Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Withdrawal from the European Union" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
    Tytuł:
    Grexit as a Challenge to the European Integrity
    Autorzy:
    Gruszczyński, Krzysztof Jerzy
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1861635.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego i Indywidualnego Apeiron w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Withdrawal from the European Union
    accession negotiation
    Opis:
    The paper analyzes the prospect of Greece exit know as “Grexit” from EU, whereas the Treaties have a specific legal regime on withdrawing – Article 50 TEU which was added to the Treaties by the Treaty of Lisbon. It confirms the possibility to leave the EU that many (but not all) legal observers believed existed beforehand. No fully-fledged Member State has in fact left the EU before or after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, although some parts of Member States have done so. Before the Treaty of Lisbon, this was accomplished by means of Treaty amendment. One of the important question is whether would it be possible for Greece to withdraw a notification to leave the EU? In the article an argument will be raised that other Member States and the EU institutions are arguably legally obliged to refuse debt relief for Greece, in accordance with the Treaties’ no bail-out rule.
    Źródło:
    Security Dimensions; 2016, 18(18); 164-189
    2353-7000
    Pojawia się w:
    Security Dimensions
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Wymogi konstytucyjne określone w art. 50 ust. 1 TUE – możliwe procedury podjęcia decyzji o wystąpieniu z Unii Europejskiej w państwach członkowskich
    Constitutional requirements specified in Article 50 (1) TEU – possible procedures for making a decision to withdraw from the European Union in Member States
    Autorzy:
    Krawczak, Marcin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2140135.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2022
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
    Tematy:
    Brexit
    Member State’s withdrawal from the European Union
    Article 50 TEU
    brexit
    wystąpienie państwa członkowskiego z Unii Europejskiej
    art. 50 TUE
    Opis:
    W literaturze traktującej o procedurze wystąpienia państwa członkowskiego z Unii Europejskiej przede wszystkim analizowane są kolejne etapy całego procesu na poziomie unijnym. Rzadko badacze odnoszą się do wewnętrznych (krajowych) procedur związanych z podjęciem decyzji o wystąpieniu z UE. Zgodnie z ust. 1 art. 50 Traktatu o Unii Europejskiej, stanowiącym podstawę prawną wystąpienia państwa członkowskiego z UE, „Każde Państwo Członkowskie może, zgodnie ze swoimi wymogami konstytucyjnymi, podjąć decyzję o wystąpieniu z Unii”. Sformułowanie „wymogi konstytucyjne” nastręczyło licznych problemów natury interpretacyjnej w procesie brexitu. Niniejszy artykuł traktuje zatem o prawdopodobnej procedurze podjęcia decyzji o wystąpieniu z Unii Europejskiej we wszystkich państwach członkowskich. W ramach badań dokonano analizy przepisów krajowych odnoszących się do członkostwa w UE oraz ogólnie w organizacjach międzynarodowych. Choć w żadnym państwie członkowskim, nie licząc Polski, nie uregulowano bezpośrednio procedury podjęcia decyzji o wystąpieniu z UE, to w systemach prawnych wszystkich państw członkowskich ujęte są postanowienia dotyczące ratyfikacji i wypowiadania umów międzynarodowych.
    The vast majority of the literature on the procedure of a Member State’s withdrawal from the European Union concerns the analysis of subsequent stages of the process at the EU level. Researchers rarely resort to internal (national) procedures related to making a decision on the withdrawal from the EU. According to Article 50(1) of the Treaty on European Union, which is the legal basis for a Member State’s withdrawal from the EU “Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements”. The term “constitutional requirements” has raised numerous problems of an interpretative nature in the Brexit process. This paper, therefore, addresses the possible procedure for making a decision to withdraw from the European Union in all Member States. The study analyzes national provisions relating to membership in the EU and international organizations in general. Although no Member State, except Poland, regulates the procedure of making a decision to withdraw from the EU directly, legal systems of all Member States include provisions concerning ratification and termination of international agreements.
    Źródło:
    Acta Iuris Stetinensis; 2022, 37; 69-85
    2083-4373
    2545-3181
    Pojawia się w:
    Acta Iuris Stetinensis
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Konsekwencje brexitu w dziedzinie prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego
    The consequences of Brexit in private international law
    Autorzy:
    Majkowska-Szulc, Sylwia
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030082.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-12-10
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    European Union
    withdrawal from the European Union
    art. 50 TEU
    Brexit
    EU uniform law
    European private international law
    national jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters
    mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments
    judicial cooperation between Member States
    e-Justice Portal
    Opis:
    Brexit is a unique phenomenon as no Member State has ever expressed the will to leave the European Union. Never before had the in-depth impact of a Member State withdrawal been analysed. The issue has started to be analysed after the referendum in which the British voted in favour of leaving the European Union. The topic of the potential consequences of Brexit in the field of private international law concerns, inter alia, national jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, specific procedures of EU uniform law, judicial cooperation between Member States or the functioning of the e-Justice Portal and dynamic forms. Before a given Member State withdraws from the EU, interested parties should have been informed, inter alia, of how pending proceedings will be conducted starting with the withdrawal day, what about proceedings initiated at the date of withdrawal or later on, and what about the rulings of the courts of the applicant state covered by the exequatur procedure before the withdrawal. Therefore, the primary purpose of the article is to determine the framework for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in the field of private international law. An additional aim of this paper is to better prepare natural and legal persons for the new post-Brexit reality. European integration has brought Europe peace and prosperity and enabled unprecedented cooperation in all areas of common interest. Following the withdrawal decision, the state and its citizens cease to benefit from the acquis communautaire. In fact, the United Kingdom left the European Union on 31 January 2020. As far as private international law is concerned, the United Kingdom has become a third country. Subsequently, on 1 February 2020 a transition period has started and it aims to provide more time for citizens and businesses to adapt. The negotiations on the future partnership between the EU and the UK has started in March 2020, but they were postponed due to the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union is sometimes compared to love that has passed away, but former lovers must continue to meet from time to time to manage certain common affaires. The analysis of the topic leads to the conclusion that, in fact, Brexit is a unique phenomenon that has no added value.
    Źródło:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 138-158
    1896-7604
    2353-9852
    Pojawia się w:
    Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Constitutional Case for Making the Article 50 TEU Notification
    Autorzy:
    Ruairi, O'Neill,
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902667.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
    Tematy:
    BREXIT
    European Union law
    national constitutional law
    English law
    Article 50 TEU
    withdrawal from the EU
    Opis:
    In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom voted in favour of leaving the European Union. For the first time since its creation in the Lisbon Reform Treaty of 2009, art. 50 TEU will probably now be invoked by the UK for the withdrawal process from the EU, envisaged by the outcome of the referendum, to commence. Article 50 TEU requires that national constitutional arrangements exist so that notification on withdrawal can be made to the European Council. Curiously, to date, the biggest consequence of the referendum outcome has not been the creation of a debate about the role of EU law in the UK legal order, but rather the separation of powers within the UK’s unwritten constitution and which organ of state has authority to activate the art. 50 TEU withdrawal: Parliament or the Executive. The debate has spawned dozens of constitutional blog posts, numerous academic articles, a High Court judicial review of the Government’s position, a second draft independence bill published by the Scottish Government and a judicial review before the Northern Irish Court of Appeal. On one side of the debate, the Government maintains that it alone possesses the Royal Prerogative to ratify and withdraw from international treaties, and thus to make the notification of withdrawal. On the other hand, Parliament and the ’Bremainers’ maintain that any unilateral action by the Government exceeds its authority, and Parliament must provide authorisation; a position which could ultimately result in the referendum outcome being ignored and the UK remaining a Member State. In a third corner, the governments of Scotland and Northern Ireland, two countries within the UK whose electorates voted to remain in the EU, demand a voice in both the decision to leave and in the subsequent negotiations with the EU institutions (note, however, that the status of the devolved administrations will not be addressed in this article, as the issue is considered by the author as being too unclear in the absence of any judicial statement on matters of devolution and institutional hierarchy, including but not limited to the limitations imposed on the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty by the Sewel Convention). The judgment of the High Court has not yet been published, and even if it were there will inevitably be an appeal to the Supreme Court, so it is only possible to speculate on what will happen, but this article intends to provide clarity on the legal principles currently under discussion in the most important constitutional discussion to happen in the UK since it joined the EU in 1973.
    Źródło:
    Studia Iuridica; 2016, 68; 249-262
    0137-4346
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Iuridica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies