Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Unia lubelska" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-50 z 54
Tytuł:
Уладзімір Падалінскі, Прадстаўніцтва Вяліка-го Княства Літоўскага на Люблінскім сойме 1569 года. Удзел у працы першага вальнага сойма Рэчы Паспалітай, Мінск 2017
U. Padalinski, The Representation of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania at the Lublin Diet of 1569: Participation in the Activities of the First General Diet of the Commonwealth, Minsk 2017
Autorzy:
Zawadzki, Jarosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/474777.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018-10-29
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Sejm lubelski 1569 r.
Unia Lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
parlamentaryzm
Opis:
recenzja
Reviews
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2018, 25; 355-357
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Idea unii polsko-litewskiej w twórczości Jana Kochanowskiego
Autorzy:
Rusnak, Radosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031010.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Jan Kochanowski
Union of Lublin
Proporzec albo Hołd pruski
Fraszki
unia lubelska
Opis:
The paper takes a common view of those works by Jan Kochanowski which reflect the relationship between the author and the act of the Polish-Lithuanian Union established on 1 July 1569 in Lublin. The only text that is the poet’s direct reaction to the event in question is Proporzec or Hołd pruski, which does not mean that there are no other works of this type by Kochanowski. The examples are the poem Zgoda / Concordia, Fragment XXI (Battle with Amurat at Varna), the Latin Ode IV (Ad Concordiam) or Fraszka II 107 (Na most warszewski / On the Bridge of Warsaw).
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 158-169
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nieznana pieczęć odnaleziona przy dokumencie Unii lubelskiej
Unknown seal in The Union of Lublin Act
Autorzy:
Król-Próba, Justyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065333.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
dokument pergaminowy
pieczęć
sfragistyka
The Union of Lublin
parchment
seal
sphragistics
sigillography
Opis:
The act of the Polish-Lithuanian Union of 1569, so-called The Union of Lublin, is preserved in the holdings of the Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw in the collection of parchment records (ref. No. 5627). This is the 16th c. parchment document with a large group of pendant wax seals. Until now it was thought that 77 seals were attached to the document. However, during the restoration work carried out in the Central Laboratory for Conservation of Archive Materials in Warsaw was revealed another previously unknown seal. This article describes this seal as well as the attempts to identify its owner.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2016, 23; 255-258
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wyciszana klęska unii lubelskiej: litewska odsiecz wiedeńska
Autorzy:
Obremski, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031020.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
John III Sobieski
Vienna
school theatre
Unia lubelska
Jan III Sobieski
Wiedeń
teatr szkolny
Opis:
Did the Union of Lublin pass the test of time in 1683 in perhaps in the most difficult period for it? The Lithuanian relief of Vienna was only simulated, but if everything was calmed down, it was because the anti-Royal opposition was strong and John III was weak. At the same time, a problem arose of how to proclaim the glory of the Viennese triumph without humiliating the late and infamous Lithuania? The answer is a school Jesuit theatre and a performance entitled Picture of Victory [...].
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 267-276
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kościół prawosławny w dobie Unii Lubelskiej. Kryzys czy początek odrodzenia?
The Orthodox Church in the era of the Union of Lublin. A crisis or the beginning of a revival?
Autorzy:
Gil, Andrzej
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16539284.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Kościół prawosławny
Unia Lubelska
Kryzys Kościoła
reforma Kościoła
Union of Lublin 1569
Orthodox Church
Kiev Metropolis
crisis
Opis:
The Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian state of the 16th century was organized under a unified and hierarchical structure of the Kiev Metropolis. Theoretically, it was subordinated to its Mother Church in Constantinople, in practice, however, it was almost fully autonomous with regard to its internal operation; in terms of organization and property, it was embedded in the social and economic system of the state of its time. Historiography to date has generally accepted the thesis about the multi-faceted crisis that the Orthodox in the Kiev Metropolis were supposed to be experiencing. This crisis was to intensify especially after the Union of Lublin in 1569, when fundamental structural changes were effected within the monarchy ruled by Sigismund Augustus. Transfer of four voivodeships from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, in which the Orthodox Ruthenian population was an important (and sometimes dominant) constituent part, into the borders of the Crown (the Kingdom of Poland), was to be the foundation on which Polish state administration and great landowners intended to build a new religious reality, primarily through the expulsion of the local Orthodox Church. An analysis of the situation of the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century shows that its condition did not differ significantly from what was happening in the Polish Catholic Church at the time. As far as the economic foundations are concerned, the Orthodox Church in the Commonwealth after 1569 owned assets sufficient to perform its function in every extent required by church law and custom, especially since it had institutional support, namely the ktetor system. The period following the Union of Lublin was also characterized by an expansion of Orthodox Church structures, especially at the level or parishes, whose number increased significantly. Artistic and spiritual culture flourished, as is clearly evident in the extant examples of icons, sacral architecture, liturgical books and theological literature. New forms of activity of the faithful (laymen) have emerged, such as Orthodox brotherhoods. Therefore, in my opinion, the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century did not differ from other religious communities, both in the Commonwealth and in other countries of Central and Eastern Europe. The only crisis that really affected it at the time was a crisis of growth.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 185-195
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
Autorzy:
Biłous, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
historiografia ukraińska
dydaktyka
nauczanie historii
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Ukraine
historiography
history textbooks
Opis:
In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przykłady losów przedstawicieli szlachty polskiej w Wielkim Księstwie Litewskim do czasu zawarcia Unii Lubelskiej
Examples of lives of Polish nobility in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania before 1569
Autorzy:
Zawadzki, Jarosław
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647765.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
szlachta polska
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Litwa
ithuania
Polish nobility in Lithuania
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Opis:
The article presents the history of representatives of several Polish noble families settled in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the period preceding the conclusion of the Union of Lublin. Persons selected for the analysis were linked to the most powerful Lithuanian families - dukes Olelkowicz Słucki and Radziwiłł. They were people who could serve as specialists in specific fields in Lithuania. Their success was determined by their talent and competence, as well as the need for specialists during the period of great internal reforms initiated by Sigismund the Elder and Queen Bona and continued by Sigismund Augustus.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 67-102
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Jana Ponętowskiego wierszowana relacja o unii lubelskiej i sejmie 1569 roku
Autorzy:
Kroczak, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031013.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
union of Lublin
parliament of 1569
Jan Ponętowski
news
historiography
Maciej Stryjkowski
unia lubelska
sejm walny 1569
nowiny
historiografia
Opis:
The union between Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania, a legal act with permanent and historically important effects, was signed in Lublin in 1569. Jan Ponętowski (a nobleman, probably a witness of the events) wrote a poetic report on the event entitled Krótki rzeczy polskich sejmowych pamięci godnych komentarz (Short Commentary on Memorable Polish Parliamentary Matters), printed in Cracow in 1569. The paper touches upon what Ponętowski says about the Union and other events in Lublin during the parliament: diplomatic missions, judgments, topics of talks and news from other lands. It also tries to explain why the Union of Lublin (the most important achievement of the parliament) was only marginally described by the author; and also why he only laconically reported the solemn feudal homage of Albert Frederick,  the Duke of Prussia, to the Polish king Sigismund II Augustus. The paper compares Ponętowski’s book with old-Polish historiographical descriptions of these matters.
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 185-201
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska aktem założycielskim Rzeczypospolitej
The Union of Lublin as a founding act of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
unie polsko-litewskie
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Central Archive of Historical Records
AGAD
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 13-64
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia lubelska 1569 : pieczęcie i herby
Pieczęcie i herby : unia lubelska 1569
Autorzy:
Górzyński, Sławomir (1962- ; historyk).
Współwytwórcy:
Wajs, Hubert. Autor
Król-Próba, Justyna. Autor
Jankowski, Rafał. Autor
Dacka-Górzyńska, Iwona. Redakcja
Wydawnictwo DiG. Wydawca
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Warszawa : Wydawnictwo DiG
Tematy:
Akt unii lubelskiej
Heraldyka
Pieczęcie
Sfragistyka
Unia lubelska (1569)
Źródłoznawstwo
Katalog zabytków
Praca zbiorowa
Publikacja bogato ilustrowana
Opis:
Na stronie przytytułowej: Historia jednego dokumentu.
Bibliografia, netografia na stronach 131-134.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Książka
Tytuł:
Dokument Unii Lubelskiej w Archiwum Głównym Akt Dawnych
The document of the Union of Lublin in the Central Archive of Historical Records
Autorzy:
Wajs, Hubert
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648080.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
AGAD
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
dokument unii lubelskiej
UNESCO
Central Archive of Historical Records
parchment documents
Union of Lublin
Opis:
It took King Sigismund Augustus the entire decade of the 1560s to bring the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania together. The plan was finalized on 1st of July 1569 at the General Sejm in Lublin. Before that, intense negotiations were held for almost three weeks, from 10th to 27th of June 1569. The conclusion of the agreement was completed by the exchange of acts of the union by both parties and the confirmation issued by the king, according to the “script” from Vilnius dated 24th March 1569. Evidence of those events is preserved in the only surviving parchment document of the Union of Lublin. It is the copy that the Lithuanian side has presented to the Polish side, authenticating it with 78 wax seals. The document is preserved in the Central Archive of Historical Records in Warsaw, in the Collection of Parchment Records, no. 5627. Before World War II, the document was viewed by professors Władysław Semkowicz and Stanisław Kutrzeba, publishers of the source edition Akta unii Polski z Litwą 1385–1791 [Records of the Poland-Lithuania Union 1385–1791] (Kraków 1932). At that time they saw two other acts of the Union of Lublin, which they also published in their book. Those were: the Union document presented by the Polish side to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (with 140 seals) and the so-called Original No. 2 (with 63 seals) of the Lithuanian document (i.e. the extant one). The article attempts to reconstruct the work of the Polish Crown Chancellery, operating under the supervision of Vice-Chancellor Franciszek Krasiński, which between 29 th June and 1 st July 1569 prepared these documents and organized their sealing by several hundred signatories. In the text, special attention is given – as Władysław Semkowicz and Stanisław Kutrzeba have already done – to the differences between the two documents of the Lithuanian side (the extant one and the lost one).
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 165-175
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Doświadczając historii: melancholia przeszłości w kulturach peryferyjnych na przykładzie Polski i Portugalii
Autorzy:
Partyka, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031005.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Portugal
Union of Lublin
Iberian Union
historical consciousness
peripheral culture
Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
Portugalia
unia lubelska
unia iberyjska
świadomość historyczna
kultura peryferyjna
Opis:
In this paper I combine several different notions from broadly conceived humanities and two histories: of Poland and of Portugal at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. I comprehend here the experiencing of history as a way of treating one’s own, national past. The metaphor of experiencing history is related to the question of what the historical circumstances and situations are, what the purpose is and what history is referred to by the elites who are instrumental in shaping national identity. Melancholy of the past is already a partial answer-thesis to the question: In what way? The notion of peripheral cultures seems to be useful when we attempt to answer the question: in what situations and for what purpose we (the Portuguese and the Poles) referred, but also still continue to refer, to the past/history. Some considerations on the experience of history will have the following two Unions in the background: the Iberian Union (1580) and the Union of Lublin (1569).
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 109-115
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska a problem rywalizacji o przywództwo w elicie politycznej Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
The Union of Lublin and the problem of competition for leadership within the political elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Autorzy:
Kempa, Tomasz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648085.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
magnates
elite of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Sigismund II Augustus
Unia lubelska
magnateria
elita Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego
Zygmunt II August
Opis:
The paper presents the problem of power struggle among the leading Lithuanian magnates in the context of the preparation and conclusion of the Union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with the Crown of Poland in 1569. Three centres contended to play a major role in Lithuanian policy before the Union of Lublin: The Radziwiłłs, with their undisputed leader – Chancellor, and Voivode of Vilnius, Mikołaj known as “the Red”; the Chodkiewicz family, among whom the starost of Samogitia, Jan Chodkiewicz, grew to be the most active figure even before the Sejm in Lublin; and a representative of Orthodox Church adherents, Knyaz [prince] Jerzy Olelkowicz Słucki, who did not hold any prestigious offices. The aspirations of Prince Słucki stemmed from the fact that he was the closest relative of Sigismund II Augustus, the last representative of Jagiellonian dynasty on the Polish-Lithuanian throne. While Radziwiłł “the Red” was against the new, stricter union with Poland, the other two magnates opposed him, supporting the idea of a new union. Since the King supported the project of further political rapprochement between Poland and Lithuania since the Sejm of 1562/63, the support for the union brought Chodkiewicz a number of promotions and royal endowments in the 1560s (all the more so as the monarch wanted to pit the Chodkiewicz family against the Radziwiłłs, who were all-powerful in Lithuania at that time). Jan Chodkiewicz was also able to take advantage of the obstruction that “Red” used during the Lublin Sejm (when he forced the Lithuanians to secretly leave Lublin), and it was ultimately he who played a major role in completing negotiations on the union and signing the new union in 1569. Although “Red” did not return to Lublin to finalise the union deliberations, he quickly regained the King’s trust. He was supported by the younger generation of the Radziwiłłs, including his son Krzysztof and his nephew Mikołaj Krzysztof, who had sworn an oath of union in Lublin. Prince Słucki’s plan, on the other hand, failed completely. Słucki, as a result of his absence from the Sejm in Lublin due to illness, lost his chance to gain an exceptional position in the new Senate (as the king’s closest relative). The Union of Lublin did not change the balance of power in Lithuania. Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł and Jan Chodkiewicz remained the most influential Lithuanian magnates in the following years.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 140-161
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ku „jednej nieróżnej Rzeczypospolitej”. Król Zygmunt August wobec idei unii polsko-litewskiej
Towards “One Not-Different Republic” King Augustus’ Attitude to the Idea of the Polish-Lithuanian Union
Autorzy:
Januszek-Sieradzka, Agnieszka
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1929359.pdf
Data publikacji:
2011
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
unia polsko-litewska
unia lubelska (1569)
Zygmunt II August (1520-1572)
Radziwiłłowie
korespondencja
Polish-Lithuanian Union
Union of Lublin (1569)
Sigismund II Augustus (1520-1572)
the Radziwiłłs
correspondence
Opis:
The issue of the Polish-Lithuanian Union that became one of the main executionist postulates put forward by the nobility at the sessions of the Sejm from the beginning of King Sigismund II Augustus' reign in Poland (1548-1572); it was also one of the main subjects of the monarch's correspondence with his most important Lithuanian political partners – Mikołaj Radziwiłł “Rudy” (the Red) (about 1515-1584) and Mikołaj Radziwiłł “Czarny” (the Black) (1515-1565). In the King's letters it is easy to observe the tactic that for nearly 20 years allowed to efficiently stop the plan of forming a Polish-Lithuanian real union that threatened the dynastic interests of the Jagiellons – a prohibition of pro-union propaganda and forming an anti-union Lithuanian party around the Radziwiłłs, obstruction, apparent concessions, winning deputies and senators against other ones, skilful temporization. Letters unambiguously show that the change in the attitude towards the question of the Union that took place at the beginning of the 1560s was for Sigismund II Augustus a derivative of the accepted solution to the issue of Livonia; the King took the position that it is only by way of forming a union of Poland and Lithuania that military security and territorial integrity of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania can be ensured. However, passing from a radically anti-union position to one of its main advocate and animator Sigismund Augustus did not change his basic postulate, namely, that Poland and Lithuania should remain separate countries and the union between them should be based on the principle of equality of both partners. It was exactly the last of the Jagiellons who decided about federation as the form of the union of the Crown (Poland) and Lithuania.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2011, 59, 2; 81-98
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„A niechaj już unijej w skrzyniach nie chowamy” – akty unii lubelskiej i horodelskiej z archiwum Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego w zbiorach Radziwiłłów
„Let us no longer secrete the Unions in our coffers”. Union of Lublin and Union of Horodło acts from the archives of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the Radziwiłłs’ collection
Autorzy:
Jankowski, Rafał
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16624571.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
Unia horodelska
unie polsko-litewskie
Radziwiłłowie
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Archiwum
Union of Horodło
Union of Lublin
Radziwiłł Warsaw Archive
documentary archive of the Great Duchy of Lithuania
Opis:
The article discusses the preservation history of two copies of the Union of Lublin act, the fate of which is unknown. These were: the second copy of the Lithuanian side’s act issued for the Polish Crown and the act of the Union handed over by the Polish side to Lithuanians. In the course of describing the history of the acts of the Union of Lublin, the author also describes the fate of several documents directly related to the Union of Lublin, contained in the Radziwiłł collection. Since the times of Nyasvizh and Kleck fee holder Antoni Wilhelm Radziwiłł (1833–1904), the acts of the Union of Lublin were kept under supervision in a special box which also contained the acts of the Union of Horodło. For this reason, the article also presents the course of preservation of the Union of Horodło. The author of the article puts forward a hypothesis that the acts of both the Union of Horodło and the Union of Lublin from the Radziwiłł collection were burnt in Warsaw together with the Krasiński fee library in the first half of October 1944.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 292-334
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Świadectwa o dawnej Polsce w źródłach ormiańskich. Współczesna wzmianka o Unii Lubelskiej
Mentions of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Kingdom of Poland in Armenian sources. Contemporary mention of Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Mnatsakanyan, Piruz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647999.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
Ormianie
Ormianie polscy
Armenian sources for history of Old Poland
Kamyanets
Chronicle
Armenian community in Old Poland
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 235-258
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dokument Unii Lubelskiej – zagadnienia konserwatorskie
The Union of Lublin document – preservation aspects
Autorzy:
Król-Próba, Justyna
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
AGAD
konserwacja pieczęci
dokument wielopieczętny
Unia Lubelska
dokument pergaminowy
wax seals
preserved condition
reasons for damage
Union of Lublin
Central Archive of Historical Records
parchment documents
Opis:
The Union of Lublin document, preserved in the Central Archive of Historical Records in Warsaw (in the Collection of Parchment Records, no. 5627) is an extremely valuable relic of great historical significance. In 2015 it was honoured with the European Heritage Label, in 2017 it was included in the UNESCO Memory of the World Register. The 450th anniversary of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, which took place in 2019, was an opportunity to summarize the many years of preservation care exercised over the document by the Central Laboratory for the Preservation of Archival Materials at the Central Archive of Historical Records. Over the years the concept of conservation has gradually changed. Restoration, aimed at restoring the original appearance of the object, gave way to protective and preventive maintenance, which emphasizes extensive documentation of the item and minimizes intervention in its structure. The article presents an outline of the problems regarding the state of preservation and causes of damage to wax seals, which have been discussed and researched in recent years.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 176-182
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Niech to każdy obaczy jeśli Litwa małą krzywdę, żal, despekt i wzgardą ma od Polaków”: epizod sporu między Litwą a Koroną Polską o Inflanty
“Let Everyone see that Lithuania has Harm, Regret, Offence, and Contempt from the Poles”: an Episode of a Dispute between the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish Kingdom over Livonia
Autorzy:
Padalinski, Uładzimir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131656.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
świadomość polityczna
szlachta
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Inflanty
wojna inflancka
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
political consciousness
nobility
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Livonia
Livonian War
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Opis:
W artykule dokonano analizy utworu rękopiśmiennego Czo za prawa X. Litewskie ma do ziemie Inflianczki a poliaczi do niei nicz niemaią (najprawdopodobniej z 1582 r.). Na jego przykładzie zaprezentowano argumenty prawne i ideologiczne wykorzystywane przez szlachtę Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego podczas sporów ze szlachtą Korony Polskiej o przynależność Inflant. Ukazano także znaczny poziom nieufności litewskiej elity politycznej wobec partnerów koronnych w końcu XVI w., spowodowany doświadczeniami związanymi z zawarciem unii lubelskiej oraz skutkami wojny inflanckiej.
The article analyses the text preserved in a manuscript under the title Czo za prawa X. Litewskie ma do ziemie Inflianczki a poliaczi do niei nicz niemaią (What rights has the Duchy of Lithuania to Livonian lands while the Poles have none, most probably written in 1582). It contains legal and ideological arguments put forward by the nobility of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania during the disputes with the nobility of the Polish Kingdom over the possession of Livonia. The author concludes that the Lithuanian political elite retained a deep distrust of their Polish partners at the end of the sixteenth century resulting from the previous experiences gained at the time of the conclusion of the Union of Lublin and the Livonian War.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 121-133
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zjednoczenie narodów cnych: polskiego, litewskiego, ruskiego : Wołyń i Kijowszczyzna w Unii Lubelskiej
Wołyń i Kijowszczyzna w Unii Lubelskiej
Autorzy:
Litwin, Henryk (1959- ).
Współwytwórcy:
Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy. Wydawca
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Warszawa : Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy
Tematy:
Sejm (1569)
Polityka
Szlachta
Unia lubelska (1569)
Monografia
Opis:
Bibliografia na stronach 199-222. Indeks.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Książka
Tytuł:
‘Free with the Free, Equal with the Equal’: Poles and Ukrainians Against the Background of the Conversion of the Jagiellonian Myth. Experience of Polish Historiography at the Beginning of the 20th Century
‘Wolni z wolnymi, równi z równymi’: Polacy i Ukraińcy w tle konwersji mitu jagiellońskiego. Doświadczenia historiografii polskiej początku XX wieku
Autorzy:
Stępnik, Andrzej Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1374031.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Polish historiography
20th century
Ukraine
Ukrainians
Union of Lublin
independence
narrative myths
collective memory
historiografia polska
XX wiek
Ukraina
Ukraińcy
unia lubelska
niepodległość
mity narracyjne
pamięć zbiorowa
Opis:
The Jagiellonian myth is relatively well developed in Polish historiography. The exception is the first twenty years of the 20th century, when its successive conversions and accelerated migration from the discourse of historiography to the discourse of memory took place. In the background of these processes, a kind of advancement of Polish-Ukrainian issues was taking place (politically conditioned), which until now had been dominated by Polish-Lithuanian relations. This article is intended to expand on and document these issues. The subject of analysis and conclusion were works of a general nature (syntheses, parasyntheses, textbooks, compendia, etc.), which accumulate and ‘reflect’ current scientific, political, social, cultural and other trends, creating interesting research material. It allowed to establish that in 1900–1918, the symbol of the Union of Lublin, the idea of ‘free with the free, equal with the equal’ was a popular motif of historical narratives, which as a scientific construct, however, became more and more archaic. Its cultivation resulted in an indirect retreat from critical historiography. It can be seen that the Jagiellonian myth attracted neo-Romantics to a greater extent than Modernists who sought a closer link between historiography and social sciences. However, it cannot be said that there were no interesting attempts to reinterpret it. Such were the references to some of the then promising sociologising and psychologising directions that appeared in the West but also in Poland. Surprisingly, the greatest admirers of this idea at the beginning of the 20th century were historians identifying themselves with national democratic ideas, followed by conservatives (realists) and researchers associated with various factions of the independence camp. The Treaty of Riga of 18 March 1921, concluded between Poland, Soviet Russia and Ukraine, showed that the romantic spirit of the Union of Lublin survived and became part of the history of ideas.
Mit jagielloński jest stosunkowo dobrze opracowany w historiografii polskiej. Wyjątek stanowi pierwsze dwudziestolecie XX w., kiedy to doszło do kolejnych jego konwersji i przyspieszenia migracji z dyskursu historiografii do dyskursu pamięci. W tle tych procesów dokonywał się (warunkowany politycznie) swoisty awans problematyki polsko-ukraińskiej, która dotychczas była zdominowana relacjami polsko-litewskimi. Niniejszy artykuł ma na celu rozwinięcie i udokumentowanie tychże kwestii. Przedmiotem analizy i wnioskowania były prace o charakterze ogólnym (syntezy, parasyntezy, podręczniki, kompendia etc.), które kumulują w sobie i ‘odbijają’ aktualne tendencje naukowe, polityczne, społeczne, kulturowe i inne, tworząc interesujący materiał badawczy. Pozwolił on na ustalenie, że w latach 1900–1918 symbol unii lubelskiej, idea ‘wolnych z wolnymi, równych z wolnymi’, była popularnym motywem narracji historycznych, który jako konstrukt naukowy stawał się jednak coraz bardziej archaiczny. Jego pielęgnowanie powodowało pośrednio odwrót od historiografii krytycznej. Daje się zauważyć, że mit jagielloński większym stopniu przyciągał neoromantyków niż modernistów zmierzających do ściślejszego powiązania historiografii z naukami społecznymi. Nie można jednak stwierdzić, że nie było ciekawych prób jego reinterpretacji. Do takich należały nawiązywania do niektórych, obiecujących wówczas, kierunków socjologizujących i psychologizujących, jakie pojawiały na Zachodzie, ale też na gruncie krajowym. Zaskakująco, największymi admiratorami tej idei na początku XX w. stali się historycy identyfikujący się z ideami narodowodemokratycznymi, dalej plasowali się ówcześni konserwatyści (realiści) i badacze związani z różnymi frakcjami obozu niepodległościowego. Traktat ryski z 18 marca 1921 r., zawarty między Polską, Rosją Sowiecką i Ukrainą, wykazał, że romantyczny duch unii lubelskiej przeżył się i stał się fragmentem historii idei.
Źródło:
Res Historica; 2020, 49; 465-485
2082-6060
Pojawia się w:
Res Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przywileje lubelskie i koncepcja „narodu ruskiego” w polemice prawosławnej (od końca XVI do lat dwudziestych XVII wieku)
The Lublin Privileges and the Notion of the “Ruthenian Nation” in Polemic Orthodox Narratives (the Late 16th century through the 1620s)
Autorzy:
Starczenko, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Kotyńska, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648017.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
polemika prawosławna
Cerkiew prawosławna
naród ruski
przywilej lubelski
Unia Lubelska
Religious polemics
privileges granted with the Union of Lublin
the Volhynian Voivodeship
the Principality of Kyiv
princes
law
identity
Opis:
In the article, the author analyzes the Lublin privileges for the Volhynian lands and the Kiev Principality as an important resource for constructing “the Ruthenian nation” as a political subject in polemical texts created after the Union of Brest (1596). Based on Apokrisis Christophora Philaletha and Palinodiа by Zachariasz Kopystenski and Melecjusz Smotrycki’s works of the early 1620s, the article tracks the meanings with which the polemists imbued the notion of “the Ruthenian nation,” and how they carved the space for the third member on the already established map of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of Two Nations based on the “ancient rights” and the privileges received with the Union of Lublin. The reading of the polemical narratives from this perspective allows to significantly undermine the popular scholarly notion that the Orthodox authors identified “the Ruthenian nation” almost exclusively with the Orthodox population, and its territory with the Kiev Metropolis. The author draws the conclusion that the notion of “the Ruthenian nation” as an amorphous confessional unity of the believers of the “ancient Greek Orthodox faith” was ceding to the political model of “Rus”, based on “its own” laws, “its own” territory, and the virtual authority of its princes. In essence, it was the polemists’ reliance on the Lublin privileges as the legal basis for the existence of the Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth that encouraged them to construct the territorial and legal model of the Ruthenian nation.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 196-221
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kogo na sejmie lubelskim reprezentował Augustyn Rotundus Mieleski (†1582), wójt wileński i sekretarz królewski?
Who did the Vogt of Vilnius, Royal Secretary Augustinus Rotundus Mieleski (†1582) represent at the Sejm of Lublin?
Autorzy:
Ragauskas, Aivas
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16648103.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
sejm lubelski 1569 r.
Lublin
Wilno
wójt wileński
sekretarz królewski
Augustyn Rotundus Mieleski
Union of Lublin
Sejm of Lublin of 1569
Vilnius
Vogt
of Vilnius
Royal Secretary
Augustinus Rotundus Mieleski
Opis:
The Vogt of Vilnius, Royal Secretary Augustinus Rotundus (the Rotund, Mieleski) was present at the Sejm of Lublin in 1569 at the initiative of the Lithuanian Chancellor and Vilnius Voivode Mikołaj “the Red” Radziwiłł. He participated in the Sejm as the Royal Secretary and Counsellor of the Lithuanian delegation, as well as a renowned historian and an experienced lawyer. Rotundus remained in close relations with the Radziwiłłs, perhaps even as a cliens. Likewise, in his capacity of notary public, Rotundus was the proxy of the Bishop of Vilnius Walerian Protasewicz. Thus, the Vogt of Vilnius was not a member of the Lithuanian delegation or a representative of the city of Vilnius. He could not be the latter due to the specificity of the office of the vogt – until the beginning of the 17 th century the vogt of Vilnius was not elected by the magistrate; he was the king’s representative in the city. As a Royal Secretary, harbouring aspirations to nobility, Rotundus (originating from a bourgeois family in Wieluń) did not want to be identified with the city. Nevertheless, Rotundus has served Vilnius well through his behind-the-scenes activities to the benefit of the city.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 122-139
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Posłowie ruskich województw Korony na sejmie lubelskim w styczniu–lutym 1569 roku
Envoys of the Ruthenian Voivodeships of the Crown to the Lublin Sejm in January and February 1569
Autorzy:
Michałowski, Witalij
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131657.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
unia lubelska
sejm lubelskie 1569 r.
województwa ruskie Korony
województwo ruskie
województwo podolskie
województwo bełskie
Union of Lublin
Lublin Sejm of 1569
Ruthenian voivodeships of the Polish Crown
Ruthenian voivodeship
Podolian voivodeship
Belz voivodeship
Opis:
W artykule omówiono stosunek szlachty z ruskich województw Korony Polskiej (ruskiego, podolskiego i bełskiego) na sejmie lubelskim w styczniu–lutym 1569 r. wobec planów unii, przed podjęciem decyzji o inkorporacji Podlasia i Wołynia.
This article presents the stance taken by the representatives of the Ruthenian voievodeships of the Polish Crown (Ruthenian, Podolian, and Belz voivodeships) at the Sejm session in Lublin in 1569 before the incorporation of Podlasie and Volhynia.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 95-119
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historyczne i artystyczne znaczenie krucyfiksu Unii Lubelskiej
Historical and artistic significance of the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Głodzik, Gabriela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1954048.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Krucyfiks Unii Lubelskiej
krucyfiks ołtarzowy z kości słoniowej
rzeźba z kości słoniowej w Polsce
Unia lubelska Jana Matejki
Crucifix of the Union of Lublin
ivory altar crucifix
ivory sculpture in Poland
Jan Matejko's Union of Lublin
Opis:
It is not known for how long the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin has belonged to the furnishing of the Dominican Fathers monastery in Lublin. Dispersed, and to a large extent destroyed archival records of the monastery do not allow reconstruction of history of that object that is linked by the Dominican tradition with the swearing-in ceremony of the Union of Lublin in 1569 and with Jan Matejko's painting. The first part of the present article is an attempt at explaining the old tradition and comparing it to Matejko's artistic vision of Unia Lubelska (Union of Lublin). This required putting the Lublin crucifix in the context of the swearing-in on the basis of the diary of the Union of 1569. The records do not mention the crucifix. Its place is taken by the New Testament. The painter faced a similar problem; as a result he weaved the Dominican tradition in the source description of the event. Today it is hard to tell if the tradition of the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin is credible. It must have been generally known in the 19th century since Matejko learned about it. The Dominican cross made of ivory became inspiration for his painting. The artist willingly used a language full of allusions to painting and meanings hidden in objects. The symbol of the snake on the base made it possible to give a new direction to the interpretation of the cross: an enslaved nation, like Christ, will soon defeat the enemy power. The legend hidden in the reliquary for St. Stanisław's head, the gospel about resurrection, the cross as a sign of triumph, together form a pictorial vision of the fall and resurrection of the homeland. The Crucifix of the Union of Lublin represents a group of small altar crucifixes made of ivory, often found in churches and monasteries all over Poland. They were especially popular in the baroque period. They were mass-produced in the Catholic countries of Europe, especially in France and Italy. Their distinguishing features are the rare and costly material – ivory – of which the figure was sculptured, and the wooden cross covered with black enamel. Two variations of presentations of Christ on the cross can be distinguished: that of Christ as an alive person, and as a dead one. The Lublin crucifix is an example of modern sculpture in ivory, with a new iconographical interpretation, presenting the alive Christ, raising his head to God the Father and uttering his last words at the moment of his death. The problem of the ivory sculpture in Poland has not yet been undertaken by Polish researchers.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2004, 52, 4; 263-300
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-50 z 54

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies