- Tytuł:
-
Le néant et l‘amour de la philosophie de Tanabe
Nothingness and the love of Tanabe’s philosophy - Autorzy:
-
Nakatomi, Kiyokazu
Głaczyński, Michał - Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2051059.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2020
- Wydawca:
- Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
- Tematy:
-
Tanable
philosophy
religion - Opis:
- The philosophy of Tanabe, the successor of Kitarō Nishida, is also explained by the principle of nothingness and love. Tanabe has succeeded in «the logic of nothingness». From my point of view, this nothingness is nothingness as negative and dead speech. Tanabe aims to reach the truth by making full use of the dialectic of the negative word. This negative word means that non-thing is nothingness. We can therefore say that Tanabe’s dialectic develops the dialectic of nothingness. Ta- nabe himself named it as an absolute dialectic that transcends Hegel’s idealist dialectic and Marx’s materialist dialectic. Even more, he understands the world as a dialectical movement. This idea over- laps with the dynamic development and movement of Aristotle. The development of dialectical logic reached its peak with Tanabe’s philosophy in the history of philosophy. But in the meantime, he criti- cized Nishida’s theory of pure experience as a viewer’s theory. At a glance, this means that Tanabe is denying «nothingness as reality» which is the flow of life and energy in the universe. It is the original energy of creation from nothing and can explain the energy of the expanding universe, dark matter and dark energy. As Tanabe denies this energy, he shows the weakness of his theory. He did not speak about the creation of the universe, because it is mysterious. He can develop his theory of time, but he cannot explain cosmology which includes the theory of energy. In his last years, the theory of the ex- pansion of the universe is already published by Edwin Hubble. Tanabe’s interest shifted from physics to philosophy. Most researchers cannot indicate this point. Therefore, Tanabe’s interpretation is not stable. It seems to fit the theory of religion where love is at the heart of religion. On the theory of religion, the essence of the transcendent being is not clear.
- Źródło:
-
Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2020, 3(38); 59-77
1898-8431 - Pojawia się w:
- Humanum. Międzynarodowe Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł