Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "antysztuka" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
Tytuł:
Kryzys w sztuce?
Is the Crisis in the Arts?
Autorzy:
Kiereś, Henryk
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1807418.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-01-02
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
sztuka
antysztuka
postmodernizm
esencjalizm
idealizm
filozofia
art
anti-art
postmodernism
essentialism
idealism
philosophy
Opis:
In the article the author takes the following topics: first, he adjudges whether the issue is really taken a functional problem, or maybe a pseudo-problem. He notes that, although the present day culture is assimilated with modern art, specifically speaking, the so-called. anti-art is still many theorist accused her betraying the ethos of art and destructive impact on the culture. Moreover, the author points out that anti-art is the cause of social conflicts. Her achievements since violate elementary — cognitive, moral and religious — the criteria of cultural discourse, and yet art is not an isolated, autonomous and autotelic area, but organically related to all spheres of culture. The author adds that the knowledge of philosophical and civilisational context is a necessary issue in the debate on the arts. Second, the author answers the question, what is a crisis. He draws attention to the etymology of the word, according to which (gr. krisis), it means either a sudden change in the course of things, the collapse of something, and the moment of decision is something that turn (from gr. krinein), is a state of existential undesirable that storm in a specific area of the balance of reality and thus undermine its purpose and rationality. Thirdly, the author briefly presents the positions taken by the artists and scholars in a discussion of the crisis in the arts. Then, fourthly, the author considers the place of the arts in culture and civilization. He touches the problem of modernism and postmodernism following it. Fifth, he answers the question of whether and how philosophy lies at the root of this crisis in the arts. Finally, the sixth, the author addresses the problem of idealism and its repercussions in the field of philosophy. In conclusion, the author notes that to really understand the problem of art, one cannot ignore the context of philosophy, without which any discussion of the art significantly alter its understanding and consequently lead to a crisis not only in terms of understanding the culture, but above the understanding of human being.
Źródło:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze; 2012, 3; 5-22
2082-8578
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Kulturoznawcze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Performatywny charakter estetyki
Autorzy:
Dziamski, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/487587.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Akademia Sztuk Pięknych im. Eugeniusza Gepperta we Wrocławiu
Tematy:
AESTHETICS
AESTHETICS OF POPULAR ART
AESTHETIC EXPERIENCE, ARTISTIC VALUES
AESTHETIC VALUES
FINE ARTS
INSTITUTIONAL ART
AESTHETIC ART
DEFINING ART
ABSOLUTE ART
ANTI-ART
ESTETYKA
ESTETYKA SZTUKI POPULARNEJ
DOŚWIADCZENIE ESTETYCZNE
WARTOŚCI ARTYSTYCZNE
WARTOŚCI ESTETYCZNE SZTUKI PIĘKNE
SZTUKA INSTYTUCJONALNA
SZTUKA ESTETYCZNA
DEFINIOWANIE SZTUKI
SZTUKA ABSOLUTNA
ANTYSZTUKA
Opis:
The performative character of aesthetics Many lecturers of aesthetics feel that the subject of their lectures is not necessarily aesthetics, but history of aesthetics, the aesthetic views of Plato and Aristotle, Kant and Hegel, Hume and Burke, the British philoso- phers of taste and German romanticists. Does that mean that aesthetics feeds on its own past, is nurtured by reinterpretations of its classics, defends concepts and categories that inspire no one and do not open new cognitive perspectives? Does it mean that aesthetics is dead today, like Latin or Sanskrit, while its vision of art and beauty is outdated, invalid and totally useless? Aesthetics is a polysemous concept, which has never been sufficient- ly defined. It can determine a way of perceiving and experiencing the world that is specific for a given community, in other words, taste, yet it can also mean certain countries’ or regions’ contribution to aesthetic thought, to the aesthetic self-knowledge of man. Thus its dimension is practical, cultural and philosophical. Today aesthetics faces new challenges that it has to live up to; its ma- jor tasks include the defence of popular art, polishing the concept of aes- thetic experience, aestheticization of everyday life and de-aestheticiza- tion of art, transcultural aesthetics and its approach to national cultures. In the book “Aesthetics: the Big Questions” (1998) Carolyn Korsmeyer reduces the main issues of contemporary aesthetics to six questions. The first question, old but valid, is a question about the definition of art. What is art? Nowadays everything can be art because art has shed all limita- tions, even the limitations of its own definition, and has gained absolute freedom. It has become absolute, as Boris Groys says. It has become absolute, because it has made anti-art a full-fledged part of art, and it has not been possible either to question or negate art since, as even the negation of 50 Grzegorz Dziamski art is art, legitimized by a more than 100 year long tradition, going back to the first ready-made by Marcel Duchamp in 1913. Today making art can be art and not making art can be art, as well, art is art and anti-art is art. The old question: “What is art?” loses its sense, and so does Nel- son Goodman’s question: “When art?”. When does something become art? These questions are substituted by new ones: “What is art for you?”, “What do you expect from art?”. There can be a lot of answers, because defining art has a performative character. Louise Bourgeois has ex- pressed the performative character of defining art in an even better way: “Art is whatever we believe to be art”. And for some reasons, which we do not fully realize ourselves, we want to make others share our belief. The text in an introduction to a new book on contemporary aesthetics by Grzegorz Dziamski.
Źródło:
DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu; 2018, 26; 32-50
1733-1528
Pojawia się w:
DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Błąd kulturowy? Próba analizy niektórych tendencji współczesnej kultury
Cultural error? The attempt to analyze some tendencies in contemporary culture
Autorzy:
Michalak, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/502053.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Łodzi
Tematy:
błąd antropologiczny
błąd kulturowy
ateizm
emancypacja rozumu i wolności
postmodernizm
duch dionizyjski i apolliński
artystyczna awangarda
klasyczna aksjologia
asztuka
antysztuka
anthropological error
cultural error
atheism
emancipation of reason and freedom
postmodernism
Dionysian and Apollonian spirit
artistic avant-garde
classical axiology
a-art
anti-art
Opis:
The idea of a “cultural error”, which is included in the title, refers to the category of an “anthropological error”, which was formulated by John Paul II in his encyclical Centesimus annus. According to the Polish pope this error was the foundation of a faulty assessment of society and human role which was suggested by the Marxist philosophical and social system. The idea of a “cultural error”, which has been put forward in this article, is an attempt to formulate a holistic view of the cultural transformation process which started in the 18th century in the Enlightenment era and which has lasted up till now. This error consists in the negation of the possibility of the natural origin of the axiological sphere and in promoting the opposite worldview that all values (ethical, esthetic, epistemological), which put order into human thinking and acting, are the merely the result of the culture. This article is the attempt to present the panorama of those transformations, which result from this erroneous assessment of man (negating the vision of a human person as a being who is open to the transcendence) and his role in culture creation process.
Źródło:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne; 2015, 24, 1; 63-75
1231-1634
Pojawia się w:
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies