Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Pachomius" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Богословський прототекст і художній вимір книги Пахомія Войни-Оранського “Zwierciadło albo zaslona naprzeciw uszczypliwey Perspektywie” (1645)
    Theological Prototext and Artistic Content of the Book of Pachomiusz Woyna-Orański “Zwierciadło albo zaslona naprzeciw uszczypliwey Perspektywie” (1645)
    Autorzy:
    Tkachuk, Ruslan
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/972833.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2018-09-01
    Wydawca:
    Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki Euroregionalnej im. Alcide De Gasperi w Józefowie
    Tematy:
    Ukrainian polemical literature;
    Pachomius Voyna-Oranskyy;
    the metropolitanate of Kyiv;
    Kasian Sakovich
    Opis:
    In the paper polemics of the Uniate theologian Pachomius Voyna-Oranskyy with catholic Kasian Sakovich, which occurred in the 40s of XVIIth century in Rich Pospolyta has been reviewed. Purpose. The aim of the article is to research the polemics of Pachomius Voyna-Oranskyy with Kasian Sakovich in the work “Zwierciadło albo zaslona naprzeciw uszczypliwey Perspektywie”. To analyze stylistic elements, figures of speech used by the author. Methods. There have been used historical and cultural (the work of Pachomius Voyna-Oranskyy is analyzed in the context of church and social relations of that time), descriptive (the contents of the book of Uniate author have been revealed, the main questions of religious polemics have been pointed out), hermeneutics (it is described the ways of interpretation of the Bible) methods. Results. Pachomius Voyna-Oranskyy wrote the book “Zwierciadło albo zaslona naprzeciw uszczypliwey Perspektywie” as a response to the work of Kasian Sakovich “Epanorthosis abo Perspectiwa”, in which the catholic author criticizes the Uniate hierarchy for keeping to the rituals of Orthodox Church. The polemicist, denying the statements of catholic theologian, characterizes the dogmas of Kyiv Uniate Church, accentuates the ritual concordance with the practices of Catholic Church. In his work the author uses metaphors, antitheses, evaluative epithets, rhetorical modes.
    Źródło:
    Intercultural Communication; 2018, 5, 2; 47-62
    2451-0998
    Pojawia się w:
    Intercultural Communication
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Życie codzienne mnicha cenobity w Egipcie na podstawie reguły św. Pachomiusza
    Everyday life of cenobite monk in Egypt based on the „rule” of Pachomius
    Autorzy:
    Dziewulski, Jakub
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/495660.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2012
    Wydawca:
    Towarzystwo Naukowe Franciszka Salezego
    Tematy:
    Pachomius
    “Rule”
    Monasticism
    Everyday life
    Cenobites
    Church in Egypt
    Egypt
    Opis:
    The article presents the everyday life of cenobite monk starting from attempting to describe the ancient monastery itself, by showing the buildings in it, such as living quarters called “houses”. In monastery there were also everyday usable rooms like “the place of praying” where monks were praying and weaving baskets or “the chamber of sick”. Pachomius thought also about economic buildings such as workshops, store-rooms and many kinds of storehouses. Next part of the article is concerned about all functions, which monks could take charge of. First of all there was the superior of the monastery who had almost absolute authority, than his “second”, who was his substitute. Also each house separately had his superior and his “second”. In Pachomius’ monastery we can find a minister, who was taking care of things connected with work and a very important gate keeper and also workers like: gardeners, cooks bakers and raftsmen. In the final part article shows how does the prayers, which were very important in the monastery, look like and when they took place. We can get known with the work, almost as important as the prayers, which happened in the monastery and outside at the fields. Monks had also free time consisted of sleeping and the meals. Pachomius was a soldier so he put in his “Rule” much precepts about discipline and obedience to superiors, which checked up very good for his monks and later monastic life.
    Źródło:
    Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe; 2012, 31; 243-258
    1232-8766
    Pojawia się w:
    Seminare. Poszukiwania naukowe
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Monks at work in Eastern Mediterranean: Ideals and reality
    Autorzy:
    Wipszycka, Ewa
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2083664.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020
    Wydawca:
    Fundacja im. Rafała Taubenschlaga
    Tematy:
    voluntary poverty
    St. Anthony
    Pachomius
    Horsiese
    Basil of Caesarea
    Evagrius of Pontus
    John Cassian
    melete
    Messalians
    ‘wandering and begging’ monks
    Rabbula
    Syriac monastic rules
    almsgiving
    Opis:
    The main question that the present paper tries to answer is as follows: since two discordant precepts concerning work were to be found in the New Testament, how did monks behave? One precept treated work as a duty, the other recommended not to care about one’s maintenance. The monks followed in their behaviour either the first or the second precept. As a result of disputes that took place in the fourth century the opinion prevailed that work was the better choice. It is important for us to find out when and under what circumstances that choice was done by the majority of the monastic movement in the East. It is also important to see what arguments were used by the monks of Late Antiquity in order to settle the conflict between the two discordant precepts. This conflict worried many and caused a renewal of a dispute that seemed to have been closed. Two ways of reasoning in favour of monastic work were generally used: monks might and should pray and work at the same time, satisfying both precepts; monks ought to work in order to be able to give alms, and this conferred to work a meaning that went beyond immediate usefulness. Praying and working at the same time was not always feasible in actual practice, but this did not bother authors of ascetic treatises.
    Źródło:
    The Journal of Juristic Papyrology; 2020, 50; 299-342
    0075-4277
    Pojawia się w:
    The Journal of Juristic Papyrology
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies