Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Unia kościelna" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9
Tytuł:
Duchowni i świeccy wobec unii kościelnej na soborach brzeskich w 1596 roku
Clergy and Lay People Against the Church Union at the Brest Councils in 1596
Autorzy:
Mironowicz, Antoni
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2168707.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Akademia Supraska
Tematy:
sobór brzeski
unia kościelna
Cerkiew prawosławna
Opis:
The vast majority of the Orthodox community: the clergy and the faithful strongly rejected the idea of the Brest union. Such an attitude was unambiguous both during the preparation of the Councils of Brest, during the sessions of the anti-union Council and after its end. It should also be emphasized that secular Orthodox (magnates, nobles and representatives of church brotherhoods) significantly influenced the attitude of the majority of the clergy to the ecclesiastical union with the Latin Church.
Źródło:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2018, Rola laikatu w życiu Cerkwi, 9; 38-50
2082-9299
Pojawia się w:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kościelna w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za czasów biskupa Prokopa Chmielewskiego (1652–1664)
The Church Union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065079.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Prokop Chmielewski
unia kościelna
diecezja przemyska (greckokatolicka)
Opis:
The church union in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor at the time of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1652–1664) is a neglected page of the historiography. There is no evidence to indicate parts of the diocese where Unites lived, as well as, the number of the churches is unknown, there is also no information about the Uniate priests involved in various levels of the hierarchy. The reign of bishop Chmielewski fall on difficult period of dual power in the eparchy of the Przemyśl-Sambor the Eastern Church. Simultaneous existence of the bishops of the Orthodox and Uniate denomination meant that they competed for the same cathedral, churches and worshippers. This was due to the complicated internal situation of Poland, involved in a civil war with the Cossacks, then in the war with Russia. The aggressors fought the church union in the name of the Eastern Orthodox Church, interfering in the internal affairs of Poland. This influenced the policy of King Jan Kazimierz towards the Church Union and the Orthodox Church. As the cathedral in Przemyśl was occupied by the Orthodox, the Uniate bishop Prokop Chmielewski resided in Walawa. He tried to maintain a semblance of hierarchical structure, thus, he called cathedral kryłos. He exercised jurisdiction over decanate of Krosno, Leżajsk, Muszyna and Oleszyce. Unites were the most represented in the royal estates, particularly in the district of Krosno, as well as, in the noble goods belonging to the Families of Fredro, Korniakta, Krasicki, Lubomirski, Sieniawski and Zamoyski. These are initial findings on the Uniate Church in the days of bishop Chmielewski. This matter requires further detailed research.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2015, 22; 169-202
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Idea zrodzona z rozpaczy“. Rola ruchu unickiego w bułgarskim odrodzeniu narodowym
“An Idea Born from Desperation”. The Role of the Uniate Movement in the Bulgarian National Revival
Autorzy:
Popek, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909799.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Bulgaria
Church Union
Bulgarian National Revival
Bułgaria
Unia Kościelna
Bułgarskie Odrodzenie Narodowe
Opis:
The article describes problems connected with the idea of a cooperation between Orthodox Bulgarian population and the Catholic Church at the turn of 50s and 60s of 19th century. The Uniate Movement was founded by Dragan Tsankov, who started to propagate the idea of westernization of Bulgarians in the newspaper “Bălgariya” with the cooperation with the French missionaries from the Congregation of the Mission and the Polish emigrants from the Hôtel Lambert. The milieu of Dragan Tsankov firstly supported the Union in Kukush in 1859 and one year later leaded to the nationwide Union. These events played an important role in history of the Bulgarian Revival and development of the Church Movement. It contributed to the emergence of the Bulgarian exarchate (1870), which was a decisive step for the Bulgarian fight for political rights in the Ottoman Empire.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2014, 21, 1; 103-120
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bizantyńskie freski w sandomierskiej katedrze: królewski dar na chwałę Bożą czy odblask idei unii horodelskiej?
Autorzy:
Smorąg-Różycka, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640694.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
bizantyńsko-ruskie malowidła, katedra w Sandomierzu, Anna Cylejska, Władysław Jagiełło, unia kościelna
Opis:
Byzantine frescoes in the Sandomierz cathedral: a royal gift for the greater glory of God or a reflection of the idea of the Union of Horodło? The subject of our deliberations is the ideological significance of the Byzantine frescoes founded by Ladislaus Jagiello and preserved until the present day in the Sandomierz cathedral. The origin of the polychrome should be traced to the period of the king’s marriage to Anna of Cilli, whose coat-of-arms is to be found in the row of coats-of-arms discovered during the conservation work conducted in the cathedral in the years 2008–2011. The very fact that Anna’s coat-of-arms had been placed within the row of coats-of-arms of the Kingdom of Poland, should be viewed in a wider perspective as a pictorial testimony of the royal legacy after king Casimir the Great and the continuity of the Piast monarchy under Jagiello’s rule. Thanks to an analysis of the content of the scenes as well as their arrangement, the authoress distinguishes two main axes of interpretation of the content of the paintings – the historical-eschatological image of theophany and the royal foundation. The polychromes gave testimony to the existence of two Christian cultures united within a single state organism, whereas the placing of the paintings and foundation plaques in within the space of the presbytery, proves that they fulfilled an important role as propaganda tools during the visits of the most illustrious guests of the kingdom. 
Źródło:
Prace Historyczne; 2014, 141, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:
Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sobór w Konstancji wobec monarchii polsko-litewskiej
Autorzy:
Graff, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/640467.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
sobór w Konstancji, monarchia jagiellońska, proces doktrynalny i prawny, chrystianizacja Żmudzi, unia kościelna
Opis:
The Council of Constance and its attitude towards the Polish-Lithuanian monarchy In the article the involvement of the delegation of the Kingdom of Poland in the work of the Council of Constance (1414–1418) was assessed. The analysis was carried out chiefly from the point of view of the key issues in the external policy of the Jagiellon monarchy; the analysis also focused on the reactions of the participants of the Council to the activities of the Polish delegation. Although the author agrees with the opinions that the Polish Kingdom did achieve an image success in Constance, yet he is of the opinion that the success played a secondary role as regards real-life events which took place in Central Europe; he also thinks that the success tends to be exagerated by Polish historiography. Apart from a narrow group of intellectuals, the contention between Poland and the Teutonic Order was of little interest to the Council participants, and hence he comes to the conclusion that military activities were a much more effective weapon in the defense of Polish-Lithuanian interests.Although without a doubt, Jagiello and Witold overestimated the significance of the Council in respect of solving the conflict with the Teutonic Order, yet they achieved a tangible success which consisted in a change of perception of their states as well as subjects by the contemporary European elites. Therefore, the author puts forward a hypothesis that the mission of the delegation of the Ja-giellon monarchy to the Council of Constance was one of those episodes in the history of Poland and Lithuania, which constitutes a permanent legacy of common historical identity.
Źródło:
Prace Historyczne; 2014, 141, 2
0083-4351
Pojawia się w:
Prace Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kapłani uniccy w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej za rządów biskupa Atanazego Krupeckiego (1610–1652)
Uniate priests in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reigns of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652)
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1064819.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
przemyska diecezja prawosławna
przemyska diecezja greckokatolicka
przemysko-samborska diecezja
unia kościelna
Atanazy Krupecki
Opis:
The article lists the Uniate priests of the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor under the reign of Bishop Atanazy Krupecki (1610–1652). This issue was overlooked in the existing historiography. The query was performed in the sources, that allowed the religious identification of a single priests, and thus, it was possible to distinguish whether the one was Uniate or Orthodox. The identification was carried out on the basis of the records of parishes created by the owners of the goods where the church was located. There was collected information about 95 Uniate priests and 12 more who probably were Uniates. Krupecki was the one who created the Uniate hierarchical structure in the Eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. This structure covered all the offices and the entire area of the vast diocese. The name register of the Uniate clergy allowed to determine the names of the following: one bishop ordinary, two bishops coadjutor, two vicars-general, nineteen kryłoszan [‘Russian cathedral canons’], three protopop [Russian dean] and two of them most probably Uniate, ten basilians monks incl., two monastery igumens, and additionaly one basilian nun (probably Uniate), and 71 popes (and additionally 11 popes probably Uniate) as well as three deacons. There were more functions and offices than exercising them priests, because many priests cumulated benefices and ecclesiastical dignities. Majority of the Uniate popes were to be found in the royal estates. The information about the 52 Uniate popes (and further 5 popes who probably were Uniates) was found in 11 districts. Most of the popes were in the royal estate called Sambor estate (21 Uniate popes and one probably Uniate). From the gentry villages was retrieved information on 5 Uniate popes (and one probably Uniate). In cities and towns belonging to the Latin Bishops of Kraków and Przemyśl cities and to the Uniate bishop of Przemyśl were indentified 10 popes of the Uniate denomination (and 4 probably Uniate). Some priests served more than one church. Under the care of the Uniate popes were 52 churches, including 6 in the cities and 46 in the villages. Among the collaborators of bishop Krupecki who occupied important offices in the eparchy were priests from outside the diocese of Przemyśl, who changed the rite from the Latin into the Greek one. The group was joined by only a few local Russians, who took the position in cathedral kryłos of Przemyśl. Many popes received parishes under the condition of their accession to the Union. The information about the Uniate priests cannot be treated as a closed list. The list will be developed in a result of further archival queries.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2014, 21; 137-170
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia w eparchii przemysko-samborskiej w latach 1664–1670
The Union in the eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor in the years 1664–1670
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1065191.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Antoni Terlecki
Jakub Susza
unia kościelna
greckokatolicka diecezja przemyska
church union
Greek Catholic Diocese of Przemyśl
Opis:
The article shows the state of the Uniate Church in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor during the transitional period between the death of Bishop Prokop Chmielewski (1664), and taking the diocese by Bishop Jan Małachowski (1670). At that time, Bishop Antoni Terlecki (1664–1669) ruled this diocese, and after his removal from the office – Jakub Susza, bishop of the neighboring Uniate diocese of Chełm, who was the administrator of the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor until the appointment of the next Bishop Ordinary. The rule by the Bishop Terlecki fell in the most difficult period in relations between the Uniate and the Orthodox churches. In the diocese of Przemysl advantage gained Orthodox under the strong leadership of bishop Antoni Winnicki, later Metropolitan of Kiev. The cathedral and most of the parishes in Przemyśl were in their hands. Orthodox took over another Uniate churches, and tried to expel the Uniate bishop from a residence in Walawa in next to Przemyśl, what they finally succeeded in 1669. An account of the bishop Terlecki’s governance is not clear, and in fact it has to be divided into two parts. The positive assessment gains the first one, launched in the final period of the rule of his predecessor – the bishop Prokop Chmielewski. Antoni Terlecki, first as coadjutor (1662), then Bishop Ordinary (1664) ably led the Uniate part of the Diocese of Przemyśl. He became involved in the efforts to strengthen the Uniate Church in Poland, in cooperation with the Uniate bishop of Chełm Jakub Susza. Antoni Terlecki was well prepared to deal with the high ecclesiastical functions. He was a basilian and a doctor of theology. However, over the time his negative traits as rowdiness and drunkenness prevailed. He neglected the duties of the bishop and voluntarily left the diocese of Przemyśl. As a result, the Uniate Metropolitan of Kiev, first imposed on Terlecki church curse, and then took his episcopal functions. Jakub Susza was entrusted with the administration of the Uniate eparchy of Przemyśl-Sambor. At the time of the Bishop Terlecki falls regression in the development of the church union in the diocese of Przemyśl-Sambor. Compact complexes of the Uniate churches were operated on the outskirts of the vast Eparchy, in its western and northern parts. There were 65 established churches confirmed by sources as Uniate and consecutive three more likely to be Uniate. A total of 45 identified with the name Uniate priest served (they cumulated several functions simultaneously).
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica; 2016, 23; 179-205
0860-1054
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Archivistica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Między „jarzmem fanariockim” a „jarzmem jezuickim”. Polemiki wokół bułgarskiej kwestii cerkiewnej między periodykami „Bułgaria” a „Dunajski Łabędź” w latach 1859–1861
Between the “Phanariote Yoke” and the „Jesuitical Yoke”. The 1859–1861 polemics between “Bulgaria” and “The Danubian Swan” journals concerning the issue of the Bulgarian Church
Autorzy:
Popek, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/909964.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016-03-08
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Bulgaria
the Church Movement
the Church Union
19th Century
Bulgarian Revival
Bułgaria
Ruch cerkiewny
Unia kościelna
XIX wiek
Bułgarskie odrodzenie narodowe
Opis:
At the turn of 1850s and 1860s there was a serious discussion inside the Bulgarian Church Movement, which had fallen apart into four parties: national, pro-Turkish moderates, pro-Russian moderates and pro-Uniate. One of the most fervent debates took place between the journals “The Danubian Swan” (edited by Georgi Sava Rakovski, connected with the national party the Church Movement) and “Bulgaria” (published by the leader of pro-Uniate party Dragan Tzankov). The discussions focused on the topics pivotal for the Bulgarian national case: the relation of the Church Movement to the Ottoman Empire, the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Catholic Church and the Great Powers (especially Russia and France), the problem of the Bulgarian cultural model, the medieval heritage and Christian dogmas. One of those topics concerned the relation of the Church movement to the Ottoman Empire – in general both journals declared loyalty to the Sultan, but the problem mainly concerned the Turkish censorship. “Bulgaria” and “The Dunabian Swan“ agreed that the Patriarchate of Constantinople is the main enemy of Bulgarian interests. Liberating the Bulgarian Church from Greeks was their primary goal. Tzankov wanted to realize this goal in cooperation with the Catholic Church, for Rakovski, instead, the Church Union would lead to the new enslavement of the Bulgarians, who would fall under the “yoke of Jesuits”. That problem was also connected with the search for an ally between the Great Powers: “Bulgaria” wanted to cooperate with France, which was the main patron of Catholicism in the World, whereas “The Dunabian Swan” tried to gain Russian support. The activists of the Church Movement realized that the Union will have a significant impact on the future of the Bulgarian culture. Tzankov was a proponent of the modernization of the Bulgarian society according to Western standards. Rakovski warned that the Union will be the beginning of the collapse of the Bulgarian nation and a betray of its age-old connection with the Orthodox Church. They proved these visions with historical examples – during the discussion the editor of “Bulgaria” created an alternative and false version of the Medieval history of Bulgaria, in which he tried to prove the existence of deep relations between Bulgarians and the Catholic Church. Another important part of the discussion between the journals revolved around Christian dogmas and was based on the old polemics about dogmas lasting since the 9th century between the Western and Eastern Christianity. The arguments used in the articles about the Church Movement by Rakovski and Tzankov only very rarely had a rational character, they were usually based on emotions, stereotypes and the Bulgarian sense of pride.
Źródło:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia; 2015, 22, 2; 55-74
0239-4278
2450-3177
Pojawia się w:
Balcanica Posnaniensia Acta et studia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Księdza Mateusza Bembusa SJ poglądy na temat schizmy kościelnej i propozycje pojednania z Cerkwią prawosławną
Father Mateusz Bembus’, S.J., Views on Church Schism and Proposals for Reconciliation with the Orthodox Church
Autorzy:
Stradomski, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130754.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-29
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
polemika religijna
unia kościelna
synod we Lwowie
jezuici
jezuici, Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
religious polemic
church union
the Synod in Lviv
Jesuits
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Opis:
Synod biskupów unickich we Lwowie z 1629 r. był jedną z prób doprowadzenia do zgody dwóch chrześcijańskich wyznań obrządku wschodniego w Rzeczypospolitej – obecnej na ziemiach ruskich od stuleci Cerkwi prawosławnej oraz nowo powstałego w wyniku zawarcia unii brzeskiej (1596) Kościoła greckokatolickiego. Podjęty z zaangażowaniem metropolity Józefa Welamina Rutskiego i króla Zygmunta III Wazy wysiłek unijny nie przyniósł spodziewanych rezultatów, a jednym z niewielu namacalnych owoców zjazdu stała się homilia krakowskiego jezuity, Mateusza Bembusa, wygłoszona w dniu otwarcia synodu. Tekst mowy znany jest z dwóch XVII-wiecznych edycji, jakie ukazały się w odstępie zaledwie kilku miesięcy w Krakowie i Lwowie. W dziele tym jezuita zawarł szereg wątków dotyczących historii chrześcijaństwa oraz propozycję sposobu przełamania schizmy kościelnej. Całość ubrana została w klasyczną strukturę mowy retorycznej, wyrażonej barwnym językiem i nietypowymi argumentami. Studium stanowi analizę formalno-treściową pracy Bembusa przedstawioną na tle wydarzeń historycznych, których dotyczy.
The Synod of the Greek Catholic Bishops in Lviv of 1629 was one of the attempts to bring about an agreement between two Eastern-rite Christian denominations in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – the Orthodox Church, which had been present in Ruthenia for centuries, and the newly established Greek Catholic Church which stemmed from the proclamation of the Brest Union (1596). Efforts for the union undertaken by Metropolitan Józef Welamin Rutski and King Sigismund III Wasa did not bring abouot the expected results, and one of the few concrete effects of the congress was the sermon of the Jesuit from Krakow, Mateusz Bembus, preached on the day of the opening of the synod. The text of the speech is known from two 17th-century editions, which were published just a few months apart in Kraków and Lviv. In this work, the Jesuit included a number of threads concerning the history of Christianity and a proposal on how to break the church schism. The content has been put into the classic structure of rhetorical speech, expressed in vivid language and unusual arguments. The paper is a structural and content analysis of Bembus’ work presented against the background of historical events.
Źródło:
Perspektywy Kultury; 2022, 38, 3; 15-40
2081-1446
2719-8014
Pojawia się w:
Perspektywy Kultury
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-9 z 9

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies