Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "SARS-CoV-2 pandemics" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6
    Tytuł:
    Stanowisko grupy ekspertów Polskiego Towarzystwa Alergologicznego w sprawie postępowania u chorych na astmę i choroby alergiczne w okresie pandemii SARS-CoV-2
    Position statement of expert panel of the Polish Allergology Society on the management of patients with bronchial asthma and allergic diseases during SARS-Cov-2 pandemics
    Autorzy:
    Kowalski, Marek L
    Bartuzi, Zbigniew
    Bręborowicz, Anna
    Czarnecka-Operacz, Magdalena
    Kruszewski, Jerzy
    Kulus, Marek
    Moniuszko, Marcin
    Niedoszytko, Marek
    Nittner-Marszalska, Marita
    Nowicki, Roman J.
    Rogala, Barbara
    Chałubiński, Maciej
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2175961.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-01
    Wydawca:
    Oficyna Wydawnicza Mediton
    Tematy:
    pandemia SARS-CoV-2
    COVID-19
    astma
    choroby
    alergiczne
    SARS-CoV-2 pandemics
    asthma
    allergic diseases
    Opis:
    Celem dokumentu jest dostarczenie lekarzom alergologom wskazówek dotyczących właściwego postępowania u pacjentów z astmą oskrzelową i chorobami alergicznymi w czasie trwania pandemii SARS-CoV-2. Postępowanie takie powinno prowadzić do zmniejszenia prawdopodobieństwa infekcji SARS-CoV-2 poprzez ograniczenie społecznych kontaktów pacjenta - równolegle alergolog powinien zapewnić właściwe leczenie chorób podstawowych. Eksperci przestawiają osiemnaście zaleceń dotyczących postępowania w okresie pandemii (w tym kontynuacji swoistej immunoterapii i leczenia biologicznego) rekomendując ograniczenie wizyt i zastąpienie ich kontaktem z pacjentem drogą telefoniczną lub internetową. U większości chorych dotychczasowe leczenie przeciwastmatyczne i przeciwalergiczne powinno być kontynuowane, ale w indywidualnych przypadkach decyzja, co do postępowania spoczywa w rękach lekarza prowadzącego mającego bezpośrednią i pełną wiedzę o stanie zdrowia i oczekiwaniach chorego, jak również o realnych możliwościach działania.
    The document prepared by the expert panel of allergy/immunology specialists representing Polish Allergy Society intends to provide allergists with recommendations with respect to proper management of allergic patients during SARS-CoV-2 pandemics. Allergist should aim at reducing patient’s social interactions by replacing face-to-face visits with communication via telephone or internet. In parallel allergist is responsible for assuring that the patient is receiving proper care of underlying allergic disease. The experts panel provides eighteen recommendations for management of patients with asthma and allergic diseases during pandemics, indicating that in majority of patients asthma treatment (including inhaled corticosteroids) and allergy treatment should be continued. Specific recommendations for treatment with allergen immunotherapy and with biologics are discussed in details.
    Źródło:
    Alergia Astma Immunologia - przegląd kliniczny; 2020, 25, 1; 2-7
    1427-3101
    Pojawia się w:
    Alergia Astma Immunologia - przegląd kliniczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Tracheostomy in intensive care unit in a patient with COVID-19
    Autorzy:
    Wyrzykowska, Dorota
    Kisielewski, Krystian
    Sawicka, Małgorzata
    Mitura, Kryspin
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29432108.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Towarzystwo Pomocy Doraźnej
    Tematy:
    SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus
    COVID-19 pandemics
    respiratory failure
    tracheostomy
    aerosolization
    Opis:
    INTRODUCTION: For many months now, the entire world experiences effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and current data indicate that this condition will continue even longer. About 5% of patients who become infected with the SARSCoV-2 coronavirus may develop a critical form of severe respiratory failure, due to which they will undergo intubation and mechanical ventilation. Prolonged mechanical ventilation will be an indication for an open tracheostomy, burdened with an increased production of aerosol containing virus particles and an increased risk of transmitting the highly contagious pathogen to medical personnel. In this situation, surgical departments with a limited number of operating theaters may be dedicated only to COVID-19 patients. Their use for other procedures will be significantly reduced or even impossible to prevent transmission of infections and exposure to other people. Taking into account the well-being of patients and staff and limiting the transmission of the virus to other departments, other safe solutions are being sought to perform a tracheostomy. An alternative procedure may be to perform a tracheostomy directly at the bedside (point-of-care) of a patient hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU). PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to present an effective performance of safe, open tracheostomy in the ICU. METHODS: The bedside tracheotomy as an alternative to the procedure performed in the setting of an operating theater has been presented. A case study was based on the analysis of the procedure performed in a 42-year-old patient who was installed an open tracheotomy tube on the twenty-ninth day of intubation. CONCLUSIONS: In order to limit the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus outside the intensive care unit, it is recommended to perform a tracheotomy in ICU, in patients requiring mechanical ventilation, as the method is effective and safe.
    Źródło:
    Critical Care Innovations; 2020, 3, 4; 21-29
    2545-2533
    Pojawia się w:
    Critical Care Innovations
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The prevalence and determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infections among healthcare workers, results of a cross-sectional study in the Silesian Voivodeship
    Autorzy:
    Wojczyk, Marek
    Kowalska, Małgorzata
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2203014.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-05-23
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    infection control
    health personnel
    personal protective equipment
    Opis:
    Objectives A significant proportion of healthcare workers (HCWs) had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, which complicated the organization of patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the exact scale of infection prevalence among the group of HCWs is not known, therefore this study aimed to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs in the Silesian voivodeship, Poland, and to define its determinants. Material and Methods The cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 multidisciplinary hospitals in the Silesian voivodeship during the period October 2021–February 2022. The standardized WHO questionnaire Surveillance protocol for SARS-CoV-2 infection among health workers was completed by 242 HCWs. To assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its determinants, such as personal, occupational, and work environment-related conditions and preventive behaviors, the collected data were subjected to statistical analysis. For this purpose, descriptive and analytical statistics (significance of differences in χ² test) were used. Results Almost half (42.6%) of subjects were infected with coronavirus, most frequently care assistants (57.1%) and paramedics (50%). People suffering from chronic diseases were infected significantly more often (p < 0.001). The majority of the infected HCWs declared previous contact with COVID-19 patients (56.3%). Unfortunately, 10.3% of respondents refused to be vaccinated against COVID-19, most often care assistants (38.1%) and nurses (10.6%). The determinants such as sex, age, occupation, place of work (ward), participation in occupational safety and health training, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), or preventive behaviors did not significantly affect the risk of infection (p > 0.05). Conclusions Even though the PPE was used and the percentage of fully vaccinated HCWs against COVID-19 was high (89.7%), the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infected HCWs remains high at 42.6% (95% CI: 40.7–44.5%). The main determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among HCWs were previous contact with infected individuals and the presence of chronic disease.
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 2; 201-213
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary and tertiary healthcare: a comparative cross-sectional study
    Autorzy:
    Aulanko, Ida
    Sanmark, Enni
    Oksanen, Lotta
    Oksanen, Sampo
    Lahdentausta, Laura
    Kivimäki, Anne
    Paju, Susanna
    Pietiäinen, Milla
    Pussinen, Pirkko
    Geneid, Ahmed
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2203020.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023-03-02
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    health personnel
    surveys and questionnaires
    cross-sectional studies
    Opis:
    Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare workers’ (HCWs) health and wellbeing. Most studies on COVID-19 have focused on tertiary healthcare. The aim of this study was to increase the knowledge on the effects of the pandemic on working conditions in tertiary and primary healthcare. Material and Methods The comparative cross-sectional study consisted of an online questionnaire sent to HCWs of the City of Helsinki (primary healthcare) and Helsinki University Hospital (tertiary healthcare). Altogether 1580 HCWs with direct patient contact participated in the study: 895 from tertiary and 685 from primary healthcare. Statistical analysis used SPSS 25 from IBM. The tests used were the χ² test, Fisher’s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis. Results Primary HCWs were less likely to treat COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.56). However, both groups reported a similar number of COVID-19 infections, primary HCWs 4.9% and tertiary HCWs 5.0%, and workrelated quarantine was significantly more prevalent (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38–2.79) among primary HCWs. In addition, work-related wellbeing was poorer among primary HCWs than tertiary HCWs in terms of feeling more stressed at work (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.55–4.02), not recovering from work (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39–0.62), reported mental wellbeing below normal levels (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.26–2.00), and increased working hours (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25–2.12). Conclusions The study demonstrates how the pandemic has affected the wellbeing and working conditions of not only tertiary but also less studied primary HCWs. The authors’ findings suggest that the challenges identified during the COVID-19 pandemic in the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers are even greater in primary care than in tertiary care. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(1):139–50
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 1; 139-150
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Working conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary and tertiary healthcare: a comparative cross-sectional study
    Autorzy:
    Aulanko, Ida
    Sanmark, Enni
    Oksanen, Lotta
    Oksanen, Sampo
    Lahdentausta, Laura
    Kivimäki, Anne
    Paju, Susanna
    Pietiäinen, Milla
    Pussinen, Pirkko
    Geneid, Ahmed
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2188906.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2023
    Wydawca:
    Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. dra Jerzego Nofera w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    pandemics
    health personnel
    surveys and questionnaires
    cross-sectional studies
    Opis:
    Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare workers’ (HCWs) health and wellbeing. Most studies on COVID-19 have focused on tertiary healthcare. The aim of this study was to increase the knowledge on the effects of the pandemic on working conditions in tertiary and primary healthcare. Material and Methods The comparative cross-sectional study consisted of an online questionnaire sent to HCWs of the City of Helsinki (primary healthcare) and Helsinki University Hospital (tertiary healthcare). Altogether 1580 HCWs with direct patient contact participated in the study: 895 from tertiary and 685 from primary healthcare. Statistical analysis used SPSS 25 from IBM. The tests used were the χ² test, Fisher’s exact test, and binary logistic regression analysis. Results Primary HCWs were less likely to treat COVID-19 patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.56). However, both groups reported a similar number of COVID-19 infections, primary HCWs 4.9% and tertiary HCWs 5.0%, and workrelated quarantine was significantly more prevalent (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.38–2.79) among primary HCWs. In addition, work-related wellbeing was poorer among primary HCWs than tertiary HCWs in terms of feeling more stressed at work (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.55–4.02), not recovering from work (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39–0.62), reported mental wellbeing below normal levels (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.26–2.00), and increased working hours (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25–2.12). Conclusions The study demonstrates how the pandemic has affected the wellbeing and working conditions of not only tertiary but also less studied primary HCWs. Our findings suggest that the challenges identified during the COVID-19 pandemic in the health and wellbeing of healthcare workers are even greater in primary care than in tertiary care.
    Źródło:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health; 2023, 36, 1; 139-150
    1232-1087
    1896-494X
    Pojawia się w:
    International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Literatura wobec kryzysu epidemii
    Literature in the Face of Epidemic Crisis
    Autorzy:
    Trościński, Grzegorz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27311193.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-14
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
    Tematy:
    epidemics
    pandemics
    literature
    virus
    coronavirus
    COVID-19
    SARS-CoV-2
    epidemia
    pandemia
    literatura
    wirus
    Covid-19
    Opis:
    Artykuł napisany został jako wstęp do numeru tematycznego „Tematów i Kontekstów” pt. Literatura wobec kryzysu epidemii. Jest to esej omawiający wpływ wirusa Covid-19 na współczesnego człowieka i otaczającą go rzeczywistość. W rozważaniach autor skupił się na wielu aspektach pandemii: medycznych, socjologicznych, filozoficznych, psychologicznych i kulturowych. Ważnym składnikiem rozważań jest  próba uchwycenia uniwersalnych mechanizmów społeczno-kulturowych towarzyszących czasom epidemii, prześledzenie paradygmatów kulturowych i literackich, które realizowane są w aspekcie społecznym i jednostkowym w czasach zarazy, postaw wobec wirusa, drugiego człowieka i samego siebie.
    This article was written as a preface to a thematic issue of „Tematy i Konteksty” entitled „Literature in the face of epidemic crisis„. It is the essay addressing the impact, which COVID-19 virus has had on contemporary man and the reality surrounding him. The author, in his deliberations, focused on many aspects of the pandemic: medical, sociological, philosophical, psychological and cultural. A very important element of the essay is an attempt of capture universal social-cultural mechanisms, which are distinctive to a time of pandemic. Another crucial issue addressed in this essay is tracing the cultural and literary paradigms, which are followed in both social and individual aspects of time of pandemic. The other essential matter which was looked into are people’s attitudes taken towards virus itself, other people and themselves.
    Źródło:
    Tematy i Konteksty; 2021, 16, 11; 15-23
    2299-8365
    Pojawia się w:
    Tematy i Konteksty
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-6 z 6

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies