Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Orzecznictwo karne" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów

Dostawca treści

Podbaza

Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29
Tytuł:
Konstytucyjne granice stosowania przymusu bezpośredniego względem oskarżonego. Uwagi na tle orzecznictwa TK i ETPCz
Autorzy:
Anna, Sikora,
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/902594.pdf
Data publikacji:
2017-09-12
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Tematy:
criminal proceedings
accused
judicature
direct coercion
Polish Constitutional Tribunal
European Court of Human Rights
postępowanie karne
oksarżony
orzecznictwo
przymus bezpośredni
Trybunał Konstytucyjny
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Opis:
The aim of the article is to present issues concerning the use of direct coercion against the accused. Indication of the basis and methods of the use of direct coercion in the criminal proceedings is extremely important, because of the values in which coercion measures interfere. Regulations which are going to be discussed during the dilatation consists legal rules defined by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the European Court of Human Rights.
Źródło:
Studia Iuridica; 2017, 69; 115-129
0137-4346
Pojawia się w:
Studia Iuridica
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Karnoprawna ochrona symboli państwowych w okresie II Rzeczypospolitej.
Criminal law protection of state symbols in the period of the Second Polish Republic
Autorzy:
Byndiu, Olga
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/14976308.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
protection of state symbols
legal doctrine concerning state symbols
criminal law
judicial decisions of the Supreme Court
destruction, removal, insult to state symbols
ochrona symboli państwowych
doktryna prawna dotycząca symboli państwowych
prawo karne
orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego
niszczenie, usuwanie, obraza symboli państwowych
Opis:
Polskie symbole państwowe są ważnym elementem państwowości, dlatego zawsze wymagały odpowiedniej ochrony prawnej. Ponad stuletnia historia funkcjonowania regulacji prawnej pozwala na analizę tej ogromnej spuścizny, a także zgłębienie przez czytelnika ogromnego dorobku prawa, który został zgromadzony w minionych okresach dziejowych. W tym celu podjęto analizę aktów prawnych, judykatury przede wszystkim Sądu Najwyższego oraz doktryny od 1918 do 1939 r. W pierwszej części czytelnik ma możliwość zapoznania się z regulacją prawną ochrony symboli państwowych od powstania nowego państwa polskiego i do rozpoczęcia II wojny światowej. W tej części omówiono kodeksy karne byłych państw zaborczych Niemiec i Rosji, obowiązujące w Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej przejściowo do czasu uchwalenia własnego kodeksu w 1932 r. Dalej analizie poddano ustawę z dnia 1 sierpnia 1919 r. o godle i barwach Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej oraz rozporządzenie Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej z dnia 13 grudnia 1927 r. o godle i barwach państwowych oraz o insygniach, sztandarach i pieczęciach. Następnie dość szczegółowo ukazano proces kodyfikacji przyszłego pierwszego Kodeksu karnego RP, a także regulacji prawnej dotyczącej symboli państwowych przyjętej ostatecznie w 1932 r. Uzupełnieniem analizy jest przytoczenie ówczesnego orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego, które w wielu przypadkach zawiera wykładnię regulacji prawnej dotyczącej wspomnianego obszaru tematycznego. Obraz uzupełnia doktryna prawnicza, w tym opinie wybitnych ówczesnych prawników, praktyków i komentatorów, a także autorów kodeksu, takich jak J. Makarewicz, W. Makowski, A. Mogilnicki, E. Rappaport i in.
The Polish state symbols are an important element of statehood, which is why they have always required proper legal protection. More than one hundred years of history of the functioning of this legal regulation brings about an analysis of this huge legacy as well as the exploration of the vast legal output, which was accumulated in the past periods of history. For this purpose, an analysis of legal acts, judicial decisions of (primarily) the Supreme Court, and the doctrine from 1918 to 1939 was undertaken. The first part grants the opportunity to get acquainted with the legal regulation concerning the protection of state symbols from the establishment of the new Polish state until the beginning of the Second World War. This part delineates the criminal codes of the former partitioning states of Germany and Russia, which were in force in the Republic of Poland on a provisional basis until the adoption of the state’s own code in 1932. Subsequently, the Act of 1 August 1919 on the Coat of Arms and the Colours of the Republic of Poland and the Decree of the President of the Republic of Poland of 13 December 1927 on the Coat of Arms and the Colours of the State as well as on the Insignia, Banners, and Seals were analyzed. Then the codification process of the future first Criminal Code of Poland as well as the legal regulation concerning state symbols (finally adopted in 1932) are presented in considerable detail. The analysis is further complemented by quoting the contemporary judicial decisions of the Supreme Court, which in many cases contained an interpretation of the legal regulation concerning the aforementioned subject matter. The image is complemented by a legal doctrine, including opinions of eminent lawyers, practitioners, and commentators of the period as well as authors of the code such as J. Makarewicz, W. Makowski, A. Mogilnicki, E. Rappaport, et al.
Źródło:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne; 2022, 74, 2; 155-178
0070-2471
Pojawia się w:
Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Zachowanie prawa do wynagrodzenia nabytego na dotychczas zajmowanym stanowisku prokuratorskim = Retention of the right to remuneration previously acquired in the prosecutors Office
Retention of the right to remuneration previously acquired in the prosecutors Office
Autorzy:
Dorsz-Drożdż, Marek
Powiązania:
Wojskowy Przegląd Prawniczy 2020, nr 4, s. 65-84
Data publikacji:
2020
Tematy:
Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka
Prawo karne wojskowe
Orzecznictwo administracyjne
Orzecznictwo międzynarodowe
Płaca
Postępowanie administracyjne
Prokuratorzy wojskowi
Prokuratura wojskowa
Artykuł problemowy
Artykuł z czasopisma fachowego
Artykuł z czasopisma prawniczego
Opis:
Artykuł omawia sporne aspekty zawarte w ustawie z dnia 28 stycznia 2016 roku „Przepisy wprowadzające - Prawo o prokuraturze na tle orzeczeń sądów administracyjnych oraz Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka”. Niektóre przepisy okazały się niejednoznaczne. Autor artykułu szczegółowo przedstawia problemy prokuratorów do spraw wojskowych będących żołnierzami zawodowymi.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Merytoryczne przesłanki orzekania kar i innych środków wobec wielokrotnych recydywistów
Penalties and other measures applied towards multiple recidivists
Autorzy:
Janiszewski, Bogusław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699228.pdf
Data publikacji:
1986
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
recydywa
wielokrotny recydywista
kara
kodeks karny
środki karne
polityka karna
wymiar kary
kara pozbawienia wolności
orzecznictwo
badania empiryczne
statystyki sądowe
recidivism
multiple recidivists
punishment
penal code
penal measures
criminal policy
sentence
imprisonment
case law
empirical research
court statistics
Opis:
The aims of the present study have been: 1) to ascertain the actual conditions of the courts' decisions applying penalties and other measures towards multiple recidivists; 2) to determine the present penal policy towards this category of convicted persons; 3) to compare this policy with the assumptions included in the Penal Code in force. Punishment imposed upon multiple recidivists is regulated by the provisions of Art. 60, para. 2 and 3 Art. 61 of the Penal Code. Their formulation is as follows: on a perpetrator sentenced twice in the conditions specified in para. 1 (special basic recidivism), who has served altogether at leat one year of deprivation of liberty and in the period of 5 years after the serving of the last penalty commits again an intentional offence with the purpose of obtaining a material benefit or of a hooligan character, similar to at least one of the previously committed offencęs, the court shall impose a penalty within the limits of from three times the lowest sanction, but not less than 2 years, up to the highest statutory sanction increased by one half, and if the highest statutory sanction is not higher than 3 years: up to 5 years deprivation of liberty. The increase of the lowest statutory sanction provided in para. 1 or 2 shall not apply, when the offence is a serious offence; in this case the court shall consider the commission of the offence in the conditions specified in para 1 or 2 as a circumstance increasing the penalty. In particularly justified cases when even the lowest penalty imposed on the basis of Art. 60. paras 1 or 2 would be incommeasurably Severe by reason of the motives for the action of the perpetrator, his traits and personal conditions as well as his way of life before the commission and his behaviour after the perpetration of the offence, the court when imposing the penalty may refrain from applying the rules specified in Art. 60. paras 1 or 2; in these cases the court shall take into consideration the commission of the offence in the conditions specified in Art. 60, para 1or 2 as circumstances influencing increasing the penalty. With regard to a perpetrator sentenced in the conditions specified in Art. 60, para. 2 he court shall adjudge protective supervision; if adjudging this supervision is not sufficient to prevent recidivism, the court shall adjudge .the commitment of the sentenced person to a social readaptation centre. (Art. 62, para. 2). The present work has been based on the author's own research and to a minimum extent only on the analysis of the national statistical data. The point of departure for the study of the actual conditions of the courts decisions were the conditions specified in the Penal Code now in force. The conditions specified in Art. 61 of the Penal Code and related to the offender only have been assumed to form the ratio legis of special recidivism in the Polish penal legislation. If, however, when aplying this provision, the courts prefer the conditions related to the most recent act of the offender, this mignt be an indication of their different attitude towards the aim of punishment in the case of the discussed category of offenders. The existence of such divergences between the conditions of application of Art 61 of the Penal Code as included in the law on the one hand, and those applied by the courts on the other hand  has been one of the hypotheses verified in the present study.  The study has been based on the examination of court records. All the accessible records of criminal cases (230) have been included in it, in which Sentences were passed with regard to multiple recidivists (under Art 60. para. 2  and Art. 61 in connection with Art. 60, para. 2 of the Penal Code) in the District Court of the city of Poznań in the years 1975-1981. The question arised whether this could be treated as an equivalent to a random sample of the national population of convicted multiple recidivists. As shown by a comparison of distributions in question are highly convergent. A questionnaire to investigate the ourt records consisted of 41 questions concerning the convicted recidivist, his previous offences and criminal record, his last offence and the content of the last sentence. The impact of a number of variables on the application of Art. 61 of the Penal Code, on the length  of the prison sentence and on the decision of commitment to a social readaptation centre has been analysed in succession. Conclusions from the study are as follows: 1. In the application of Art.61 of the Penal Code ,the predominating part is played by the conditions connected with the degree of socil danger of the act and with its legal label. The conditions connected with the person of the perpetrator seem to have a much smaller effect. The reason of this state of affairs may be seeked in the fact that the court is obligated by Art. 60, para.2 of the Penal Code to impose long-term penalties of deprivation or liberty regardless of the degree of social danger (seriousness) of the offence which may be trivial in particular cases. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at that in these cases the courts apply Art. 61 of the Penal Code so as to impose a lower or more lenient penalty in order to make it commeasurable with the offence. The following conditions have been found to exert the greatest influence on the length of sentences to deprivation of liberty under Art. 60, para. 2: firstly, the legal appraisal of the offence and the related content of the instructions for meting out punishment specified in Art. 60, para. 2 of the Penal Code, and secondly, the degree of social danger of the offence. The character of the offence and the appraisal of its social danger influence the sentence too, including the type of penalty, when Art. 61 of the Penal Code is applied by the court. This is probably a further result of following the same conditions already when deciding on the application of Art. 61 of the Penal Code. When adjudging the commitment of convicted persons to a social readaptation centre, the courst were guided by the conditions connected with intense symptoms of demoralization of these persons and with a previous application of various penal measures towards them; thus the conditions were formally the same as those to be found in the Penal Code. At the same time, conditions connected with the recently committed offence were left out of account here. One should be particularly careful when interpreting the findings in this case aS the decisions in question may be conditioned by the courts' various attitudes towards the practical functioning of the centers, and by different purposes of their adjudgement in definite cases. The length of the perod for which commitment to a social readaptation centre was adjudged has appeared to increase with the length of the sentence to deprivation of libety. Admittedly, outright conclusions as to the need for amendments of the provisions of the Penal Code in its part concerning recidivists do not follow immediately from the findings of the present study. These findings have. however, demonstrated the degree to which the instructions for meting out, punishment specified in Art. 60, para. 2 of the Penal Code sever the relation between the offence and punishment, as  well as the fact that the corrective function of punishment imposed upon multiple recidivists - officially assumed by the legislator-has a fictious character in practice. In consequence, Art. 61 of the Penal Code is used in discord with its purpose; it is applied to adjust the adjudicated punishment to the seriousness of the offence committed.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 1986, XIII; 109-139
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Przestępczość i polityka karna sądów w Węgierskiej Republice Ludowej
Crime and the penal policy of courts in the Hungarian peoples republic
Autorzy:
Kubiak, Jacek R.
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/699255.pdf
Data publikacji:
1987
Wydawca:
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
Tematy:
polityka karna
republika ludowa
przestępczość
ustawodawstwo
prawo karne
Węgry
orzecznictwo
gwałt
sądownictwo
pozbawienie wolności
grzywna
ludobójstwo
people's republic
criminality
legislation
criminal law
Hungary
certification
rape
judiciary
deprivation of liberty
fine
genocide
criminal policy
criminal Policy
Opis:
There is in Hungary a many years tradition. of gathering and publishing criminal statistics and its theoretical analysis. This tradition dates back to the early 19th century. In the modern days, it was discontinued in the years 1944-1956 only. However, in 1957, the publication of the basic data of criminal statistics in Statistical Yearbooks published by the central statistical Office was started anew. As shown by an analysis of the trends of the number of convictions of adults in the years 1944-1984 based on official sources, there is a high substantial changes in these trends with changes in the provisions of the penal law and to some extent in the socio-political climate. The following can thus be noticed: A very big number of convictions in the late fourties and early fifties (with the culminating point in 1952), accompanied by rapid drops in the years when amnesty laws were passed or new provisions of the penal law were introduced. A great drop in the number of convictions in 1956 and, 1957 which was related directly first of all to the course of events before and after October 23, 1956, and to the fact that a part of the jurisdiction of common courts of law was taken over by special courts of law was taken over by special courts the activity of which is not reflected in the analysed statistical data. A relative stabilization of the number of convictions in the years of gradual socio-political consolidation ( 1958-1962). A gradual increase in the number of convictions after the entering into force of the Penal Code of 1961 and its amendment of 1971. Accompanied by intermittent drops in the amnesty years and in the years when provisions that modified the Penal Code entered into force. An increase in the number of convictions after the entering into force of the Penal Code of 1978. The rate of convictions per 100,000 of the population in 1984 was 2'5 times higher than in 1952, but not much lower than the 1961 rate. The rise in crime in the recent years is also evident in the available data from the police and public prosecutor's statistics. The number of reported offences went up by one-third in the period 1965-1985 and has a constant upward trend. Among the offences reported most numerous are offences against property (about 60 per cent of all reported offences), traffic offences (about 12-13 per cent), offences against public order (hooliganism and parasitism in particular), and offences against person (about 7-8 per cent).  As compared with 1965, the number of burglaries was 3.5 times as big in the eighties, and the number of robberies - 7 . times. The number of traffic offences increased by over one-third as well. Also offences against person reveal a small upward trend, with the number of homicides being stable. However, the number of homicides in Hungary has for many years been considerably larger than the mean European figure (mean homicide rate per 100,000 of the population amounting to 3.8 in the years 1979--1983). The rise in crime concerned financial offences also (offences against the foreign currency exchange regulations, against customs regulations, tax offences) which are included in ,the group of offences against the national economy. The penal policy of the Hungarian courts has rather frequently been subject to spectacular transformations. In the early seventies, stabilization was achieved in this policy which manifested itself by a limited application of unconditional deprivation of liberty and by a broad use of fine and other measures not involving deprivation of liberty. However, the rise in crime in the eighties influenced a more frequent application of unconditional deprivation of liberty, which resulted in the growth of prison population. In 1979, the number of persons deprived of liberty amounted to 16,764 (157 per 100,000 of the population), while in 1984 the respective number was 21,884 (205 per 100.000 of the population). In Hungary, conditional suspension of the execution of the penalty of deprivation- of liberty is not as popular as in other European socialist countries. For every fifth convicted person, the execution of penalty is suspended. In 1973, the courts for the- first time passed a greater number of fines (48.8 per cent) than prison sentences (43.9 per cent). In the-following years, the share of fines in the structure of penalties even exceeded 50 per cent. However, after entering into force of the new Penal code, an unexpected drop in the number of fines took place things to the which was due among other fact that some of the  petty offences were removed from the Penal Code , and that a new penal measure without deprivation of liberty, i.e. probation, was introduced. In 1983, the share of fines dropped to 40 per cent of all sentences. The Hungarian courts were most reluctant to apply the penalty of corrective and educational work as soon as the penalty was introduced in 1950. For a dozen-odd years the share of this penalty in all penalties imposed never exceeded 10 per cent. After the 1961 Penal Code was introduced the penalty of corrective and educational work  showed an upward trend (up to 15,8 per cent in 1964), but later on started to fall up, to 4 per cent in 1983. In the years 1962 -1983. common courts sentenced 105 persons to death penalty, for qualified homicide in the vast majority of cases. Since 1968, this penalty has been applied exlusively towards the perpetrators of homicide. In 1984, the extent of reported crime in Hungary was similar to that found in Poland (1, 470 per 100,000 o0f the population); however, in Hungary the response to the rise in crime has been in general much more balanced and quiet.
Źródło:
Archiwum Kryminologii; 1987, XIV; 43-95
0066-6890
2719-4280
Pojawia się w:
Archiwum Kryminologii
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Sprawa Gäfgen przeciwko Niemcom : analiza przypadku
Autorzy:
Patora, Krystyna.
Powiązania:
Przegląd Policyjny 2020, nr 2, s. 201-218
Współwytwórcy:
Świąder, Emil. Autor
Data publikacji:
2020
Tematy:
Dzieci
Groźba
Orzecznictwo
Policjanci
Prawo administracyjne
Prawo karne
Prawo międzynarodowe
Przesłuchanie podejrzanego
Tortury
Uprowadzenie
Zabójstwo
Artykuł z czasopisma naukowego
Artykuł z czasopisma policyjnego
Raport z badań
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy sprawy Gäfgen przeciwko Niemcom. Autorzy omawiają granice postępowania funkcjonariuszy policji realizujących swoje obowiązki, prowadzących sprawy dotyczące terroru i stosowania przemocy w następstwie których zagrożone jest zdrowie ludzkie oraz którzy muszą podejmować decyzje chroniące życie pokrzywdzonych. Funkcjonariusze są często narażeni na ocenę prawnokarną na płaszczyźnie ochrony podstawowych praw człowieka z których korzysta sprawca sprowadzający niebezpieczeństwo dla życia innych. Sprawa Gäfgen przeciwko Niemcom dotyczy problematyki wyboru dóbr i odpowiedzialności karnej funkcjonariuszy policji jaka się z tym wiąże oraz możliwości wykorzystania dowodów pozyskanych z naruszeniem prawa w procesie karnym i granic koncepcji owoców zatrutego drzewa.
Bibliografia, netografia, wykaz aktów prawnych na stronach 216-218.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 29

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies