Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Roman Imperialism" wg kryterium: Temat


Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4
Tytuł:
Gemma Augustea and the Roman Stoicism
Gemma Augustea i rzymski stoicyzm
Autorzy:
Burliga, Bogdan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2167991.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013-12
Wydawca:
Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne Diecezji Elbląskiej w Elblągu
Tematy:
Roman Stoicism
cameo
ideology
the Roman imperialism
philosophy
Opis:
The article is devoted to the problem of so-called Roman Stoicism - the final stage in the development of Stoic philosophy and school. The starting point is the scene of the crowning of Octavian Augustus by the goddess Oikumene on the so-called Gemma Augustea, a beautiful cameo that dates from the early reign of Emperor Tiberius. The presence of the figure of Oikumene there is puzzling because, as is well known, the term was used in Hellenistic philosophy (Stoic and Cynic) to denote the inhabited world. The fact that the figure of Oikumene was included in the imperial programme of Emperor Augustus shows that the Romans gave the concept a different meaning: in their understanding, Oikumene now meant the Roman world stricto sensu. It was a symbolic way of expressing Roman rule over the world. Thus, the figure of Oikumene on the gemma is evidence that the Romans did not passively repeat Stoic teaching, but used some of its elements to describe their rule over the world. More importantly, the very fact of having such a vast empire defined, as it were, the nature of Roman Stoicism in passing.
Źródło:
Studia Elbląskie; 2013, 14; 401-427
1507-9058
Pojawia się w:
Studia Elbląskie
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Friendship and Alliance’ between the Judaeans under Judas Maccabee and the Romans (1Macc 8: 17–32): A Response to Linda Zollschan’s Rome and Judaea
Autorzy:
Coşkun, Altay
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/52229507.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
1Maccabees
Judas Maccabee
Eupolemus
Demetrius I Soter
amicitia populi Romani
friendship diplomacy
Roman Imperialism
Opis:
Linda Zollschan promises a highly interdisciplinary study of the report on the first Roman embassy to Rome under Judas Maccabee in 1Macc 8. In part, she argues that the Senate did not grant the requested alliance, but only informal amicitia; in part, she claims that not even amicitia was granted but only a declaration of liberty; in part, she proposes that the ambassadors misunderstood the result of their mission, since it meant subjection under Rome without effective protection. Further results include the views that the embassy was undertaken in 162 BCE, and that the account and treaty text is based on the Aramaic report of the ambassadors Eupolemus and Jason. The contradictions and misunderstandings of Zollschan’s book are plentiful and serious. The present study engages with the questions she asks and with the answers she gives, adds substantially to the recent bibliography in the addressed areas and concludes with very different assessments: namely, that we should maintain the traditional date of 161/60 BCE for the Judaean embassy, that the Senate granted a treaty of friendship and alliance, that the Continuator of 1Macc inserted the (highly edited) version he found on a bronze inscription in Jerusalem, and that success was largely denied to the mission, since the ambassadors returned after Judas had died in battle. 
Źródło:
Electrum; 2018, 25; 85-125
1897-3426
2084-3909
Pojawia się w:
Electrum
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Just war in the classical world: Grece and Rome
Autorzy:
Bermúdez Vázquez, Manuel
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/431234.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Tematy:
just war
Peloponnesian war
Roman imperialism
Cicero
Thucydides
wojna sprawiedliwa
wojna peloponeska
imperializm rzymski
Cyceron
Tukidydes
Opis:
'War is hell’ is one of the mantras used to offer an explanation for the lack of ethical guidance in the radical antagonism involved in that human conflict known as war. Throughout the history of mankind, there has been an effort to introduce ethical considerations in war-waging. However, humanity has assisted, defenseless, to the greatest injustices and disasters once and again. This situation highlights the problematic issues and paradoxes of the concept of “just war”. Our purpose here is to analyze the origins of this concept in the Greek ethical reflection during the Peloponnesian War and in the justification of the Roman expansion during the founding of the Roman Empire.
Źródło:
Studia Philosophiae Christianae; 2017, 53, 3; 41-54
0585-5470
Pojawia się w:
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Pourquoi les Athéniens ont-ils lamentablement échoué là où les Romains ont brillamment réussi?
Dlaczego Ateńczykom tak żałośnie nie powiodło się tam, gdzie tak błyskotliwie udało się Rzymianom?
Autorzy:
Pałuchowski, Adam
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/33921238.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
imperialism
Near East
Sargon of Akkad
Assyrian Empire
Shalmaneser III
classical antiquity
Athenian Empire
Roman Empire
network theory
state formation
impérialisme
Proche-Orient
Sargon d’Akkad
empire assyrien
Salmanasar III
Antiquité classique
empire athénien
empire romain
théorie des réseaux
politogenèse
Opis:
L’enquête se veut comparative et se focalise, avant tout autre chose, sur l’Antiquité classique et ses deux centres majeurs qui sont, d’un côté, Athènes, cité-raison d’impérialisme chaotique et, de l’autre, Rome, cité-monde d’impérialisme pragmatique et pleinement assumé. D’abord est brièvement abordé, toujours dans la perspective comparative, le contexte proche-oriental, à entendre le micro-empire mis sur pied par Sargon d’Akkad et l’empire assyrien sous Salmanasar III. L’objectif premier est cependant d’apporter une réponse à la question de savoir pourquoi l’impérialisme athénien a essuyé un échec cuisant et ceci malgré l’évidence de la guerre du Péloponnèse perdue, à l’opposé de la réussite fulgurante de l’impérialisme romain. On aura recours à l’analyse d’une sélection de sources tant narratives qu’épigraphiques ainsi qu’à la théorie des réseaux.
The study is comparative and focuses, essentially, on classical antiquity, it means both its major centers that are, on the one hand, Athens, the city-reason of chaotic imperialism, and, on the other hand, Rome, the city-world of pragmatic and fully assumed imperialism. First of all, but still, from a comparative perspective, it begins with Near Eastern much older imperialist background, such as the micro-empire set up by Sargon of Akkad or the Assyrian empire during the reign of Shalmaneser III. However, the main aim is to answer the question about why Athenian imperialism fell, despite the obviousness of the lost Peloponnesian War and in contrast to the dazzling success of Roman imperialism. Narrative as well as epigraphic sources are comparatively analysed and one takes advantage of the network theory.
Źródło:
Res Historica; 2023, 56; 23-44
2082-6060
Pojawia się w:
Res Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
    Wyświetlanie 1-4 z 4

    Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies