- Tytuł:
-
Apologie Pawel Fjodorowitsch Karamasows. Schuld bei Dostojewskij und seinen Interpreten
Pavel Fyodorovich Karamazov’s Apology. Guilt in Dostoyevsky and his commentators - Autorzy:
- Paulin, Maximilian
- Powiązania:
- https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/558840.pdf
- Data publikacji:
- 2013
- Wydawca:
- Gdańskie Seminarium Duchowne
- Tematy:
-
Amok
Dostojewskij
Girard
Justiz
Karamasow
Literaturkritik
Menschenrechte
Mobbing
Opferselektion
Schuldfähigkeit
Suizid
Sündenbock
Vatermord
amok
criminal responsibility
Dostoyevsky
human rights
justice
Karamasov
literacy criticism
mobbing
parricide
scape-goat
suicide
victim selection criteriology - Opis:
-
In einer gängigen Interpretation des Romans „Die Brüder Karamasow” wird die Verantwortung für den Vatermord in unterschiedliche Komponenten zerlegt, deren jede in der Gestalt eines der vier Brüder allegorisch auskomponiert sei. Die „Komponente Smerdjakow” liege dabei als bloße physische Ausführung des Verbrechens außerhalb der Sphäre ethischer Betrachtung. Damit wird Smerdjakow aber noch in der Interpretation einmal mehr in seinem Menschsein verkannt. Eine durch Girard geschulte Lektüre zeigt hingegen, wie gekonnt Dostojewskij – ob intuitiv oder mit Absicht – diesen Charakter mit Kriterien der Opferselektion ausstattet und ihn so der Leserschaft als Sündenbock regelrecht anbietet.
In a common interpretation of Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamasov, Dmitri Karamasov is held guilty of murdering his father in a moral sense, while the character of Smerdyakov is put beyond the range of ethic consideration as he is seen as an allegory of the merely executing factor of the act of violence. Hence, his suicide is read as a proof that the evil itself doesn’t take over responsibility; in face of the accusation it fades away, leaving the charge of responsibility to the human moral subject. Dostoyevsky, however, seems not wanting to stress such a kind of moral hero that, in this interpretation, could be seen in Dmitri. With introducing Alexey in his preamble, he is in fact presenting us a „weak” hero, leading us to another understanding of the story. Yet Alexey is still not the weakest. It is Smerdyakov. What this article pleads for is that Smerdyakov is systematically made a scapegoat, as Dostoyevsky is illustrating in several pertinent scenes. It is only coherent that interpreters, while completely ignoring this fact, continue this scapegoating in dehumanising him by taking off him of all ethic consideration, reducing him to a personification of a merely mechanic component. By contrast, this is an apology for Smerdyakov as a human being. And as a son of Fyodor and brother of Alexey, Dmitri and Ivan. - Źródło:
-
Studia Gdańskie; 2013, 32; 91-107
0137-4338 - Pojawia się w:
- Studia Gdańskie
- Dostawca treści:
- Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł