Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Sentence of imprisonment" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17
Tytuł:
The Sentencing System in the Albanian Criminal Code and the Demand for Special Tretament of Juveniles
Autorzy:
Xhafo, Jola
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1035875.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Academicus. International Scientific Journal publishing house
Tematy:
Sentencing system
Sentence of imprisonment
Special treatment
Alternative measures
Educational measures
Opis:
Juveniles are subject to a cognitive process and growth, where the physical, intellectual, emotional and personality are still in phase of development phase. As a result, they enjoy a special status which arises the demand for their specialized treatment. The status as a minor in criminal matters raises the need to create a system consisting of different rules, which should take into consideration the physical and psychological peculiarities of the child and his educational needs. This system should be oriented towards the goal of juvenile education, rehabilitation and development, goal which can be successfully implemented only if it is reflected in the nature and types of sanctions applied to juveniles. In the application of sanctions it should be taken into consideration the need for education, assistance and welfare of the juvenile. Prison sentence and other similar measures should be considered as a last resort and used in order to reduce only when other forms of treatment do not comply with the personality of the offender and the seriousness of the offense. Priority should be given to educational and non-institutional measures. These requirements impose the necessity of legal interventions in the system of sanctions to address the needs for special treatment in accordance with the personality of the children and their individual needs for education. This paper aims at a critical analysis of the sentencing system provided in the Criminal Code, in the focus of the standards set by the international instruments which safeguard in a special manner the juvenile as a criminal offender. Through the analysis of legal provisions as well as referring to the juridical doctrine and court jurisprudence, there will be evidenced some issues related to the special treatment of juvenile criminal offenders in the field of the system of sentencing. After a detailed analysis, there will be provided conclusions and concrete recommendations on the current stage of the sentencing system, its’ compliance with the need for special treatment of juvenile criminal offenders, the need for improvement as well as the concrete legal initiatives to be adopted.
Źródło:
Academicus International Scientific Journal; 2012, 06; 47-61
2079-3715
2309-1088
Pojawia się w:
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Conditions and Procedure for the Admission of Children of Incarcerated Mothers to Mother-and-Baby Units at Prisons in Poland
Autorzy:
Teleszewska, Magdalena
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/685016.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
convicted women
children
serve a sentence of imprisonment
House of the Mather and Child in prison
Opis:
The admission of mother and child to the a mother-and-baby unit has a positive effect on both the development of the child as well as the social rehabilitation of the mother. Children in mother-and-baby units are provided the right conditions for development. The mother learns to fulfill her parental responsibilities. In addition, incarcerated women who are in prison with their children want to change for the better, in order to provide their children a better future.
Źródło:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review; 2017, 7; 301-310
2450-0976
Pojawia się w:
Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dozór elektroniczny: izolacja czy iluzja?
Electronic monitoring: isolation or illusion?
Autorzy:
Zawiślan, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/528863.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
Criminal law
Electronic monitoring
isolation
Execution of Sentence of Imprisonment Outside Prion
Law on Electronics Inspection Regulations
Electronically Monitored House Agrest
Opis:
Electronic monitoring is primarily isolation, while the illusory nature of it should be treated only as an ineffective plea, because resulting from superficial assessments. However, the verification of this thesis must be preceded by the study of law, doctrinal guidelines for its application and the judiciary itself. The institution of electronically monitored house arrest, which is a kind of spontaneous sanction, as well as a form of control of the convict, was created as a sort of boon for certain categories of offenders for whom the term of imprisonment could be regarded as an overly severe. Electronic monitoring is undoubtedly a novelty and it is governed by a separate, limited-time law. It constitutes part of a broad perspective Polish political crime thought, which should be positively reviewed due to the presence of more and more important element of humanity.
Źródło:
Państwo i Społeczeństwo; 2014, 4; 11-23
1643-8299
2451-0858
Pojawia się w:
Państwo i Społeczeństwo
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kara pozbawienia wolności w protokołach Wydziału Karnego Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP oraz w kodeksie karnym z 1932 r.
The penalty of imprisonment in the protocols of the criminal division of the Codification Commission of the Second Polish Republic and in the Criminal Code of 1932
Autorzy:
Trybus, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/31348399.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
criminal code
Codification Commission
alternative sentence of imprisonment
Makarewicz Criminal Code
kodeks karny
Komisja Kodyfikacyjna
pozbawienie wolności
kodeks karny Makarewicza
Opis:
Katalog kar zasadniczych w kodeksie karnym z 1932 r. obejmował dwie kary pozbawienia wolności, tj. więzienie i areszt. Kara więzienia miała przede wszystkim za cel resocjalizację sprawców. Szczególną jej odmianą była kara dożywotniego pozbawienia wolności. Z kolei areszt uznawano za karę względnie izolacyjną o charakterze przymusowo-zapobiegawczym. Traktowano go również jako surogat niehańbiącej kary pozbawienia wolności. W artykule przybliżono rozważania prowadzone w trakcie obrad Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej II RP, Wydział Karny (Prawo materialne), dotyczące wskazanych form reakcji karnej na przestępstwo, jak również przedstawiono te kary w świetle przepisów kodeksu karnego Makarewicza.
The catalogue of basic punishments in the 1932 Criminal Code included two types of imprisonment, i.e. prison and jail. The main purpose of prisons was to rehabilitate offenders. A particular variant of this punishment was life imprisonment. On the other hand, the jail was considered a punishment of relative isolation which was coercive and preventive in nature. It was also treated as a surrogate for non-degrading penalty of imprisonment. The purpose of the paper is also to portray the deliberations of the Codification Commission of the Second Polish Republic, its Criminal Division (Substantive Law), concerning the indicated forms of criminal reactions to a crime as well as to present these punishments in light of the provisions of the Makarewicz Criminal Code.
Źródło:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne; 2023, 75, 2; 89-102
0070-2471
Pojawia się w:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z problematyki pracy świadczonej przez skazanego odbywającego karę pozbawienia wolności na podstawie skierowania dyrektora zakładu karnego. Rozważania na kanwie zagadnienia prawnego w sprawie III PZP 3/20
On the Issues of Work Provided by a Convict Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment on the Basis of a job Placement by the Director of a Penitentiary Institution. Considerations on the Basis of the Legal Issue in the Case III PZP 3/20
Autorzy:
Wolak, Grzegorz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1197591.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
Tematy:
job placement
convict serving a sentence of imprisonment
decision
director of a penitentiary institution
employing entity
skierowanie do pracy
skazany pozbawiony wolności
decyzja
dyrektor zakładu karnego
podmiot zatrudniający
Opis:
The article discusses in general the issues of the legal regime of work provided by a convict serving a sentence of imprisonment on the basis of a job placement by the director of a penitentiary institution. The basis for considerations is the legal issue referred to the Supreme Court in the case III PZP 3/20 with the following wording: “Is a claim to establish the existence of an employment relationship and remuneration asserted by a convict sent to work while serving the sentence of imprisonment should be considered as ‘a civil matter’ within the meaning of art.1 of the Civil Code and be subject of verification by means of a civil action (art.2 §1 of the Civil Code)”. The Supreme Court refused to pass a resolution on the matter. However, this does no exempt from making an attempt to clarify whether the provision of work by the convict on the basis of a job placement by the director of a penitentiary institution takes place under an employment relationship in the meaning of art.22 of the Labour Code and whether legal action is permitted (art.199 §1(1) of the Civil Code) for assertion of claims by a convict against a penitentiary institution arising from the fact of providing such work, and therefore, whether the case for such a claim is a civil matter within the meaning of art.1 of the Civil Code.
W artykule omówiona została ogólnie problematyka reżimu prawnego pracy świadczonej przez skazanego odbywającego karę pozbawienia wolności na podstawie skierowania dyrektora zakładu karnego. Kanwą rozważań jest zagadnienie prawne skierowane do rozstrzygnięcia Sądowi Najwyższemu w sprawie III PZP 3/20, które brzmiało następująco: „Czy roszczenie o ustalenie istnienia stosunku pracy i wynagrodzenie dochodzone przez skazanego skierowanego do pracy w czasie odbywania kary pozbawienia wolności powinny zostać uznane za »sprawę cywilną« w rozumieniu art. 1 k.p.c. i podlegać weryfikacji w drodze powództwa cywilnego (art. 2 § 1 k.p.c.)”. Sąd Najwyższy odmówił podjęcia uchwały w tej sprawie. Nie zwalnia to jednak od podjęcia próby wyjaśnienia, czy świadczenie pracy przez skazanego na podstawie skierowania dyrektora zakładu karnego odbywa się w ramach stosunku pracy w rozumieniu art. 22 k.p. oraz czy dopuszczalna jest droga sądowa (art. 199 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.) dla dochodzenia przez skazanego roszczeń od zakładu karnego wynikających z faktu wykonywania takiej właśnie pracy, a zatem czy sprawa o takie roszczenie jest sprawą cywilną w rozumieniu art. 1 k.p.c.
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały; 2020, 2(27); 63-86
1689-8052
2451-0807
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
ROZWAŻANIA O USTALANIU SĄDU WŁAŚCIWEGO DO WSTRZYMANIA WYKONANIA WYROKU W ZWIąZKU ZE ZŁOŻENIEM WNIOSKU O UDZIELENIE ZEZWOLENIA NA ODBYWANIE KARY POZBAWIENIA WOLNOŚCI W SYSTEMIE DOZORU ELEKTRONICZNEGO
Some Reflections on the Determination of the Appropriate Court to stay a Prison Sentence Following the Offender’s Application to serve His Sentence Subject to the Electronic Monitoring System
Autorzy:
Tarapata, Szymon
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2096559.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-07-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
dozór elektroniczny; wstrzymanie wykonania wyroku; kara pozbawienia wolności.
electronic monitoring system; stay of sentence; imprisonment.
Opis:
W artykule rozważono kwestię ustalania sądu właściwego do wstrzymania wykonania wyroku w związku ze złożeniem wniosku o udzielenie zezwolenia na odbywanie kary pozbawienia wolności w systemie dozoru elektronicznego. Ostatecznie stwierdzono, że właściwy do wykonania takiej czynności jest sąd penitencjarny, nie zaś sąd pierwszej instancji.
The article considers the question which court is empowered under Polish law to stay a sentence of imprisonment if the offender submits an application to serve his sentence with the use of the electronic monitoring system. It concludes that the appropriate court empowered to take such decisions is the penitentiary court, not the court of first instance.
Źródło:
Zeszyty Prawnicze; 2020, 20, 2; 235-248
2353-8139
Pojawia się w:
Zeszyty Prawnicze
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polityka karna w sprawach o wykroczenia w Polsce Ludowej pod rządami kodyfikacji z 1971 r.
Criminal policy in infraction cases in the Polish People’s Republic while the codification of 1971 was in force
Autorzy:
Łysko, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/14966659.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-07-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Polish People’s Republic
codification of the infraction law
Minister of Internal Affairs
alternative sentence of imprisonment
boards adjudicating on infractions
Polska Ludowa
kodyfikacja prawa wykroczeń
minister spraw wewnętrznych
kara aresztu zastępczego
kolegia do spraw wykroczeń
Opis:
Kompleksowa kodyfikacja prawa wykroczeń Polski Ludowej z 1971 r. zawierała nie tylko rozwiązania stworzone z myślą o surowym karaniu sprawców najpoważniejszych wykroczeń, lecz także instytucje umożliwiające prowadzenie liberalnej polityki karnej. Jednakże praktyka stosowania kodyfikacji zmierzała w kierunku stopniowego zaostrzania represji przez usytuowane w strukturach resortu spraw wewnętrznych kolegia do spraw wykroczeń. Sprawujący zwierzchnictwo nad orzecznictwem kolegiów minister spraw wewnętrznych traktował prawo wykroczeń w kategoriach instrumentu służącego zwalczaniu opozycji politycznej i trzymania w posłuchu pozostałej części społeczeństwa. Realizując wydawane przez ministra wytyczne, kolegia stosowały kary aresztu zasadniczego oraz wysokie grzywny nie tylko wobec sprawców wykroczeń o charakterze politycznym, lecz także licznych wykroczeń przeciwko porządkowi publicznemu. W latach 80. podstawowym instrumentem prowadzenia represyjnej polityki karnej była zastępcza kara aresztu, która w przeciwieństwie do aresztu zasadniczego nie podlegała kontroli sądowej. Surowe grzywny podlegające zamianie na areszt zastępczy orzekano w trybie postępowania przyspieszonego, który cechowała natychmiastowa wykonalność zapadłych orzeczeń. Złagodzenie nadmiernej represyjności orzecznictwa cechującej okres Polski Ludowej nastąpiło w wyniku przeprowadzonej po upadku systemu komunistycznego reformy ustrojowej z 1990 r. Usytuowanie kolegiów w strukturach resortu sprawiedliwości, w połączeniu z likwidacją instytucji wytycznych co do polityki orzecznictwa, stworzyło warunki do prowadzenia liberalnej polityki karnej w latach 90.
The complex codification of the infraction law of the Polish People’s Republic of 1971 contained not only the solutions which were created with the aim of severely punishing the perpetrators of the most serious infractions but also the institutions which made it possible to conduct a liberal criminal policy. However, the practice of employing the codification aimed to gradually make repressions more severe by placing the boards adjudicating on infractions within the structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The adjudicating boards were supervised by the Minister of Internal Affairs, who treated the infraction law as a method of persecuting political opponents as well as repressing the remainder of the society. In order to carry out the Minister’s guidelines, the boards meted out such punishments as prison and high fines not only to the perpetrators of infractions which were political in character but also to the perpetrators of numerous infractions against public order. The basic instrument of the criminal policy of repression was the institution of the alternative sentence of imprisonment which, contrary to the punishment of prison, was not subject to judicial review in the 1980s. High fines which could be substituted for the alternative sentence of imprisonment were adjudicated in the form of accelerated proceedings, and they were characterized by immediate enforceability. The repressive character of adjudication, which was characteristic of the Polish People’s Republic, was eased as a result of the political reform of 1990 which was carried out after the fall of the communist system in Poland. The placement of the adjudicating boards within the structure of the Ministry of Justice in conjunction with the abolishment of the institution of guidelines concerning the policy of judicial decisions created the conditions to conduct a liberal criminal policy in the 90s.
Źródło:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne; 2022, 74, 1; 279-299
0070-2471
Pojawia się w:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A Gloss for the Judgement of the Supreme Court of 22 June 2017, File Ref. No. Iv Kk 189/17
Autorzy:
Joachimiak, Sławomir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1803117.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-25
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
expungement
conditional suspension of penalty
imprisonment
concurrent sentence
cumulative penalty
Opis:
In this gloss, the author offers a mostly favourable commentary on the content of the judgement of the Supreme Court of 22 June 2017, file ref. no. IV KK 189/17, which provides a backdrop for a discussion of the recent legislative changes made to Article 76 of the Criminal Code that formed the basis for the said judicial decision. The relationship between this provision and Article 108 of the Code is discussed in the context of the amendments, the doctrine and case law. The article also addresses the possibility of including a conditionally suspended custodial sentence in a concurrent sentence after the probation period is over and the expiry of the period referred to in Article 75 § 4 of the Criminal Code.
Źródło:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych; 2019, 28, 1; 167-176
1507-7896
2544-5227
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Nauk Prawnych
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Kara pozbawienia wolności jako ostateczny środek karny. Założenia i implikacje praktyczne Kodeksu Karnego z 1997 r.
Autorzy:
Zylik, Bartosz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2158677.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Instytut Studiów Międzynarodowych i Edukacji Humanum
Tematy:
Polish Penal code
penalty of imprisonment
short time sentence
ultimate means of penalty
Opis:
The main objective of this paper is to show the impact of adopted in 1997 Criminal Code on the justice system in Poland. In particular the principle of "ultima ratio of imprisonment" as the ultimate means of penalty. Author through the following paragraphs shows the main foundations that was taken to establish penal code, then presents statistics of delinquency, judical decision of imprisonment, penal statistics of short time sentences covering last 25 years. The last paragraph in the brief refers to the causes why regulations of imprisonment formed in penal code was not fully exploited.
Źródło:
Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne; 2013, 2(6); 383-396
1730-0266
Pojawia się w:
Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Odpowiedzialność karna sprawców powracających do przestępstwa w świetle kodeksu karnego z 1932 r.
Criminal liability of repeat offenders in the light of the 1932 Penal Code
Autorzy:
Szczygieł, Barbara
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/782560.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
recidivism
return to crime
establishment for the wrongdoers imprisonment
restriction of sentence
Opis:
The subject of the discussion is the instance of recidivism in the Criminal Code of 1932. The main discussion is preceded by a brief description of the formation of criminal liability of persons returning to crime in the work of the codification committee established to unify criminal legislation after Poland gained independence in 1918. Then, the premises for recidivism specified in Article 60 of the Penal Code and the criminal consequences of returning to crime are analysed, taking into account the positions of doctrine and judicature.
Źródło:
Z Dziejów Prawa; 2019, 12; 559-572
1898-6986
2353-9879
Pojawia się w:
Z Dziejów Prawa
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The alternatives of imprisonment according to the Albanian Law and the ways of surveillances
Autorzy:
Belishta, Admir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1036594.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Academicus. International Scientific Journal publishing house
Tematy:
the alternatives of imprisonment
probation service
semi release
the conditional sentence
parole
house arrest
community services
Opis:
This paper considers different alternatives to Sentence to a Term of Imprisonment listed in a chapter with the same title, in the Articles 58-64 of the Albanian Criminal Code. This approach to such subject reflects not only the reality of how the judicial system in Albania operates, but, because of the purpose and the positive changes that the implementation of these alternatives to sentence to a term of imprisonment brings, it is also a permanent requirement of the international community. In this note I have focused in three important quests: theoretical interpretations of these criminal code provisions, examples from court’s practices as well as problems and challenges that might arise, and lastly, the procedures required for their implementation. Moreover, in considering the procedural challenges, the conditional sentence (Article 59), semi freedom (Article 58), house arrest (Article 59/a), community service (Article 63) and conditional release or parole (Article 64) of the Criminal Code, I have also presented my personal view on the matters. My thoughts and suggestions add to the explanation and elaboration of this subject not only from the practitioners’ points of view, but they also add to the intellectual discussion among those who exchange ideas and theories on the subject. This concludes the intent and purpose of this note, which focuses on a topic that is very current today.
Źródło:
Academicus International Scientific Journal; 2015, 12; 244-259
2079-3715
2309-1088
Pojawia się w:
Academicus International Scientific Journal
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zakład karny i wykonanie kary pozbawienia wolności w opinii społeczności lokalnej
Prison and Imprisonment in the Opinion of Local Community
Autorzy:
Mościskier, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699182.pdf
Data publikacji:
1984
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
zakład karny
wykonanie kary
kara
pozbawienie wolności
opinia społeczna
społeczność lokalna
penitentiary
execution of a sentence
imprisonment
public opinion
local community
Opis:
Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
     Basically, the study concers three  problems. Firstly, an attempt was made to explain the mechanism which led to the results obtained by other authors. They found a supposedly most rigorous attitude of the Polish society towards law breakers, which was to become manifest in the demands for relentless and severe punishment of such persons. This highly rigorous attitude has been confirmed in the present study too, yet only in answers to questions drawn up as generally as those put by the mentioned authors. As the level of abstractness of the questions is lowered, the rigorous attitude diminishes, which finds expression, among others, in the disapproval of a number of penalties applied by regulation during the execution of imprisonment.       Secondly  the attitude of the local community was presented not only towards prisoners, but also towards prison einployees. As compared with many other occupations, the prestige of prison employees is rather low, yet in spite of a certain social isolation, their general opinion is not negative. It is also worthy of attention that the sense of social distance between prisoners and community was les marked than expected.       Thirdly, the attitude was described towards prison as a physical object and an institution in the local community. This problem was studies by means of questions about the opinion on the very fact of existence of such an object in twon, the possible impact the prison has on economy, supplies, etc., an  the citizens’  feeling of safety. In this formulation, the results fail to point to the existence of markedly negative attitudes, though some socio-demographic features of the examined persons tend  to differentiate their answers.       The study was realized from 1979 till 1981. In spite of the considerable interval and the differences in the country's respective social situations, the answers given by the examined persons from both groups were nearly parallel to each other.      In 1979, random samples of adults were examined, inhabitants of two towns, about 25 thousand inhabitants each, in which there were prisons. In one of these towns, the prison had been established over 20 years before, while in the second one, it was only a few years old. In each town, 200 persons were examined by means of a questionnaire, which makes the total of 400 examined persons.        In 1981, 462 persons were examined by means of the same questionnaire, who were selected with the use of "Quota Sampling" from the population of 10 towns of 11 to 95 thousand of inhabitants, in which there were prisons.        The study was intentionally realized in towns of medium population. The aim was to examine communities large enough for the prison not to dominate them on the one hand, and on the other hand, small enough to enable an assumption that a majority of inhabitants have a certain knowledge and opinions about the prison acquired through observation and nin-institutionalized flow of information.       As regards the opinion on imprisonment, it should first of all be stressed that over  50 per cent of the examined persons are of opinion that the essential aim oi this type of penalty should be the resocialization of prisoners. About 23 per cent of answers concerning this problem referred to the idea of individual prevention; 12-18 per cent of the examined persons were of opinion that imprisonment should serve to protect the society from the criminal by isolating him for a certain period of time; about 6 per cent of answers pointed to retribution as the aim of punishment, while  as few as 2-3 per cent considered the aim to be general prevention.        However, to find out if the attitude of the examined persons was rigorous or tolerant, answers to other questions were more significant, that is those concerning the mothods of execution of imprisonment, i.e., the penalties and rewards applied  towards  prisoners and the rights they enjoy. Here, a significant trend appeared to turn from rigorous to tolerant  attitudes as the level of generality of questions lowered. It seems that questions about certain abstract principles, which in the mind of an average man have no connection with any actual situation or person,  provoked answers which hinted at a rigorous attitude; yet whenever the same respondent had to answer a question which allowed him to realize the details of a given situation or the position of a given persons in such circumstances, the tolerant attitude prevailed.       Thus, for instance, as many as over 70 per cent of the examined persons approved of the most  general  statement that  „in prison, strict discipline should reign”.  When another question was asked, this time less generally formulated,  if „all amenities of life and attractive activities should be reduced to a minimum”, the numbers of approving and disapproving answers were more or less equal, which points to the lowering of the level of rigorism. The answers to further questions concerning definite cases frankly contradict  those given  to the former questions and point to a markedly tolerant attitude. Thus, for example, the question if „a prisoner should have free access to newspapers, radio, and TV in his leisure time”, was answered in the affirmative by over 75 per cent of the examined persons.       Also the questions about definite penalties and rewards applied towards prisoners were answered in a way which seems to point to the prevalence of tolerant attitudes over rigorism. The majority of the examined persons are for abolition or limitation of penalties provided by prison regulations and for granting the prisoners with a number of rights, such as unlimited receipt of parcels, letters, and visitors from the outside (prison regulations limit the number of such prisoners' contacts with the outside world and treat any extension of these contacts as a special reward). The examined  persons were also for alegal regulation of the sphere of prisoners' work, pointing to the need for making the working conditions in prison resemble those generally found in State-controlled economy.       Also the rational attitude of the public opinion towards prison should be stressed. The prison is perceived as an institution which could play a greater part than before in the life of the local community, particularly through including prisoners in the borader social unit and increasing their participation in the town’s economic activity. The citizens’ expectations point in this direction, accompanied also by the favourable opinion as to the extending of the prisoners' range of personal liberty outside the prison walls. In this connection, also the attitude of fear of the prisoners was much less marked than had been expected, as well as the bias against them, both of which appear in principle only as regards a small group of dangerous criminals.       The attitude of the local community towards prison employees is a completely separate problem. It is characterized by a peculiar ambivalence: on the one hand, prison employees enjoy a good reputation as persons and members of the local community, their financial status perceived as decidedly higher than that of an average citizen. On the other hand, however, the social status of a prison employee is estimated as very low, as compared with other professions, which is accompanied by a stressed disapproval revealed by the examined persons of the very fact of working in a prison. This may lead to a conclusion that in the social consciousness disfavourable opinion persists as to the human relations in prison and the nature of work of prison employees. This is an additional factor which speaks for changes in the system of execution of the penalty of deprivation of liberty which would modernize it and adjust it to the contemporary progressive trends in the world. The present study has not only confirmed the existence of social support for such changes but it has also revealed the conducive atmosphere to a far-reaching reform in this field.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 1984, XI; 245-267
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Orzecznicze i doktrynalne czynniki ochrony praw człowieka w stosowaniu przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności po 1 stycznia 2012 r.
Judicial and doctrinal aspects of human rights protection in the application of an interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence after 1 January 2012 Wprowadzenie Przerwa w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności określa jeden z najważniejszych prze
Autorzy:
Juszka, Karol
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1828652.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-09-21
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Przerwa w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności
postępowanie wykonawcze
Sąd Najwyższy
sądy powszechne
Interruption of imprisonment
interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence
enforcement proceedings
Supreme Court
common courts
Opis:
Celem artykułu jest prezentacja czynników dotyczących przestrzegania praw człowieka w stosowaniu instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności w orzecznictwie Sądu Najwyższego i sądów powszechnych od 1 stycznia 2012 r. Przedmiotową problematykę zaprezentowano za pomocą regulacji kodeksowej instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności. Zakres artykułu obejmuje wszystkie etapy stosowania tytułowej instytucji. W celu zwiększenia efektywności ochrony praw człowieka w stosowaniu instytucji przerwy w wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności należy monitorować stosowanie tej instytucji w praktyce. W zależności od wyników tego monitoringu przedstawiciele doktryny i orzecznictwa mogą przedstawić propozycje de lege ferenda zmian ustawowej konstrukcji instytucji przerwy wykonywaniu kary pozbawienia wolności a także zmian w stosowaniu niniejszej instytucji w ramach obowiązujących przepisów.
The aim of this article is to present the factors concerning the observance of human rights in the institution of the interruption in the execution of a custodial sentence. Analysis will be presented by showing judicial and doctrinal aspects in the judgments issued by the Supreme Court and common courts since 1 January 2012. The presentation is concentrated on the code regulation of the titular institution. The presentation and analysis of this subject will be provided through successive stages of the interruption in the execution of the custodial sentence. In order to increase the efficiency in the protection of human rights in practice in the titular institution, monitoring of the application of the interruption of imprisonment should be used. Depending on the results of this kind of monitoring, representatives of the doctrine and judiciary can present de lege ferenda proposals which may include the modification of the legislative construction of the institution in question, and proposals of measures to be taken in its practical application within the framework of the provisions in force.
Źródło:
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny; 2021, 3; 65-78
1898-2166
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Prawno-Ekonomiczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Gloss to the Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal of 11 June 2019 (P 20/17, OTK-A 2019, Item 29)
Autorzy:
Nowosad, Aleksandra
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/618509.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
restriction of liberty
imprisonment
sequence of the penalties
aggregate penalty
concurrent sentence
concurrent offences
kara ograniczenia wolności
kara pozbawienia wolności
sekwencja kar
kara łączna
wyrok łączny
zbieg przestępstw
Opis:
The author agrees with the Constitutional Tribunal’s opinion that Article 87 § 1 of the Penal Code to the extent that it imposes an obligation on the court to combine imprisonment and restriction of liberty and to impose a total penalty of deprivation of liberty after converting the penalty of restriction of liberty into imprisonment is inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In addition, the author raised the problem of ratio legis of Article 87 of the Penal Code and indicated why the deficiencies in regulation were noticed so late in the case law.
Autorka podziela stanowisko Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, że art. 87 § 1 k.k. w zakresie, w jakim nakłada na sąd obowiązek połączenia kar pozbawienia wolności i ograniczenia wolności oraz wymierzenia kary łącznej pozbawienia wolności po dokonaniu zamiany kary ograniczenia wolności na karę pozbawienia wolności, jest niezgodny z Konstytucją RP. Dodatkowo poruszono problem ratio legis art. 87 k.k. i wskazano, dlaczego tak późno w orzecznictwie zostały dostrzeżone mankamenty regulacji.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia; 2020, 29, 3
1731-6375
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przesłanki formalne warunkowego zwolnienia skazanego z odbycia reszty kary pozbawienia wolności po rocznej przerwie jej wykonania
Формальные предпосылки для условного освобождения осужденного от отбывания оставшейся части наказания в виде лишения свободы после годичного перерыва в его отбывании
Формальні критерія умовного звільнення засудженого від відбування решти покарання у вигляді позбавлення волі після однорічної перерви у його виконанні
Formal prerequisites for conditional release of a convicted person from serving the remainder of a prison sentence after a one-year break from its execution
Autorzy:
Stefańska, Blanka Julita
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2090131.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-09
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
позбавлення волі
перерва у виконанні покарання
формальні причини
розмір покарання
засуджений
умовно-дострокове звільнення
зупинення провадження
наказание в виде лишения свободы
прерывание срока исполнения наказания
формальные предпосылки
quantum наказания
осужденный
условно-досрочное освобождение
приостановление производства по делу
imprisonment
interruption of sentence
break in sentence
conditional release
formal prerequisites
quantum of sentence
convict
suspension of proceedings
kara pozbawienia wolności
przerwa w wykonaniu kary
przesłanki formalne
quantum kary
skazany
warunkowe zwolnienie
zawieszenie postępowania
Opis:
Artykuł stanowi analizę przesłanek formalnych warunkowego zwolnienia skazanego z odbycia reszty kary pozbawienia wolności po rocznej przerwie jej wykonania, które jest szczególnym rodzajem tej instytucji (art. 155 Kodeksu karnego wykonawczego). Są to: 1) odbycie przez skazanego co najmniej 6 miesięcy kary; 2) nieprzekroczenie przez orzeczoną karę lub sumę kar 3 lat; 3) korzystanie przez skazanego z przerwy w wykonaniu kary co najmniej przez rok (§ 1). Doprowadziła ona do wniosków, że quantum wykonanej kary musi mieć miejsce przed uzyskaniem przez skazanego przerwy w wykonaniu kary, z tym że kara nie musi być odbyta w trybie ciągłym, lecz może także odbywać się etapami. Przerwa w wykonaniu kary pozbawienia wolności ma trwać co najmniej rok i nie musi być jednorazowo udzielona na ten okres, ale może być wielokrotnie przedłużana. Bez znaczenia jest zarówno przyczyna całej przerwy, jak i poszczególnych przedłużanych przerw. Na równi z przerwą w wykonaniu kary pozbawienia wolności należy traktować zawieszenie postępowania wykonawczego co do kary pozbawienia wolności w przypadku, gdy skazany rozpoczął już odbywanie kary pozbawienia wolności, lecz nie można wykonać wobec niego orzeczenia z powodu choroby psychicznej lub innej przewlekłej, ciężkiej choroby (art. 15 § 2 K.k.w.).      
У статті аналізуються формальні критерія умовного звільнення засудженого від відбування решти покарання у вигляді позбавлення волі після однорічної перерви у його виконанні, що є особливим видом цього інституту (ст. 155 КК РФ). Це: 1) відбуття засудженим не менше 6 місяців покарання; 2) покарання або сума покарання не перевищили 3 років; 3) засудженнй використав перерву у виконанні покарання не менше одного року (§ 1). Це привело до висновку, що відлік виконаного вироку має відбутися до перерви у виконанні покарання засудженим, однак покарання не повинно відбуватися безперервно, а може відбуватися і поетапно. Перерва у виконанні покарання у виді позбавлення волі має тривати не менше одного року і на цей термін не обов’язково надаватися один раз, але може бути продовжена кілька разів. Причина як усієї перерви, так і окремих продовжених перерв не має значення. Зупинення виконавчого провадження щодо покарання у виді позбавлення волі слід трактувати нарівні з перервою у виконанні покарання у вигляді позбавлення волі, якщо засуджений вже почав відбувати покарання у вигляді позбавлення волі, але вирок не може бути виконаний стосовно до нього через психічне захворювання або іншу хронічну тяжку хворобу (ст. 15 § 2 Виконавчого кримінального кодексу).
Статья представляет собой анализ формальных предпосылок условного освобождения осужденного от отбывания оставшейся части наказания в виде лишения свободы после годичного перерыва в его отбывании, что является особым видом данного института (ст. 155 Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса). К ним относятся: (1) условие, чтобы осужденный отбыл не менее 6 месяцев наказания; (2) условие, чтобы назначенное наказание или сумма наказаний не превышала 3 лет; (3) условие, чтобы осужденный воспользовался перерывом в исполнении наказания не менее одного года (§ 1). Это привело к выводу, что quantum наказания должно происходить до того, как осужденный получит перерыв в исполнении наказания, однако наказание не обязательно должно отбываться непрерывно, но также может отбываться поэтапно. Перерыв в исполнении наказания в виде лишения свободы должен длиться не менее одного года и не обязательно должен быть предоставлен один раз на этот период, но может быть неоднократно продлен. Причина как всего перерыва, так и отдельных продлеваемых перерывов не имеет значения. Наравне с перерывом в отбывании наказания в виде лишения свободы, надо рассматривать приостановление исполнительного производства в отношении приговора к лишению свободы в случае, если осужденный уже начал отбывать наказание в виде лишения свободы, но приговор в отношении его не может быть исполнен из-за психического заболевания или другой хронической, тяжелой болезни (статья 15 § 2 Уголовно-исполнительного кодекса).
The article analyses the formal prerequisites for the conditional release of a convicted person from serving rest of the sentence of imprisonment after one-year break in its execution which constitutes special type of this institution (Article 155 of Penal Enforcement Code). These are: 1) that the convicted person has served at least 6 months of sentence; 2) that the sentence imposed or the sum of the sentences has not exceeded 3 years; 3) that the convicted person has benefited from a break in the execution of the sentence for at least one year (§ 1). It led to the conclusion that quantum of the sentence served must have taken place before the convicted person obtained a break in the execution of the sentence, except that the sentence need not be served continuously, but may also be served in stages. A break in the execution of a sentence of imprisonment is to last for at least one year and does not have to be granted once for that period, but may be repeatedly extended. The reasons for both the entire break and the individual extended breaks is irrelevant. Suspension of the enforcement proceedings with regard to a sentence of imprisonment should be treated on a equal footing with a break in the execution of the sentence of imprisonment if the convicted person has already started serving his sentence, but the sentence cannot be executed against him due to a mental illness or other chronic, serious illness (Article 15 § 2 of Penal Enforcement Code).
Źródło:
Studia Prawnicze KUL; 2022, 2; 129-143
1897-7146
2719-4264
Pojawia się w:
Studia Prawnicze KUL
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 17

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies