Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "choice of applicable law" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Sprawy spadkowe w umowie polsko-ukraińskiej z 1993 r.
Matters of succession in the Agreement of 1993 between Poland and Ukraine
Autorzy:
Pazdan, Maksymilian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151099.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-14
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
umowa polsko-ukraińska z 1993
statut spadkowy
spadek bezdziedziczny
testament
konwencyjna klauzula zgodności
wybór prawa
jurysdykcja w sprawach spadkowych
zasada równego traktowania
agreement of 1993 between Poland and Ukraine
law applicable to succession
estate without a claimant
will
general compatibility clause provided for in international agreement
choice of applicable law
jurisdiction in matters of succession, principle of equal treatment
Opis:
The article is dedicated to the matters of succession in the Agreement of 1993 on Legal Aid concluded between Poland and Ukraine. The author touches upon a number of issues. First, he discusses the role of the “general compatibility clause” provided for in Article 97 of the 1993 Agreement. He concludes that the clause does not produce effects with regard to the Regulation (EU) No 650/2012. Under the “general compatibility clause”, in all situations where the 1993 Agreement does not provide for a rule being the equivalent of the rules laid down in the Hague Convention of 1961 determining the law applicable to the form of a testamentary disposition, in Poland, in relations between Poland and Ukraine, the law applicable to the form of a testament is to be determined pursuant to the provisions of the Hague Convention of 1961.Second, the author discusses the conflict-of-laws rules set out in the Agreement which designate, as the applicable law, either Polish or Ukrainian law. He contends that where the deceased is a Polish and Ukrainian national, in order to determine which of those nationalities have to be taken into account for the purposes of Article 37 (1) of the 1993 Agreement, the criterion of the most effective (more closely connected) nationality should be relied on. However, the situations that involve a deceased of Polish or Ukrainian nationality, who is also a third-State national, do not fall within the scope of the 1993 Agreement. The application of the 1993 Agreement is, on the other hand, not barred by the fact that an immovable property in a third State forms part of the estate. Jurisdiction and the law applicable to the succession of such immovable property must be determined, both in Poland and in Ukraine, pursuant to their general conflict-of-laws regulations on matters of succession. The author explains also that the drafters of the 1993 Agreement (in Articles 37 (1) and (2)) ruled out the principle of unity of succession in favour of the principle of scission, employing the connecting factors of nationality and of location of the immovable property. This results in numerous complications in the determination of the applicable law and in its application. However, the law applicable to succession determined on the basis of Article 37 (1) and (2) of the 1993 Agreement of 1993 governs the succession as a whole, with the exception of issues covered by other rules provided for in that agreement (for example, Article 39) and of the issues that do not fall within its scope of the 1993 Agreement. Although Article 39 (1) of the 1993 Agreement expressly mentions only consequences of defective consent, there is no doubt that the said rule also covers the legal requirements for effective declaration of consent.Third, the author addresses the function of Article 38 of the 1993 Agreement, which is a substantive law provision on the estate without a claimant. This provision enjoys priority over Article 33 of the Regulation No 650/2012. Article 38 solely determines the State (Poland or Ukraine) acquiring the estate without a claimant. The concerned State enjoys the competence to designate the entity that will become the subject of rights and obligations forming part of the estate without a claimant.Finally, the author comments on the pending case resulting from the preliminary question posed by the Opole District Court (Sąd Okręgowy, case no II Czz. 438/21). The Opole Court requested from the European Court a ruling on whether a Ukrainian national residing in Poland may, under Article 22 of the Regulation No 650/2012, choose Ukrainian law. The author suggests, that — although not without a doubt — it is tempting to answer this question in the affirmative. The argument here is that the freedom to choose the applicable law in matters of succession falls entirely outside the ambit of the 1993 Agreement and so the Agreement does not preclude the choice.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 31; 133-161
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Obowiązek alimentacyjny w prawie materialnym i prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym Ukrainy
Maintenance obligation in the Ukrainian substantive and private international law
Autorzy:
Zeniv, Mariia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/21151098.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
maintenance obligation
applicable law
choice of law
circumvention of law
public order clause
Opis:
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza charakteru prawnego obowiązku alimentacyjnego w świetle ukraińskiego prawa materialnego i prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego. Przedstawiając specyfikę regulacji zobowiązań alimentacyjnych w ukraińskim systemie prawnym, przeanalizowano szereg orzeczeń sądowych. Dalsze rozważania poświęcono określeniu prawa właściwego. W pierwszej kolejności w artykule omówiono możliwość wyboru przez strony prawa właściwego dla zobowiązań alimentacyjnych. W dalszej kolejności uwaga została skupiona na kwestiach ustalenia prawa właściwego w przypadku braku wyboru prawa przez strony. Ponadto w artykule w tym kontekście poruszono ogólne zagadnienia prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego, takie jak obejście prawa i klauzulę porządku publicznego. W artykule omówiono źródła prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego w zakresie spraw alimentacyjnych. Stwierdzono, że ukraińska ustawa o prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym z 2005 r. nie zawiera jednej normy kolizyjnej, której zakres dotyczyłby wszystkich kategorii roszczeń alimentacyjnych, a przepisy kolizyjne dla zobowiązań alimentacyjnych są rozproszone wśród instrumentów prawnych dotyczących pomocy prawnej i stosunków prawnych w sprawach rodzinnych. W szczególności są one objęte zakresem szeregu umów dwustronnych, a także zakresem konwencji mińskiej z 1993 r. mającej regionalny zasięg stosowania. Jednakże dotychczas Ukraina nie jest związana żadną umową międzynarodową o zasięgu globalnym, która regulowałaby ustalenie prawa właściwego dla zobowiązań alimentacyjnych.
The article presents an analysis of the provisions of substantive law and private international law in force in Ukraine regarding the maintenance obligation, as well as their application in judicial practice.When presenting the issues regarding determination of the law applicable to maintenance obligations, the author fi rst refers to the possibility for the parties to choose the law applicable to maintenance obligations. Further attention is devoted to the determination of the applicable law on the basis of objective connecting factors to be considered by default when parties have not chosen the law applicable. General issues of private international law, such as circumvention of law and public policy clause, are also addressed in this context.It has been underlined that in addition to the domestic law on private international law, the conflict-of-law rules are contained in bilateral international agreements on legal assistance and legal relations in civil matters binding on Ukraine, and in the 1993 multilateral Minsk Convention, which has a regional scope of application.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 31; 103-131
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ przepisów wymuszających swoje zastosowanie na rozstrzyganie spraw spadkowych pod rządami rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) Nr 650/2012
The influence of the overriding mandatory rules on decision making in succession matters under the EU Regulation 650/2012
Autorzy:
Żarnowiec, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782438.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Succession Regulation
succession matters
choice of law
connecting factor
applicable law
overriding mandatory provisions
Opis:
Since August 17, 2015 the courts of the Member States of the European Union apply the conflict-of-laws rules adopted in the EU Succession Regulation (EU) in succession matters. From the Polish point of view, this constitutes not only the change of the rules applied for the purposes of determining jurisdiction and the applicable law, but also a new approach to the overriding mandatory provisions. Contrary to other European instruments of private international law, the Succession Regulation neither uses the term “overriding mandatory provisions”, nor defines its meaning. Nevertheless, in Article 30 the Regulation provides for application - irrespective of the law applicable to the succession under its conflict rules - of the special rules of the State, where certain immovable property, enterprises or other special categories of assets are located, and which - for economic, family or social considerations - impose restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets, in so far as, under the law of that State, they are applicable irrespective of the law applicable to the succession. The interpretation of this provision cause difficulties. It is not clear whether the concept of the special provisions embodied in Article 30 refers to the concept of overriding mandatory rules, well known in the European private international law, or whether it constitutes an original solution. Another controversial issue discussed in the paper is the relevance of the mandatory rules of the forum or the third State other than those mentioned in Article 30.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 43-65
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wybór prawa dla umowy o pracę. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 15 lipca 2021 r. w sprawach połączonych DG, EH c/a SC Gruber Logistics SRL (C-152/20) oraz Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD c/a SC Samidani Trans
The gloss to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 July 2021 in the joined cases of DG, EH v. SC Gruber Logistics SRL (C-152/20) and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD v. SC Samidani Trans SRL (C-218/20)
Autorzy:
Kurowski, Witold
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20745505.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-12-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
a choice of law to the individual employment contract
the law applicable to the individual employment contract in the absence of a choice
an employee’s protection, a concept of „provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement”
the minimum wage
Rome I Regulation
Opis:
This paper comments on a recent ruling concerning the choice of law to the individual employment contract according to the Rome I Regulation. In the judgement in the joined cases C–152/20 and C–218/20 (DG, EH v. SC Gruber Logistics SRL and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi, TD v. SC Samidani Trans SRL), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided the interpretation of Article 8 of the Rome I Regulation on two issues. At first, the EU Court was asked about the freedom of choice of law applicable to the individual employment contract if (a) national law required the inclusion of a clause into that contract under which the contractual provisions are supplemented by national law and (b) the contractual clause concerning that choice was drafted by the employer. The second issue was connected with the concept of the employee’s protection, under which the choice of law may not have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him (her) by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement, under the law that would have been applicable to the contract in the absence of choice. Regarding the first question, the CJEU admitted that the parties to an individual employment contract dispose of freedom to choose the law applicable to that contract, even if the contractual provisions are supplemented by national labour law under a (relevant) national provision, if “the national provision in question does not require the parties to choose national law as the law applicable to that contract”. Secondly, the Court found that the parties to an individual employment contract were “to be regarded as being, in principle, free to choose the law applicable to that contract, even if the contractual clause concerning that choice is drafted by the employer”. Therefore, the CJEU confirmed the application of the rules concerning the choice of law resulting from Article 3 of the Rome I Regulation to the individual employment contracts. Referring to the second issue of the commented ruling, the CJEU confirmed that Article 8 (1) of the Rome I Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that, where the parties have chosen the law governing the individual employment contract, the application of the law that would apply to the contract in the absence of choice must be excluded, with the exception of “provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement”, if those provisions offer the employee concerned greater protection than those of the law chosen by the parties. The EU Court underlined that rules on the minimum wage could be treated as “provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement” and the law that, in the absence of choice, would be applicable should decide about it. Unfortunately, it is necessary to follow the commented judgment’s justification to correctly understand the concept of an employee’s protection applied in Article 8 (1) of the Rome I Regulation. The thesis of the ruling in this regard seems to be too laconic, and it can be misinterpreted. 
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2021, 29; 169-190
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies