Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Polish–Lithuanian union" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25
Tytuł:
From the Union of Lublin to the Mutual Guarantee of the Two Nations
Autorzy:
Malec, Jerzy
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27308732.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Union of Lublin
Mutual Guarantee of the Two Nations
union of Poland and Lithuania
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Opis:
The purpose of this study is to show changes in the legal and political nature of the alliance between the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania over the centuries, from the Union concluded in Lublin in 1569, through the so-called ‘coequatio iuris’ of 1697, until the regulations adopted in the Constitution of May 3, and the “Reciprocal Guarantee of Both Nations” crowning the process and passed at the Four-Year Sejm on October 20, 1791. The study uses a wide range of archival manuscript sources, old prints, parliamentary legislation, and also numerous studies using both old and current literature. The main research goal of the study was to show to what extent the changes in the legal nature of the union of the two countries led to their full unification, which was in the past (and sometimes still is) the interpretation of this process in many studies, and to what extent the federalist character of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was preserved, which is nowadays the dominant view and which the author of this study is a strong supporter of.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2023, 22, 1; 455-484
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ławryn Drewiński – najważniejszy prawosławny protagonista szlachecki w czasach Zygmunta III
Ławryn Drewiński – the Most Important Orthodox Noble Protagonist in the Reign of Sigismund III
Autorzy:
Kempa, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/33915739.pdf
Data publikacji:
2023
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
Tematy:
Sigismund III Vasa
Ławryn Drewiński
Ruthenian nobility
Orthodoxy
the Union of Brest
the Diet (Sejm) of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
the orthodox Brotherhoods
Zygmunt III Waza
ruska szlachta
prawosławie
unia brzeska
sejm polsko-litewskiej Rzeczypospolitej
bractwa cerkiewne
Opis:
Artykuł poświęcony jest postaci jednego z najważniejszych prawosławnych liderów szlacheckich w czasach Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów – Ławrynowi Drewińskiemu. Był on jednocześnie jednym z najwybitniejszych parlamentarzystów epoki staropolskiej. Uczestniczył w 15 sejmach. Zasłynął z wyrazistych mów wygłaszanych na forum parlamentarnym (zwłaszcza w latach 1620 i 1621) w obronie prawosławia, które po zawarciu unii brzeskiej (1596) musiało rywalizować o zachowanie wcześniej posiadanych wolności i przywilejów z Cerkwią unicką. Drewiński był posłem z województwa wołyńskiego, którego sejmik w okresie panowania Zygmunta III Wazy najczęściej zabierał głos w sprawach wyznaniowych, konsekwentnie opowiadając się za zachowaniem tolerancji religijnej. Odegrał wybitną rolę w okresie bezkrólewia 1632 r., gdy prawosławnym udało się (w znacznej mierze dzięki determinacji króla-elekta Władysława IV Wazy) doprowadzić do odzyskania części władyctw, a potem także szeregu cerkwi, wcześniej przejętych przez unitów. Mimo zajmowanej konsekwentnej postawy wierności wobec prawosławia, w 1629 r. włączył się aktywnie w próbę budowania unii pomiędzy prawosławnymi i unitami. Drewiński należał też do najbardziej czynnych działaczy bractw prawosławnych w czasach Zygmunta III, widząc w nich szansę na duchowe i intelektualne odrodzenie prawosławia w Rzeczypospolitej. Mimo podkreślanego ruskiego pochodzenia Drewiński uległ też w pewnej mierze polonizacji. W działalności publicznej posługiwał się językiem polskim. Tak jak ojciec Bazyli, był zwolennikiem unii polsko-litewskiej, jednocześnie będąc przeciwnikiem wciągania Moskwy do walki o przywrócenie praw prawosławnym w Rzeczypospolitej.
The article concerns one of the most important Orthodox noble leaders in the times of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – Ławryn Drewiński. He was one of the most outstanding parliamentarians of the Old Polish era. He participated in 15 parliamentary assemblies. He became famous for his expressive speeches in the parliamentary forum (especially in 1620 and 1621) in defense of the Orthodox Church, which after the conclusion of the Union of Brest (1596) had to compete with the Uniate Church for the preservation of previously held freedoms and privileges. Drewiński was a deputy from the Volyn voivodeship, whose sejmik, during the reign of Sigismund III Vasa, most often spoke about religious matters, consistently advocating for religious tolerance. He played an outstanding role during the interregnum of 1632, when the Orthodox managed (largely thanks to the determination of the king-elect Władysław IV Vasa) to regain some of the bishoprics, and then also a number of churches, previously taken over by the Uniates. Despite his consistent stance of fidelity to Orthodoxy, in 1629 he actively supported the attempt to build a union between the Orthodox Church and Uniates in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Drewiński was also one of the most active activists of the Orthodox brotherhoods in the times of Sigismund III, seeing them as an opportunity for the spiritual and intellectual revival of Orthodoxy in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Despite the emphasized Ruthenian origin, Drewiński was also to some extent polonized. In public activities, he used the Polish language. Like his father Basil, he was a supporter of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, while at the same time being an opponent of involving Moscow in the fight for the restoration of the Orthodox Church in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (after the Union of Brest).
Źródło:
Res Historica; 2023, 56; 89-150
2082-6060
Pojawia się w:
Res Historica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Księdza Mateusza Bembusa SJ poglądy na temat schizmy kościelnej i propozycje pojednania z Cerkwią prawosławną
Father Mateusz Bembus’, S.J., Views on Church Schism and Proposals for Reconciliation with the Orthodox Church
Autorzy:
Stradomski, Jan
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2130754.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022-09-29
Wydawca:
Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
Tematy:
polemika religijna
unia kościelna
synod we Lwowie
jezuici
jezuici, Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
religious polemic
church union
the Synod in Lviv
Jesuits
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Opis:
Synod biskupów unickich we Lwowie z 1629 r. był jedną z prób doprowadzenia do zgody dwóch chrześcijańskich wyznań obrządku wschodniego w Rzeczypospolitej – obecnej na ziemiach ruskich od stuleci Cerkwi prawosławnej oraz nowo powstałego w wyniku zawarcia unii brzeskiej (1596) Kościoła greckokatolickiego. Podjęty z zaangażowaniem metropolity Józefa Welamina Rutskiego i króla Zygmunta III Wazy wysiłek unijny nie przyniósł spodziewanych rezultatów, a jednym z niewielu namacalnych owoców zjazdu stała się homilia krakowskiego jezuity, Mateusza Bembusa, wygłoszona w dniu otwarcia synodu. Tekst mowy znany jest z dwóch XVII-wiecznych edycji, jakie ukazały się w odstępie zaledwie kilku miesięcy w Krakowie i Lwowie. W dziele tym jezuita zawarł szereg wątków dotyczących historii chrześcijaństwa oraz propozycję sposobu przełamania schizmy kościelnej. Całość ubrana została w klasyczną strukturę mowy retorycznej, wyrażonej barwnym językiem i nietypowymi argumentami. Studium stanowi analizę formalno-treściową pracy Bembusa przedstawioną na tle wydarzeń historycznych, których dotyczy.
The Synod of the Greek Catholic Bishops in Lviv of 1629 was one of the attempts to bring about an agreement between two Eastern-rite Christian denominations in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth – the Orthodox Church, which had been present in Ruthenia for centuries, and the newly established Greek Catholic Church which stemmed from the proclamation of the Brest Union (1596). Efforts for the union undertaken by Metropolitan Józef Welamin Rutski and King Sigismund III Wasa did not bring abouot the expected results, and one of the few concrete effects of the congress was the sermon of the Jesuit from Krakow, Mateusz Bembus, preached on the day of the opening of the synod. The text of the speech is known from two 17th-century editions, which were published just a few months apart in Kraków and Lviv. In this work, the Jesuit included a number of threads concerning the history of Christianity and a proposal on how to break the church schism. The content has been put into the classic structure of rhetorical speech, expressed in vivid language and unusual arguments. The paper is a structural and content analysis of Bembus’ work presented against the background of historical events.
Źródło:
Perspektywy Kultury; 2022, 38, 3; 15-40
2081-1446
2719-8014
Pojawia się w:
Perspektywy Kultury
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Stanowisko posłów podlaskich w sprawie unii polsko-litewskiej na sejmie brzeskim w 1566 r.
The Statement of the Envoys of Podlasie Concerning the Case of Polish-Lithuanian Union at the Sejm of Brześć in 1566
Autorzy:
Kalinowski, Emil
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/27291747.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet w Białymstoku. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku
Tematy:
Podlasie
nobility of Podlasie
sejm envoys
Lithuanian sejm
Polish-Lithuanian union
land sejmiks
szlachta podlaska
posłowie sejmowi
sejm litewski
unia polsko-litewska
sejmiki ziemskie
Opis:
Artykuł zawiera edycję mało dotąd znanego w historiografii źródła historycznego z 1566 r., związanego ze staropolskim parlamentaryzmem wraz z obszernym omówieniem tła historycznego i jego treści. Zawiera ono wspólne stanowisko sześciu posłów wybranych na podlaskich sejmikach na litewski sejm w Brześciu nad Bugiem w 1566 r. wyrażone w imieniu pozostałej w domach szlachty, dotyczące kwestii unii Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego z Królestwem Polskim. Badania zostały oparte na możliwie szerokiej bazie źródłowej, na którą składały się zarówno materiały wydane drukiem w XIX, XX i XXI w., jak również archiwalne, w tym zachowane akta urzędów grodzkich z terenu Podlasia: w Drohiczynie, Mielniku i Brańsku oraz wypisy z nich autorstwa Ignacego Kapicy. Przybliżono również biografie autorów pisma: Adama Kosińskiego i Jana Buyno z ziemi drohickiej, Kaspra Irzykowicza i Piotra Padkowskiego z ziemi mielnickiej, Tomasza Owsianego i Wojciecha Wyszkowskiego z ziemi bielskiej. Byli to prominentni przedstawiciele lokalnej elity szlacheckiej, niemal wszyscy w chwili wyboru na posła związani z sądownictwem, które na Podlasiu opierało się na prawie polskim. Prezentowane tu źródło to ciekawy pod wieloma względami przekaz ukazujący nastroje i dążenia szlachty podlaskiej na kilka lat przed wiekopomnymi wydarzeniami 1569 r.: inkorporacją jej województwa do Polski oraz zawarciem unii realnej polsko-litewskiej. Umieszczenie go w kontekście dotychczasowej wiedzy, jak i nowych ustaleń o ówczesnej sytuacji politycznej na Podlasiu dopełnia ten obraz.
The article contains an edition of the historical source from 1566 connected with old Polish parliamentarism, so far barely known in historiography, with comprehensive periphrasis of its historical background and its content. It contains a joint position of six envoys elected at the sejmiks of Podlasie to the Sejm of Brześć-on-the-Bug in 1566, expressed on behalf of the nobility remaining in their homes, on the issue of the union of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania with the Kingdom of Poland. The research was based on the broadest possible source base, which included both materials published in print in the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries, as well as archival ones, including the preserved files of castle offices from Podlasie: in Drohiczyn, Mielnik and Brańsk and excerpts from them by Ignacy Kapica. The biographies of the authors of the writing are also presented: Adam Kosiński and Jan Buyno from Drohiczyn Land, Kasper Irzykowicz and Piotr Padkowski from Mielnik Land, Tomasz Owsiany and Wojciech Wyszkowski from Bielsk Land. They were prominent representatives of the local noble elite, almost all of them associated with the judiciary, which in Podlasie was based on Polish law. The source presented here is an interesting draft in many respects, showing the moods and aspirations of the Podlasian nobility several years before the memorable events of 1569: the incorporation of its voivodeship into Poland and the conclusion of the Polish-Lithuanian real union. Placing it in the context of existing knowledge and new findings about the then political situation in Podlasie completes this picture.
Źródło:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica; 2022, 21, 1; 21-49
1732-9132
2719-9991
Pojawia się w:
Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
„Niech to każdy obaczy jeśli Litwa małą krzywdę, żal, despekt i wzgardą ma od Polaków”: epizod sporu między Litwą a Koroną Polską o Inflanty
“Let Everyone see that Lithuania has Harm, Regret, Offence, and Contempt from the Poles”: an Episode of a Dispute between the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Polish Kingdom over Livonia
Autorzy:
Padalinski, Uładzimir
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131656.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
świadomość polityczna
szlachta
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
Inflanty
wojna inflancka
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
political consciousness
nobility
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Livonia
Livonian War
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Opis:
W artykule dokonano analizy utworu rękopiśmiennego Czo za prawa X. Litewskie ma do ziemie Inflianczki a poliaczi do niei nicz niemaią (najprawdopodobniej z 1582 r.). Na jego przykładzie zaprezentowano argumenty prawne i ideologiczne wykorzystywane przez szlachtę Wielkiego Księstwa Litewskiego podczas sporów ze szlachtą Korony Polskiej o przynależność Inflant. Ukazano także znaczny poziom nieufności litewskiej elity politycznej wobec partnerów koronnych w końcu XVI w., spowodowany doświadczeniami związanymi z zawarciem unii lubelskiej oraz skutkami wojny inflanckiej.
The article analyses the text preserved in a manuscript under the title Czo za prawa X. Litewskie ma do ziemie Inflianczki a poliaczi do niei nicz niemaią (What rights has the Duchy of Lithuania to Livonian lands while the Poles have none, most probably written in 1582). It contains legal and ideological arguments put forward by the nobility of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania during the disputes with the nobility of the Polish Kingdom over the possession of Livonia. The author concludes that the Lithuanian political elite retained a deep distrust of their Polish partners at the end of the sixteenth century resulting from the previous experiences gained at the time of the conclusion of the Union of Lublin and the Livonian War.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 121-133
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Czy naprawdę unia została wykreślona z projektów Litwy nowoczesnej w końcu XIX – na początku XX wieku?
Was the Union Really Erased from the Modern Lithuanian Statehood Projects in the Late Nineteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries
Autorzy:
Miknys, Rimantas
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131668.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
idea of the (Lublin) Union
Lithuanian national movement
Lithuanian statehood projects
“Lithuanian federalism”
Lithuanian and Polish historiography
idea unii polsko-litewskiej (lubelskiej)
litewski ruch narodowy
projekty państwowości Litwy
„federalizm litewski”
historiografia litewska a polska
Opis:
W artykule podjęto próbę krytycznej oceny tezy funkcjonującej w historiografii litewskiej, a częściowo także polskiej, że idea unii obu państw została wyeliminowana z projektów litewskiego ruchu narodowego ukształtowanych w końcu XIX i na początku XX w. Wyniki analizy ukazują potrzebę badań koncepcji federalizmu litewskiego, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem kwestii wpływu na nią unii polsko-litewskiej.
The article offers a critical assessment of the deeply entrenched view in Lithuanian and Polish historiography that the idea of the (Lublin) Union was erased from the Lithuanian statehood projects created within the Lithuanian national movement in the late nineteenth–early twentieth centuries. Summarising the critical assessments made against this idea, several theses were formulated based on which further research could be conducted that could explain the effects of the Union on the formation and development of “Lithuanian federalism”.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 221-234
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Świadectwa o dawnej Polsce w źródłach ormiańskich. Współczesna wzmianka o Unii Lubelskiej
Mentions of the Late Medieval and Early Modern Kingdom of Poland in Armenian sources. Contemporary mention of Union of Lublin
Autorzy:
Mnatsakanyan, Piruz
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647999.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
Ormianie
Ormianie polscy
Armenian sources for history of Old Poland
Kamyanets
Chronicle
Armenian community in Old Poland
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 235-258
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia kalmarska a unie polsko-litewskie – kilka uwag na temat ich początków i potrzeby kontynuacji badań porównawczych obu związków państwowych
The Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian Unions – Some Remarks on Their Beginnings and the Need for Continued Comparative Research on the Both State Unions
Autorzy:
Gaca, Andrzej
Bąk, Hubert
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2131654.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-09-19
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN w Warszawie
Tematy:
unia kalmarska
unie polsko-litewskie
układ w Krewie
królowa Jadwiga
król Władysław Jagiełło
unionsbrevet
kroningsbrevet
Małgorzata – królowa Danii
Norwegii i Szwecji
Eryk Pomorski
unia lubelska
Kalmar Union
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Act of Krewo
Queen Jadwiga
King Władysław Jagiełło
Queen Margaret of Denmark
Norway and Sweden
Erik of Pomerania
Lublin Union
Opis:
Artykuł prezentuje dotychczasowy stan badań komparatystycznych nad unią kalmarską i uniami polsko-litewskimi. Na wstępie przedstawiono genezę obu unii: przyczyny ich zawarcia, scharakteryzowano i porównano dokumenty obu układów: w Krewie (1385 r.) i unii kalmarskej (unionsbrevet) (1397 r.). Wskazano również podobieństwa obu związków na płaszczyźnie rywalizacji o przywództwo, a także rolę królowej Małgorzaty w zawarciu unii oraz samodzielne rządy Eryka Pomorskiego i ich skutki. Następnie przybliżono transformację unii kalmarskiej, jej poszczególne etapy i przyczyny upadku oraz losy obu związków unijnych po ich formalnym ustaniu i ich wpływ na dalszy rozwój państw członkowskich. Na zakończenie podjęto próbę wytyczenia kierunków dalszych badań porównawczych nad obydwoma uniami, stawiając postulat o konieczności ich kontynuowania i rozwijania.
The article presents the current state of comparative research into the Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian unions, contributing to the postulate of the need for further detailed comparative studies in this field. It outlines a genesis of the unions (their causes, the 1385 Act of Krewo and the 1397 Kalmar Union [unionsbrevet]), then characterises the both documents and conducts a comparative analysis; indicates the similarities between the unions as regards rivalry for the leadership; emphasises the role played by Queen Margaret in the conclusion of the union, and describes the independent rule of Erik of Pomerania with its results. Next, it analyses the transformation of the Kalmar Union together with its successive stages and the causes of its collapse; the fate of the two unions after they formally ended and their impact on the historical development of the member states. Finally, it attempts to indicate lines of further comparative research into the both unions.
Źródło:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny; 2020, 6; 135-166
2450-8454
2450-8446
Pojawia się w:
Rocznik Lituanistyczny
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska aktem założycielskim Rzeczypospolitej
The Union of Lublin as a founding act of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Autorzy:
Krochmal, Jacek
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647667.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
unia lubelska
Rzeczpospolita
unie polsko-litewskie
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian unions
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Central Archive of Historical Records
AGAD
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 13-64
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Unia Lubelska we współczesnej ukraińskiej historiografii i dydaktyce
The Union of Lublin in contemporary Ukrainian historiography and didactics
Autorzy:
Biłous, Natalia
Rachuba, Andrzej
Choińska-Mika, Jolanta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/chapters/16647206.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020-12-23
Wydawca:
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Tematy:
Unia Lubelska
historiografia ukraińska
dydaktyka
nauczanie historii
Union of Lublin
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Ukraine
historiography
history textbooks
Opis:
In Ukrainian historiography, treatment of the significance and aftermath of the Union of Lublin depended on ideological priorities of the time. In the 19 th and 20 th century historians were united by a sustained anti-Polish attitude. As early as in the 19th century, the scholars built an image of Poland as the main “stranger” in Ukrainian history. This negative image survived throughout the 20th century and passed into the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to examine various historiographic problems and stereotypes related to the Union of Lublin in the last 25 years and evolution, i.e. transformation, of the views of Ukrainian historians and textbook authors regarding this landmark event. Soviet historiography borrowed the negative assessment of the Union of Lublin and its consequences for Ukraine from the “national” concept of Mykhailo Hrushevsky and, going further, added new stereotypes to it. In the mid-1990s we observe a departure from the model introduced by Hrushevsky and the Soviet model of writing about history. As a result of the new political realities, some emphases in historiography have shifted, the evaluations of events have changed slightly, and historians have outlined new, neutral evaluations of the union. Over the past ten years, a number of modern works by Ukrainian researchers have emerged, appreciating the common heritage of Poland and Ukraine, especially from the history of parliamentarianism, ideology, identity and culture, the history of the nobility, the bourgeoisie and the Cossacks, which have their roots in the Union of Lublin, when the Ukrainian lands became part of the former Commonwealth. In 2019, in connection with the 450th anniversary of the Union of Lublin, interest in this event among the Ukrainian public has increased. A scholarly conference was held with the support of the Polish Institute in Kiev. Unfortunately, new views of historians have not affected the content of most textbooks for secondary and tertiary schools. They still describe the Union of Lublin along the lines of the “best” Soviet models. In recent years, state policy in Ukraine has been aimed primarily at overcoming myths about the 20th century. Therefore, much attention is paid to the content of the recent history books, while the events of the 16th–17th century remain in its “shadow”. Although ideological formulas and stereotypes of national and Soviet historiography have been partly incorporated into contemporary textbooks, some positive changes in the assessment of the consequences of the Union of Lublin are already visible. The topic of the Union of Lublin is well suited for developing critical thinking among pupils and students. It allows them to form their own assessment, based on facts, sources and the latest research by historians.
Źródło:
Unia Lubelska 1569 roku i unie w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej; 273-291
9788395630255
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Between the Union of Lublin and the Mutual Pledge of the Two Nations: From the Union of Two States to the Commonwealth of Three Provinces
Autorzy:
Zakrzewski, Andrzej
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178393.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Polish Crown
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Union of Lublin
political system
law
changes of the political system
Opis:
The aim of the article is to present changes in the position of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania towards the Polish Crown within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the years 1569–1791. The analysis was based on the transformation of both common (monarch, Sejm) and separate (central and local offices, judicial system and law) institutions in the context of economic, social and cultural changes of the era. Gradually, the Commonwealth was transforming into a state in which Lithuania was not so much one of its two parts – along with the Crown, but one of its three provinces – along with Lesser Poland and Greater Poland. It was, however, a special province since it had its own ministers, offices, courts, treasury and fiscal courts along with its own codification of political and private law. The rule introduced in 1673 that every third Sejm was to be held in Grodno, however, was rarely observed. The reasons for this change were: the smaller population of the Grand Duchy, its lower fiscal income along with the war damage and territorial losses suffered in the mid-17th century. This transformation was also facilitated by the fact that the Lithuanian political system and laws became increasingly similar to the Polish ones. Another factor was the slow creation of a sense of political community among nobles of both the Crown and Lithuania. This feeling was born not only out of the same rights and privileges, but also owing to the immigration of the Crown noblemen to the lands of the Grand Duchy and joining – by marriage – Lithuanian noble families, which was especially the case among magnate families. During this period, the common culture of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on the Polish language – lingua franca of the whole state – was also created. Other languages also functioned in the Polish- -Lithuanian state, but Polish, enriched by Lithuanian, Ruthenian, Latin, German and Oriental elements, began to dominate. The Government Act of 3 May 1791 did not mention the Grand Duchy at all, but created a common government for the whole of Commonwealth – the Guard of Laws and Great Commissions. Mutual Pledge of the Two Nations, unanimously adopted on 20 October 1791, constituted an attempt to return to the dualism from the era of the Union of Lublin. This act granted Lithuanians half of the commissioners in the military and fiscal commissions and – in the future – in the police commission. Lithuania also retained separate ministers, offices, a separate treasury and tax judiciary. Thus, the gradual unification of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was still visible, while maintaining some separate aspects, which were important for Lithuanians, albeit secondary in the scale of the entire state. Nevertheless, this process was interrupted by the upcoming partitions.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 4; 5-40
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Doświadczając historii: melancholia przeszłości w kulturach peryferyjnych na przykładzie Polski i Portugalii
Autorzy:
Partyka, Joanna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031005.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Portugal
Union of Lublin
Iberian Union
historical consciousness
peripheral culture
Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów
Portugalia
unia lubelska
unia iberyjska
świadomość historyczna
kultura peryferyjna
Opis:
In this paper I combine several different notions from broadly conceived humanities and two histories: of Poland and of Portugal at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. I comprehend here the experiencing of history as a way of treating one’s own, national past. The metaphor of experiencing history is related to the question of what the historical circumstances and situations are, what the purpose is and what history is referred to by the elites who are instrumental in shaping national identity. Melancholy of the past is already a partial answer-thesis to the question: In what way? The notion of peripheral cultures seems to be useful when we attempt to answer the question: in what situations and for what purpose we (the Portuguese and the Poles) referred, but also still continue to refer, to the past/history. Some considerations on the experience of history will have the following two Unions in the background: the Iberian Union (1580) and the Union of Lublin (1569).
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 109-115
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ivan Ivanovich Lappo’s Views on the Circumstances of Establishing the Union of Lublin in the Context of Pre-Revolutionary Russian Historiography
Autorzy:
Ambroziak, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1178395.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-31
Wydawca:
Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Union of Lublin
Ivan Ivanovich Lappo
Russian historiography
history of historiography
Opis:
The aim of the article is to analyze the views of Ivan Ivanovich Lappo regarding the circumstances of the conclusion of the Union of Lublin. The opinions of this historian were presented in the context of the views of Russian pre-revolutionary historiography, especially of such authors as Nikolay Gerasimovich Ustryalov, Mikhail Osipovich Koyalovich, Nikolay Alexeyevich Maksimieyko, Matvey Kuzmich Lyubavskiy and Fedor Ivanovich Leontovich. The article belongs to the vast area of studies on the history of historiography, the undertaking of which allows the assessment of the current scholarly achievements and research methodology, and thus making new research postulates. It should be noted that, despite some evolution, the fundamental assessment of the Union of Lublin in Russian pre-revolutionary historiography remained negative. However, the circumstances and reasons for its conclusion were perceived differently. Although the description of the conclusion of the Union of Lublin was not the main research goal for I. Lappo, he carried out a fairly detailed reconstruction of the Sejm of Lublin and the circumstances of the conclusion of the Polish-Lithuanian union in 1569. It seems that the aim of such a procedure was not only to explain the attitude of Lithuanians towards Poles and the legal relationship between the Grand Duchy and the Crown, but first of all to support of the historian’s fundamental thesis that, as a result of the Union of Lublin, the Grand Duchy did not lose its independence and distinctiveness. This historian not only reported the course of the Sejm of Lublin and the decision of the Act of the Union of July 1, but also confronted the views of Poles and Lithuanians concerning the conditions of the Union and the way it was concluded. According to him, the historical reality and the political system of the Grand Duchy until 1569 corresponded to the project of a union presented by Lithuanians. In his opinion, the aim of Poles was not to bring about real unification based on the principles of equality and fraternity, but to force Lithuanians to enter into a union through the implementation of old rights and privileges. In some parts of his research, however, the scholar differentiated between the radical attitude of the Chamber of Deputies of the Crown and the more conciliatory position of the Senate. The description of King Sigismund Augustus’s activities presented by I. Lappo turned out to be quite paradoxical and partly incoherent. On the one hand, the historian claimed that the monarch was under the influence of Poles and betrayed the Grand Duchy. On the other hand, he quoted a number of cases in which the king’s attitude contradicted this general opinion. Lappo’s general attitude towards the Union of Lublin remained negative. The historian clearly sympathized with Lithuanians, seeing Poles as merely caring for their own interests to the detriment of the Grand Duchy. The analysis of Lappo’s views made in this article shows that there are elements in his concepts that testify to the connection with the traditional narrative of Russian historiography, as well as new and original ideas.
Źródło:
Zapiski Historyczne; 2019, 84, 4; 97-122
0044-1791
2449-8637
Pojawia się w:
Zapiski Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Mikołaj Rej a „sprawa litewska” – uwagi Pana z Nagłowic o unii (lubelskiej) i Litwinach
Autorzy:
Dybek, Dariusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031008.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Mikolaj Rej
Polish–Lithuanian union
Seym
Mikołaj Rej
unia polsko-litewska
sejm
Opis:
Mikolaj Rej was not only one of the most notable 16th century Polish writers, but also an active member of the parliament. Among others, he worked on the Polish-Lithuanian issues. Based on the governmental documentation, Rej was engaged in these issues from 1542 onwards. He also dedicated a few pieces of writing to the matter, the most important of which is a poem written around 1567 entitled ‘Union with Lithuania’. In the poem he condemned the sluggishness in debating the unification of the two countries, but emphasized that the Lithuanians should have taken a greater interest in the matter, since Poland could have helped their fights with the Eastern neighbours. As he did during the parliamentary sessions, the author also stressed the need for electing a common king.Despite hoping for a quick resolution and unification, Rej did not regard Lithuania as an equal parter for Poland. Based on a few poets, the author seems to think of the Lithuanians as of a backward  nation (e.g. their table manners during the feasts and the use of primitive language). It is worth noting that Rej treated the Lithuanian aristocracy differently. While describing the clans and noble families (e.g. the Radziwiłł family or the Chodkiewicz family), he emphasised their patriotism and bravery. Rej’s remarks on the Lithuanians and the union did not stand out from the common opinion at the time. They could represent the feelings of a typical member of the Polish gentry.
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 144-157
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Polityczne, historyczne i kulturowe aspekty unii polsko-litewskiej w twórczości Józefa Weyssenhoffa
Autorzy:
Demkowicz, Agata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2031025.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-12-16
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
Tematy:
Polish-Lithuanian Union
Grand Duchy of Lithuania
Monarchy
Józef Weyssenhoff
Lithuanian novel
unia polsko-litewska
Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie
powieść litewska
Opis:
Józef  Weyssenhoff was a highly popular and widely read author at the end of the 19th and in the early 20th century. He was active as a writer, literary critic, and journalist during the time of the Young Poland movement and in the interwar period. He wrote his works at the turn of the two centuries and in the first decades of the new century. Throughout the later stage of his literary activity, i.e. from 1905 until his death, Weyssenhoff was greatly interested in politics. His contacts, reads, own observations and experiences in this matter gave rise to his tendentious political novels. The subjects he raised and reflected upon include the issue of the Polish-Lithuanian conflict, which caused a huge controversy in the first decades of the 20th century. Weyssenhoff demonstrated his own stance on the matter in his novel Union, published in 1910, which he wrote during the period of intensification of the national movement in Lithuania, particularly in Vilnius. The author regarded the movement to be politically dangerous, propagating hatred towards Poland, and able to cause the common cultural, historical, and political heritage of Poland and Lithuania to be destroyed. Young Lithuanian activists were acting to the detriment of the Polish language, depreciating the value of anything Polish. The conflict between Poland and Lithuania increased the risk of russification. The author suggested that what should be done in those circumstances was seek to restore the Polish-Lithuanian alliance. He showed the readers of his book how that process should be initiated. The marriage between the protagonists of Union: Kazimierz Rokszycki, a Pole, and Krystyna Sołomerecka, a Lithuanian, who loved their common motherland, serves as a symbol of a new, revived relationship between Poland and Lithuania.
Źródło:
Tematy i Konteksty; 2019, 14, 9; 327-347
2299-8365
Pojawia się w:
Tematy i Konteksty
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 25

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies