Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "arbitration law" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 33
Tytuł:
New technologies in Polish commercial arbitration on the background of European Union regulations
Autorzy:
Ryszkowski, Karol
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2010148.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-03-10
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
new technologies
European Union law
contract law
arbitration law
COVID pandemic
Opis:
Commercial arbitration in Poland has to face contemporary problems, including those related to the constant development of information technologies, and therefore new technologies. It is seen during the COVID pandemic. This article is intended to assess the state of Polish regulation on the background of European Union regulations in the abovementioned area and to propose potential changes to the Polish legislation[1] if they are needed.   [1] Karol Ryszkowski, “New technologies in the Polish commercial arbitration,” in Právo, obchod, ekonomika : zborník príspevkov (Právo - obchod - ekonomika), eds. Jozef Suchoža, Ján Husár, and Regina Hučková (Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika Vydavatel’stvo Šafárik Press, 2020), 249.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2022, 48, 1; 29-41
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Consensual Dispute Resolution in the Damage Directive. Implementation in CEE Countries
Autorzy:
Modzelewska de Raad, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530010.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-06-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
private antitrust enforcement
arbitration
competition law arbitration
Damages Directive
Opis:
This paper discusses the use of consensual dispute resolution for the purpose of antitrust damage claims as introduced by the Directive. It presents these type of claims in a broader context of arbitration (or ADR), in comparison with traditional claim settling before a state court. Particular focus is on selected CEE countries and their implementation of the Directive, serving as an example of the transposition of the Directive’s rules (Article 18 and 19) into national systems in the area of consensual dispute resolution. Specific institutions intended to encourage consensual resolution included in the Directive (and transposed into national systems) are being commented on as well. Lastly, the paper briefs on the advantages of ADR in general, and concludes that even post-Directive, ADR remains attractive as a complimentary instrument to public enforcement and state judiciary enforcement.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2017, 10(15); 49-68
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Państwowy arbitraż w ZSRR
Autorzy:
Stawarska-Rippel, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/621232.pdf
Data publikacji:
2009
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Soviet law, State’s arbitration
Opis:
The introduction of planned economy in Russia after the 1917 October Revolution had a result that the whole economy was treated as one state owned organization. From 1922 the courts’ jurisdiction in cases between state owned enterprises was abolished and these cases were transferred to arbitration committees. On May 3, 1931 the state’s economic arbitration was established. It was separated completely from the courts’ system and was included into administration structures. It had nothing in common with the private arbitration and with the conciliatory proceedings. The state’s arbitration was an instrument of central planning and its activity were to strengthen the realization of economic plans. By doing it, the state’s arbitration performed two functions in the management of economy. It could pass legal acts on one side and on the other it considered the economic disputes between state institutions. From 1931 to October 1, 1991 (when arbitration was abolished) its functions have not been changed. The analysis of legal character of this institution causes problems and controversies among lawyers. The state’s arbitration was a hybrid. It was bounded with the administration and the arbitrators, very often not being lawyers, were not independent. From the other hand, the arbitration proceedings was somehow connected with the proceedings applied in the courts. Despite that, it should be treated as a separated proceedings. The state’s arbitration was an administrative, not judicial body.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2009, 8; 143-159
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Arbitration Agreements and Actions for Antitrust Damages After the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment
Autorzy:
Sadrak, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/530165.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-31
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
arbitrability
arbitration
arbitration agreement
antitrust
competition law
damages
unfair competition
Opis:
On May 21st 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union in CDC Hydrogen Peroxide decided whether the application of jurisdiction clauses in actions for damages impedes the effective enforcement of EU competition law. The CJ stayed silent, however, on how to treat arbitration clauses, which similarly to jurisdiction clauses, exclude a default court jurisdiction. The question of how to interpret arbitration agreements in the event of an antitrust violation and subsequent actions for damages remains thus unanswered. In light of the foreseen increase in private enforcement of EU competition law, this problem gains significance. This is because arbitration agreements may be frequently used to govern commercial relationships between antitrust infringers and their injured direct contractors. Against this background, the paper aims to analyse the consequences brought about by the existence of arbitration clauses in the event of actions for antitrust damages. It seeks to answer two questions: whether the claims for antitrust damages can be per se arbitrated, and whether the general arbitration clauses used by the parties to regulate their commercial relations cover the actions for antitrust damages. In order to address these problems, the papers draws attention to the CJ’s interpretation of jurisdiction clauses and the Polish experience of interpreting the scope of arbitration agreements in the field of unfair competition law. The paper reaches the conclusion that neither the arbitration nor EU law prevent arbitrating actions for antitrust damages. Whether a specific arbitration agreement covers actions for antitrust damages or not can be analyzed only with reference to the will of the parties interpreted under applicable national law. It is believed, however, that there are many reasons to adopt an arbitration-friendly interpretation of vague arbitration agreements.
Źródło:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies; 2017, 10(16); 77-106
1689-9024
2545-0115
Pojawia się w:
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Alternatywne metody rozwiązywania sporów w świecie sportu na przykładzie działania sądu koncyliacyjnego w Lozannie
Alternative Dispute Resolutions in the World of Sport on the Example of the Conciliation Court in Lausann
Autorzy:
Tartak, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/518342.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Fundacja Utriusque Iuris
Tematy:
tribunal
court
law
dispute
arbitration
mediation
Opis:
This work presents the most important legal issues related to dispute resolution on the sports level. The author, recalling the procedure connected with world’s most important sports court, intends to show the significant advantages of the arbitration procedure, which is a reformative way of resolving all antagonisms that bind entities involved in the fields of physical activity. The aim of the work is to show legal problems on the part of a person interested in the world of sport. The work uses monographic and comparative methods, which allowed for a me- ticulous presentation of current formal and legal problems. The analysis carried out as part of the following work shows that the existence of an independent con- ciliation court dealing with sporting matters is necessary to be able to keep the area of sports competition away from the sphere of influence of people whose one goal is to use sport as an important field to expand their own negative interests all entourage. Through the functioning of specialized legal forms and institutions that will watch over their observance, it is possible to create from professional physical activity matter that brings legal and fair values that can shape young generations for whom clean and healthy competition will become a priority
Źródło:
Forum Prawnicze; 2019, 2 (52); 46-65
2081-688X
Pojawia się w:
Forum Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sport arbitration and interim measures – a Swiss glance
Autorzy:
Wójtowicz, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1596465.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
Tematy:
International Arbitration
Interim Measures
Sports Law
Opis:
This article highlights selected characteristics of Swiss international arbitration law focussing on interim measures in sports-related disputes. The key academic concern of the article is to indentify whether under Swiss law the parties may waive the state courts’ jurisdiction to grant interim relief in international arbitral proceedings and declare the arbitral tribunal as exclusively competent. The view held in this article favours the admissibility of the waiver based on mainly two arguments: the parties’ autonomy and the lack of statutory limitations to the waiver. Further, this article deems that in ad hoc arbitral proceedings the waiver is not enforceable (but not null and void) as long as the tribunal has not been yet established. In such a case, the parties may exceptionally request interim relief with state courts. Seeking for a arbitral alternative to the said solution the article scrutinises whether in sports-related disputes the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne could be competent until the constitution of the ad hoc tribunal. Finally, the article examines the formal requirements for the waiver.
Źródło:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2016, 15, 3; 169-189
2083-4373
2545-3181
Pojawia się w:
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kierunki reformy arbitrażu inwestycyjnego w ramach prac Grupy Roboczej III UNCITRAL
Future development of investment arbitration reform under auspices of UNCITRAL Working Group III
Autorzy:
Zrałek, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030069.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
investment arbitration reform
investment arbitration crisis
rule of law
UNCITRAL Working Group III
ICSID
Opis:
The goal of the study is to briefly present the work on the reform of investment arbitration under the auspices of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and to indicate the directions in which further discussion on this reform could potentially go. The Commission entrusted to Working Group III to work on the reform of international investment dispute resolution mechanisms. The ongoing debate in this area has met with very little interest in Polish literature. It is surprising since its outcome may have an impact on future investment policy also in Poland. The work is divided into five parts. The first part presents the scope of the work and the research methodology. The second one presents a very concise historical background for the establishment of investment arbitration, taking into account the key features underlying current crisis of this institution. The third part briefly outlines the course of work of UNCITRAL Working Group III. This section provides a background to show how negotiations are progressing, what major obstacles negotiators are facing and what the future direction of the Working Group’s work might be. These issues are discussed in the fourth part of the study. Author’s opinion on anticipated development of further discussion is presented in the closing remarks.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 253-281
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia na temat wniosku dotyczącego decyzji Rady w sprawie zawarcia w imieniu Unii Europejskiej Konwencji Narodów Zjednoczonych dotyczącej przejrzystości w umownych postępowaniach arbitrażowych między inwestorem a państwem [COM(2015) 20 final]
Opinion on the proposal for a Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on transparency in treaty-based investor-State arbitration
Autorzy:
Lackoroński, Bogusław
Bartosz, Pawłowski
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/6574564.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
International Investment Law
Convention
European Union
arbitration proceedings
Opis:
The opinion concerns spreading the use and extending the substantive and temporal scope of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treatybased Investor-State Arbitration. Possible conflict of obligations of Member States under international law may arise regardless of whether the United Nations Convention on the transparency will be concluded only by the Europe‑ an Union or by its Member States. The position of the European Commission according to which the Convention relates only to exclusive competence of the European Union should be considered as doubtful.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2015, 4(48); 83-94
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Brave, New, International Investment Court in Context. Towards a Paradigm Shift of the ISDS
Autorzy:
Kułaga, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706620.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
investment arbitration
multilateral investment court
international investment law
Opis:
The idea of a Multilateral Investment Court seems to be one of the most prominent initiatives of the “multilateralization” of international investment law during this century. The creation of a new international, permanent court concentrated on settling investor – state disputes is an extraordinary challenge. Possible problems relate not only to the negotiations concerning the organizational and procedural aspects necessary to ensure the efficient operation of this type of body. It is also necessary to take into account the dynamics of the functioning of international adjudication as such, as well as the controversies surrounding the international legal protection of foreign investments.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 115-139
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ADR in Sport on the Example of Association Football in Poland and Ukraine
Autorzy:
Sławicki, Piotr
Kryzhanivskyi, Viktor
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/40441760.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
alternative dispute resolution
association football
sports law
mediation
arbitration
Opis:
The subject of this article is the use of ADR in sports disputes in association football under the Polish and Ukrainian law. Professional and amateur sport generates various types of disputes related to both disciplinary and civil cases, an example of which may be disputes arising during the execution of contracts binding players and football clubs. In the first part, the scope of disputes that are subject to ADR in association football is outlined. The next part presents legal solutions adopted under the Polish law in this respect, of which the activity of the Football Arbitration Court of the Polish Football Association is a particular example. The last chapter is devoted to the Ukrainian perspective on the resolution of disputes in association football.
Źródło:
Review of European and Comparative Law; 2023, 53, 2; 149-168
2545-384X
Pojawia się w:
Review of European and Comparative Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Legal and political implications The Republic of Philippines. The Republic of Philippines v. The Peoples Republic of China. 2016 case
Autorzy:
Gruszczyński, Krzysztof Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2157847.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Tematy:
Permanent Court of Arbitration
arbitration
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
China
US
Opis:
The article analyzes The Philippines v. China arbitration case and its geopolitical implications for further bilateral relations between USA and China. Additionally, it examines the viewpoints of Chinese leaders. Term arbitration refers to a process in which a party submits a “dispute” to an unbiased, independent third party. Its main goal is to settle and conclude the disputes presented. The Permanent Court of Arbitration is an intergovernmental organization established in 1899 that designates arbitral tribunals to resolve disputes between and among nations. It is based in The Hague, Netherlands, and currently presides over the arbitration case. Philippines brought the case before the tribunal to dispute China’s claim of “indisputable sovereignty” over almost the entire South China sea through its “nine-dash line” claim. The five arbitrators were assigned to the Judge Thomas A. Mensah (President), Judge Jean-Pierre Cot, Judge Stanislaw Pawlak, Professor Alfred H. Soons, and Judge Rüdiger Wolfrum. It will be argued that China has had a bad relationship with all neighbors since 1974, when China used force against South Vietnam in the South China Sea in order to recapture the Paracel Islands and against a unified Vietnam in 1988 to seize Johnson Reef and five more features, massacring a party of Vietnamese flag-bearers. In 1994, China seized Mischief Reef unobserved and it took months before the world noticed. Until then, China was the only claimant to have no permanent presence in the area. There are already clear signs that China is using its military power to rebuke the arbitration. Admiral Wu Shengli, the Commander of the Chinese navy, just hosted the US Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson, at the Chinese Navy Headquarters on July 18 2016, following the successful participation of Chinese warships in the major US RIMPAC exercise in the Pacific. He made clear that the militarization of China’s artificial islands will continue so that their defense corresponds to the “level of threats”. After a PLA Air Force patrol close to Scarborough Shoal made the headlines of most Chinese newspapers yesterday, a military spokesman announced that air patrols would become a regular occurrence now. The Tribunal issued its Award on July 16 2016 after several months of hearings and submission of documents. China was absent throughout the proceedings, refusing to recognize the case. The Tribunal concluded that there was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources within the sea areas falling within the ‘nine-dash line The Spratly Islands and its many reefs are being claimed by China under its “nine-dash line” claim that covers nearly the entire South China Sea including parts of the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone (hereafter referred to as EEZ). China insisted it has historic rights in asserting its ownership of the region believed to be rich in natural gas resources and also a vital trade route for international cargo ships The 2012 Scarborough Shoal standoff was one of the factors that prompted the Philippines to file a case against China. Tensions between the two countries escalated when Chinese surveillance ships prevented Philippine authorities from apprehending Chinese vessels found poaching endangered Philippine marine species at the shoal. The dispute over maritime features in the South China Sea has been ongoing for decades prior and involved other Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia. On January 23, 2013, the Philippine government (hereafter referred to as Manila) announced that it had initiated an arbitration case against the People’s Republic of China in accordance with the dispute settlement provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning a range of issues relevant to the ongoing sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea between the two nations.Manila’s case was submitted for arbitration to a five-judge panel formed under the “Settlement of Disputes” process contained in Part XV of UNCLOS and hosted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is an international treaty that defines the limits of a nation’s maritime sovereignty claims. This convention was ratified by both the Philippines and China. Under its provisions, areas within 200 nm from the country’s baselines would be part of the EEZ. UNCLOS states three basic maritime features: Islands under the sovereignty of a country are entitled to a 12 nm (approximately 22 kilometers) territorial sea and a 200 nm (approximately 370 km) exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The state may exclude foreign entities within its territorial sea and has the sole right to exploit resources found within the EEZ Since the initiation of the arbitration case, China has conducted several massive reclamation projects to turn submerged reefs into artificial islands capable of hosting military structures and equipment. The conclusion offers general thoughts on the larger implications of the findings for the management of maritime disputes involving China and especially U. S.-China security relations.
Źródło:
Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne; 2016, 4(23); 45-65
1898-0171
Pojawia się w:
Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Arbitraż a prawo konkurencji – wybrane zagadnienia teoretyczne i praktyczne
International commercial arbitration and competition law – selected legal issues from the perspective of an arbitrator
Autorzy:
Nowaczyk, Piotr
Syp, Szymon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507777.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-09-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
prawo konkurencji
arbitraż
międzynarodowy arbitraż handlowy
rozstrzyganie sporów
prawo konkurencji UE
competition law
arbitration
international commercial arbitration
dispute resolution
EU competition law
Opis:
Przedmiotowy artykuł1 stanowi ujęcie wybranych zagadnień prawnych dotyczących wzajemnych relacji pomiędzy międzynarodowym arbitrażem handlowym a prawem konkurencji. Dominująca perspektywa ujęcia tematyki zastosowana w artykule została określona jako perspektywa arbitra (rzecz jasna jako jedna z kilku możliwych). Autorzy wskazują na dwie kwestie węzłowe o znaczeniu uniwersalnym (międzynarodowym) będące odpowiedzią na pytania: 1) czy arbiter może (a może musi) stosować prawo konkurencji? (w kontekście dopuszczalności poddania sporu pod arbitraż); 2) które prawo konkurencji powinien stosować arbiter? Wywody w toku artykuły będą odnosiły się do abstrakcyjnego stanu faktycznego potencjalnego sporu, który zmuszony byłby rozstrzygnąć sąd arbitrażowy, a który zostanie rozstrzygnięty przez Autorów artykułu. Takie określenie tematyki pozwala następnie na wyciągnięcie wniosków de lege lata oraz de lege ferenda w zakresie relacji pomiędzy prawem konkurencji a międzynarodowym arbitrażem handlowym dla rozstrzygającego spory arbitra.
The subject-matter of this article encompasses selected legal issues on the relationship between international commercial arbitration and competition law. The main perspective used in this paper is that of an arbitrator (clearly being only one of several possible). The paper points to two main issues of universal (international) meaning in response to the following questions: 1) Can (or in fact must) the arbitrator apply competition law (in terms of admissibility of the submission of the dispute to arbitration)? 2) which competition law should the arbitrator apply? The arguments presented in the paper refer to a potential fact scenario of a dispute (one that would have to be settled by arbitration), which will be settled by the Authors. A few conclusions will be drawn de lege lata and de lege ferenda concerning the relationship between competition law and international commercial arbitration for the main actor resolving disputes – an arbitrator.
Źródło:
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny; 2013, 2, 5; 81-89
2299-5749
Pojawia się w:
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Arbitraż a prawo konkurencji – głos w dyskusji (artykuł polemiczny)
Arbitration and competition law – some input into the dispute (A polemic)
Autorzy:
Bagdziński, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/508575.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-06-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
Tematy:
arbitraż
prawo konkurencji
prawo antymonopolowe
arbitration
competition law
antitrust
Opis:
Artykuł jest głosem w dyskusji dotyczącej możliwości rozstrzygania sporów z zakresu prawa konkurencji za pomocą arbitrażu. Stanowi polemikę z artykułem autorstwa Piotra Nowaczyka i Szymona Sypa, którzy opowiedzieli się za możliwością rozstrzygania sporów z zakresu prawa konkurencji w drodze arbitrażu. Autor przedstawia argumenty dotyczące publicznoprawnego charakteru regulacji, jaką jest prawo konkurencji i skutków z tego wynikających, w szczególności w zakresie celów realizowanych regulacjami oraz kontroli nad orzecznictwem z tego zakresu, a także trudności z potencjalną egzekucją rozstrzygnięć zapadłych w arbitrażu.
This article is a voice in the discussion whether a competition law dispute may be resolved by way of arbitration. It constitutes a polemic response to an earlier article written by Piotr Nowaczyk and Szymon Syp who argue in favour of such a solution. By contrast, the author of this paper stresses the public-law character of competition law and the resulting repercussions, especially with respect to the goals of competition law and judicial control over its enforcement. The author notes also the potential difficulties with the execution of verdicts reached in arbitration.
Źródło:
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny; 2015, 4, 4; 69-74
2299-5749
Pojawia się w:
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Book review: Andrea Gattini, Attila Tanzi, and Filippo Fontanelli (eds.), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston: 2018
Autorzy:
Menkes, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706764.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-01
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
book review
general principles of law
investment arbitration
ICSID
ISDS
Opis:
Review of a book: Andrea Gattini, Attila Tanzi, and Filippo Fontanelli (eds.), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston: 2018
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2018, 38; 293-299
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Non-State Law in International Commercial Arbitration
Autorzy:
König, Michał
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/706881.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-07-26
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
arbitration
Rome I
rules of law
lex mercatoria
non-state law
applicable law
UNIDROIT
lex arbitrii
Opis:
The feature that most attracts private parties from different states to referring their dispute to an arbitral tribunal is the flexibility of the procedure. However, the differences between arbitration and court litigation are not only procedural, but they concern the substance of the parties’ cases. This is because in the realm of international arbitration the law applicable to the merits of the case is determined according to other provisions than the statutory conflict of laws rules. Depending on the arbitration law of the seat, the entire private international law statute can be captured in a single provision – “absent the parties’ choice, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the rules of law which it determines to be appropriate”. It follows that arbitral tribunals, unlike state courts, are not bound by the conflict of laws rules of the forum. What’s more, the merits of a dispute submitted to arbitration may be governed not only by some national body of law (e.g. the Polish Civil Code) but also by a non-state, non-national set of provisions – “rules of law” (e.g. the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts). The aim of this article is to analyze how the parties and tribunals may make use of their autonomy in determining the law applicable to a dispute. Furthermore it examines whether there are any limits thereto in light of the Rome I Regulation.
Źródło:
Polish Yearbook of International Law; 2015, 35; 265-292
0554-498X
Pojawia się w:
Polish Yearbook of International Law
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 33

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies