Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Standing Orders of the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 62
Tytuł:
Wykładnia pojęcia „ustawa podatkowa” (art. 37 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
Interpretation of the term “tax act” (Article 37 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż‑Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2195375.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
tax
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The term “tax act” is used in the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the substantive sense and refers to a public levy having the features of a tax, i.e. a pecuniary, compulsory, non-returnable and nonequivalent payment imposed by law and constituting budgetary revenue of the State Treasury or local government units of general purpose. The author points out that it is irrelevant for the qualification of a bill as a “tax bill” what name the bill uses to denote a public levy, if it bears the features of a tax. The title of a tax bill also refers to the bill that repeals or modifies the scope of a tax obligation or its elements. The author concludes that any tax act amendment bill meets the characteristics of the term “tax act”, and the scope of the term “tax act” does not include public tributes other than taxes.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2021, 2(70); 85-98
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie pojęcia „forma pisemna” w odniesieniu do przepisów zawartych w regulaminie Sejmu
Legal opinion on the meaning of the term “in writing” in relation to the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543114.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
In accordance with Article 193 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, the answer to an interpellation is to be given in writing. The term in question is, in the parliamentary practice, understood explicitly. It considers it as a “paper form” of a document, which is also supported by established practice of the Sejm in this respect.. Even if the Standing Orders do not contain a legal definition of the term “in writing”, the classification allowing – in the analyzed case – for the use of an electronic version would be of a “projective” nature and differ from the current understanding of the rules of the Sejm. The proposal for a relevant amendment of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, explicitly guaranteeing accessibility of an electronic document, is justifiable.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 48-52
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wątpliwości interpretacyjnych odnoszących się do art. 193 ust. 1 i 2 regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on interpretative doubts on Article 193 paras. 1 and 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543113.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellations
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The opinion provides an assessment of the legal acceptability of limiting the form of submission of interpellation and Deputies’ questions to the format an electronic document. The analysis of Article 193 (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm currently precludes such a possibility, as both interpellations and Deputies’ Questions must meet the formal requirements that include, inter alia, the need to be in writing. The Standing Orders of the Sejm do not contain a legal definition of the phrase “in writing”. From literal interpretation it follows that it is a paper document, signed in person by its author. The inability to accept that the meaning of the written form can also include the form of electronic document is proved by an absolute requirement to append two copies to an answer to a Deputies’ question. The imposition of an obligation for interpellations and Deputies’ question to be submitted in the form of an electronic document therefore requires amendment of Article 193 (1) and (2) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 43-47
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat wykładni pojęcia „forma pisemna” występującego w przepisach regulaminu Sejmu
Legal opinion on the interpretation of the term “in writing” appearing in the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szydło, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543116.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
interpellation
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing”, as provided for in the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should be understood as an obligation to fix on paper the content of a particular act, using in this purpose graphic symbols, as required by the so-called written language, and such a paper document should be signed in person. The requirement to perform a particular act “in writing” cannot be satisfied by making it in an electronic form. Electronic form is a form of making certain acts (separate and autonomous from a written one) which the Standing Orders of the Sejm provides for only in special situations. A written response to a Deputy’s interpellation must therefore be filed in paper, hand-signed by the person giving response to the interpellation.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 53-73
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat konsekwencji utraty mandatu przez posła popierającego wniosek o zwołanie posiedzenia komisji (art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu)
Legal opinion on the consequences of the loss of the mandate by a Deputy who has supported the motion to convene the sitting (Article 152, para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm)
Autorzy:
Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216101.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
Opis:
The author is of the opinion that the loss of the mandate by a Deputy, who has supported the motion to convene a sitting of the committee in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, does not affect the effectiveness of the motion, even if it will result in the number of members supporting the motion (putting their signatures thereupon) being less than 1/3 of the committee membership. An obligation to establish the date and time of the sitting of the committee arises at the time of submission of the properly formulated motion, and should be satisfied immediately. It cannot be accepted that the tardiness in the implementation of the obligation, which arose at the time of submission of the motion, could have an impact on its binding efficiency.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2016, 1(49); 59-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia w sprawie art. 30 ust. 5 regulaminu Sejmu RP
Opinion on Article 30 (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm
Autorzy:
Szmyt, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12232901.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Sejm committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
The purpose of the opinion is to examine the possibility of referring the recommendation for election or appointment by the Sejm of individual persons to particular State offices specified in Articles 26, 27–29 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, or dismissal therefrom, to more than one Sejm committee for their opinion thereto. In the author’s view, a flexible interpretation of Article 30 (5) is possible, as it is implied by the wording of that article which does not state that the recommendation is to be referred to “one” committee, so it does not preclude referring it to a greater number of committees.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 70-72
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kontynuowanie przez Komisję do Spraw Petycji postępowań w sprawie petycji, które zostały wszczęte w poprzedniej kadencji
The continuation of proceedings by the Committee on Petitions regarding petitions that were submitted in the course of a previous term
Autorzy:
Chybalski, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2206395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
Standing Orders of the Sejm
discontinuation
Opis:
In the opinion of the author, the principle of discontinunity in relation to “petition proceedings” does not apply to acts carried out as part of the work of the Committee on Petitions. This should also apply to those activities of the Commission that follow the choice of how to handle the petition, e.g. to prepare projects or desiderates as part of dealing with a given petition. Petitions that were considered in the previous term of office should be reconsidered, while the Commission in the current term is not bound by the arrangements made in the previous term of the Sejm. It is not permissible to renew the legislative initiative in the event of the draft submitted by the Committee on Petitions of the previous term was discontinued at the end of the term.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 1(65); 57-63
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna w sprawie interpretacji art. 152 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu w świetle wątpliwości przedstawionych przez przewodniczącego Komisji Ochrony Środowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Leśnictwa
Legal opinion on the interpretation of Article 152. para 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm in the light of the doubts expressed by the Chairman of the Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry Committee
Autorzy:
Kubuj, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543060.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Poland;
committee
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
As determined by analysis, a committee sitting convened under Article 152. para. 2 at the request of a defined group of Deputies should concern matters falling within the scope of activities of a Sejm committee. In contrast, a supervisory measure established in Article 167 consists in inspecting and examining by committees of the activities of the entities specifically mentioned in that provision (enterprises, firms or government institutions; basic criterion for the designation of controlled entities is a form of property – the property of the Treasury). Moreover, there are no legal obstacles for the committee (or the committee’s presidium) convened in accordance with Article 152 para. 2 to decide on the visit of the committee members, to inspect the entity meeting the requirements specified in Article 167. The author stresses, however, that such a visit, or examination of activities, should take into account the aim expressed in Article 167, which is the assessment of the mode of action of specific entities managing the property belonging to the State Treasury.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 3(43); 73-78
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ocena petycji w sprawie zmiany regulaminu Sejmu RP w zakresie obowiązku prowadzenia konsultacji publicznych w przypadku rządowych projektów ustaw
Assessment of a petition regarding amendments to the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerning the obligation to conduct public consultations in the case of government bills
Autorzy:
Wasil-Rusecka, Wioleta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2216001.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
petition
consultations
Sejm
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Opis:
In the author’s opinion, the petition stands as a part of the postulates regarding legal modifications in the field of public consultations. The author emphasizes that changes in the governmental model of conducting public consultations would remove the need to amend the Standing Orders of the Sejm in this respect.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2020, 3(67); 83-92
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Opinia prawna na temat skutków prawnych głosowania prowadzącego do odrzucenia projektu uchwały komisji sejmowej
Legal opinion on the legal consequences of a vote resulting in the rejection of a committee’s draft resolution
Autorzy:
Gierach, Ewelina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543265.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
Tematy:
Standing Orders of the Sejm
Sejm committee
bills
Opis:
The opinion was drawn up in the context of the work of Sejm committees on the Concept for Town and Country Planning 2030 (Paper No. 169). The author finds the occurrence of procedural inconsistency in the conduct of the committee’s procedures and the ineffectiveness of the election of a Deputy‑Rapporteur. She claims that the formal requirements provided in Article 43 (2) of the Standing Orders for the adoption by the committee of a report on a bill (draft resolution) should also be applied to other committee resolutions relating to reports, information or other documents supposed to be discussed by the Sejm, as well as committee desiderata and opinions. The lack of support from the majority of Deputies participating in the vote does not necessarily mean support for the motion to the contrary. Therefore, in the author’s view, the committees have not finished their work on the above‑mentioned draft resolution.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 1(37); 113-120
1896-9852
2082-064X
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 62

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies