Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Wyszukujesz frazę "Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków" wg kryterium: Temat


Tytuł:
Prace Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków nad architekturą współczesną
Autorzy:
Olszewski, Andrzej K.
Włodarczyk, Wojciech
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537673.pdf
Data publikacji:
1976
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ODZ
ewidencja architektury współczesnej
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1976, 2; 136-137
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ogólnopolska Konferencja poświęcona zagadnieniom konserwacji malowideł ściennych
Autorzy:
Schuster-Gawłowska, Małgorzata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538724.pdf
Data publikacji:
1965
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
konserwacja malowideł ściennych
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
freski z Faras
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1965, 1; 61-63
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo!
Dear Readers!
Autorzy:
Florjanowicz, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537896.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Krajowy Ośrodek Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Ośrodek Ochrony Zabytkowego Krajobrazu
Ośrodek Ochrony Dziedzictwa Archeologicznego
Opis:
The National Board of Poland, the publisher of the Ochrona Zabytków magazine, was established in 2011, but is already celebrating the 50th anniversary of its activity. How is that possible? The National Board of Poland, formerly the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments, is the legal successor of the Centre for Documentation of Monuments (CDM) – an institution to which the Polish conservation owes very much. CDM has been established by the then Minister of Culture and Art in 1962 and accomplished its tasks successfully for four successive decades. In 2002 the former CDM and the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape were merged to establish the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments (NCRDM), into which the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage was incorporated in 2007. In 2011, by the decision of the Minister of Culture and National Heritage, NCRDM changed its name to the National Heritage Board of Poland. We decided to celebrate this magnificent anniversary with a special issue of our magazine. It will contain information about achievements of the Centre for Documentation of Monuments during 40 years of its existence and about the activities of the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape and the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage, i.e., the institutions on the basis of which NCRDM and later the National Heritage Board of Poland was established. The last jubilee issue of Ochrona Zabytków was published on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of CDM exactly 10 years ago, at the beginning of 2002 (Ochrona Zabytków no. 1, 2002). A few months later, CDM ceased to exist in its then-current structure. Its ideas were continued by the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments and later the National Heritage Board of Poland. However, the current jubilee issue is different from the one published 10 years ago. Successive articles were arranged in a manner showing the continuity of the mission of our institution; articles on historical topics are accompanied by texts of current employees of the National Heritage Board of Poland (NHB), who continue the presented projects, at the same time adapting them to contemporary expectations of recipients and making use of the latest methodology. Anyway, innovation was the trademark feature of CDM – after all, it was one of the first conservation institutions in the world that collected documentation about historic object resources of the entire country in a standardised manner. It is something worth remembering. In the changing reality, we have to adapt the methodology of our activities to challenges of contemporary times, but the mission of CDM that was defined in its statutes 50 years ago remains valid: „to improve the stock-taking of monuments for the rational planning of their reconstruction and conservation”. Obviously, monuments are no longer reconstructed today, but the mission of NHB is still to create the basis for the sustainable preservation of heritage by gathering and disseminating knowledge about historical monuments, by setting standards for their protection and conservation, and by raising the social awareness of Polish cultural heritage in order to preserve it for posterity. The National Heritage Board of Poland acts at the intersection of many different fields of activity of the state and society and, therefore, runs a multitude of projects addressed to diverse target groups. Consequently, it is extremely difficult to pass information about the full scope of our activity to all interested persons. This volume does not contain all articles concerning the entire activity of NHB, either. For instance, the entire area of international co-operation was not covered, including important issues such as the implementation of part of the provisions of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, or expert co-operation with the Council of Europe and the European Commission that has been carried out successfully for a few years. There is also no mention of our activity concerning the support of conservation initiatives in the Ukraine and Belarus or the long-term program of revitalisation of the Muskau Park, which is managed directly by NHB. The role of NHB in the recognition of the most valuable objects as Monuments of History and our intense efforts to create their strong brand are not mentioned, either. Many other areas of NHB’s activity were not covered as well – not because they are less important, but because there was not enough space to write about everything. However, the primary idea of this special issue of Ochrona Zabytków was to present the original tasks of CDM and the manner in which their implementation is continued by NHB today. And the number of these tasks is continuously increasing and there will be many opportunities to write about them, also in this magazine. According to the promise made in the previous issue, Ochrona Zabytków is being transformed into a more interesting magazine that reflects more closely real and current conservation issues. When preparing this special issue, we assumed that each of us had the right to include his own memories and we treat the published texts as authors’ works. This applies particularly to the authors who participated in activities of CDM and other predecessors of NHB and look back on 50 years of achievements from a slightly different perspective. Some of them contain critical remarks about our current activities, which we humbly accept and for which I would like to thank very much here. Articles by current employees of NHB were written according to a completely different principle – they contain no criticism of the past. This is not our role, because we feel that we continue the idea of CDM formulated 50 years ago and, in spite of various twists and turns of history, our task is to pursue this mission and try to fulfil it as best as possible. We do not want to criticise things from the past, but to evolve and adapt our current activities to requirements of contemporary times. I believe that we succeed in doing this and I hope that you have this feeling, too. Finally, let me wish all of you, including former and current employees and collaborators of CDM, CPHL, the Centre for Archaeological Rescue Research, CPAH, NCRDM and NHB, in particular all former directors of those renowned institutions, all the best on the occasion of the jubilee of the 50th anniversary. I would like to thank you for your work, knowledge and passion, because it is the passion, commitment and personal attitude to the tasks being undertaken that connects authors of past successes of CDM with today’s creators of the image of the National Heritage Board of Poland.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 3-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Aby z dawnego bytu wartości utrwalić i upowszechnić…
To preserve and disseminate values from the former existence…
Autorzy:
Konopka, Marek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537124.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Spis zabytków architektury i budownictwa
Katalog zabytków sztuki
ewidencja zabytków
KOBiDZ
Opis:
The Centre for Documentation of Monuments (CDM) was created at the end of 1961 and at the beginning of 1962. Currently it functions under the name “National Heritage Board of Poland”. The axis around which the system of protection of historical monuments in the People’s Republic of Poland was built was the register of monuments set up after the regaining of independence in 1918 and continued in the Law on the protection of cultural property and on museums that was passed in 1962. The establishment of CDM is strictly connected with political changes (the “thaw”) that happened after October 1956. The restoration, conservation and organisation of museums was entrusted after the war to the central institution named the General Directorate for Museums and Protection of Monuments, which was headed by Stanisław Lorentz and Prof. Jan Zachwatowicz (General Conservator of Monuments). At the end of the 1950s, museums and protection of monuments were managed centrally by the Ministry of Culture of Art and its subordinated entity – the Administration of Museums and Monument Protection (AMMP) (the counterpart of a department), the head of which was doc. dr Kazimierz Malinowski, an art historian. In years 1958-1960, works were undertaken in AMMP to create a list of monuments of architecture and art on the “green card” form. In 1962, after a new law was passed, the state took over responsibility for the condition of monuments, and the monument was defined as a cultural property entered into the register. The prepared list resulted in the classification of collected materials and the division of monuments into five groups, where the highest classes were subject to protection and the lowest classes were left without care on the state level. K. Malinowski was the originator of the idea to establish a new institution – the Centre for Documentation of Monuments, whose main collection consisted of documentary materials gathered in the Ministry of Culture and, primarily, cards of the list of monuments, which encompassed 35,000 items. Thus, at the beginning CDM became an “external” department of AMMP. The regulations specified the existence of five departments: non-movable monuments, movable monuments, museum exhibits, archives and the library and issuing of AMMP’s publications. This activity began with the Ochrona zabytków quarterly. The department of non-movable monuments dealt with objects of architecture and historic buildings. The idea to prepare a register of movable monuments required the scope of such a project to be determined. The museology department prepared the Muzealnictwo annual. Within 10 years of its existence, CDM gained the status of a central institution collecting documentation concerning the protection of monuments and museology and became an unofficial publishing house. Issued in one volume in 1964, the list of monuments of architecture was published in 17 journals in division into voivodeships existing at that time. In the 1970s, monument protection was becoming an instrument of „historical policy” again. The title of the General Conservator of Monuments was restored. The criteria of “selection of monuments” applied in the list, which completely ignored objects from the 2nd half of the 19th century and the 20th century, traditional wooden buildings – characteristic elements of the cultural landscape of Poland, monuments of industry and technology, historic cemeteries and archaeological sites were questioned during the discussion published in Ochrona zabytków. In 1975 the function of Director of CDM was taken over by Prof. Wojciech Kalinowski, an architect and a town planner, who prepared a new conception of the institution and undertaken the idea of preparation of a full list and record of monuments. From 1975 new models of records and instructions for their implementation began to be developed, resulting in the preparation of the “white card” of monuments of architecture, the address list and the three-level system supplemented with a historical study. The preparation of the register of historic parks, gardens and cemeteries was started, too. The last link of the system became the register of archaeological sites (KESA card). New forms and instructions were published in 1981. Glossaries necessary for the proper description of monuments were being prepared for all specialistic fields. It was also at that time that Spotkania z zabytkami – the first and only magazine about popular science in the Eastern Bloc countries – began to be released. The emphasising of the importance of the monument in the context of cultural landscape became more intense in the 1980s. These discussions made it possible to prepare amendments to the 1962 Law. At the time of political transformations in 1989, the State Monument Protection Service managed by the General Conservator of Monuments was established. On the voivodeship level, SMPSs were formed by offices of voivodeship conservators of monuments. One of the authorities exercising the protection of cultural property was the Director of CDM, who performed the following tasks: support of SMPSs, keeping of the central record of monuments and co-ordination of SMPS units in this respect, development of the rules of documentation of monuments, preparation of the substantive basis for the conservator’s policy of protection of the cultural environment. In the amendment to the law, the care of monuments was entrusted to their users. In 1990 CDM gained a new statute and new role: it was transformed from the institution keeping the register of monuments into the institution supporting the office of the General Conservator of Monuments on the one hand and voivodeship conservators of monuments in historical regions of the country on the other hand. This purpose was to be served by regional centres – divisions of CDM forming interdisciplinary teams of specialists. At the beginning of the 1990s, the Centre and its divisions were computerised. As a result of changes introduced in 1990, the Centre became a content base of state administration in the field of heritage protection (at the time of its establishment, i.e. in 1962, CDM employed 6 persons, and by 1991 this number rose to 160, including 100 persons in 12 regional divisions). However, the new law on the protection and care of monuments adopted in 2003 changed the cultural heritage protection system once again. In 2002, CDM was merged with the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape, which had dealt with the subject area of cultural landscape until then, and its name was changed to the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments. In 2011, the National Heritage Board of Poland was established.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 9-34
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z działalności Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków : weryfikacja zabytków architektury i ewidencja miast
Autorzy:
Charytańska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536757.pdf
Data publikacji:
1962
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ODZ
weryfikacja zabytków architektury i budownictwa
ewidencja miast zabytkowych w Polsce
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1962, 2; 69-70
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków w latach 1969-1970
Autorzy:
Charytańska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539622.pdf
Data publikacji:
1971
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
działalność ODZ 1969-1970
„Miasta zabytkowe w Polsce”
Teki Glinki
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1971, 1; 57-61
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków - instytucja ochrony dziedzictwa narodowego
CENTRE FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS — AN INSTITUTION PROTECTING NATIONAL HERITAGE
Autorzy:
Kunkel, Robert M.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536110.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ewidencja dóbr kultury w Polsce
inwentarz narodowy dóbr kultury
dziedzictwo kulturowe
Opis:
The exchange and transformations of man’s material surrounding is a natural phenomenon, but societies wish to simultaneously preserve the fullest possible knowledge about their past. The physical salvaging and conservation of all old buildings or objects exceeds the potential of even the most prosperous countries. Inventories and documentation of cultural heritage remain therefore, the basic conservation undertakings, and in the case of impermanent objects or those not appreciated for their “values”, they remain probably the most essential activity possible. In the form of drawings, photographs or descriptions they make it possible to relay information about non-extant buildings and transformed towns. Considering that certain domains of scientific research, such as archeological excavations conducted by means of traditional methods are an intentional and sanctioned form of destroying select fragments of national legacy, the importance of their thorough documentation is ascribed even greater significance. In the cases of certain cultural property, which by its very nature is transitory and impermanent, such as a concert or a theatrical spectacle, its record does not prolong the existence of the given phenomenon, but merely recalls it. Other forms of artistic activity recognise exclusively the documentation of a given work, as in the case of theatrical spectacles broadcast on television or studio music recordings. It is not the spectacle itself but its record which is protected by copyright, and can be frequently copied on assorted carriers and recreated. The documentation of historical monuments in normal conditions serves as material for scientific studies and research concerning the given monument as well as the foundation for conservation projects. In instances of natural calamities or wartime devastation, such documentation may serve the reconstruction of, at the very least, the outer form of those damaged objects which constitute an essential part of natural heritage. In traditional conservation circles, attached to the “cult of substance”, launched by Ruskin, the conception of documented records conceived as a substitute for the conservation of the very substance of cultural property, produces considerable resistance. The prime task of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments is to conduct a record of cultural property in Poland, constantly brought up to date and supplemented. The central files encompass all historical and conservation data about mobile and immobile monuments registered in Poland (as long as they are not featured in museums, libraries or archives possessing their own inventories). This is the nature of the objectives of institutions documenting cultural heritage throughout the whole of Europe, and creating information resources which serve the comprehension and interpretation of assorted elements of the cultural landscape of our continent. In order to render comparative opinions or conclusions possible, it is necessary to accept a uniform and generally understood manner of documentary registration. This purpose is served by special systems, such as the so-called Core Data Index, accepted as a European Union recommendation for architectural and construction objects, or the Polish system of registering archeological sites, known as AZP (the Archeological Photograph of Poland). Their joint feature is the fact that the process of filing is entrusted to specialists, and the treatment of knowledge about historical monuments is envisaged as common property. This has been the heretofore praxis in Poland. The registration and documentation of cultural property was entrusted to services dealing with the protection of historical monuments, while a specialised central cultural institution was responsible for the co-ordination of those operations. At its thirteenth session held in Paris in 1964 the UNESCO General Conference recommended that each member state should prepare “a national inventory of cultural p roperty in its territory” (§10), confirming this proposition at its sixteenth session, also organised in Paris (1970) and in the text of the Convention passed at the time (Article 5. b). Additionally, a consecutive (seventeenth) session formulated A recommendation concerning the protection o f national cultural and natural legacy, whose point 13. b declares that: “Member states (...) should establish in their territory specialist services whose tasks (...) would entail predominantly preparing an inventory o f protected heritage and establishing a specialised documentary s e r v i c e points 29 and 30 stated: “Each member state should prepare as soon as possible an inventory o f its cultural and natural legacy, and include into this inventory also property which — albeit without particular value — comprises an inseparable fragment o f the environment to which it belongs”, and “that the outcome o f inventory work (...) should be constantly brought up to date and arranged in suitable order”. The value of all collections and databases, whose gathering required long-term activity consisting of the co-operation of numerous specialists and institutions, depends on the stability of criteria for the selection of information and its recording. Such an approach offers the possibility of comparing particular records and statistical research. All campaigns based on subjective legal-official or political criteria, with changing opinions about “historical features” and the state conservation policy, together with the tendency, natural among p articular recorders of national legacy, towards expanding bases concerning problems of interest to them (often only to them), introduce chaos into the image of cultural legacy. Moreover, it is important to conduct such bases in a holistic manner, encompassing the whole country, and to manage them via a central institution. Although cultural heritage, which is composed of elements introduced by local communities (both in the past and today) is a moral duty of the whole nation, the process of multiplying knowledge about its resources cannot be borne only by particular counties. Contrary to the proclivities of part of the administration or scientists, the gathered information should be accessible to all those interested, in accordance to regulations binding also other public collections. The awareness of all those facts makes it possible to guarantee, not only formally but also for the sake of suitably conceived social interest, the constitutional right of Polish citizens towards their national legacy, and to wish the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments successive decades of undisturbed and useful work. Robert M. Kunkel Vice-Director of the Centre for the Documentation of Historical Monuments
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 1-3
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Z działalności Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków
SUR L’ACTIVITE DU CENTRE DE DOCUMENTATION DES MONUMENTS HISTORIQUES
Autorzy:
Charytańska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538441.pdf
Data publikacji:
1966
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
działalność ODZ
historia ODZ
ewidencja zabytków nieruchomych
fototeka zabytków architektury
ewidencja miast zabytkowych
Opis:
Le Centre de Documentation des Monuments Historiques fut crée le 1er janvier il'962 en vertu de l’arrêté du Ministre de la Culture et des Arts du 22 décembre 1Θ61. Le Centre jouit d’une organisation autonomique; il est toutefois subordonné à la Direction des Musées et de la Protection des Monuments Historiques. Le Centre assume la tache de rassembler la documentation sur les monuments historiques d’architecture et du bâtiment, de l’urbanisme, des arts plastiques et de la muséologie. Le Centre est réparti en plusieurs sections qui constituent sa composition structurale et notamment: 1. La Section des monuments-immeubles 2. La Section des monuments-meubles 3. La Section de la muséologie 4. La Section des archives et des publications δ. La Bibliothèque spécialisée. Dans la période écoulée, les principales missions du Centre ont été présentées d’après les résultats des travaux réalisés par chaque section respective. La Section des monuments-immeubles a procédé, à partir du recensement des monuments d’architecture et du bâtiment effectué „in situ”, à un classement des dits monuments en 4 groupes selon leur valeur. 52 monuments ont été mis en évidence dans le groupe qualifié de classe „О” — c’est-à-dire d’une valeur internationale. Au cours des années 1962—1963, l’on a procédé au recensement de toutes les villes et localités en Pologne qui, au fil de l’histoire, ont obtenu des franchises urbaines. Cette activité continue. Un catalogue contenant les mesurages des monuments historiques d’architecture et du bâtiment est en voie de réalisation. Il paraîtra probablement en 1967 ou en 1968. Le dossier photographique du Centre comprend 80 000 pièces — des photos de monuments historiques d’architecture et du bâtiment. En plus, il possède 4.000 épreuves négatives. Une bibliographie des monuments d’architecture et d’art plastique est mise en train et tenue à jour au Centre de Documentation. La Section des monuments-meubles est chargée du contrôle professionnel du recensement des monuments d’art plastique sur le lieu de leur placement actuel. C’est un travail de longue échéance et qui na peut s’effectuer qu’en plusieurs temps. Chaque année, la section organise des conférences scientifiques spécialisées dont le sujet porte sur la conservation des matériaux ci-contre: en· 1962 — le métal en 1963 — le tissu et la peau en 1964 —■ les peintures murales en 1965 — séminaire sur les „Problèmes esthétiques de la conservation des peintures murales”, en 1966 — la pierre dans l’architecture et la sculpture. La Section des monumenits-meubles a demandé aux spécialistes d’étudier plus à fond le problème de la conservation de la porte de Gniezno, du portail d’ Olbin, de la Console de Moise dans l’église Saint- Jean de Toruń. Successivement, d’étudier aussi les méthodes de traitement pour la ' conservation des pierres. La Section muséologique s’occupe de la bibliographie des publications sur les problèmes muséologiques, elle la complète et la tient à jour. En même temps, elle met sur pied un répertoire des musées contenant les principales informations sur tous les musées en Pologne. La Section des archives et des publications rassemble les extraits des écrits archivaux et de la correspondance concernant les monuments historiques, les artistes, les artisans et les mécènes de l’art. Le Centre lui-même publie 4 revues, notamment: „Ochrona Zabytków” (La protection des monuments historiques), revue trimestrielle (19 années de parution); „Muzealnictwo” (Muséologie), périodique (14 fascicules); „Teka Konserwatorska” (Le dossier du conservateur), „Biblioteka Muzealnictwa i Ochrony Zabytków” (La bibliothèque de la muséologie et de la protection des monuments), série A — imprimée, série В — polycopiée, où paraissent tous les matériaux auxiliaires destinés au sources de la conservation et de la muséologie, aussi bien que les rapports et les comptes-rendus des conférences organisées par la Direction des Musées et de la Protection des Monuments en intelligence avec le Centre. La Bibliothèque spécialisée a pour mission de rassembler les publications relatives à la conservation des monuments historiques et à la muséologie. Elle est pourvue en outre des oeuvres fondamentales sur l’histoire de l’art et sur les sciences auxiliaires. Son assortiment de livres se compose de 10.700 volumes d’imprimés compacts et de 52 titres de périodiques parus en Pologne et à l’étranger. La plus étroite collaboration existe entre le Centre et la Direction des Musées et de la Protection des Monuments, et les conservateurs des monuments historiques, les spécialistes d’histoire de l’art, d’architecture, d’urbanisme et des sciences naturelles. Le Centre donne les informations requises et met à la disposition ds personnes intéressées les collections et les dossiers dont il dispose. Le Centre de Documentation a l’intention de faire paraître chaque année dans la revue — „Ochrona Zabytków” {La protection des monuments historiques) un compte-rendu de ses principales réalisations.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 1966, 4; 3-8
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dział Wydawnictw
Autorzy:
Wierzbicka, Katarzyna
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539630.pdf
Data publikacji:
2002
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
ODZ
działalność ODZ
historia ODZ
Dział Wydawnictw
Biblioteka Muzealnictwa i Ochrony Zabytków
Ochrona Zabytków
Muzealnictwo
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2002, 1; 65-69
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Od Ośrodka Dokumentacji Zabytków do Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa
From the Centre for Documentation of Monuments to the National Heritage Board of Poland
Autorzy:
Wendlandt, Juliusz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536043.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
ODZ
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Kazimierz Malinowski
służby konserwatorskie
standardy ewidencji
Ośrodek Ochrony Zabytkowego Krajobrazu
Ośrodek Ochrony Dziedzictwa Archeologicznego
Opis:
By the Order no. 166 of the Minister of Culture and Art of 22 December 1961, the Centre for Documentation of Monuments was established “for the purpose of improvement of the stock-taking of monuments for the rational planning of their reconstruction and conservation”. Its tasks included the preparation of the central register, record and supplementary documentation of non-movable and movable monuments. CDM’s substantive activity was based on record cards of non-movable (ca 40,000) and movable monuments, record files of cities, historic complexes and parks, historical and technical documentation of historic objects of architecture and historic buildings as well as archival and photographic materials acquired from the then existing Administration of Museums and Monument Protection. Tasks were performed by the Centre in three research departments: the Department of Architecture and Town Planning, the Department of Movable Monuments and the Department of Archaeology and in supplementary departments: the Department of Museology, which collected and documented knowledge about Polish museums, the Department of Archives and Scientific Collections, which collected, among others, materials relating to the historical issues and conservation of monuments, and the Phototeque with a unique collection of negatives, positives and diapositives, including historic aerial photographs of historic urban complexes and spatial development layouts. This collection is particularly important, because it often concerns the objects that no longer exist. Among achievements of the Department of Publications, which existed in the Centre from the beginning, it is particularly worth noting one hundred volumes of the Library of Muse ology and Monument Protection (LMMP) devoted to a variety of topics: from legal protection of monuments, materials from conservation conferences, specialistic issues of the conservation technology, to glossaries. For many years CDM was the publisher of a number of magazines devoted to popular science: Spotkania z Zabytkami, Muzealnictwo and Ochrona Zabytków. What also existed in CDM from the beginning, was the library – one of the few libraries in Poland that had not only a collection of books on the history of art and museums, but also a collection of books on issues of stock-taking and documentation of monuments and conservation issues – both with regard to theory and practice. Within the limits of its statutory activity, the Centre kept a central record of cultural properties, determined models and established standards of record-keeping. It organised training courses for employees of Conservation Offices and Offices for Documentation of Monuments, directed priorities in the preparation of records of monuments and supervised periodically the financing of the entire record-keeping programme in Poland. For the purpose of closer co-operation with conservation services and local administration bodies, twelve Centres for Studies and Protection of the Cultural Environment were established as local centres of CDM in 1991 and 1992. In 2000, part of CDM’s competences relating to the initiation and financing of records was transferred to conservation services and the Centre became responsible only for archives and information. Until then, during 40 years of its activity, CDM had collected and co-created an imposing record documentation, which constituted a unique collection encompassing around: • 130,000 record cards of historic objects of architecture and historic buildings, • 640,000 address index cards of historic objects of architecture and historic buildings, • 600 historical & urban planning studies of cities, • 320,000 record cards of movable monuments, • 6,600 files of the Archaeological Photograph of Poland (68% of the surface of the country; 375,000 archaeological sites), • 70,000 decisions on entry into the register of monuments (all categories of monuments), • 130,000 negatives and 1,000 binders of positives in the phototeque, • 35,000 negatives, diapositives and photographs of the aerial documentation of cities and the cultural landscape, • 50 linear metres of archival materials, • 60,000 volumes of books and magazines in the library. Moreover, CDM had at its disposal materials of the State Enterprise Monument Conservation Workshops from years 1948-1988 (750 linear metres of conservation documentation, 250,000 negatives, 1,881 photogrammetries, 8 linear metres of photographs in boxes). These materials were not only used by the personnel of conservation services, but also made widely available for scientific and educational research. In 2002, two cultural institutions: the Centre for Documentation for Monuments and the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape were merged and the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments was established. The Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape was created on the basis of the Administration of the Protection and Conservation of Palace & Garden Complexes, which functioned from 1977 within the structures of the National Museum in Warsaw. Originally it engaged in the maintenance of historic parks in the divisions of the National Museum –in Łazienki Park, Wilanów, Nieborów and Królikarnia. The methods that were used there in broadly understood conservation activities, from historical research to the revitalisation of these parks, were employed to work out theoretical and practical rules relating to the maintenance of historic green layouts in the scale going beyond museum objects. In those years, there were no specialistic institutions taking care of historic parks; these shortages were particularly severe for local conservation offices, which employed mainly historians of art, architects, ethnographers and archaeologists in their structures. Only a small group of landscape architects or foresters took care of historic greens. Because of the need to support voivodeship conservators of monuments, the Administration of the Protection of Palace & Garden Complexes was separated from the National Museum and started nationwide activity as an independent entity. As far as records and documentation are concerned, the Administration’s activity was similar to that of CDM, but was carried on with regard to historic green layouts – parks, gardens and cemeteries, including former Polish cemeteries situated outside the country. Apart from that, the Administration was authorised by the General Conservator of Monuments to exercise the broadly understood heritage conservator supervision of works being performed in historic parks in Poland. The co-operation concerned both design and performance. For instance, a programme of clearing works in neglected parks was commenced, under which conservators and users received an instruction concerning the performance of basic maintenance works before proper revitalisation activities. The Administration elaborated also the rules of preparation of conservation documentation, paying particular attention to the need to carry out historical & scientific research before design works. It was also the originator of pre-design research that was called “park archaeology”. From the beginning of its activity, the Administration ran a large-scale training programme for conservation services. A design studio was also created to carry out park revitalisation projects within the scope of statutory activity. At the same time, a scientific base was created by establishing a specialised library and collecting all materials concerning the history of gardening. Research on park plants and their selection in the historical development process was also initiated. Grounds were even created for the establishment of a specialised nursery which was to prevent the spreading fashion for introduction of foreign species of trees and shrubs to historic parks through selection of native plants occurring in historic gardens. The large-scale research and record-keeping programme resulted in a series of publications, including the list Parks and historic gardens in Poland, catalogues of historic cemeteries in various provinces, a catalogue of Galician cemeteries from World War I and catalogues of Polish cemeteries in Belarus and the Ukraine. Special attention in the activity of the Administration was paid to the role of historic parks in the local environment and their importance for the cultural landscape. In this context, research on particularly endangered large-area layouts and composed landscape was commenced. As a result of the extended research zone and environment protection activities, the Administration of the Protection of Palace & Garden Complexes was transformed into the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape on 1 January 1994. Special achievements of CPHL include activities for the benefit of the Muskau Park in Łęknica, a park & landscape work of primary importance for the history of the world art of gardening. For the purpose of ensuring proper progress of revitalisation works, CPHL took over the administration of this facility and restored the original grandeur and importance of the park after a few years of intense work, as a result of which the park was entered into the UNESCO World Cultural and Natural Heritage list. CPHL carried on very intense training & conference activities, and materials acquired by means of them were systematically published in a few dozen volumes of the Studia i Materiały publication, which was divided into several thematic series. The National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments basically continued the tasks of both merged institutions, but focused rather on documentation works and the elaboration of methods of protection and maintenance of monuments, and direct design and field works were gradually limited. Higher importance was attached to giving opinions on various projects, including conservation projects. NCRDM became the main provider of opinions for the General Conservator of Monuments. In addition, NCRDM engaged in the preparation of materials connected with the establishment of a monument of history (including the elaboration of a draft of criteria for the application and the carrying-out of the procedure), giving of opinions on and verification of applications. It also prepared a proposal for monitoring of historic objects regarded as monuments of history and entered into the UNESCO World Cultural and Natural Heritage list. The computerisation of collections became one of the most important tasks of NCRDM. NCRDM had already commenced work on that subject in the past, but these were not complex activities aimed at creating a unified programme for all kinds of documentation. NCRDM also started to make 3D scans of historic objects for the needs of conservation services and activities. It is worth mentioning that from 2002 till 2006 NCRDM did not engage in recording of archaeological monuments, because this function was fulfilled by the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage. Its predecessor was the Centre for Rescue Archaeological Research (CRAR) established in 1995, whose primary goal was to supervise and examine areas laid out for large-area investments being designed. These activities were particularly necessary in areas through which national fast traffic roads were to run. Within the scope of CRAR’s research, a huge number of archaeological sites was examined within a relatively short time and many important scientific discoveries were made. Irrespective of the specific nature of archaeological research, which was different from research on other kinds of monuments, scientific and record documentation was being prepared, the meaning and significance of which was identical to that of documentation of monuments in general. Thus, the activities of the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage turned out to coincide in many respects with work of the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments. As a result, both of these cultural institutions were merged in 2006. Until 31 December 2010, they functioned as the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments, which changed its name to the National Heritage Board of Poland by virtue of the order of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage on 1 January 2011. This change involves also the adoption of new statutes, according to which the Institute is obliged to pursue tasks relating to the sustainable protection of the cultural heritage of Poland in order to preserve it for future generations through: 1. the collection and dissemination of knowledge about heritage; 2. the determination and dissemination of standards of protection and maintenance of monuments, 3. the formation of social awareness regarding the values and maintenance of cultural heritage. This shows that, apart from activities being performed so far, e.g. with regard to the collection of record documentation, the goal of the Institute is to undertake tasks on a broader social scale, especially those relating to the dissemination of knowledge on cultural heritage. This goal should be supported by activities such as the monitoring of the state of preservation and the evaluation of the heritage resource, the building and development of the nationwide geospatial database about monuments and the improvement of access to collections through their digitalisation. The Institute continues to issue opinions and expertises concerning monument-related activities to public administration bodies, but it is also obliged to carry out, upon the Minister’s order, a part of tasks of the ministry of culture resulting from the accession of Poland to the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention and, in particular, carry out works to ensure standards of protection, conservation and presentation of World Heritage sites, monitor and evaluate their condition, co-ordinate work on the preparation of management plans and supervise their implementation as well as participate in international co-operation with a view to the protection of cultural heritage. In order to implement these tasks, the Institute has the properly qualified staff and supplements its technical equipment within the limits of its financial possibilities. Some difficulty is caused by the lack of adequate place both for the expanding documentation resources and for arrangement of research workshops. The Centre for Documentation of Monuments has actually grappled with the lack of appropriate premises since the beginning of its existence; currently, after a series of organisational changes and mergers, the National Heritage Board of Poland with its rich archives and specialistic workshops is located in four separate facilities in and outside Warsaw, in accidental rooms that are completely inadequate to the kind of its activity. This means that, after 50 years of its activity, the institution is entering the new stage as the National Heritage Board of Poland without a seat that would be adequate to its name and role. Such a situation hinders the current activity of the institution and, in the first place, does not contribute to the improvement of mutual relations between employees and the building of an integrated team and causes a serious problem to a very large number of clients making use of the dispersed collections.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 35-47
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies