Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2
Tytuł:
The poetic reception of Rimbaud on the interface of Young Poland and the literature of the interwar period
Recepcja poetycka Rimbauda jako synapsa Młodej Polski i międzywojnia
Autorzy:
Kuczyńska-Koschany, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087997.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the late 19th and early 20th century
Polish-French literary relations
Arthur Rimbaud (1854–1891)
Eliza Orzeszkowa (1841–1910)
Józef Weyssenhof (1860–1932)
Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
Julian Tuwim (1894–1953)
Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz (1894–1980)
synapsa
Jean Arthur Rimbaud
Młoda Polska
XX-lecie międzywojenne
recepcja poetycka
Opis:
This article deals with the reception of Arthur Rimbaud’s poetry and his biographic legend by the poets of the last decades of 19th and the first decades of the 20th century, though, in fact, its earliest phase belongs to the literary period of pre-Modernist, anti-Romantic reaction (which described itself by the name Positivism, epitomized by the novels of Bolesław Prus). The process of Rimbaud’s reception proceeded in two dimensions, on the intergenerational level and in dialogue between poets and translators. Interestingly, it acted as a veritable catalyst of changes in the poetics of writers across the spectrum, from the old school (Józef Weyssenhof and Eliza Orzeszkowa) to the modernist avant-garde. The influence of Rimbaud was by no means uniform and went beyond the usual names like Zenon Przesmycki (Miriam), Julian Tuwim or Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz. This article casts its net widely to include representatives of three generations, among them some of the less acclaimed authors.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 17-32
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Yeży Yankowski vs. Jankowski: a breakup with young Poland and with himself (act I)
Yeży Yankowski kontra Jerzy Jankowski. Akt zerwania z Młodą Polską i samym sobą (pierwsza odsłona)
Autorzy:
Okulicz-Kozaryn, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2087964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Polish literature of the early 20th century
Young Poland
Modernism
Futurism
Jerzy Jankowski (1887–1941)
Zenon Przesmycki (1861–1944)
Tadeusz Miciński (1873– 1918)
Leon Choromański (1873–1952)
Zygmunt Kisielewski (1882–1942)
Filippo Tommaso Marinetti (1876–1944)
Jerzy Jankowski
futuryzm
modernizm
Młoda Polska
krytyka młodopolska
Tadeusz Miciński
Leon Choromański
Zygmunt Kisielewski
witalizm
urbanizm
Opis:
This article deals with the first phase of Jerzy Jankowski’s severing ties with the Young Poland movement and his access to the futurist avant-garde. His conversion to the new poetic worldview, which he pioneered in Poland, was reflected in his articles and poems published in Widnokrąg [Horizon], a magazine he founded in 1913 to replace Tydzień [The Week], of which he was the main publisher. The rebranding came on top of disagreements between the magazine’s contributors. The divergent views focused on the assessment of Tadeusz Miciński’s novel Xiądz Faust. In May 1913, in his former magazine, Jankowski heaped praises on it. However, the following year, when it came up for debate in the Widnokrąg between Miciński’s aficionado Zygmunt Kisielewski and the skeptically-minded Leon Choromański, Jankowski sought to distance himself from both the emotionalism and the intellectualism of his colleagues. By that time he was absolutely adamant that the antinomies of Young Poland’s high art were a trap. Now that the worship of art striving for timeless perfection would have to give way to an unpretentious concern for ‘fugitive art’, the time was ripe for working out a new aesthetic, centered on the thrilling ‘beauty of big cities’, cabaret, cinema, and modern machines. Jankowski broke with his erstwhile mentor Ferdynand Ruszczyc and Zenon Przesmycki-Miriam, to follow the incomparably more exciting Filippo Tommaso Marinetti. Meanwhile, Choromański made one last attempt to bring the young man back on track by writing an article, in which he argued that Futurism was crude, and shallow, a throwback rather than a modern breakthrough. However, his warnings made no dint in Jankowski’s faith in futurism. For him its triumph was a matter of historical necessity. And, he had already thrown in his lot with the new movement by publishing his first futurist poems, ‘Spłon lotnika’ [‘Pilot in flames’] and ‘Maggi’.
Źródło:
Ruch Literacki; 2020, 1; 33-46
0035-9602
Pojawia się w:
Ruch Literacki
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-2 z 2

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies