Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Presidium of the Sejm" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7
    Tytuł:
    Wykładnia art. 23 ust. 2 regulaminu Sejmu – odwołanie od uchwały Prezydium Sejmu o obniżeniu uposażenia lub diety parlamentarnej
    Interpretation of Article 23 para. 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm – an appeal against a resolution of the Presidium of the Sejm on decreasing the salary of a Deputy or parliamentary per diem allowance
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2215771.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Deputy
    Presidium of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    Analysis of the matter of decisions that may be taken by the Presidium of the Sejm, considering an application for reconsideration of the case. In the author’s opinion, the scope of possible decisions of the Presidium of the Sejm, made on the basis of the analyzed provision, includes: sustaining the original resolution, repealing it, as well as changing the amount of deprivation of Deputy’s benefits made in the original resolution (in favour of the appealing Deputy).
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2018, 3(59); 63-67
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat wykładni skutków prawnych uchylenia przez Prezydium Sejmu uchwały Komisji Etyki Poselskiej na podstawie art. 147 ust. 1 w związku z art. 145 ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu
    Legal Opinion on the interpretation of the effects of repeal of the Deputies’ Ethics Committee resolution pursuant to Article 147 Paragraph 1 in connection with Article 145 Paragraph 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, by the Presidium of the Sejm
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16640306.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Deputies’ Ethics Committee
    Presidium of the Sejm
    rei iudicatae
    Opis:
    The repeal of the resolution of the Ethics Committee by the Presidium of the Polish Sejm under Article 22 Paragraph 3 point 1 in conjunction with Article 147 Paragraph 4 and Article 132 Paragraph 2 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland lead to closure of the case. There are no adequate normative basis, which would indicate the possibility of a retrial by the Presidium of the Sejm. Discontinuance of proceedings by the Presidium of the Sejm stimulates a state of rei iudicatae. Outside the scope of review remains the legal assessment of this resolution and its justification, which implies that the procedural irregularities in the proceedings conducted by the Deputies’ Ethics Committee are a sufficient condition for the repeal of the resolution of the Committee, and consequently the closure of the case.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 2(34); 76-80
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat prawa do wynagrodzenia z tytułu pełnienia funkcji członka Prezydium Sejmu w związku z uzyskiwaniem dochodów z tytułu działalności podlegającej prawu autorskiemu
    Legal opinion on the Remuneration a member of the Presidium of the Sejm in terms of the possibility of obtaining of income from activities subject to copyright law
    Autorzy:
    Galińska-Rączy, Irena
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11543130.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2014
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Presidium of the Sejm
    register of Interests
    state position
    salary
    Opis:
    The article points out that the activity of conducting occasional lectures and publishing articles and books should be classified as an activity subject to copyright law within the meaning of Article 33 para. 1 of the Act on the Exercise of the Mandate of a Deputy or Senator. Members of the Presidium of the Sejm are obliged to report their income from this source in the Register of Interests and to reveal it in two statements of financial status. From the analysis of the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal it follows that even incidental lectures can be classified as “other function” within the meaning of Article 4 para. 2 of the Act on the Remuneration of Persons Holding State Management Posts. It was stated, however, that this position contradicts the historical and teleological interpretation of the rule presented in the law doctrine and the trend observed in relation to those legal solutions which take into account the principle of freedom of choice and carrying out of the profession. Therefore, it can be assumed that a member of the Presidium of the Sejm may earn income from activities subject to copyright law and obtain, at the same time, a salary due to the position of Marshal or Vice-Marshal of the Sejm. In the author’s view, the provision in question should be amended.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2014, 4(44); 191-201
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat wykładni art. 132 ust. 2 w związku z art. 147 ust. 4 regulaminu Sejmu (tryb odwołania od uchwały Komisji Etyki Poselskiej stwierdzającej naruszenie „Zasad etyki poselskiej”)
    Legal Opinion on the interpretation of Article 132 Paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 147 Paragraph 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland (the mode of appeal against the resolution of the Deputies’ Ethics Committee on infringement of the principles of ethics of Deputies)
    Autorzy:
    Odrowąż-Sypniewski, Wojciech
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/16638969.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Deputies’ Ethics Committee
    Presidium of the Sejm
    ethics of deputies
    Opis:
    Provision of Article 132 Paragraph 2 in conjunction with Article 147 Paragraph 4 of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland doesn’t provide a legal basis for the participation of the chairman of the Deputies’ Ethics Committee in the meeting of the Presidium of the Sejm in order to present a resolution referred to in Article 147 Paragraph 1. In Article 132 Paragraph 2, only the requirement to provide a document to the Presidium of the Sejm is stated.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2012, 2(34); 72-75
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna na temat potrzeby przeprowadzania na posiedzeniu Sejmu głosowania w sprawie odwołania ze stanowiska członka Prezydium Sejmu, w wypadku złożenia przez tę osobę rezygnacji z zajmowanego stanowiska
    Legal opinion on whether there is need to take a vote, during the sitting of the Sejm, to remove from office of the member of the Presidium of the Sejm in the event of his/her resignation
    Autorzy:
    Mordwiłko, Janusz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/11855196.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    Speaker of parliament
    removal from office
    Presidium of the Sejm
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Opis:
    The opinion analyses the possibility of removal from office of the Marshal (Speaker) and Vice-Marshals (Deputy Speakers) of the Sejm. In the author’s view, the provision contained in the amendment to the Standing Orders (2008) making possible such a remove is not compatible with Article 110 (1) of the Constitution, which does not relate to appointment of a Marshal or Vice-marshals, but rather deals with the “election” of a Marshal (which would imply his/her irremovability during the term of parliament). He also points to the controversies relating to the possibility of an appropriate application of the provision on resignation from the function of Marshal when the Vice-Marshal has been removed from office. Such an interpretation seems to be abuse of law, since an appropriate application of the provisions in similar situations cannot be assumed, but should rather be expressly formulated in a legal provision. From an analysis of Article 10a (5) of the Standing Orders of the Sejm it follows that the future regulation should be made more specific, particularly by the inclusion of the case of death and the conditions of resignation of the Vice-Marshal.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 2(38); 47-51
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości ewentualnego podjęcia przez Prezydium Sejmu uchwały wykładniczej dotyczącej ograniczania liczby interpelacji i zapytań poselskich w tej samej „sprawie”
    Legal opinion on possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”
    Autorzy:
    Chybalski, Piotr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/12236964.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2013
    Wydawca:
    Kancelaria Sejmu. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych
    Tematy:
    interpellation |
    Deputy’s question
    Standing Orders of the Sejm
    Presidium of the Sejm
    parliamentary oversight
    Deputy
    Opis:
    Examining the possible adoption by the Presidium of the Sejm of an interpretative resolution regarding limiting the number of interpellations and Deputy’s questions on the same “matter”, the author of the opinion concludes that any restrictions in this regard should be formulated with caution. The rights of Deputies to submit interpellations cannot be only illusory. He also notes that the Standing Orders of the Sejm have already introduced a mechanism for control by the Presidium of the Sejm over interpellations and Deputy’s questions. In order to counter the practice of submitting excessive number of interpellations of similar content to the same body, the author examines the possibility of combining by the Presidium of the Sejm similar interpellations into one interpellation.
    Źródło:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS; 2013, 3(39); 73-79
    1896-9852
    2082-064X
    Pojawia się w:
    Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Geneza i skutki dekonstytucjonalizacji Prezydium Sejmu - próba oceny
    Autorzy:
    Koksanowicz, Grzegorz
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1041675.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018
    Wydawca:
    Fundacja Niepodległości
    Tematy:
    sejm
    prezydium sejmu
    marszałek sejmu
    organy kierownicze sejmu
    presidium of the sejm
    marshal of the sejm
    governing bodies of the sejm
    Opis:
    The entry into force of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 meant the Presidium of the Sejm losing its status of a constitutional body. The justification for adopting such a solution was the conviction of the Constitution creators that there is no need to include in it the contents which lie within the autonomy of the Parliament and which may be regulated in the rules and regulations of the Sejm. However, the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium of the Sejm gave rise to some doubts when it comes to the interpretation of the constitutional provisions regulating the status of the Marshal of the Sejm. It also fundamentally influenced the process of directing the work of the Sejm. Therefore, it was a significant change in relation to the previous legal status; however, the importance of the said change (in my opinion) was not fully noticed. One of the effects of the deconstitutionalisation of the Presidium was a change in the model of directing the work of the Sejm. A single-person model was introduced in place of the previous collegial manner of decision-making, and as a result the Marshal of the Sejm became the main governing body of the Chamber. After the lapse of over twenty years of adopting such solutions the author is inclined to make an attempt of the assessment of their functioning in the Polish political realities.
    Źródło:
    Prawo i Polityka; 2018, 8; 37-45
    2080-5799
    Pojawia się w:
    Prawo i Polityka
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-7 z 7

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies