Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Succession Regulation" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17
Tytuł:
The Principle of a Single Estate and Its Role in Delimiting the Applicable Laws
Autorzy:
Pacuła, Krzysztof
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030003.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
EU Succession Regulation
principle of unity of succession
characterisation (classification)
Opis:
This paper argues that the principle of unity of succession is one of the key concepts of the Succession Regulation. By operation of this principle on the jurisdictional level, the Regulation tends to favor a perspective of a single Member State when it comes to all issues related to succession. The principle of unity of succession does not of course eliminate the need to proceed to the characterization and to delimitate the scopes of conflict of laws rules at stake. However, this principle — aiming to promote a unitary vision of a single estate in all the Member States bound by the Regulation — sets a tone for some interpretative techniques that tend to favor succession-related characterization of the issues having some importance in the context of succession with cross-border implications. According to the Author, effet utile-driven characterization, on the one hand, and succession-friendly characterization of the issues falling within ‘gray areas’ created by the operation of Article 1(2) of the Succession Regulation, on the other hand, are among them.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 107-123
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Application of the Succession Regulation by German courts — Selected Issues
Autorzy:
Kohler, Christian
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030088.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
private international law
EU Succession Regulation
law of German courts
European Certificate of Succession
Opis:
The article discusses the impact of the EU Succession Regulation on the German system of private international law. The change came with some important differences introduced in the text of the Regulation as in comparison to previous German solutions (especially the use of the habitual residence as the main connecting factor instead of nationality), and, as a result of the number of decisions of the CJEU on the Regulation (in particular the Kubicka case).The paper presents the most important, up-to-date German case-law relating to the EU Succession Regulation. It starts with the general remarks in that regard and continues to discuss judgments covering issues of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the European Certificate of Succession. Three conclusions are drawn therefrom. First, the cases show a general willingness of the courts to cope with the fundamental changes introduced by the Regulation. In particular, the concept of “habitual residence” is applied on the basis of an autonomous interpretation by reference to the case-law of the CJEU on Regulation Brussels IIa. Second, a number of decisions make apparent that the courts are sometimes slow to accept the consequences which flow from the changes brought about by the Regulation, and which oblige to re-consider the German practice in matters of international successions. That applies in particular to the issuing of the European Certificate of Succession. Third, German courts are generally ready to initiate cooperation with the CJEU by formulating preliminary questions (three questions posed by the end of 2019).
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 27-43
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Wpływ przepisów wymuszających swoje zastosowanie na rozstrzyganie spraw spadkowych pod rządami rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) Nr 650/2012
The influence of the overriding mandatory rules on decision making in succession matters under the EU Regulation 650/2012
Autorzy:
Żarnowiec, Łukasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782438.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Succession Regulation
succession matters
choice of law
connecting factor
applicable law
overriding mandatory provisions
Opis:
Since August 17, 2015 the courts of the Member States of the European Union apply the conflict-of-laws rules adopted in the EU Succession Regulation (EU) in succession matters. From the Polish point of view, this constitutes not only the change of the rules applied for the purposes of determining jurisdiction and the applicable law, but also a new approach to the overriding mandatory provisions. Contrary to other European instruments of private international law, the Succession Regulation neither uses the term “overriding mandatory provisions”, nor defines its meaning. Nevertheless, in Article 30 the Regulation provides for application - irrespective of the law applicable to the succession under its conflict rules - of the special rules of the State, where certain immovable property, enterprises or other special categories of assets are located, and which - for economic, family or social considerations - impose restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets, in so far as, under the law of that State, they are applicable irrespective of the law applicable to the succession. The interpretation of this provision cause difficulties. It is not clear whether the concept of the special provisions embodied in Article 30 refers to the concept of overriding mandatory rules, well known in the European private international law, or whether it constitutes an original solution. Another controversial issue discussed in the paper is the relevance of the mandatory rules of the forum or the third State other than those mentioned in Article 30.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2019, 25; 43-65
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Notion of “Court” under the Succession Regulation
Autorzy:
Wilderspin, Michael
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029997.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
EU Succession Regulation
the notion of “court”
authentic instruments
judicial body
competent authority
Opis:
The article concerns the notion of “court” in the Succession Regulation. This notion is used in the Brussels I and Brussels Ia Regulations, where it does not necessarily have the same scope. The author attempts to interpret the concept in the light of the recitals to the Succession Regulation (in particular Recital 20) and of the case law of the Court of Justice. The very general description of the concept contained in Article 3(2) of the Regulation might potentially embrace other authorities and legal professionals, where they exercise judicial functions by way of delegation of power from the court. In the author’s view, the European Court, especially in Oberle and WB v Notariusz Przemysława Bac correctly navigated its way through the Succession Regulation and ruled in a way which is both coherent as regards the operation of the Regulation and consistent with the intentions of the legislator. The above judgments are analysed also with regard to Poland’s omission to notify notaries as “courts” under Article 79 of the Succession Regulation. The European Court found that the criteria for determining whether an authority or a legal professional, in particular a notary public, constitutes a “court” aredetermined by Article 3(2) and not by Article 79. Consequently, Poland’s omission to notify was not conclusive, but was in any event correct in substance. The author expresses the opinion that the judgment is accurate on this point.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 45-56
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ujawnienie w europejskim poświadczeniu spadkowym udziału w spadku nabytego tytułem wyrównania dorobków w małżeństwie spadkodawcy i spadkobiercy : glosa do postanowienia Kammergericht w Berlinie z dnia 25 października 2016 r., 6 W 80/16 (pytanie prejudycjalne w sprawie C-558/16, Mahnkopf)
Revealing a share in the estate acquired as a result of share of gains in the marriage of the deceased and the heir in the European certificate of succession : case-note on the preliminary question of Kammergericht in Berlin of 25 October 2016 in the case C-558/16, Mahnkopf
Autorzy:
Margoński, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/485603.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Instytut Europeistyki
Tematy:
rozporządzenie spadkowe europejskie poświadczenie spadkowe
C-558/16
succession regulation
European certificate of succession C-558/16
Opis:
The text comments on the preliminary question of Kammergericht in Berlin in the case C-558/16, Mahnkopf. It concerns revealing a share in the estate acquired according to § 1371 German BGB - as a result of simplified share of gains (Zugewinnausgleich) - in the European certificate of succession. Determining the boundary between the applicable matrimonial property and the applicable succession law, the author qualifies the share in the estate resulting from § 1371 BGB as a succession law regulation. It should, thus, be revealed in the European certificate of succession. The author criticises at the same time a few assumptions made by the Kammergericht on the European certificate of succession itself.
Źródło:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego; 2017, 15; 176-189
1730-4504
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Organ wydający jako organ właściwy do dokonania sprostowania, uchylenia, zmiany lub zawieszenia skutków europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego
The issuing authority as the authority competent for the rectification, modification, withdrawal or suspension of the effects of the European Certificate of Succession
Autorzy:
Biernat, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/476834.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
European Succession Regulation
European Certificate of Succession
issuing authority
unijne rozporządzenie spadkowe
europejskie poświadczenie spadkowe
organ wydający
Opis:
Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession created a European Certificate of Succession. According to the provisions of the above-mentioned regulation the issuing authority shall rectify, modify, withdraw or suspend effects of the of the European Certificate of Succession. The determination of the authority that shall have the competence to rectify, modify, withdraw or suspend the effects of the of the European Certificate of Succession raises some serious questions particularly under Polish law.
Rozporządzeniem Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 650/2012 z dnia 4 lipca 2012 roku w sprawie jurysdykcji, prawa właściwego, uznawania i wykonywania orzeczeń, przyjmowania i wykonywania dokumentów urzędowych dotyczących dziedziczenia oraz w sprawie ustanowienia europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego ustanowiono europejskie poświadczenie spadkowe. Zgodnie z przepisami wskazanego rozporządzenia organ wydający europejskie poświadczenie spadkowe dokonuje sprostowania, zmiany, uchylenia lub zawieszenia skutków europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego. Ustalenie organu, któremu przysługuje kompetencja do dokonania sprostowania, zmiany, uchylenia lub zawieszenia skutków europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego, budzi istotne wątpliwości w szczególności na gruncie prawa polskiego.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2015, 2(17); 55-64
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
“Member States” and “Third States” in the Succession Regulation
Autorzy:
Basedow, Jürgen
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030038.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
EU Succession Regulation
recognition of decisions given in Member States
the notion of third State
Opis:
The author advocates a flexible approach with respect to the interpretation of the term “Member State” as employed in the Succession Regulation, allowing the differentiation between “participating” and “non-participating” States. It does not mean that the term “Member State” should always be interpreted in a wide sense including the three non-participating States: Denmark, the Republic of Ireland, and the United Kingdom. Whether a wide or a narrow interpretation is appropriate depends on the context and the purpose of the single provision. Most provisions contained in the chapter on jurisdiction refer to participating Member States only. But some articles such as the Article 13 of the Regulation, provide a counter-example. A uniform interpretation of the concept of Member State in all provisions of the Succession Regulation seems far too sweeping. It reminds of Begriffsjurisprudenz and does not take account of the purpose of the single provisions. In particular, it disregards the need for the cross-border protection of individual rights in a Union with open frontiers.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 15-25
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
La réserve héréditaire dans le re`glement 650/2012 sur les successions
Autorzy:
Lagarde, Paul
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030035.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
forced heirship rights
forced heirs
EU Succession Regulation
hereditary reserve
public policy exception
private international law
Opis:
The article addresses the issues relating to the protection of forced heirs in international context with a particular focus on the provisions of the EU Succession Regulation pertaining thereto. It contrasts common law tradition with the solutions adopted in French law, whereby certain relatives are entitled to the hereditary reserve (la réserve héréditaire). The author discusses selected examples taken from a body of French case-law dealing with the issue in question. Amongst the cases touched upon by the author are those concerning the successions of Johnny Hallyday and Maurice Jarre, which were two cases widely discussed in the recent French jurisprudence.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 9-14
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Capacity and the Quality of Heir. Possible Interaction with Preliminary Questions
Autorzy:
Bariatti, Stefania
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1029992.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
private international law
EU Succession Regulation
capacity of heir
legal capacity
preliminary questions
personal status
family relationships
Opis:
The article contains an overview of the rules relating to the scope of application of the EU private international law regulations. It addresses the treatment of the relevant preliminary questions, with special reference to the Succession Regulation. The issues are discussed in three steps. The first is connected with the way of interpreting the notions and concepts, such as marriage, adoption, legal capacity etc., where such matters as personal status, legal capacity or family relationship may come to the foreground as a preliminary question. The second is dealing with the law applicable to the preliminary question. The author compares pros and cons of the “independent reference” (lex fori) and the “dependent reference” (lex causae) solutions, considering the latter as less effective, producing more negative consequences. The third step embraces questions relating to the jurisdiction with respect to preliminary question.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 57-70
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Krytyczna analiza postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 marca 2016 r., I CSK 64/15
Critical appraisal of the decision of the Supreme Court of 11 March 2016 in the case I CSK 64/15
Autorzy:
Czubik, Paweł
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/485571.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Instytut Europeistyki
Tematy:
jurysdykcja w sprawie spadkowej rozporządzenie 650/2012
wybór prawa
jurisdiction to rule on the succession Regulation 650/2012
choice of law
Opis:
After the judgment of 11 March 2016 no. I CSK 64/15 given by the Polish Supreme Court it seems to be impossible to define in Polish legal space the proper law applicable to the succession case. In a very short succession judgment (in which the deceased Polish citizen died in Sweden in 2008) Supreme Court has done at least three fundamental mistakes concerning the intertemporal application of legal rules. The Supreme Court has not recognized that Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 (of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession) is applied only to the succession of persons who die on or after 17 August 2015. It mistook also the rules of 1965 Polish statute on private international law with a new one (2011). Conclusions drawn from this particular case by court are too broad and can be applied also to cases much more different that case on which the judgment was based. Court decision analyzed in this article is an example of the comic solution of the problems arising in the Polish succession law. This is why the criticism on this order seems to be important because of its possible influence on future Polish court's practice.
Źródło:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego; 2017, 15; 168-175
1730-4504
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Adaptacja prawa polskiego do wymogów unijnego rozporządzenia spadkowego (Nr 650/2012)
The adaptation of Polish law to the EU succession regulation (No. 650/2012)
Autorzy:
Załucki, Mariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/476924.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
EU succession Regulation 650/2012
inheritance law
succession law
polish law adaptation
unijne rozporządzenie spadkowe (Nr 650/2012)
prawo spadkowe
prawo o dziedziczeniu
adaptacja prawa polskiego
Opis:
This article discusses legislative alignment of the Polish law to the requirements of the EU succession Regulation No. 650/2012. Author presents the origins of the Polish Act adapting the Regulation and shows the course of legislative works. His presentation aims to identify major changes in the Polish law related to this Regulation.
Tematem pracy jest adaptacja prawa polskiego do wymogów unijnego rozporządzania spadkowego (Nr 650/2012). Autor przedstawia źródła polskiej ustawy o adaptacji rozporządzania i wykazuje tok legislacji. Niniejsza praca ma na celu wykazywanie ważnych zmian w polskim prawie z powodu wyżej wspomnianego rozporządzania.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2015, 2(17); 5-18
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odrzucenie spadku w świetle wyroku TSUE z 2 czerwca 2022 r. (C-617/20)
Waiver of Succession in light of the CJEU’s Judgment of 2 June 2022 (C-617/20)
Autorzy:
Pazdan, Jadwiga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/20750263.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
the EU Succession Regulation
habitual residence
acceptance of waiver of the succession, of a legacy or of a reserved share
substantive validity
jurisdiction
case C 617/20
Opis:
The jurisdiction provided for in Article 13 of Regulation 650/2012 is ancillary to the jurisdiction regulated in Articles 4—11 of the Regulation. It covers only the declarations described in this provision. Their content is determined by the law applicable to succession. Jurisdiction under Article 13, on the other hand, does not cover the consequences of the silence of a candidate for an heir. The effects of the waiver of the succession are assessed according to the provisions of the law applicable to succession even if the waiver occurred within the jurisdiction of Article 13 of the Regulation. In the case before the CJEU, the Bremen court of succession held that since it had not been served with the original document containing the waiver of the succession with an official translation into German within the deadline set by the law application to succession (Section 1944(3) BGB), there had been no effective waiver of the succession. Responding to the preliminary questions of the German court of second instance, the CJEU correctly stated that in the case of waiver of the succession in the state, in which the waiving heir has his or her habitual residence, it is sufficient to comply with the form requirements provided for by the law of the state in which that declaration is made, without a necessity to comply with the requirements of the lex successionis. On the basis of legis processualis, the German court of succession could have requested that translation into German of the documents drawn up in Dutch is submitted. On the same basis, it could also have demanded the submission of the originals of the above documents. However, it incorrectly held that these acts must be completed within the time limit for waiver of succession provided for in the legis successionis. It is also clear that the failure of the heir waiving the succession to comply with the instruction contained in the last sentence of recital 32 of the Regulation (paragraph 74) regarding the obligation to give notice of waiver, does not render the waiver invalid. It seems desirable in future, however, to explicitly include in the Regulation the obligation to notify the court of succession of the waiver, in the country of habitual residence of the waiving heir.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2022, 30; 139-172
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Highlights and Pitfalls of the EU Succession Regulation
Autorzy:
Pazdan, Maksymilian
Zachariasiewicz, Maciej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030030.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
the EU Succession Regulation
dispositions upon death
intertemporal issues
succession administration of the enterprise in the estate
notion of a “court” and a “decision”
deed of certification of succession
principle of the unity of legis successionis
Opis:
The EU Succession Regulation constitutes a remarkable achievement of unification of conflict of law rules at the European level. It has importantly changed the landscape for all those interested in succession law, in particular, the notaries and theestate planning practitioners. The present article takes up a number of selected issues that arise under the Regulation. The paper first identifies certain general difficulties that result either from the complex nature of the matters addressed or from a somewhat ambiguous wording of the rules adopted by the EU legislator. The attention is devoted to the exceptions to the principle of the unity of legis successionis, the dispositions upon death, and the intertemporal questions resulting from the change of the conflict of laws rules in the Member States which occurred on 17th August 2015 when the Regulation started to be applied. The paper then moves to some of the more specific issues arising under the Regulation. To that effect, it first looks at the Polish Act of 2018 governing the ”succession administration” of the enterprise, which forms part of the estate. The argument is made that the rules contained in the 2018 Act should be applied by virtue of Article 30 of the Succession Regulation because they constitute “special rules” in the meaning of this provision. Second, the notion of a “court” under Article 3(2) of the Regulation is discussed in light of the recent judgment of the CJEU in case C-658/17 WB, where the European Court found that a Polish notary issuing the deed of certification of succession is not a “court” for purposes of Article 3(2). The paper provides a critical account of the Court’s decision.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 26; 125-187
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
W kierunku harmonizacji prawa spadkowego w Unii Europejskiej – rozporządzenie (UE) nr 650/2012 z 4 lipca 2012 r.
The way towards the harmonization of the law of succession in the European Union – regulation (eu) no 650/2012 of July 2012
Autorzy:
Makowiec, Aneta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/443485.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Wyższa Szkoła Humanitas
Tematy:
rozporządzenie
harmonizacja
prawo właściwe
jurysdykcja
sprawy spadkowe
Europejskie poświadczenie spadkowe
prawo spadkowe
rozporządzenie w sprawie dziedziczenia
miejsce zwykłego pobytu
prawo państwa członkowskiego
prawo właściwe dla spraw spadkowych
regulation
harmonization
applicable law
jurisdiction
matters of succession
European Certificate of Succession
the law of succession
Succession Regulation
habitual residence
the law of a Member State
the law applicable to the succession
Opis:
Przedmiotem opracowania jest analiza bardzo aktualnych, węzłowych kwestii unormowanych w rozporządzeniu Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 650/2012 z dnia 4 lipca 2012 r. w sprawie jurysdykcji, prawa właściwego, uznawania i wykonywania orzeczeń, przyjmowania i wykonywania dokumentów urzędowych dotyczących dziedziczenia oraz w sprawie ustanowienia europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego (tzw. rozporządzenie „Rzym IV”). Wprowadzenie rozporządzenia wieńczy długoletnią dyskusję nad wspólnymi przepisami kolizyjnymi i jurysdykcyjnymi dla krajów Unii Europejskiej, jak również stanowi uzupełnienie dotychczasowych regulacji unijnych z zakresu prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego i procesowego, stąd też problemtyka związana z regulacjami zawartymi w rozporządzeniu w pełni zasługuje na przybliżenie i omówienie. W pracy poruszone zostały kwestie związane z prawem właściwym dla spraw spadkowych, ściśle łączące się z tematyką kolizyjną zagadnienie jurysdykcji krajowej oraz problematyka europejskiego poświadczenia spadkowego. Poddana pod wątpliwość została słuszność wprowadzonych regulacji i ich przydatność w kontekście zwiększenia bezpieczeństwa obrotu. Została także podjęta próba rozstrzygnięcia pojawiających się wątpliwości, czy to natury interpretacyjnej, czy też odnoszących się do celowości przyjętych rozwiązań. Rozważania zamykają wnioski płynące z przeprowadzonej analizy.
Until quite recently all of the countries of the world have had different rules dealing with succession rights (that is the rules relating to inheritance whether testate or intestate). However since the creation of the Succession Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enfocement of authentic instruments in metters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession all that has changed for all of the member states of the European Union. The Regulation aims to harmonise the laws relating to succession throughout the European Union. Moreover the Regulation aims to facilitate the free movement of persons within th EU and also to promote the area of freedom, security and justice which is a primary goal of the EU. The regulation provides certainty as to which law applies. The regulation enables persons to make a choice of law of the country of their nationality to govern their succession. The general ruled applied in the Regulation is that the law applicable to the succession as a whole shall be the law of the State in which the deceased had his habitual residence at the time of death unless the latter chose the law of the state to apply in accordance with Article 22. The paper focuses on jurisdiction, applicable law and recognitions and enforcement of decisions and Europewan Certificate of Succession covered by the Regulation. The paper is designed of deeply analyze the regulations contained in the Regulation. The authoress focuses on jurisdiction, applicable law and recognitions and enforcement of decisions and Europewan Certificate of Succession covered by the Regulation. The authoress analyses the topic of her research by exploiting the dogmatic method and that of comparative type.
Źródło:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa; 2013, 13; 443-455
1644-9126
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pozycja prawna notariusza w sprawach spadkowych o charakterze transgranicznym Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej w sprawie C-658/17 WB
The position of a notary in transnational succession law matters. A note on the judgment of the Court of Justice of European Union in case C-658/17 WB
Autorzy:
Konieczna, Kinga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1030065.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
Regulation (EU) 650/2012
succession
deed of succession certification
notary public
Opis:
The commentary presents an analysis of a thesis presented by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Judgment of 23rd of May 2018. The question referred to the Court in case C-658/17 WB concerned legal definition of a ‚court’ and legal classification of the national deed of certification of succession under the provisions of Regulation(EU) No 650/2012. The Judgment states that notary in Poland that draw up a deed of certificate of succession at the unanimous request of all the parties, does not constitute a ‚court’ within the meaning of that provision. Subsequently, a deed drawn up by such authority does not constitute a ‘decision’ within the meaning of that provision. The Judgment is particularly relevant since its impact extends to national certificates of succession issued by notaries in other countries, that are part of the Latin part notary system. In conclusion it is indicated, that the Judgment rendered by Tribunal, although highly rightful, relates to merely one of numerous issues concerning use of authentic documents in cross-border succession cases.
Źródło:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego; 2020, 27; 303-317
1896-7604
2353-9852
Pojawia się w:
Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies