Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "chrystianizacja Rusi" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
A.D. 966. Chrzest księcia Mieszka. Dylematy naukowe i znaczenie tego aktu dla przemian kulturowych na ziemiach polskich. Zagadnienia wybrane
A.D. 966. The Baptism of Duke Mieszko. Research Dilemmas and the Importance of the Act for Cultural Transformations in Poland
Autorzy:
Wyrwa, Andrzej Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/532591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Muzeum Pierwszych Piastów na Lednicy
Tematy:
chrzest księcia Mieszka I
Bolesław Chrobry
rok 966
księżna Dobrawa
biskup Jordan
chrystianizacja ziem polskich chrystianizacja Pomorzan
chrystianizacja Prusów
św. Wojciech
św. Bruno z Kwerfurtu
św. Otton z Bambergu
św. Wulfram z Sens
Ethelbert władca Kentu
św. Metody
Włodzimierzksiążę Rusi
Thietmar
Gall Anonim
Jan Długosz
burzenie bałwanów
baseny chrzcielne na ziemiach polskich
Ostrów Lednicki
Poznań
Gniezno
Łekno
1050. rocznica symbolicznego chrztu Polski
baptism of Duke Mieszko I
Bolesław the Brave
966
Duchess Dobrawa,
Bishop Jordan
Christianization of the Polish lands
Christianization of the Pomeranians
Christianization of Prussia
St Adalbert
St Bruno of Querfurt
St Otto of Bamberg
St Wulfram of Sens
king Æthelbert of Kent
St Methodius
Prince Vladimir of Rus
Gall Anonymous
demolition of idols
baptismal fonts in Poland
1050th
anniversary of the symbolic baptism of Poland
Opis:
This paper provides a general overview of selected sources and ideas functioning in Polish historiography on the baptism of Duke Mieszko I and the early stages of the Christianization of the Polish lands. The issue has long been debated by historians specialising in different fields, and new hypotheses and interpretations are still formulated. As part of this unfinished discussion, this paper seeks to make some general comments on some of the most lively discussed questions. Understandably, the hypotheses presented in the paper do not unravel all the mysteries and issues are still pending further research. The baptism of Duke Mieszko I, and thus the symbolic baptism of Poland, coincided with a moment of an intense expansion of Christianity in Europe (Fig. 1). Regardless of its religious, political and cultural significance for the next generations of rulers, nobles, prelates, chroniclers, historians, writers, artists and many others, the baptism has always been a great inspiration for various creative undertakings. The origins of historical reflections on this act can be found, e.g., in the chronicles of Thietmar or Gallus Anonymous. The latter rendered the events of this Holy Saturday of 966 in a very colourful and symbolic way, approximately 150 years later. In his chronicle, Gallus Anonymous noted, e.g., that just as Duke Mieszko was healed from blindness as a child, so having married a Bohemian Duchess Dobrawa, Mieszko — as a prudent and foresighted ruler — accepted baptism. The baptism freed him and his subjects from the blindness and darkness of paganism, giving them in return the clarity and truthfulness of the new faith. Although the very act, its exact date and location, as well as its cultural and civilization- bearing role are still subjects of heated debate among historians specialising in various fields, there is no doubt that it marked the beginning of a new phase in the connection between the Polish lands and the European cultural circle. At first, the process of Christianization involved merely a small circle of the society. The establishment of Christianity in the whole area of Poland was a very long process, characterised by varying dynamics and completed — using a variety of means — not earlier than at the end of the thirteenth century. Nevertheless, Mieszko I’s baptism inscribed our lands into the circle of Christian Europe in perpetuity. What did the adoption of Christianity mean for Poland? Through the introduction of the Christian faith, regardless of its initial kinks (in the 1030s), the Church strengthened the position of the ruler, offered him a divine legitimacy and made him an equal partner in the family of the Christian rulers of Europe. Christianity introduced also new, previously unknown cultural elements. These were, for example: — a new concept of God, the world and the place of humans within it; — the opening of expanded international contacts in the secular and ecclesiastical sphere; — bringing religious orders, such as the Benedictines, later Cistercians, Canons Regular, mendicant orders and others. These, as in Europe, actively participated in the shaping of the new economic and cultural image of the Polish lands, irrespective of their spiritual duties; —Latin, a universal language and alphabet associated with the circle of the clergy, and the princely chancellery; — a new way of measuring time (a calendar and related holidays and liturgical celebrations); — the inclusion of Christian symbols into the native cultural space, including the symbolism of colours, signs and gestures, the symbols of the natural world, etc.; — scriptoria, book and wall painting; — various worship and liturgy-related objects, such as, e.g., frescoes, the statues of saints and patron saints, reliquary boxes, liturgical combs, signs of episcopal dignity, patens, chalices, bowls, crosses, bells, suspended canopy lighting, etc.; — new architecture, and canons of style and workshops (the mastery of stone processing, techniques of construction and the preparation of mortars and mosaics); — inhumation took over from cremation as the dominant burial rite, etc. And other things. Slowly but consequently, these elements replaced and sometimes demolished the hitherto prevailing way of perceiving and ordering the world and its evaluation. Therefore, there is no exaggeration in the statements of the ‘revolutionary’ nature of the new faith formulated by scholars. Due to the enigmatic nature of the written sources and an unsatisfactory state of knowledge of, e.g., the earliest architecture related to the Christianization of the Polish lands (especially its more precise chronology), some issues addressed in this paper remain unresolved. However, despite many shortcomings and unexplained hypotheses, there is no doubt that an area in Europe, which since c.1000 came to be called Polonia, became permanently linked to the European Christianitas in the second half of the tenth century. All this started in 966, following previous preparations, due to Duke Mieszko I of the Piast dynasty.
Źródło:
Studia Lednickie; 2016, 15; 19-72
0860-7893
2353-7906
Pojawia się w:
Studia Lednickie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wokół chrztu Rusi Kijowskiej do czasów Włodzimierza I Wielkiego
On the baptism of Kievan Rus’ up to the reign of Vladimir I the Great
Autorzy:
Sprutta, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29519411.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Ruś Kijowska
Bizancjum
chrystianizacja Rusi
kult pogański
księżna Olga
książę Włodzimierz I Wielki
chrzest
Kievan Rus’
Byzantium
Christianization of Rus’
pagan cult
Princess Olga
Prince Vladimir I the Great
baptism
Opis:
Ewangelizacja Rusi Kijowskiej zaczęła się już za panowania księżnej Olgi, która przyjęła chrzest, według powszechnego poglądu, w Konstantynopolu. Jednakże rzeczywistym chrzcicielem Rusi był dopiero jej wnuk, książę Włodzimierz I Wielki. To on doprowadził do chrztu swe księstwo, ale nie zdołał wytrzebić z niego pogaństwa. Na decyzję o przyjęciu chrztu przez tego księcia bardziej jednak zdawały się wpływać czynniki polityczne niż religijne. Prestiż Rusi jako kraju chrześcijańskiego usiłowano podnieść, przypisując jej ewangelizację samemu apostołowi Andrzejowi. Z nim też, jak i z Mojżeszem, królami Dawidem i Salomonem oraz ze św. Pawłem i św. Jerzym porównywano księcia Włodzimierza, natomiast księżną Olgę ze św. Marią Magdaleną i św. Heleną, w obojgu widząc chrzcicieli Rusi. Okolicznościami najbardziej sprzyjającymi przyjęciu chrztu przez ruskiego władcę było udzielenie tego sakramentu księżnej Oldze, wcześniejsza znajomość chrześcijaństwa przez księcia Włodzimierza, a także obecność chrześcijan w jego drużynie. O tym traktuje niniejszy artykuł.
The evangelization of Kievan Rus’ had already begun under the reign of Princess Olga, who was baptized, according to popular belief, in Constantinople. However, it was her grandson, Prince Vladimir I the Great, who was the true baptizer of Rus’. He was the one who brought his principality to baptism, but failing to eradicate paganism. However, this prince’s decision to receive baptism appeared to be motivated more by political than religious considerations. Rus’s reputation as a Christian country was boosted by crediting its evangelization to the apostle Andrew personally. Apart from this apostle, Prince Vladimir was also likened to Moses, Kings David and Solomon, as well as St. Paul and St. George, while Princess Olga was linked to St. Mary Magdalene and St. Helena, all of whom were regarded as baptizers of Rus. The granting of this sacrament to Princess Olga, Prince Vladimir’s prior awareness of Christianity, and the presence of Christians in his troop were the circumstances most conducive to the Ruthenian ruler’s embrace of baptism. This is the subject of the article.
Źródło:
Annales Missiologici Posnanienses; 2023, 28; 77-88
1731-6170
2956-6282
Pojawia się w:
Annales Missiologici Posnanienses
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies