Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Roman literature" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 39
Tytuł:
Obraz Achillesa i Hektora w poezji rzymskiej. Prolegomena
The Image of Achilles and Hector in Roman Poetry. Prolegomena
Autorzy:
Hendzel, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/648611.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Tematy:
Hector
Achilles
Roman literature
Opis:
In this article the author tries to present the images of two great heroes of The Iliad, Achilles and Hector, that emerges from the Roman poetry and compare them with those present in the Greek tradition. In this analysis, focus is primarily put on The Aeneid of Virgil and on Ovid’s works, with minor remarks to the works of other authors. The article concludes that in the case of Achilles there is a huge difference between the image of this character in the Greek tradition and in Roman poetry. Achilles, who for Greeks was an object of universal esteem, in the eyes of Romans has become a synonym of a criminal, a ruthless murderer and the personification of the destroyer of Troy. The image of Hector in Roman literature is also different from the Greek perspective, since Roman authors idealized the prince of Troy to such an extent that they saw him as the greatest hero of the Trojan War.
-
Źródło:
Collectanea Philologica; 2017, 20; 63-79
1733-0319
2353-0901
Pojawia się w:
Collectanea Philologica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ojcowie i synowie w deklamacji rzymskiej
Roman Declamations on Fathers and Sons
Autorzy:
Sapota, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1046686.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015-01-01
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Roman literature
rhetoric
declamation
Roman family
Roman education
Roman ideology
Opis:
The text outlines how the concept of pietas understood as unreserved reverence of sons towards their fathers was incorporated into the repertory of school declamations that in the Roman education system made the main means of modelling the social attitudes of younger generations.
Źródło:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2015, 25, 1; 71-80
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tell me a curious (hi)story. Historical content in Vitruvius’ De architectura
Autorzy:
Kołoczek, Bartosz Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2143560.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-08-18
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Vitruvius
Roman erudite literature
Greek history
architecture
Opis:
The article examines the significance of history–themed passages (historiae) in Vitruvius’ architectural treatise De architectura and assesses their veracity vis–à–vis their rhetorical impact. The article’s particular focus lies on Vitruvius’ reflections on history, since the sound knowledge of it—as the author claims—is vital for any competent architect. It asserts that Vitruvius tends to stretch the historical truth whenever he makes an attempt at self–promotion (as an author or an architect) or seeks to win the approval of his patron emperor Augustus, to whom he dedicated his work.
Źródło:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2022, 32, 1; 57-78
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Patrzenie jako źródło cierpień (z rzymskich dziejów pewnego motywu literackiego)
(Sight and Suffering: From the Roman History of a Literary Motif)
Autorzy:
Pigoń, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1806858.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-10-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
viewing as a literary theme
Roman literature
Cicero
Vergil
Seneca the Younger
Tacitus
consolation
Opis:
The paper examines a number of Roman literary texts (by Ennius, Cicero, Vergil, Ovid, Seneca the Younger, Lucan, Tacitus, Jerome, etc.) in which viewing is connected with mental or emotional suffering. Usually, the emphasis is laid on a character’s viewing of some dramatic events – a close relative’s death, for example – and on his or her emotional response to what is being seen. In some works, especially in consolatory contexts, someone’s premature death is presented as advantageous because the dead person is now spared the necessity of viewing misfortunes which the living have to witness. Also, people may be compelled (e.g. by an emperor) to watch evil things; in such a situation they are usually viewers and objects of viewing at the same time, since their gestures and facial expression are carefully observed.
Źródło:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2021, 31, 1; 205-225
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Portrayal of Seneca in the Octavia and in Tacitus’ Annals
Autorzy:
Pigoń, Jakub
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1045976.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-12-15
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Seneca the Younger
Octavia Praetexta
Tacitus
Nero
characterisation in literature
Roman literature (1st and 2nd cent. AD)
Roman Empire
Opis:
The paper examines the representation of Seneca in two literary works of the late 1st and early 2nd centuries AD, the anonymous tragedy Octavia and the Annals by Tacitus. In the Octavia Seneca appears as the emperor Nero’s upright but unhappy teacher trying in vain to inculcate salutary advice to his master. There is no question of his being responsible for the crimes of Nero; the picture of him drawn in the play is wholly favourable. The portrayal of Seneca in Tacitus’ Annals is more complex and nuanced, and only seldom does the historian give his own views about Nero’s advisor. However, it would be wrong to suppose that Seneca is harshly criticised by Tacitus.
Źródło:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2017, 27, 3; 169-187
0302-7384
Pojawia się w:
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Antykwarystyka jako alternatywny model rozwoju refleksji historycznej w starożytnym Rzymie
Antiquarian Writing as an Alternative to Historical Studies in Ancient Rome
Autorzy:
Kołoczek, Bartosz Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2080768.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Czytelnia Czasopism PAN
Tematy:
Roman antiquarianism
Roman historiography
Roman erudite literature
antykwarystyka rzymska
historiografia rzymska
rzymska literatura erudycyjna
Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne
Opis:
This article aims to look at the Roman interest in the past beyond the context of traditional historiography, focused on the great politics, events and individuals. It suggests that antiquarian writing was not so much a separate literary genre, but rather an alternative model of historical reflection focused on studying the distant past in all its manifestations: everyday life, culture, religion, language or law.
Źródło:
Historyka studia metodologiczne; 2020, 50; 439-460
0073-277X
Pojawia się w:
Historyka studia metodologiczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Słoń Pliniusza
Pliny the Elder on Elephants
Плиний Старший о слонах
Autorzy:
Sapota, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1879911.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-06-29
Wydawca:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Tematy:
римская литература
зоология
Плиний Старший
слоны
стоицизм
literatura rzymska
zoologia
Pliniusz Starszy
słonie
stoicyzm
Roman literature
zoology
Pliny the Elder
elephants
stoicism
Opis:
Tłem rozważań podjętych w tym artykule jest stoicka koncepcja relacji między ludźmi i zwierzętami. Stoicy zakładali panowanie ludzi nad pozostałymi istotami i uważali, że hegeminia człowieka nie może być ograniczana przez normy sprawiedliwości. Passus z Historii naturalnej – opowieść o słoniach – służy jako materiał do zbadania, w jakim stopniu Pliniusz zgadzał się z tym przekonaniem.
В основе этой статьи лежит концепция взаимоотношений между людьми и животными, выдержанная в русле философии стоиков. Стоики предполагали человеческое господство над другими существами и считали, что человеческая гегемония не может быть ограничена нормами справедливости. Отрывок из Естественной истории – рассказ о слонах – служит материалом для исследования того, в какой степени Плиний согласился с этим убеждением стоиков.
As a point of departure, article presents the Stoic understanding of human-animal relationships: the Stoic philosophers presupposedhuman dominance over other creatures, which excluded the norms of justice as a means of limiting the human hegemony. On the basis of an excerpt from Pliny’s Natural History, which recounts a story of elephants, Tomasz Sapota examines the extent to which Pliny accepted this view of the Stoics.
Źródło:
Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies; 2021, 1 (7); 1-12
2719-2687
2451-3849
Pojawia się w:
Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Genethliakόn – a Religious and Humanistic Poem-Song in Commemoration of Life or Rhetorical Approbation of Poetry?
Autorzy:
Gaj, Beata Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/440993.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Fundacja Naukowa Katolików Eschaton
Tematy:
genethliakόn
Greek and Roman occasional literature
Silesian literature in Latin at the beginning of modernity
history and theory of rhetoric
Opis:
The main idea of this article is to present the genre called genethliakón from its origins in Antiquity to the modern times. The paper contains an analysis of several works in ancient Greek and Latin, which shows how widespread this literary genre was at that that time. This analysis contradicts the views of some scholars who claim that genethliakón evolved only in the Renaissance and the Baroque period. The motifs of birthday works are repeatedly used through the centuries, and the most important one seems to connect the birth of poetry with the tutelary deity. Modern genethliakón refers to different traditions: the Christian and the Greek of the Hellenistic era.
Źródło:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education; 2014, 1(5); 45-60
2299-9922
Pojawia się w:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zagadnienie periodyzacji literatury łacińskiej doby republiki rzymskiej
The Issue of Periodization of the Latin Literature in the Time of the Roman Republic
Autorzy:
Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1791395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-02-07
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
Tematy:
język łaciński
literatura rzymska
okres literacki
Rzym
teoria periodyzacji Juliana Krzyżanowskiego
wpływy greckie
Latin language
Roman literature
literary period
Rome
Julian Krzyżanowski’s theory of periodization
Greek influences
Opis:
Artykuł podejmuje problem periodyzacji literatury rzymskiej doby republiki. Autor uznaje tradycyjny podział na 3 okresy literackie: (1) archaiczny; (2) cyceroński; (3) augustowski za częściowo poprawny. Bazując na teorii periodyzacji literatury, opracowanej przez prof. Juliana Krzyżanowskiego (1937), która zakłada cykliczność zjawisk w dziedzinie kultury i literatury, autor proponuje wydzielenie czterech kolejnych faz historycznoliterackich: [1] Okres archaiczny albo „hellenizujący” (240-160 r. przed Chr.); [2] Okres późnoarchaiczny albo „reakcyjny” (160-81 r. przed Chr.); [3] Okres cyceroński (81-31 r. p.n.e.); [4] Okres augustowski (31 r. przed Chr. – 14 r. po Chr.). Poszczególne okresy literackie stoją w wyraźnej opozycji do faz poprzedzających i po nich następujących. Występują w nich dominujące prądy i zjawiska literackie, odmienne niż w fazie poprzedzającej i bezpośrednio po nich następującej. Biorąc pod uwagę kryterium wpływów obcych (helleńskich) i rodzimości, możemy łatwo stwierdzić, że okresy nieparzyste [1, 3] mają charakter wyraźnie prohelleński, co przejawia się między innymi w tłumaczeniu bądź adaptacji najważniejszych dzieł literatury greckiej, wykorzystaniu istniejących w Grecji gatunków literackich, przyswojeniu obcych struktur metrycznych, motywów literackich lub prądów filozoficznych, podczas gdy w okresach parzystych [2, 4] twórcy literatury łacińskiej wprowadzają rodzime wątki i czysto rzymskie motywy, a także rozwijają własne gatunki literackie (np. satyrę, rzymską elegię miłosną).
The article deals with the problem of periodization of Latin literature in the time of the Roman Republic. The author recognizes the traditional division into three literary periods (i.e. archaic, Ciceronian and Augustean) as partially correct. Basing on J. Krzyżanowski’s theory of periodization of literature (1937), which assumes the cyclical nature of phenomena in the field of culture and literature, the author proposes to separate four successive historical-literary phases: [1] the early-archaic or ‟Hellenizing” period (240–160 BC); [2] the late-archaic or ‟reactionary” period (160–81 BC); [3] the Ciceronian age (81–31 BC); [4] the Augustean age (31 BC–14 AD). The individual literary periods stand in clear opposition to the preceding and following phases. They contain dominant currents and literary phenomena, different than in the preceding and immediately following them. Taking into account the criterion of foreign (Hellenic) influences and nativity, we can easily conclude that odd periods [1, 3] are clearly favorable to the Greeks, which is manifested, inter alia, in translating or adapting the most important works of Greek literature, using literary genres existing in Greece, acquiring foreign metrical structures, literary motifs or philosophical currents, while in even periods [2, 4] Latin writers introduce native themes and purely Roman motifs, as well as develop their own literary genres (e.g. Roman satire, subjective love elegy).
Źródło:
Roczniki Humanistyczne; 2020, 68, 3; 133-153
0035-7707
Pojawia się w:
Roczniki Humanistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
[Rev.:] Richard Griffith, The Pen and the Cross : Catholicism and English Literature, 1850-2000, London ; New York : Continuum, 2010. xii, 260 p.
Autorzy:
Słyszewska, Aleksandra
Zgierska, Roksana
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/441072.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Fundacja Naukowa Katolików Eschaton
Tematy:
English literature
religion
the Roman Catholic Church
christianity
catholicism
literature
Christian literature
Opis:
It is beyond any doubt that Richard Griffiths’ The Pen and the Cross is an interestingly written and a rather fascinating book, which certainly is a valuable addition to the study of Catholic writing. It provides a very basic insight into the development of Catholicism and Catholic literature in England between 1850 and 2000, which includes many notable, yet still forgotten novelists and poets. An attempt to discuss such a vast number of writers was very ambitious and certainly involved artistic as well as critical skill, and yet Mr. Griffiths manages to provide the reader with a quite clear and comprehensible description of Catholic writing. The main focus of the study seems to be the influence of Roman Catholicism on the writers (recusants, converts and even, in some cases, nonbelievers) and their works. It attempts to examine the importance of religious experience in shaping the intellectual vision conveyed in texts of most notable English writers including, among others, Hopkins, Greene, Waugh, Sparks or Lodge. Mr. Griffiths acknowledges the fact that quite frequently Catholic committed literature is on the verge of propaganda, but when it is done well, as in case of the aforementioned authors, it may provide an extremely profound outlook not only on religion but also modern culture, human behavior and original literary themes and techniques. He also raises the question whether the understanding of Catholic novels and poems is at all possible without specific knowledge connected with religion. There are, however, elements of Mr. Griffiths’ work that need some explanation. One of them is the title. More often than not authors of various critical works, including those which deal mainly or exclusively with Catholic writers, try to convey in the title as much as they can about the subject of their inquiry or the attitude taken by them. The results of this are, among many others, Some Catholic Writers by Ralph McInerny, Literary Giants, Literary Catholics by Joseph Pearce, The Catholic Revival in English Literature by Ian Ker, or Catholic Literature: An Introduction by Margaret Sum-mitt. It seems, however, that Mr. Griffiths decided to go against this tendency. He chose not to provide (at least not in a straightforward way) any specific information on the scope of literature that he is interested in nor in the attitude taken by him in his investigation. Mr. Griffiths himself must have considered his title as not very informative, as he supplemented it. Only through the second part of the title is the reader informed that the work is concerned with Catholicism and English literature in the period 1850-2000. Still, it does not say much about the content. Catholicism in English Literature would be more suggestive, not mentioning other obvious options such as English Catholic Literature, Catholic Literature in England or, what seems also applicable, English Catholic Writers. All these suggestions address the issue straightforwardly and provide a sound frame of reference. Meanwhile, Mr. Griffiths refuses to include a term crucial to his work, and one that he otherwise uses quite frequently and discusses openly in the first section as the basis for further investigation; that is, “Catholic literature”. It is understandable that he avoids the term “Catholic writers” as some of the authors renounce it and consider it inappropriate. It is also understandable that he does not want to limit his investigation to English writings alone, as a substantial part of his comments involve French literature and he successfully presents the two as closely related and, at times, even inseparable. It is confusing, however, that he avoids calling his subject what it actually is, considering that his arguments supporting the validity of the term “Catholic literature” are very convincing. One reason for this eva-sion may be, of course, the marketing. “The Pen and the Cross” surely stands out among many other titles of works devoted to similar issues and may be considered appealing to the reading public. It is also possible that Mr. Griffiths does not want to impose anything on his readers but only suggests certain tendencies, leaving much space for speculation on the subject of the relationship between Catholicism and English literature in the period given. Also, he might have considered this title the only possible way of encapsulating all the social, historical and cultural elements which influenced what can be (and by Griffiths is) called the English Catholic literature. There is one interesting implication of the combination of “the Pen” with “the Cross” which maybe did not immediately occur to some of Mr. Griffiths’ readers. “The Pen” as a symbol of poetry and prose (specifically novels of a different kind) is combined with “the Cross” which indicates a specific religious commitment. However, bearing in mind Griffiths’ comments on the turbulent history of Catholicism in England, cultural and social difficulties that Catholic believers, and above all Catholic writers must have overcome, and finally the “pitfalls” of writing Catholic literature without falling into sentimentality, it becomes apparent that producing Catholic works involved many sacrifices and may indeed be seen in terms of bearing ones’ Cross. Thus, the title can be a general statement as to the situation of English Catholic literature throughout the ages. What is also very unusual about Mr. Griffiths work is the fact that his presentation of the Catholic writers seems to be strongly influenced by his personal views and likings which are clearly visible through the tone of his descriptions. Even though he recognizes the importance and influence of all the writers he examines, it is apparent that he is fonder of some of them over others. He directs his attention especially to three outstanding figures: Graham Greene, Evelyn Waugh and David Jones. His admiration for them is convincingly argued and certainly well-deserved. However, while Greene is described as “a pivotal figure in the history of the Catholic novel in Britain” and Jones is treated as a highly original and forward-looking poet, Waugh is presented primarily as a re-constructor of the already existing patterns, “entrenched in a last ditch defense of traditional values” and his works, in spite of their great value, are seen as “a dead-end”. The last statement, although preceded by words of praise, seems unjust. Mr. Griffiths refers primarily and quite understandably to Brideshead Revisited as Waughs’ best work. He indicates a number of interesting ways in which traditional Catholic themes are arranged and constitute a substantial part of fictional reality. However, he seems not to notice a whole range of new, original and often surprising elements which, if carefully analyzed, may indicate new paths for the development of Catholic literature. First of all, the extensive use of satire, characteristic of Waugh’s early works, in Brideshead Revisited gains new meaning. It seems that for the first time the satire is aimed at the secular, modern way of life and religious elements alike. The reader smiles at political discussions of Rex Mottram and his friends, the adventures of homosexual Anthony Blanche as well as at Cordelia’s novenas for pigs and her collection of little black Cordelias somewhere in Africa. Bursting with laughter may occur especially at the account of Cordelia making fun of Rex about the rules of Catholic faith which supposedly include sleeping with one’s feet pointing east, sending people to hell for just a pound or keeping sacred monkeys in Vatican. All this is presented to stress how different and confusing Catholic faith is for the non-believers, and yet Waugh seems to be the first to exaggerate and distort religious truths for this purpose. He is also the first to create Catholic characters who are simply unlikeable. It seems a part of a convention to present Catholic way of life as full of difficulties and unattractive to the modern man, as it is with the Riversdales in Mrs. Wilfrid Ward’s One Poor Scruple. However, in Brideshead Revisited the reader feels no sympathy for Bridey or Lady Marchmain, the two most pious members of the family, not so much due to their sacrifice or ascetic life but their personality traits and their attitude towards other people. The potential saints are, quite surprisingly, short-sighted and egoistic. This is a strange novelty, and yet Waugh has a purpose in it. The two characters, especially when compared to other members of the Flyte family, make the reader understand that piety, devotion and knowledge of religious truths are nothing when compared to the sincere desire to act according to God’s will, however mysterious it may be. Also, Waugh reveals here his fascination with the act of conversion which he clearly values very highly. This, however, the readers may find in earlier works by G.K.Chesterton, Charles Péguy or François Mauriac. More thorough investigation would reveal a number of other innovative elements involving the creation of characters and spaces within which they function. This review, however, is not concerned with Waugh exclu-sively. The purpose, therefore, is just to signal that some important aspects of Waugh’s novels, Brideshead Revisited in particular, may not have been recognized by Mr. Griffiths. Otherwise, however, his remarks are very interesting and insightful. In his defense it should be admitted that the creative potential of Waugh’s works has not yet been fully explored by other writers. However engaging The Pen and the Cross is, it should be treated most of all as a good starting point for more careful research, since for some readers the overall character of the work may not present a sufficient examination of the topic. One simply cannot pass over in silence the very peculiar omission of such highly important figures as J.R.R. Tolkien, Rumer Godden, Geoffrey Hill and some others. Their absence at least demands an explanation as it does not allow for a fully comprehensive picture of the topic. Nevertheless, The Pen and the Cross, due to its briefness, may actually succeed in encouraging some of the readers to conduct their own examination of presented novels, poems and their creators.
Źródło:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education; 2013, 2(2); 171-174
2299-9922
Pojawia się w:
Religious and Sacred Poetry: An International Quarterly of Religion, Culture and Education
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
The Gospel as Literary Genre and Form of Language
Autorzy:
Basta, Pasquale
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1623391.pdf
Data publikacji:
2021-07-16
Wydawca:
Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
Tematy:
Gospels
literary genre
Greco-Roman bíoi
volks literature
typology
Opis:
The studies on the literary genre “gospel” are often compared with the so-called Greco-Roman bíoi and popular literature. The points of contact are numerous and undeniable. As well as the differences and peculiarities of the gospels, whose link with the Hebrew Bible is a unicum to be taken into account. In particular, the typology, with its network of references, makes the canonical gospels a text proceeding through continuous phenomena of association and repetition with the ancient Scriptures. As result, the narrative takes on particular tones insofar as it indulges little in the chronicle, concentrating rather on the richness of meaning hidden in entire story of Christ. Consequently, the gospels are evidence of a mixed genre, having some characteristics of the Greco-Roman bíoi and contemporary popular Lives, together with constant re-elaboration of OT elements re-read and applied in a typological key. And it could not be otherwise because the events and the protagonist of the gospels perfectly intersect the horizontal and vertical dimensions of a story merging with the eternal.  
Źródło:
The Biblical Annals; 2021, 11, 3; 441-458
2083-2222
2451-2168
Pojawia się w:
The Biblical Annals
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
O HERETYKU MAHOMECIE – OPOWIEŚĆ O NARODZINACH ISLAMU W LATOPISIE HELLEŃSKIM I RZYMSKIM DRUGIEJ REDAKCJI
ON THE HERETIC MUHAMMAD – AN ACCOUNT OF THE ORIGIN OF ISLAM IN THE SECOND REDACTION OF THE HELLENIC AND ROMAN CHRONICLE
Autorzy:
Brzozowska, Zofia A.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1037787.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-11-04
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Muhammad
Islam
Old Russian literature
Hellenic and Roman Chronicle
Opis:
A piece of writing On the Heretic Muhammad concerning the life of Muhammad, the origin of Islam and the first Arab conquests in the 7th century is included in the second redaction of the Hellenic and Roman Chronicle, a medieval Russian historiographical source containing an outline of universal history. The aforementioned text was edited and translated into Polish following the manuscript of РГБ, собр. Пискарева (228), № 162, from 1485.
Źródło:
Slavia Antiqua: rocznik poświęcony starożytnościom słowiańskim; 2020, 61; 101-116
0080-9993
Pojawia się w:
Slavia Antiqua: rocznik poświęcony starożytnościom słowiańskim
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
RECENZJA - Р. Кацман, Неуловимая реальность. Сто лет русско-израильской литературы (1920–2020), Academic Studies Press–BiblioRossica, Boston–St. Petersburg 2020, s. 336.
review - Р. Кацман, Неуловимая реальность. Сто лет русско-израильской литературы (1920–2020), Academic Studies Press–BiblioRossica, Boston–St. Petersburg 2020, s. 336.
рецензия ! Р. Кацман, Неуловимая реальность. Сто лет русско-израильской литературы (1920–2020), Academic Studies Press–BiblioRossica, Boston–St. Petersburg 2020, s. 336.
Autorzy:
Michalska-Suchanek, Mirosława
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/603710.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Polskie Towarzystwo Rusycystyczne
Tematy:
rosyjsko-izraelska literatura
Kacman
Russian literature in Israel
Roman Katsman
Źródło:
Przegląd Rusycystyczny; 2020, 172, 4
0137-298X
Pojawia się w:
Przegląd Rusycystyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Between Freedom and Imprisonment. The Shanghai Ghetto from the Perspective of the Bulgarian Writer Angel Wagenstein
Autorzy:
Kuczyńska, Marzanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/30148727.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
Angel Wagenstein
Bulgarian literature
roman
China
Shanghai
World War II
Opis:
Angel Wagenstein’s novel Farewell, Shanghai is this article’s focal point. The attention focuses on the literary picture of the Shanghai ghetto (Hongkew district) during the Second World War. Wagenstein shows the ghetto as symbol of the end of the Jews’s eternal wandering, where they found autonomy from other nations, and reunification based on sufferings and religion. Before them there stands the long-awaited promised land, where they themselves will govern themselves.
Źródło:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne; 2023, 24; 117-130
2084-3011
Pojawia się w:
Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Tyberiusz według Jacka Bocheńskiego
Tyberius According to Jacek Bocheński
Autorzy:
Morawiec, Arkadiusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/579083.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
Tematy:
Jacek Bocheński
Polish literature
historical novel
the Emperor Tiberius
Roman Empire
Opis:
The article contains the interpretation of Jacek Bocheński’s Tyberiusz Cezar (2009). This historical novel, which is a polemic with the “black legend” of the Emperor Tiberius, created by Roman historians, especially Tacitus and Suetonius, takes the issue of the historical truth, entanglement in political power, as well as the state of contemporary culture.
Źródło:
Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich; 2016, 59/119 z. 3; 31-39
0084-4446
Pojawia się w:
Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 39

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies