Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Plato, knowledge" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10
    Tytuł:
    Plato and the Classical Theory of Knowledge
    Autorzy:
    Pacewicz, Artur
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/665193.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    Plato, knowledge
    Opis:
    In this paper, the notion of the classical theory of knowledge is analysed with reference to its primary source – the philosophy of Plato. A point of departure for this analysis is the description of the classical theory of knowledge presented by Jan Woleński in his book Epistemology (but it can be also found in the works of other researchers devoted to epistemology). His statements about Plato are examined in the context of Plato’s thought. The dialogues Apology, Gorgias, Meno, fragments of the Republic, Theaetetus, Timaeus and the testimonies about the so-called agrapha dogmata are especially taken into consideration.
    Źródło:
    Folia Philosophica; 2019, 42, 2; 91-114
    1231-0913
    2353-9445
    Pojawia się w:
    Folia Philosophica
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dvokrilnost istine u Divljoj patki: Platon, Ibsen i Krleža
    The Two Winged Truth in The Wild Duck: Plato, Ibsen, and Krleža
    Autorzy:
    Tomljenović, Ana
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1890684.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-09-22
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    bsen
    Plato
    Krleža
    dialogue
    knowledge
    Opis:
    Questioning the commonly held assumption in critical reception that Ibsenʼs symbol of the wild duck was influenced by Darwinʼs theory, I want to argue that the wild duck flew into Ibsenʼs play all the way from Platoʼs aporetic dialogue The Theaetetus. Following Lacanʼs reading of Plato, I want to examine the connection between the Socratic position towards knowledge – especially the rupture between knowledge and truth – and the treatment of dramatic dialogue in Ibsenʼs The Wild Duck and Krležaʼs The Glembays.
    Źródło:
    Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne; 2021, 20; 215-235
    2084-3011
    Pojawia się w:
    Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Dialectic, Drama and Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Charmides
    Autorzy:
    Mouzala, Melina G.
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/507272.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-03-30
    Wydawca:
    International Étienne Gilson Society
    Tematy:
    dialectic
    drama
    self-knowledge
    Plato
    Charmides
    Socrates
    Opis:
    Charmides is a dialogue highly indicative of the importance that the prologues to Plato’s works have for our understanding of the whole spirit and philosophical content of each dialogue as a whole. It is representative of the Platonic tendency to always combine philosophical content with dramatic form through narrative and drama, in order to enhance the reader’s and audience’s insight into the inquiries of his philosophical work. Following this line of presentation, the prologue of Charmides prefigures the understanding of the central themes of the dialogue; focusing on the depiction of Socrates as a therapist and of Dialectic as a therapy or a kind of remedy, which through the process of dialectical engagement and interaction reestablishes the relation of each interlocutor to his own self. The Apollonian ideal of self-knowledge (know thyself) is construed as a “greeting” of the god to worshipers who enter the temple, not as a moral counsel or as a piece of advice. This distinction implies the difference between a knowledge conveyed from without and a knowledge discovered by insightful inner search of one’s self. Within the passages 165c to 175a, sōphrosunē is presented and examined as “the knowledge of what one knows and what one does not know.” It has been claimed that in this part of the dialogue, the Socratic model of self-knowledge is subjected by Plato to the Socratic elenchus, where he attempts to make a criticism of it. I believe that this section of the dialogue is an extended excursus, aimed towards introducing and examining a model of self-knowledge different from that of Socrates, Critias’ model of self-knowledge. This model of self-knowledge poses a whole series of philosophical problems; the relation between the subject and the object of knowledge, the possibility of their identification or the distinction between them, the possibility of the existence of an internal and external object of knowledge, the relation of this model of self-knowledge with other kinds or domains of knowledge, and the question whether external knowledge or knowledge of other knowledges is a constituent of knowledge of knowledge. The question of the possibility of knowledge of knowledge is not definitely rejected, especially if we consider that in all of this discussion there is a hint towards the way in which philosophy works and relates to other kinds of knowledge. I believe, however, that in the last part of the dialogue, where the knowledge of good and bad emerges, Plato again meets Socrates and becomes reconciled with him. The only knowledge that is useful and beneficial is knowledge of good and bad. In this way Plato chooses to put forward a self-conscious model of self-knowledge, which does not presuppose, as Critias’ model does, the critical examination of knowledge or the critical distance from knowledge. This self-conscious model of self-knowledge is connected with the knowledge of good and bad. On the one hand doing of good presupposes knowledge of good and bad and on the other, “doing one’s own things” presupposes self-knowledge. The possibility of knowing good and bad is ensured by each person, either through looking deep within himself or by orientating towards the Idea of the Good itself.
    Źródło:
    Studia Gilsoniana; 2016, 5, 1; 179-194
    2300-0066
    Pojawia się w:
    Studia Gilsoniana
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Word in Education: Good, Bad and Other Word
    Autorzy:
    Carr, David
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/454158.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    Education
    Word
    Soul
    Reason
    Plato
    Christianity
    Knowledge
    Opis:
    St John’s Gospel identifies logos, translated as English ‘Word’, as the divine source of the wisdom or truth of the Christian message, if not with the godhead as such. However, given the cultural and intellectual influence of Greek thought on early Christian literature, one need not be surprised that these (and other) theological or metaphysical associations of Word are almost exactly replicated and prefigured in the dialogues of Plato, for whom formation of the divine aspect or element of human soul clearly turned upon access to or participation in the wisdom of logos. This paper explores the moral and spiritual connections between logos or Word, reason and soul in such Platonic dialogues as Gorgias, Republic and Theaetetus as well as the implications of conceiving education as the pursuit of such Word for ultimate human flourishing.
    Źródło:
    Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education; 2020, 17; 13-30
    2543-7585
    Pojawia się w:
    Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The World is Too Much with Us: Apparent and Real Platonic Views of Intelligence and Knowledge for Education
    Autorzy:
    David, Carr
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/454218.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
    Tematy:
    intelligence
    knowledge
    Plato
    selective vs egalitarian education
    Opis:
    From Plato onwards, notions of intelligence and ability – and of their implications for human flourishing – have had a chequered educational history. Following some attention to the influence of IQ theory on (arguably neo-Platonic) post-WW2 British selective state education, this paper proceeds to consider the more egalitarian educational reaction to such selection from the nineteen-sixties onwards. However, while appreciative of the individual and social benefits of such greater educational equality, the paper proceeds to ask whether the notions of individual growth, fulfilment and flourishing that they may seem to entail are entirely appropriate for the human world of tomorrow
    Źródło:
    Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education; 2019, 15; 11-30
    2543-7585
    Pojawia się w:
    Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Argument and Performance: Alcibiades’ Behavior in the Symposium and Plato’s Analysis in the Laws
    Argument and Performance: Alcibiades’ Behavior in the Symposium and Plato’s Analysis in the Laws
    Autorzy:
    Erler, Michael
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/633616.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    Plato
    Alcibiades
    Symposium
    Laws
    knowledge
    performance
    argument
    weakness
    Opis:
    Argument and literary form, and how they both relate to each other, are crucial aspects of any interpretation of the Platonic dialogues. Plato the author and Plato the philosopher always work hand in hand in that Plato the author tries to serve Plato the philosopher. It is, therefore, an appropriate principle for approaching the study of Plato’s philosophy to take into account the literary aspects of the dialogues and to ask how Plato’s literary art of writing could possibly support his philosophical message and, for instance, to consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy. In the present paper , I argue that the performance of the characters plays an important role in this context. I discuss various passages in the Laws which analyse the weakness of the will and I compare what Plato says there with the performance of Alcibiades in the Symposium. I conclude that the passages in the Laws can be read as a kind of commentary on Alcibiades’ behavior and I consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy.
    Argument and literary form, and how they both relate to each other, are crucial aspects of any interpretation of the Platonic dialogues. Plato the author and Plato the philosopher always work hand in hand in that Plato the author tries to serve Plato the philosopher. It is, therefore, an appropriate principle for approaching the study of Plato’s philosophy to take into account the literary aspects of the dialogues and to ask how Plato’s literary art of writing could possibly support his philosophical message and, for instance, to consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy. In the present paper , I argue that the performance of the characters plays an important role in this context. I discuss various passages in the Laws which analyse the weakness of the will and I compare what Plato says there with the performance of Alcibiades in the Symposium. I conclude that the passages in the Laws can be read as a kind of commentary on Alcibiades’ behavior and I consider what this relation means in the context of the debate about developementalism versus unitarianism in Plato’s philosophy
    Źródło:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua; 2017, 8, 1; 213-224
    2082-7539
    Pojawia się w:
    Peitho. Examina Antiqua
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The meaning of Antiquity: Septem Liberales Artes
    Znaczenie antyku. Siedem sztuk wyzwolonych
    Autorzy:
    Dürüşken, Çiğdem
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1045888.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-03-21
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
    Tematy:
    knowledge
    mental education
    liberal arts
    philosophy
    Plato’s cave
    tree of wisdom
    Opis:
    The article aims to address the meaning of Antiquity as it appears in the educational system of this most influential civilization.
    Źródło:
    Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae; 2018, 28, 2; 65-75
    0302-7384
    Pojawia się w:
    Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    In Defense of Knowing, In Defense of Doubting: Cicero Engages Totalizing Skepticism, Sensate Materialism, and Pragmatist Realism in "Academica"
    Autorzy:
    Prus, Robert
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2138833.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2006-12-21
    Wydawca:
    Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
    Tematy:
    Knowledge
    Skepticism
    Pragmatism
    Realism
    Relativism
    Symbolic interactionism
    Postmodernism
    Cicero
    Plato’s Academy
    Opis:
    Whereas contemporary scholars in the social sciences and humanities often envision themselves as exceptionally, if not uniquely, attentive to the problematics of human knowing and acting, the competing philosophies of totalizing skepticism, sensate materialism, divine worldviews, and pragmatist realism have a much more enduring presence in Western social thought. Plato (c420-348BCE) introduces a broad array of philosophic standpoints (theological, idealist, skepticist, materialist, and pragmatist) in his texts and Aristotle (c384-322BCE) addresses human knowing and acting in more distinctively secular, pluralist terms. Still, more scholarly considerations of human knowing and acting would be comparatively neglected by Cicero’s time and even more so after his era. Although much overlooked by those in the human sciences, Cicero’s Academica re-engages a number of highly consequential issues pertaining to the matter of human knowing and acting. Likewise, whereas Christian theologians often were hostile to heathen (relativist, materialist, pragmatist) philosophic viewpoints, important residues of these approaches would remain part of the Western intellectual tradition though Augustine’s (c354- 430 BCE) works. Academica is centered on the historically sustained skepticist emphases of Plato’s Academy (c350-50CE) but Cicero’s text also attends to some competing viewpoints that developed along the way. In addition to (1) acknowledging some of the intellectual shifts in Plato’s Academy over three centuries, this statement also (2) provides a pragmatist critique of the totalizing skepticism of the Academicians, and (3) illustrates the ways in which Cicero, as a representative and defender of Academician skepticism, deals with critiques pertaining to the problem of human knowing and acting. Thus, whereas Cicero is best known as a rhetorician and his text is presented as an instance of rhetorical interchange, Cicero’s Academica also may be seen as “a defense of knowing” and “a defense of doubting,” two of the most central features of scholarship.
    Źródło:
    Qualitative Sociology Review; 2006, 2, 3; 21-47
    1733-8077
    Pojawia się w:
    Qualitative Sociology Review
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    The Topographies of the Philosophical Path, or on the Consequences of Not Wearing Shoes
    Topografie drogi filozoficznej, albo o konsekwencjach nienoszenia obuwia
    Autorzy:
    Kubok, Dariusz
    Jędrzejko, Paweł
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2097186.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2021-12-30
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
    Tematy:
    metafilozofia
    sceptycyzm
    zetetycyzm
    Eros
    wiedza
    Platon
    Uczta
    filozofia
    antydogmatyzm
    mądrość
    metaphilosophy
    skepticism
    zeteticism
    knowledge
    Plato
    The Symposium
    anti-dogmatism
    wisdom
    Opis:
    The purpose of the considerations presented in this article is to analyze the status of philosophy in terms of its problem-solving potential, or, more simply, to trace the possible topographies of a philosophical path. The point of departure, but also the central subject of my research, is a passage from Plato’s The Symposium (201d–204c), containing an emblematic, though ambiguous, description of a philosophical journey. The key problems that this description poses, particularly in the area of its metaphilosophical consequences, certainly deserve a more profound reflection. Therefore, in the subsequent sections of the article, I present – and critically discuss – some of the most significant interpretations of Plato’s passage, emphasizing their (meta) philosophical implications. The latter, in turn, are organized according to the categories of the modes of philosophy, as proposed by Sextus Empiricus (Pyr., I, 1–4). On the basis of the proposed reflection upon the topography of the philosophical path and upon the character of the generally accepted model of knowledge, I endeavor to provide an explanation that, while avoiding the reefs of dogmatic consequences of thinking about philosophy, would account for – and acknowledge – the uncertainty inscribed in philosophy, both with respect to particular resolutions and with respect to the possibility of its own self-fulfillment. For this purpose, other narratives of paths, journeying, and pursuits – metaphorically unlike those offered by Plato, prove useful.
    Zasadniczym celem rozważań w tym artykule jest analiza statusu filozofii w zakresie jej spełnialności czy też po prostu możliwe topografie drogi filozoficznej. Punktem wyjścia i zarazem głównym przedmiotem dociekań jest ustęp z Uczty Platona (20 d–204c), w którym znaleźć można emblematyczny, choć niejednoznaczny opis podróży filozoficznej. Warto pokazać kluczowe trudności związane z tym opisem, a przede wszystkim jego metafilozoficzne konsekwencje. Ukazane i krytycznie omówione zostaną wybrane znaczące interpretacje tego fragmentu z uwypukleniem ich (meta)filozoficznych implikacji, a te zostaną skatalogowane w świetle Sextusowego podziału filozofii (Pyr., I, 1-4). Na podstawi refleksji na temat topografii drogi filozoficznej, a także akceptowanego modelu wiedzy, zaproponowana zostanie taka wykładnia, która stara się ominąć silnie dogmatyczne konsekwencje myślenia o filozofii, jednocześnie akceptując zawartą w niej niepewność, zarówno w odniesieniu do konkretnych rozstrzygnięć, jak i w stosunku do własnej spełnialności. W tym celu wykorzystane zostaną metaforycznie inne niż Platońskie opowieści o drogach i dążeniu.
    Źródło:
    ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura; 2021, 43; 253-277
    1508-6305
    2544-3186
    Pojawia się w:
    ER(R)GO: Teoria – Literatura – Kultura
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Nieskończoność Boga u Orygenesa: przyczyna wielkiego nieporozumienia
    The infiniteness of God in Origen: a great misunderstanding
    Autorzy:
    Mrugalski, Damian
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/612720.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2017
    Wydawca:
    Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
    Tematy:
    nieskończoność Boga
    moc Boga
    wiedza Boga
    filozofia patrystyczna
    Orygenes
    Filon z Aleksandrii
    Klemens z Aleksandrii
    wpływ greckiej filozofii na chrześcijaństwo
    Platon
    Arystoteles
    Plotyn
    the infiniteness of God
    the power of God
    the knowledge of God
    patristic philosophy
    Origen
    Philo of Alexandria
    Clement of Alexandria
    the influence of Greek philosophy on Christianity
    Plato
    Aristotle
    Plotinus
    Opis:
    Many historians of ideas – philosophers and theologians – believe that the first thinker to introduce the concept of a positive understanding of the infiniteness of God was Plotinus. In Greek philosophy, however, something infinite was understood as “unfinished” and therefore “imperfect”. All the same, according to many scholars, Christianity took the concept of the infiniteness of God precisely from the founder of neo-Platonism. One of the reasons for which researchers of the doctrines of the ancient world persist in this thesis even today is the fact that, in the writings of Origen – who lived at the time of Plotinus – we find the expressions which might give readers the impression that God’s power is finite, since God brought into existence a finite number of created beings. This article argues that this widely-held interpretation is wrong. Philo and Clement, a Jewish and a Christian thinker, both of Alexandria – from whose doctrines Origen borrowed abundantly – wrote of an infinite God before Origen did. In the surviving works of Origen, moreover, he nowhere states explicitly that God’s power is finite, although it is true that, according to him, God created a finite number of creatures. The controversial thesis of a finite God is found only in fragments written by ancient critics of Origen’s teaching. A detailed analysis of Origen’s own original pronouncements on the nature, power and knowledge of God leads one to the conclusion that the fragments that have led many historians of ideas into confusion, either do not represent the views of Origen himself or present Origen’s teachings inaccurately. Moreover, in Origen’s surviving Greek writings, we find the term ¥peiron used in reference to God. This is precisely the term used by Greek philosophers to designate infinity. We may posit, then, that the concept of the infiniteness of God, positively understood, was born of the encounter of Greek philosophy with the Bible – that is, with the Jewish and Christian doctrines of the first centuries of the common era. Origen, who came slightly later, continued the thought of his predecessors and does not contradict them anywhere in his surviving works. What remains to be examined is the question of whether Plotinus himself made use of the work of Jewish and Christian thinkers in forming his doctrine of an infinite God, rather than those thinkers leaning on Plotinus, as is usually assumed.
    Źródło:
    Vox Patrum; 2017, 67; 437-475
    0860-9411
    2719-3586
    Pojawia się w:
    Vox Patrum
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-10 z 10

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies