Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Tarnogród Confederation" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
Tytuł:
„Ta konfederacyja nie stała się contra Maiestatem…”. Postawa Jakuba Zygmunta Rybińskiego, wojewody chełmińskiego, w czasie konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej (1715–1717)
‘Ta konfederacyja nie stała się contra Maiestatem…’: The Attitude of Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński, Voivode of Chełmno, during the Tarnogród Confederation (1715–1717)
Autorzy:
Perłakowski, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1059226.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-30
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
jakub zygmunt rybiński
tarnogród confederation
nobility
augustus ii the strong
house of wettin
polish-lithuanian commonwealth
eighteenth century
Opis:
The article aims to present the activity of the Voivode of Chełmno, Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński (d. 1725) during the Tarnogród Confederation (1715–1717). In the period when the movement of the nobility rebelled against the rule of the Saxon dynasty in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Rybiński commanded some of the troops that remained loyal to the king, and was involved in hit-and-run tactics against the Confederation’s forces. He did not show any remarkable military talents, as he suffered a defeat in the Battle of Wąchock on 30 November 1715. However, if the situation required it, he was able to oppose the Confederation using various political means, e.g. in the matter of suspending the judiciary. When analysing the collected primary sources, it can be concluded that among noblemen he enjoyed the reputation of a loyal servant to the king. At times this reputation proved to be a burden, when, for example, he received threats from radically anti-royal noblemen. However, in the most difficult period of the struggle between the nobility and the royal court, Jakub Zygmunt Rybiński did not abandon Augustus II, which did not mean that he fully and uncritically supported his political programme. He considered the king’s idea of radically strengthening the monarch’s power with the help of Saxon troops to be a mistake. He rightly predicted that it would cause indignation among noblemen. This was particularly evident in the period immediately preceding the outbreak of discontent in 1714 and early 1715. His attitude towards the Tarnogród Confederation evolved. Initially, he was a supporter of the armed suppression of the rebellion, but later he was increasingly inclined to resolve the conflict through negotiations.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2020, 85, 2; 33-65
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Bitwa pod Kowalewem (5 X 1716) – geneza, przebieg, konsekwencje
Battle of Kowalewo (5 October 1716) – Origin, Course, Consequences
Autorzy:
Ciesielski, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1157713.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-09-30
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
the Tarnogród Confederation
Saxon army
Polish-Lithuanian army
battle of Kowalewo
Opis:
The article, which refers to the research on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth’s military history in the 18th century and the crisis of Old Polish war art, presents the genesis, course and effects of the battle of Kowalewo of 5 October 1716. Epistolographic material, press and chronicle accounts along with plans of two battles constitute the source base. These primary sources were given a critical analysis, the acquired information being collated and verified in order to obtain a reasonably precise picture of the causes, course and consequences of the battle. The armed forces participating in the battle consisted of the military forces of the Tarnogród Confederation and the royal corps formed from Saxon and Polish regiments and banners, which made the battle fratricidal. About 9–10 thousand soldiers with 6 cannons fought on the side of the Confederation, whilst the royal army had 6,000–6,500 royal soldiers with 4–7 cannons. The confederates had numerical superiority, which was compensated by the advantage in artillery, firearms and better training of royal soldiers. It turned out that these factors were decisive, because the Confederate forces suffered a devastating defeat. After the battle, the group of Chrysostom Gniazdowski actually ceased to exist, and the second military unit commanded by Stefan Potocki withdrew to Mazovia. At least 1,500 or even over 2,000 confederates were killed or wounded in the battle. Another 610 were captured. The royal army also won six cannons and many military characters. The royal forces paid for their success with minor losses – probably only 132 killed and wounded soldiers. Although this battle should not have taken place due to the current ceasefire, its military and political effects were significant. As a result of the battle, the royal army regained full control over Kuyavia and Pomerania, securing the facilities of the troops protecting Warsaw. With the beginning of the Russian armed intervention, this led to the weakening of the confederates’ position in the ongoing peace negotiations, and, as a consequence, to the conclusion of a compromise agreement on 3 November 1716, which did not meet many of the demands of the Warsaw treaty.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 3; 31-56
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Nie wszystko złe, co z epoki saskiej. Refleksje na temat ocen historiografii polskiej na przykładzie konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej
Autorzy:
Kierys, Arkadiusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2040986.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Confederation of Tarnogród
Polish-Saxon Union
August II the Strong
Stanisław Ledóchowski
Silent Sejm
konfederacja tarnogrodzka
unia polsko-saska
August II Mocny
Sejm niemy
Opis:
Critical evaluation of the reign of the Wettin dynasty in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth dominated Polish historiography until the mid-20th century. August II the Strong was blamed for bringing the monarchy under the control of Peter I the Great, and the nobility for anarchizing political life – in a word, for the beginning of the collapse of the state. The study of the course of the Confederation of Tarnogród and the analysis of pacification talks between the Confederates and the King's plenipotentiaries, based on Diariusz Konfederowanych na Kongresie Lubelskie de Anno 1716 (Diary of the Confederates at the Congress of Lublin, 1716), allowed for a revision of the previous views. The nobility of the day were not only aware of the need to repair the system and describe the offices (mainly those of the Hetman), but also saw the need to curb the increasing role of Russia in the mediation. The most intriguing issue related to the Tarnogród Confederation seems to be the attitude of the nobility towards religious dissidents – they stood up for their rights, opposing the Catholic hierarchy as well as the king himself.
Krytyczna ocena panowania dynastii Wettinów w Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów dominowała w polskiej historiografii aż do połowy XX w. Augusta II Mocnego obarczano odpowiedzialnością za oddanie monarchii pod kontrolę Piotra I Wielkiego, a szlachtę za anarchizowanie życia politycznego – słowem początek upadku państwa. Badania przebiegu konfederacji tarnogrodzkiej oraz analiza rozmów pacyfikacyjnych między skonfederowanymi a plenipotentami króla – w oparciu o Diariusz skonfederowanych na Kongresie Lubelskim de Anno 1716 – pozwoliły na rewizję dotychczasowych poglądów. Szlachta ówczesna była nie tylko świadoma potrzeb naprawy ustroju i opisania urzędów (głównie hetmańskiego), ale także dostrzegała konieczność ukrócenia zwiększającej się roli mediacyjnej Rosji. Najbardziej intrygującą kwestią związaną z konfederacją tarnogrodzką wydaje się postawa szlachty wobec dysydentów religijnych – stanęli oni w obronie ich praw, sprzeciwiając się tym samym hierarchii katolickiej, jak i samego króla.
Źródło:
Res Historica; 2021, 51; 221-251
2082-6060
Pojawia się w:
Res Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The 18th century Lublin in the eyes of a military engineer. Fortifications and security measures for the negotiations on the map of Lublin created by C. d’Örken and modern evidence confirming their existence
Autorzy:
Nieścioruk, Kamil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/92542.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Oddział Kartograficzny Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
Tematy:
Tarnogród Confederation
Lublin
old map
city map
fortifications
Opis:
Just as contemporary cartographic works, old maps were usually made for specific purposes, e.g. related to taxation, propaganda or military objectives. C. d’Örken’s map of Lublin of 1716 is an example of a cartographic work created for military purposes, as it was made in the context of negotiations of the Tarnogród Confederation. The author of the map focused on the thematic content – he marked control zones, as well as military outposts, and accommodation sites. In many instances, the base content is presented with little attention to detail. There are a few exceptions to this rule, with fortifications being the most noticeable one. It was most likely motivated by the author’s profession, as he was a military engineer. Still, although Lublin has never been a particularly well-fortified city, the aforementioned content of the map perfectly reflects not only the former shape of the city space, but also its contemporary organisation. This article, due to its detailed description of selected works and the methodology involving the use of old cartographic materials, can be used as an important source material for archaeological, restoration and regeneration works.
Źródło:
Polish Cartographical Review; 2019, 51, 2; 95-103
2450-6974
Pojawia się w:
Polish Cartographical Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Bishops of the Diocese of Vilnius and Lithuanian Domestic Politics in 1709–17: Attitudes, Problems, and Solutions
Autorzy:
Šapoka, Mindaugas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2121457.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-08-08
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
Augustus II
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Vilnius bishopric
Lithuanian Catholic Church
Kazimierz Konstanty Brzostowski
eighteenth century
Confederation of Tarnogród
Confederation of Vilnius
Opis:
The article looks into the participation of the bishop ordinary of the diocese of Vilnius, Kazimierz Konstanty Brzostowski, and his suffragan, Maciej Józef Ancuta, in Lithuanian politics of the period between 1709 and 1717. The study has been based on the letters written by the bishops to the Lithuanian chancellor. It examines the bishops’ attitude towards Russian contributions, the taxation of Church estates, the arbitrary contributions raised by the Lithuanian army, the introduction of Saxon troops in 1713, the reaction to the king’s policies, and the attitude towards the nationwide uprising against the Saxon troops known as the confederations of Tarnogród and Vilnius. Finally, the bishops’ opinion on Russian mediation and the notorious Silent Sejm, where it was agreed that the liberum veto would be invalid. The bishops of the diocese of Vilnius were rather indifferent to the internal problems of Lithuania. They defended the immunity of the Church estates and disapproved of the introduction of Saxon troops. However, when the confederations were formed, they tried to manoeuvre between the noble and royal camps, not wanting to ruin their reputation on either side. The bishops often spoke on behalf of the diocesan clergy. Therefore, their adopted posture was often the expression of the opinion of the whole diocese’s clergy.
Źródło:
Acta Poloniae Historica; 2022, 125; 179-206
0001-6829
Pojawia się w:
Acta Poloniae Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zjazd szlachty litewskiej w Wilnie w 1715 roku
Gathering of Lithuanian Nobility in Vilnius in 1715
Autorzy:
Šapoka, Mindaugas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/32388103.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023-03-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Augustus II
Ludwik Konstanty Pociej
Vilnius Confederation
Tarnogród Confederation
Great Northern War
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
eighteenth century
Opis:
The issue of the gathering of the Lithuanian nobility in Vilnius, organised in August 1715 by Great Hetman of Lithuania Ludwik Konstanty Pociej as a way of sparking a protest against the contributions imposed by King Augustus II for the maintenance of the Saxon army in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, has so far been marginally addressed in historiography. The purpose of the article is to examine the causes and consequences of the gathering and to determine the Russian attitude towards it. Using manuscript sources from Russia, Belarus, Poland and Lithuania, the author argues that the Russians had minimal influence over the organization of the gathering, yet they used it as a means to combat King Augustus II’s attempts to free himself from Russian influence. There is ample evidence to put forward a hypothesis that the request to Tsar Peter I for acting as an intermediary in the conflict between the king and the nobility was conceived by Pociej and other leading officials of the Commonwealth rather than by Russian diplomats. The article also argues that the convention in Vilnius contributed significantly to the formation of the Tarnogród Confederation in the Crown. The Poles believed that the Lithuanians were determined to uphold the declaration of the Vilnius convention to instigate military action against the king’s policies and contributions for the purposes of the Saxon army. When the news of the Vilnius gathering spread throughout Poland, riots began in the southern provinces, and part of the Polish army declared a confederation and took up arms.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2023, 88, 1; 25-52
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies