejsza znajomość chrześcijaństwa przez księcia Włodzimierza, a także obecność chrześcijan w jego drużynie. O tym traktuje niniejszy artykuł.
    The evangelization of Kievan Rus’ had already begun under the reign of Princess Olga, who was baptized, according to popular belief, in Constantinople. However, it was her grandson, Prince Vladimir I the Great, who was the true baptizer of Rus’. He was the one who brought his principality to baptism, but failing to eradicate paganism. However, this prince’s decision to receive baptism appeared to be motivated more by political than religious considerations. Rus’s reputation as a Christian country was boosted by crediting its evangelization to the apostle Andrew personally. Apart from this apostle, Prince Vladimir was also likened to Moses, Kings David and Solomon, as well as St. Paul and St. George, while Princess Olga was linked to St. Mary Magdalene and St. Helena, all of whom were regarded as baptizers of Rus. The granting of this sacrament to Princess Olga, Prince Vladimir’s prior awareness of Christianity, and the presence of Christians in his troop were the circumstances most conducive to the Ruthenian ruler’s embrace of baptism. This is the subject of the article.
    Źródło:
    Annales Missiologici Posnanienses; 2023, 28; 77-88
    1731-6170
    2956-6282
    Pojawia się w:
    Annales Missiologici Posnanienses
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    A.D. 966. Chrzest księcia Mieszka. Dylematy naukowe i znaczenie tego aktu dla przemian kulturowych na ziemiach polskich. Zagadnienia wybrane
    A.D. 966. The Baptism of Duke Mieszko. Research Dilemmas and the Importance of the Act for Cultural Transformations in Poland
    Autorzy:
    Wyrwa, Andrzej Marek
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/532591.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy
    Tematy:
    chrzest księcia Mieszka I
    Bolesław Chrobry
    rok 966
    księżna Dobrawa
    biskup Jordan
    chrystianizacja ziem polskich chrystianizacja Pomorzan
    chrystianizacja Prusów
    św. Wojciech
    św. Bruno z Kwerfurtu
    św. Otton z Bambergu
    św. Wulfram z Sens
    Ethelbert władca Kentu
    św. Metody
    Włodzimierzksiążę Rusi
    Thietmar
    Gall Anonim
    Jan Długosz
    burzenie bałwanów
    baseny chrzcielne na ziemiach polskich
    Ostrów Lednicki
    Poznań
    Gniezno
    Łekno
    1050. rocznica symbolicznego chrztu Polski
    baptism of Duke Mieszko I
    Bolesław the Brave
    966
    Duchess Dobrawa,
    Bishop Jordan
    Christianization of the Polish lands
    Christianization of the Pomeranians
    Christianization of Prussia
    St Adalbert
    St Bruno of Querfurt
    St Otto of Bamberg
    St Wulfram of Sens
    king Æthelbert of Kent
    St Methodius
    Prince Vladimir of Rus
    Gall Anonymous
    demolition of idols
    baptismal fonts in Poland
    1050th
    anniversary of the symbolic baptism of Poland
    Opis:
    This paper provides a general overview of selected sources and ideas functioning in Polish historiography on the baptism of Duke Mieszko I and the early stages of the Christianization of the Polish lands. The issue has long been debated by historians specialising in different fields, and new hypotheses and interpretations are still formulated. As part of this unfinished discussion, this paper seeks to make some general comments on some of the most lively discussed questions. Understandably, the hypotheses presented in the paper do not unravel all the mysteries and issues are still pending further research. The baptism of Duke Mieszko I, and thus the symbolic baptism of Poland, coincided with a moment of an intense expansion of Christianity in Europe (Fig. 1). Regardless of its religious, political and cultural significance for the next generations of rulers, nobles, prelates, chroniclers, historians, writers, artists and many others, the baptism has always been a great inspiration for various creative undertakings. The origins of historical reflections on this act can be found, e.g., in the chronicles of Thietmar or Gallus Anonymous. The latter rendered the events of this Holy Saturday of 966 in a very colourful and symbolic way, approximately 150 years later. In his chronicle, Gallus Anonymous noted, e.g., that just as Duke Mieszko was healed from blindness as a child, so having married a Bohemian Duchess Dobrawa, Mieszko — as a prudent and foresighted ruler — accepted baptism. The baptism freed him and his subjects from the blindness and darkness of paganism, giving them in return the clarity and truthfulness of the new faith. Although the very act, its exact date and location, as well as its cultural and civilization- bearing role are still subjects of heated debate among historians specialising in various fields, there is no doubt that it marked the beginning of a new phase in the connection between the Polish lands and the European cultural circle. At first, the process of Christianization involved merely a small circle of the society. The establishment of Christianity in the whole area of Poland was a very long process, characterised by varying dynamics and completed — using a variety of means — not earlier than at the end of the thirteenth century. Nevertheless, Mieszko I’s baptism inscribed our lands into the circle of Christian Europe in perpetuity. What did the adoption of Christianity mean for Poland? Through the introduction of the Christian faith, regardless of its initial kinks (in the 1030s), the Church strengthened the position of the ruler, offered him a divine legitimacy and made him an equal partner in the family of the Christian rulers of Europe. Christianity introduced also new, previously unknown cultural elements. These were, for example: — a new concept of God, the world and the place of humans within it; — the opening of expanded international contacts in the secular and ecclesiastical sphere; — bringing religious orders, such as the Benedictines, later Cistercians, Canons Regular, mendicant orders and others. These, as in Europe, actively participated in the shaping of the new economic and cultural image of the Polish lands, irrespective of their spiritual duties; —Latin, a universal language and alphabet associated with the circle of the clergy, and the princely chancellery; — a new way of measuring time (a calendar and related holidays and liturgical celebrations); — the inclusion of Christian symbols into the native cultural space, including the symbolism of colours, signs and gestures, the symbols of the natural world, etc.; — scriptoria, book and wall painting; — various worship and liturgy-related objects, such as, e.g., frescoes, the statues of saints and patron saints, reliquary boxes, liturgical combs, signs of episcopal dignity, patens, chalices, bowls, crosses, bells, suspended canopy lighting, etc.; — new architecture, and canons of style and workshops (the mastery of stone processing, techniques of construction and the preparation of mortars and mosaics); — inhumation took over from cremation as the dominant burial rite, etc. And other things. Slowly but consequently, these elements replaced and sometimes demolished the hitherto prevailing way of perceiving and ordering the world and its evaluation. Therefore, there is no exaggeration in the statements of the ‘revolutionary’ nature of the new faith formulated by scholars. Due to the enigmatic nature of the written sources and an unsatisfactory state of knowledge of, e.g., the earliest architecture related to the Christianization of the Polish lands (especially its more precise chronology), some issues addressed in this paper remain unresolved. However, despite many shortcomings and unexplained hypotheses, there is no doubt that an area in Europe, which since c.1000 came to be called Polonia, became permanently linked to the European Christianitas in the second half of the tenth century. All this started in 966, following previous preparations, due to Duke Mieszko I of the Piast dynasty.
    Źródło:
    Studia Lednickie; 2016, 15; 19-72
    0860-7893
    2353-7906
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Lednickie
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies