Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Savonarola" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5
Tytuł:
W jaki sposób należało opiekować się dzieckiem w pierwszych tygodniach jego życia? Zalecenia autorów wybranych średniowiecznych (XI-XV) traktatów medycznych
How was the child to be attended in the first weeks of life? Recommendations of the authors of selected medieval medical treatises
Autorzy:
Głusiuk, Anna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2174857.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-12-30
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
Trotula
Aldobrandino ze Sieny
Michał Savonarola
opieka nad dzieckiem
średniowiecze
Aldobrandino of Siena
Michael Savonarola
childcare
Middle Ages
Opis:
Artykuł omawia kwestie związane z opieką nad dzieckiem w pierwszych tygodniach jego życia na przykładzie wybranych średniowiecznych traktatów medycznych: Liber de sinthomatibus mulierum i De curis mulierum przypisywanych żyjącej w XI/XII wieku Trotuli z Salerno, Ad mulieres ferrarienses de regimine pregnantium et noviter natorum usque ad septennium autorstwa Michała Savonaroli oraz Régime du corps Aldobrandina ze Sieny. Autorzy tych dzieł omówili między innymi, jak prawidłowo przeciąć pępowinę, wykąpać dziecko czy w razie konieczności wybrać odpowiednią mamkę, która w zastępstwie matki miała zająć się jego karmieniem.
The article discusses issues related to childcare in the first weeks of the baby’s life using selected medieval medical treatises as examples. Based on Liber de sinthomatibus mulierum and De curis mulierum attributed to Trotula of Salerno, who lived in the 11th/12th centuries, Ad mulieres ferrarienses de regimine pregnantium et noviter natorum usque ad septennium by Michael Savonarola and Régime du corps by Aldobrandin of Siena, it is presented how, according to medical knowledge of the time, babies should be cared for in their first weeks of life. The authors discussed a.o., how to cut the umbilical cord correctly, bathe the baby or, if necessary, choose a suitable wet nurse who would breastfeed the child instead of a mother.
Źródło:
Saeculum Christianum. Pismo Historyczne; 2022, 29, 2; 17-30
1232-1575
Pojawia się w:
Saeculum Christianum. Pismo Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ficino And Savonarola Two Faces of the Florence Renaissance
Autorzy:
Gawrońska-Oramus, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1806836.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-23
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Ficino; Savonarola; Pico della Mirandola; neo-Platonism; art; religion; Renaissance; republic; piagnoni; Apologia contra Savonarolam
Opis:
The Polish version of the article was published in “Roczniki Humanistyczne,” vol. 61 (2013), issue 4. Analysis of the mutual relations between the main intellectual and spiritual authority of the Plato Academy—Marsilio Ficino on the one hand, and Girolamo Savonarola, whose activity was a reaction to the secularization of de Medici times on the other, and a thorough study of their argument that turned into a ruthless struggle, are possible on the basis of selected sources and studies of the subject. The most significant are the following: Savonarola, Prediche e scritti; Guida Spirituale—Vita Christiana; Apologetico: indole e natura dell'arte poetica; De contempt mundi as well as Ficino’s letters and Apologia contra Savonarolam; and also Giovanni Pica della Mirandoli’s De hominis dignitate. The two adversaries’ mutual relations were both surprisingly similar and contradictory. They both came from families of court doctors, which gave them access to broad knowledge of man’s nature that was available to doctors at those times and let them grow up in the circles of sophisticated Renaissance elites. Ficino lived in de Medicis' residences in Florence, and Savonarola in the palace belonging to d’Este family in Ferrara. Ficino eagerly used the benefits of such a situation, whereas Savonarola became an implacable enemy of the oligarchy that limited the citizens’ freedom they had at that time, and a determined supporter of the republic, to whose revival in Florence he contributed a lot. This situated them in opposing political camps. They were similarly educated and had broad intellectual horizons. They left impressive works of literature concerned with the domain of spirituality, philosophy, religion, literature and arts, and their texts contain fewer contradictions than it could be supposed. Being priests, they aimed at defending the Christian religion. Ficino wanted to reconcile the religious doctrine with the world of ancient philosophy and in order to do this he did a formidable work to make a translation of Plato’s works. He wanted to fish souls in the intellectual net of Plato’s philosophy and to convert them. And it is here that they differed from each other. Savonarola’s attitude towards the antiquity was hostile; he struggled for the purity of the Christian doctrine and for the simplicity of its followers’ lives. He called upon people to repent and convert. He first of all noticed an urgent need to deeply reform the Church, which led him to an immediate conflict with Pope Alexander VI Borgia. In accordance with the spirit of the era, he was interested in astrology and prepared accurate horoscopes. Savonarola rejected astrology, and he believed that God, like in the past, sends prophets to the believers. His sermons, which had an immense impact on the listeners, were based on prophetic visions, especially ones concerning the future of Florence, Italy and the Church. His moral authority and his predictions that came true, were one of the reasons why his influence increased so much that after the fall of the House of Medici he could be considered an informal head of the Republic of Florence. It was then that he carried out the strict reforms, whose part were the famous “Bonfires of the Vanities.” Ficino only seemingly passively observed the preacher’s work. Nevertheless, over the years a conflict arose between the two great personalities. It had the character of political struggle. It was accompanied by a rivalry for intellectual and spiritual influence, as well as by a deepening mutual hostility. Ficino expressed it in Apologia contra Savonarolam written soon after Savonarola’s tragic death; the monk was executed according to Alexander VI Borgia’s judgment. The sensible neo-Platonist did not hesitate to thank the Pope for liberating Florence from Savonarola’s influence and he called his opponent a demon and the antichrist deceiving the believers. How deep must the conflict have been since it led Ficino to formulating his thoughts in this way, and how must it have divided Florence's community? The dispute between the leading moralizers of those times must have caused anxiety in their contemporaries. Both the antagonists died within a year, one after the other, and their ideas had impact even long after their deaths, finding their reflection in the next century’s thought and arts. 
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2018, 66, 4 Selected Papers in English; 63-86
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O sztuce (nie tylko) religijnej w powieści Savonarola Marii Gertrudy Skórzewskiej
Autorzy:
Tomaszewska, Wiesława
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1369603.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-10-15
Wydawca:
Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie
Tematy:
kultura religijna
literatura religijna
Giròlamo Savonarola
Maria Gertruda Skórzewska
niepokalanki
religious culture
religious literature
the Immaculate
Opis:
Trylogia powieściowa pt. Savonarola Marii Gertrudy Skórzewskiej, niepokalanki z Jazłowca, jest jedyną w literaturze polskiej powieścią o Giròlamo Savonaroli, teologu, kaznodziei, pisarzu religijnym. Podjęta w artykule analiza powieściowej narracji, wyłoniła trzy tekstowe kategorie, a mianowicie: wzniosłość, uobecnienie i prawdziwość jako „prawdę artystyczną”. W takim też horyzoncie został omówiony temat, którym jest obraz kultury Florencji z przełomu XV i XVI w., jej środowiska intelektualnego i artystycznego. Rozważając zawartą w powieści ideę piękna, łączonego z dobrem i prawdą, autorka artykułu omawia dwa kręgi zagadnień, którymi są: 1. konfrontacja dwóch epok jako dwóch formacji moralno-estetycznych, średniowiecza i renesansu, którym odpowiada bądź religijny (Boga jako istoty sprawczej, doskonałości dzieł Bożych), bądź świecki sposób pojmowania dzieła stworzenia; 2. ukierunkowanie narracji na religijnie pojmowaną ideę arcydzieła i na jej różnorakie konkretne realizacje; one to potwierdzają wartość kultury, sztuki i literatury, pozostającej w twórczej relacji do Biblii i wybitnej europejskiej tradycji intelektualnej.
The novel trilogy Savonarola by Maria Gertruda Skórzewska, the Immaculate Virgin from Jazłowiec, is the only novel in the Polish literature about Giròlamo Savonarola, a theologian, preacher and religious writer. The analysis of the novel’s narrative undertaken in the article has identified three textual categories, namely: sublimity, presence and truth as “artistic truth”. In this horizon was discussed the topic of the image of the culture of Florence at the turn of the 15th and 16th centuries as well as its intellectual and artistic environment. Considering the idea of beauty contained in the novel, combined with good and truth, the author of the article discusses two circles of issues: 1. confrontation of two epochs as two moral and aesthetic formations i.e. the Middle Ages and the Renaissance which correspond to either religious (God as the creative force, perfection of the works of God), or a secular way of understanding the work of creation; 2. orienting the narrative on the religiously conceived idea of a masterpiece and its various specific implementations; they confirm the value of culture, art and literature remaining in a creative relation to the Bible and an outstanding European intellectual tradition.
Źródło:
Studia Bobolanum; 2019, 30, 3; 117-131
1642-5650
2720-1686
Pojawia się w:
Studia Bobolanum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ficino i Savonarola. Dwa oblicza florenckiego renesansu
Ficino and Savonarola. Two faces of the Florence Renaissance
Autorzy:
Gawrońska-Oramus, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1890573.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
Ficino
Savonarola
Pico della Mirandola
neoplatonizm
sztuka
religia
renesans
republika
piagnoni
Apologia contra Savonarolam
neo-Platonism
art
religion
Renaissance
republic
Opis:
Analysis of the mutual relations between the main intellectual and spiritual authority of the Plato Academy – Marsilio Ficino on the one hand, and Girolamo Savonarola, whose activity was a reaction to the secularization of the Medicean times on the other, and a thorough study of their argument that turned into a ruthless struggle, are possible on the basis of selected sources and studies of the subject. The most significant are the following: Savonarola, Prediche e scritti; Guida Spirituale – Vita Christiana; Apologetico: indole e natura dell’arte poetica; De contempt mundi as well as Ficino’s letters and Apologia contra Savonarolam; and also Giovanni Pica della Mirandoli’s De hominis dignitate. The two adversaries’ mutual relations assumed the shape of surprising similarities and contradictions. They both came from the families of court doctors, which gave them access to broad knowledge of man’s nature that was available to doctors at those times, and let them grow up in the circles of sophisticated Renaissance elites. Ficino lived in the Medici’s residences in Florence, and Savonarola in the palace belonging to the Este family in Ferrara. Ficino eagerly used the benefits of such a situation, whereas Savonarola became an implacable enemy of the oligarchy that limited the citizens’ freedom they had at that time, and a determined supporter of the republic, to whose revival in Florence he contributed a lot. This situated them in political camps that opposed each other. They were similarly educated and had broad intellectual horizons. They left impressive works of literature concerned with the domain of spirituality, philosophy, religion, literature and arts, and their texts contain fewer contradictions than it could be supposed. Being priests they aimed at defending the Christian religion. Ficino wanted to reconcile the religious doctrine with the world of ancient philosophy and in order to do this he did gigantic work to make a translation of Plato’s works. He wanted to fish souls in the intellectual net of Plato’s philosophy and to convert them. And it is here that they differed from each other. Savonarola’s attitude towards the antiquity was hostile; he struggled for the purity of the Christian doctrine and for the simplicity of its followers’ lives. He called upon people to repent and convert. He first of all noticed an urgent need to deeply reform the Chuch, which led him to an immediate conflict with Pope Alexander VI Borgia. In accordance with the spirit of the epoch he was interested in astrology and he cast accurate horoscopes. Savonarola rejected astrology, and he believed that God, like in the past, sends prophets to the believers. His sermons, that had an immense impact on the listeners, were based on prophetic visions, especially ones concerning the future of Florence, Italy and the Church. His moral authority and his predictions that came true, were one of the reasons why his influence increased so much that after the fall of the House of Medici he could be considered an informal head of the Republic of Florence. It was then that he carried out the strict reforms, whose part were the famous „Bonfires of the Vanities”. Seemingly Ficino passively observed the preacher’s work. Nevertheless over the years a conflict arose between the two great personalities. It had the character of a political struggle. It was accompanied by a rivalry for intellectual and spiritual influence, as well as by a deepening mutual hostility. Ficino expressed it in Apologia contra Savonarolam written soon after Savonarola’s tragic death; the monk was executed according to Alexander VI Borgia’s judgment. The sensible neo-Platonist had no hesitation in thanking the Pope for liberating Florence from Savonarola’s influence and he called his opponent a demon and the Antichrist deceiving the believers. How deep must the conflict have been since it led Ficino to formulating his thoughts in this way, and how must it have divided Florence’s community? The dispute between the leading moralizers of those times must have caused anxiety in their contemporaries. Both the antagonists died within a year, one after the other, and their ideas had impact even long after their deaths, finding their reflection in the next century’s thought and arts.
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2013, 61, 4; 103-126
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inkunabuły "medyczne" z Biblioteki Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego w Kielcach
Autorzy:
Kardyś, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2088335.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-06-29
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
incunabula
old prints
Michele Savonarola
Gentile da Foligno
medicine
Library of the Major Seminary in Kielce
inkunabuły
medycyna
Biblioteka Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego w Kielcach
Opis:
W artkule omówiono 5 inkunabułów o treści medycznej przechowywanych obecnie w Bibliotece Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego w Kielcach. Traktaty autorstwa niekwestionowanych średniowiecznych autorytetów Michele Savonaroli i Gentile da Foligno zostały współoprawione w jeden klocek. Scharakteryzowano oprawę i zawartość inkunabułów, przytaczając poszczególne rubryki, porady i recepty. Krótko zostały omówione dokonania w zakresie medycyny i biografie obu wymienionych autorów. Niestety, na obecnym etapie badań niemożliwe jest wyjaśnienie, w jaki sposób wolumin trafił do Biblioteki Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego w Kielcach. Można jedynie stwierdzić fakt użytkowania go w XVI-XVII wieku poprzez wpisy o charakterze poweniencyjnym.
The article discusses five incunabula with medical content that are currentlystored in the Library of the Major Seminary in Kielce. Treatises by the undisputed medieval authorities Michele Savonarola and Gentile da Foligno have been bound together in a single adligat. The binding and contents of the incunabula are characterised and specific sections, tips and prescriptions are cited. The medical achievements and biographies of the two authors mentioned above are discussed in brief. Unfortunately, at the present stage of research it is impossible to explain how the volume found its way to the Library of the Major Seminary in Kielce. It is only possible to ascertain its use in the 16th and 17th centuries through entries made after its renovation.
Źródło:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne; 2022, 118; 141-170
0518-3766
2545-3491
Pojawia się w:
Archiwa, Biblioteki i Muzea Kościelne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-5 z 5

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies