Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Unia Lubelska" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 54
Tytuł:
Szkice do portretu szlachcianki w dawnej Rzeczypospolitej: dokumenty dotyczące Rainy Gniewoszówny Strzyżewskiej w zbiorach Wojewódzkiej Biblioteki Publicznej im. Hieronima Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Sketches for a portrait of a noblewoman in the former Polish Republic: documents concerning Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska in the collection of the Hieronim Łopaciński Regional Public Library in Lublin
Штрихи к портрету шляхтянки в старой Речи Посполитой: документы о Раине Гневошовне Стрижевской в фондах Люблинской Воеводской Публичной Библиотеки им. Иеронима Лопацинского
Autorzy:
Baran, Aleksander
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1070665.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna im. Hieronima Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Tematy:
Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska
Gniewosz Dmitrowicz Strzyżewski
Iwan Hrehorewicz Hulewicz Poddubiński
Jakub Stradomski (Stradowski)
Łuck
Winnica
Unia Lubelska, Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna im. H. Łopacińskiego w Lublinie
Jakub Stradomski (Stradowski) Łuck
the Union of Lublin
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
H. Łopaciński Regional Public Library in Lublin
Раина Гневошовна Стрижевская
Гневош Дмитриевич Стрижевский
Иван Грегорович Гулевич Поддубинский
Якуб Страдомский (Страдовский)
Луцк
Винница
Люблинская Уния
Речь Посполитая Обеих Наций
Люблинская Воеводская Публичная Библиотека им. Иеронима Лопацинского
Opis:
Artykuł poświęcony jest szlachciance Rainie Gniewoszównie Strzyżewskiej – postaci mało znanej w historiografii. W okresie swej samodzielnej aktywności gospodarczej skupiała ona w swych rękach znaczne posiadłości ziemskie w Łucku i na przedmieściach. Analiza źródeł dotyczących tej kobiety pozwała odsłonić mało lub wręcz nieznane karty historii Łucka w XVI w.
This article is devoted to the noblewoman Raina Gniewoszówna Strzyżewska – a figure little known in historiography. During the period of her independent economic activities, she gathered into her possession substantial estates in Lutsk and the suburbs. The analysis of the sources concerning this woman made it possible to reveal little-known or even unknown pages of Lutsk's history of the 16th century.
Статья посвящена шляхтянке Раине Гневошовне Стрижевской – персоне, мало известной в историографии. В период самостоятельной хозяйственной активности она сосредотачивала в своих руках значительные земельные владения в Луцке и его пригородах. Анализ источников, касающихся этой женщины, позволил раскрыть малоизвестные или, даже, неизвестные страницы истории Луцка XVI века.
Źródło:
Bibliotekarz Lubelski; 2019, 62; 71-94
0137-9895
Pojawia się w:
Bibliotekarz Lubelski
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
Autorzy:
Biłous, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
historiografia ukraińska
dydaktyka
nauczanie historii
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Ukraine
historiography
history textbooks
Opis:
In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Mowa ojców potrzebna od zaraz” „Iż Rusi słuszna rzecz dla nabożeństwa po grecku i po słowieńsku uczyć się” (Lithos, Kijów 1644)
Autorzy:
Chynczewska-Hennel, Teresa
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2167728.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Akademia Supraska
Tematy:
unia lubelska
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Melecjusz Smotrycki
prawosławie
język ruski
Piotr Skarga
Piotr Mohyła
Akademia Kijowska
Union of Lublin
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Meletius Smotritsky
Ortho-
doxy
Russian Language
Peter Skarga
Peter Mohyla
Academy of Kiev
Opis:
After the Union of Lublin in 1569 the Polish Kingdom and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania formed one state. The Russian remained the official language of the Grand Duchy and it was guaranteed that the inhabitants of the Duchy could remain orthodox. It was feared that the nobles would convert to the Roman Catholicism and at multiple occasions the deputies from Grand Duchy as well as Cossacks had to defend their rights for their own language and faith. In the polemical literature of the end of the XVI and the first half of the XVII century concerning the Union of Brest much concern was expressed for or against the use of the Church Slavonic – particularly by Peter Skarga and Ivan Vishensky. Peter Mohyla in the orthodox Academy of Kiev, founded by himself, particularly insisted on teaching, among other subjects, Latin and Polish as he thought that an educated orthodox Russian should feel a rightful citizen of the Polish state and participate in the religious and political life of the country.
Źródło:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej; 2012, Język naszej modlitwy- dawniej i dziś, 3; 41-47
2082-9299
Pojawia się w:
Latopisy Akademii Supraskiej
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kalmarska a unie polsko-litewskie – kilka uwag na temat ich początków i potrzeby kontynuacji badań porównawczych obu związków państwowych
The Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian Unions – Some Remarks on Their Beginnings and the Need for Continued Comparative Research on the Both State Unions
Autorzy:
Gaca, Andrzej
Bąk, Hubert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131654.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
unia kalmarska
unie polsko-litewskie
układ w Krewie
królowa Jadwiga
król Władysław Jagiełło
unionsbrevet
kroningsbrevet
Małgorzata – królowa Danii
Norwegii i Szwecji
Eryk Pomorski
unia lubelska
Kalmar Union
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Act of Krewo
Queen Jadwiga
King Władysław Jagiełło
Queen Margaret of Denmark
Norway and Sweden
Erik of Pomerania
Lublin Union
Opis:
Artykuł prezentuje dotychczasowy stan badań komparatystycznych nad unią kalmarską i uniami polsko-litewskimi. Na wstępie przedstawiono genezę obu unii: przyczyny ich zawarcia, scharakteryzowano i porównano dokumenty obu układów: w Krewie (1385 r.) i unii kalmarskej (unionsbrevet) (1397 r.). Wskazano również podobieństwa obu związków na płaszczyźnie rywalizacji o przywództwo, a także rolę królowej Małgorzaty w zawarciu unii oraz samodzielne rządy Eryka Pomorskiego i ich skutki. Następnie przybliżono transformację unii kalmarskiej, jej poszczególne etapy i przyczyny upadku oraz losy obu związków unijnych po ich formalnym ustaniu i ich wpływ na dalszy rozwój państw członkowskich. Na zakończenie podjęto próbę wytyczenia kierunków dalszych badań porównawczych nad obydwoma uniami, stawiając postulat o konieczności ich kontynuowania i rozwijania.
The article presents the current state of comparative research into the Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian unions, contributing to the postulate of the need for further detailed comparative studies in this field. It outlines a genesis of the unions (their causes, the 1385 Act of Krewo and the 1397 Kalmar Union [unionsbrevet]), then characterises the both documents and conducts a comparative analysis; indicates the similarities between the unions as regards rivalry for the leadership; emphasises the role played by Queen Margaret in the conclusion of the union, and describes the independent rule of Erik of Pomerania with its results. Next, it analyses the transformation of the Kalmar Union together with its successive stages and the causes of its collapse; the fate of the two unions after they formally ended and their impact on the historical development of the member states. Finally, it attempts to indicate lines of further comparative research into the both unions.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 135-166
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kościół prawosławny w dobie Unii Lubelskiej. Kryzys czy początek odrodzenia?
The Orthodox Church in the era of the Union of Lublin. A crisis or the beginning of a revival?
Autorzy:
Gil, Andrzej
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16539284.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Kościół prawosławny
Unia Lubelska
Kryzys Kościoła
reforma Kościoła
Union of Lublin 1569
Orthodox Church
Kiev Metropolis
crisis
Opis:
The Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian state of the 16th century was organized under a unified and hierarchical structure of the Kiev Metropolis. Theoretically, it was subordinated to its Mother Church in Constantinople, in practice, however, it was almost fully autonomous with regard to its internal operation; in terms of organization and property, it was embedded in the social and economic system of the state of its time. Historiography to date has generally accepted the thesis about the multi-faceted crisis that the Orthodox in the Kiev Metropolis were supposed to be experiencing. This crisis was to intensify especially after the Union of Lublin in 1569, when fundamental structural changes were effected within the monarchy ruled by Sigismund Augustus. Transfer of four voivodeships from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, in which the Orthodox Ruthenian population was an important (and sometimes dominant) constituent part, into the borders of the Crown (the Kingdom of Poland), was to be the foundation on which Polish state administration and great landowners intended to build a new religious reality, primarily through the expulsion of the local Orthodox Church. An analysis of the situation of the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century shows that its condition did not differ significantly from what was happening in the Polish Catholic Church at the time. As far as the economic foundations are concerned, the Orthodox Church in the Commonwealth after 1569 owned assets sufficient to perform its function in every extent required by church law and custom, especially since it had institutional support, namely the ktetor system. The period following the Union of Lublin was also characterized by an expansion of Orthodox Church structures, especially at the level or parishes, whose number increased significantly. Artistic and spiritual culture flourished, as is clearly evident in the extant examples of icons, sacral architecture, liturgical books and theological literature. New forms of activity of the faithful (laymen) have emerged, such as Orthodox brotherhoods. Therefore, in my opinion, the Kiev Metropolis in the second half of the 16th century did not differ from other religious communities, both in the Commonwealth and in other countries of Central and Eastern Europe. The only crisis that really affected it at the time was a crisis of growth.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 185-195
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Historyczne i artystyczne znaczenie krucyfiksu Unii Lubelskiej
Historical and artistic significance of the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Głodzik, Gabriela
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1954048.pdf
Data publikacji:
2004
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Krucyfiks Unii Lubelskiej
krucyfiks ołtarzowy z kości słoniowej
rzeźba z kości słoniowej w Polsce
Unia lubelska Jana Matejki
Crucifix of the Union of Lublin
ivory altar crucifix
ivory sculpture in Poland
Jan Matejko's Union of Lublin
Opis:
It is not known for how long the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin has belonged to the furnishing of the Dominican Fathers monastery in Lublin. Dispersed, and to a large extent destroyed archival records of the monastery do not allow reconstruction of history of that object that is linked by the Dominican tradition with the swearing-in ceremony of the Union of Lublin in 1569 and with Jan Matejko's painting. The first part of the present article is an attempt at explaining the old tradition and comparing it to Matejko's artistic vision of Unia Lubelska (Union of Lublin). This required putting the Lublin crucifix in the context of the swearing-in on the basis of the diary of the Union of 1569. The records do not mention the crucifix. Its place is taken by the New Testament. The painter faced a similar problem; as a result he weaved the Dominican tradition in the source description of the event. Today it is hard to tell if the tradition of the Crucifix of the Union of Lublin is credible. It must have been generally known in the 19th century since Matejko learned about it. The Dominican cross made of ivory became inspiration for his painting. The artist willingly used a language full of allusions to painting and meanings hidden in objects. The symbol of the snake on the base made it possible to give a new direction to the interpretation of the cross: an enslaved nation, like Christ, will soon defeat the enemy power. The legend hidden in the reliquary for St. Stanisław's head, the gospel about resurrection, the cross as a sign of triumph, together form a pictorial vision of the fall and resurrection of the homeland. The Crucifix of the Union of Lublin represents a group of small altar crucifixes made of ivory, often found in churches and monasteries all over Poland. They were especially popular in the baroque period. They were mass-produced in the Catholic countries of Europe, especially in France and Italy. Their distinguishing features are the rare and costly material – ivory – of which the figure was sculptured, and the wooden cross covered with black enamel. Two variations of presentations of Christ on the cross can be distinguished: that of Christ as an alive person, and as a dead one. The Lublin crucifix is an example of modern sculpture in ivory, with a new iconographical interpretation, presenting the alive Christ, raising his head to God the Father and uttering his last words at the moment of his death. The problem of the ivory sculpture in Poland has not yet been undertaken by Polish researchers.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2004, 52, 4; 263-300
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia lubelska 1569 : pieczęcie i herby
Pieczęcie i herby : unia lubelska 1569
Autorzy:
Górzyński, Sławomir (1962- ; historyk).
Współwytwórcy:
Wajs, Hubert. Autor
Król-Próba, Justyna. Autor
Jankowski, Rafał. Autor
Dacka-Górzyńska, Iwona. Redakcja
Wydawnictwo DiG. Wydawca
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Warszawa : Wydawnictwo DiG
Tematy:
Akt unii lubelskiej
Heraldyka
Pieczęcie
Sfragistyka
Unia lubelska (1569)
Źródłoznawstwo
Katalog zabytków
Praca zbiorowa
Publikacja bogato ilustrowana
Opis:
Na stronie przytytułowej: Historia jednego dokumentu.
Bibliografia, netografia na stronach 131-134.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Książka
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 54

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies