Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 23
Tytuł:
„Ochrona zabytków numizmatycznych” Seminarium naukowe, Opole, 8 września 2011 r.
Scientific seminar “Protection of numismatic monuments”, Opole, 8th September 2011
Autorzy:
Kaczorowska, Bogna
Kaczorowska, Maria
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538741.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
zabytki numizmatycznie
Narodowy Instytut Muzealnictwa i Ochrony Zbiorów
NIMiOZ
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
NID
numizmatyka
Opis:
A scientific seminar on protection of numismatic monuments organized by the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Opole and the Customs Chamber in Opole with the cooperation of the Financial Law Association „Aureus” took place on 8th September 2011 in Opole. There were two papers presented during the seminar, both accompanied with multimedia presentation. Marcin Sabaciński (National Heritage Board of Poland, Archeology Department) focused on the presentation of institutional system of monuments protection in Poland and Polish legal regulations on protection and care of cultural heritage. Michał Zawadzki (Director of Numismatic Collection of the Royal Castle in Warsaw) gave a paper on the numismatics as a scientific discipline and presented the main types of historical coins, banknotes and other collector’s items as well as the characteristics of the numismatic market in Poland. The participants of the discussion held during the seminar paid attention to the need for closer cooperation among different entities dealing with protection of monuments, as well as for appropriate legislative initiatives in this field.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2010, 1-4; 289-294
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
A. Chabiera , A. Dąbrowski, A. Fortuna-Marek, A. Kozioł, M. Lubaś, P. Nowak, B. Skaldowski, K. Stepnik, Dziedzictwo kulturowe w badaniach, T. 1, Polacy wobec dziedzictwa. Raport z badań społecznych, Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa i Instytut Socjologii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Warszawa–Kraków 2017, ss. 144
A. Chabiera, A. Dąbrowski, A. Fortuna-Marek, A. Kozioł, M. Lubaś, P. Nowak, B. Skaldowski, K. Stepnik, Cultural Heritage and Research, vol. 1, Poles And Their Legacy. A Social Study Report, National Heritage Board and the Institute of Sociology of the Jagiellonian University, Warszawa–Kraków 2017, p. 144
Autorzy:
Stępniak, Władysław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/51847824.pdf
Data publikacji:
2018
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Tematy:
społeczne oceny i postawy wobec dziedzictwa
dziedzictwo kulturowe
materiały archiwalne
narodowy zasób archiwalny
dobra kultury
dzieła sztuki
tradycje i zwyczaje
badania społeczne
funkcjonowanie dziedzictwa kulturowego
znaczenie dziedzictwa kulturowego
UNESCO
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Instytut Socjologii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
cultural heritage
archival materials
national archival fonds
cultural legacy
works of art
traditions and customs
social research
functioning of cultural heritage
significance of cultural heritage
social assessment and attitudes towards heritage
National Heritage Institute
Institute of Sociology of the Jagiellonian University
Opis:
The publication reviewed in the article is the first in a series of volumes on cultural heritage. Volume 1 presents the results of a social study focused on how cultural legacy is assessed and treated by Polish society. The starting point for the deliberations included in the report is the definition of cultural heritage, followed by an analysis of the particular components of attitudes towards it, being interested or involved in protecting it. The report also includes the economic aspects of heritage. The study and its results take into account archives and archival materials. Approximately 80% of the respondents acknowledged their significance, implying that they play a very significant role among other means of preserving national heritage. However, the questionnaires used in the study do not provide a complete picture of the certain specific characteristics of archives and archival materials. This is why the archivist community should become directly involved in the future activities of the National Heritage Board and the Institute of Sociology of the Jagiellonian University. 
Źródło:
Archeion; 2018, 119; 456-461
0066-6041
2658-1264
Pojawia się w:
Archeion
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Drodzy Czytelnicy,
Dear Readers,
Autorzy:
Stachańczyk, Renata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536474.pdf
Data publikacji:
2016
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
„Ochrona Zabytków”
konserwacja zabytkowych ogrodów
ogrody zabytkowe
Opis:
It is with pleasure that we present to you the recent issue of “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. It differs from previous editions as it is entirely devoted to conservation of historic gardens. Here, in Poland, this field has truly impressive achievements as we are one of the few European countries to hold a considerable collection of garden documents (records), and to develop – in the post-war period – research methods as well as following methodology taught in a plethora of academic centres. Furthermore, it may seem that applicable legal acts and international recommendations are sufficient tools to protect this particular type of heritage. Nevertheless, as a consequence of failing to grasp the phenomena of a garden – with its essence and artistic value – and due to the necessity to adopt measures other than for historic architecture, decisions regarding gardens often raise much controversy. We are observing occurrences that prove disturbing especially in the context of the increasing resources allocated to conservation and restoration of historic gardens. As a result, we are witnessing a process which would be unthinkable a few decades ago, when the majority of works was carried out within the inner management of the historic site. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the notion of recreating historical garden compositions, which should be an aftermath of a far-reaching process and not a one-time act. This process involves conservators struggling to make various substantive decisions, and as there is no one universal path to follow, all options and conditions must be taken into account. In 2014, the celebration of the 10th anniversary of inscribing the Polish-German Mużakowski Park on the UNESCO World Heritage List proved to be a unique opportunity to call to mind the principles of conduct towards historic gardens, in particular, the doctrine for conservation in relation to this type of heritage, and to discuss current issues and tendencies. Inscribing Mużakowski Park, whose eastern part is managed by the National Heritage Board of Poland on behalf of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, on the UNESCO World Heritage List is one of the key points of park’s revitalisation process which started at the beginning of 1990s and was initiated by predecessors of the Board in cooperation with the manager of German part of the site. The inscription emphasised the efforts of Polish manager that went into rescuing the park – without it, this precious site would go down only in the history of landscape gardening. The wide range of conservation works carried out by both managers is unprecedented in Europe and constitutes an example of good practices in the field of historic garden conservation. The National Heritage Board of Poland – an organiser of the “Historic gardens as objects of maintenance, conservation and restoration” conference which was held from 11 to 13 September 2014 in the Żagań Palace and outdoors in the Mużakowski Park to commemorate the inscription – has committed to remind us that historic gardens must be treated in a different manner than other types of heritage due to special characteristics of their material, longevity and value of composition. Moreover, the conference was to present European views on standards of conduct and to discuss on a spectrum of possibilities related to selecting the right path prior to deciding on measures to be adopted. Most papers read by speakers from Poland and abroad have been adapted to the requirements set out for academic writing, and subsequently collected in a volume that is presented to you. We strongly believe that our Readers will learn more on the subject of historic gardens which so far has rarely been raised in “Ochrona Zabytków” magazine. A garden is a type of historic site that requires continuous care, in particular constant and professional maintenance. Understanding its complexity is the foundation of any revitalisation process and a guarantee for maintaining its inherent value. Without it, our conservation efforts will result in passing to future generations our mere representations of historic garden achievements that will have nothing to do with the real thing. dr inż. Renata Stachańczyk The Manager of the Revitalisation Project of Mużakowski Park, Head of the Team for expert opinions and analysis of historic landscape The National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2016, 1; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Dziedzictwo kulturowe województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle danych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa. Przykład zabytków nieruchomych
Autorzy:
Siniecka, Anna
Bogacka, Emilia
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/911629.pdf
Data publikacji:
2019-07-10
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Tematy:
dziedzictwo kulturowe
zabytki nieruchome
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
województwo wielkopolskie
Opis:
Otaczające nas dziedzictwo kulturowe stanowi cenny zasób będący świadectwem naszej historii, którego zachowanie dla przyszłych pokoleń jest niezwykle istotne. Artykuł przedstawia dziedzictwo kulturowe w województwie wielkopolskim, regionie o szczególnym znaczeniu dla powstania i rozwoju całego państwa. Analizie zostały poddane zabytki nieruchome znajdujące się w rejestrze zabytków Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa.
Źródło:
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna; 2018, 44; 53-65
2353-1428
Pojawia się w:
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Inwentaryzacja dzieł sztuki i rzemiosła artystycznego w dawnym klasztorze Cystersów w Krzeszowie
Inventory of works of art and artistic handicraft in the former Cistercian Monastery at Krzeszów
Autorzy:
Sebzda, Beata
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536367.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Krzeszów
Lwów
cystersi
benedyktyni
benedyktynki
inwentaryzacja
dzieła sztuki
karty ewidencyjne
rejestr zabytków
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Opis:
The complex of the former Cistercian Abbey at Krzeszów has a long history that dates back to the 13th century. Its heyday were the second half of the 17th and the 18th centuries, when refurbishments and expansions made it an important centre of Baroque, that attracted the then leading Silesian and Czech artists. On 31 May 1946, Benedictine sisters deported from the All Saints’ monastery in Lwów (Lviv) arrived at the abbey with their belongings. They noticed the need to record the works of art collected in the Krzeszów monastery. The inventory has been carried out by the Local Division of the National Heritage Board of Poland (NHBP) in Wrocław, since 2008. In December 2012, the first phase of the operation was concluded. Until then, 1006 items were registered, for which 710 records of movable historical items were established. The records, developed by the Local Division of the NHBP in Wrocław in the years 2008-2012, set the basis for three decisions to include in the register of historical monuments 416 works of art from both the Krzeszów and Lwów collections. Another such decision is currently being prepared. Previous decisions enabled the sisters to gain funds necessary to renovate the Baroque painting of St. Fortunate from the Lwów monastery church, as well as 12 portraits of Lwów prioresses. The developed records were disseminated in the scientific and museum communities, i.a. as an auxiliary material attached to a publication on Roman-Catholic churches and monasteries of the former Ruthenian Voivodeship. Works of art from the abbey were first displayed at the exhibitions “Glory of Krzeszów” („Blask Krzeszowa”) and „Ora et labora” at Kamienna Góra in 2010-2012. The inventory completed until now, covers works of art from the Cistercian and Benedictine collections. The planned second phase of operation will mainly address the items the Benedictine sisters managed to salvage, by bringing them to Krzeszów.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 3-4; 161-164
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Konstrukcyjne drewno zabytkowe – rozszerzone metody badań na przykładzie dawnych więźb dachowych
Historical construction wood – extended research methods on the example of old roof trusses
Autorzy:
Mączyński, Dominik
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2063940.pdf
Data publikacji:
2020
Wydawca:
Politechnika Lubelska. Polski Komitet Narodowy Międzynarodowej Rady Ochrony Zabytków
Tematy:
dawne konstrukcje drewniane
współczesne metody badań
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
badania historycznych konstrukcji drewnianych
badania interdyscyplinarne
old wooden structures
contemporary research methods
National Heritage Board of Poland
research of historic wooden structures
interdisciplinary studies
Opis:
Dawne konstrukcje drewniane są integralnymi częściami zabytków. Konstrukcje te często są niedostatecznie rozpoznane i udokumentowane. Zawarte w nich informacje naukowe często są zacierane lub niszczone w czasie remontów lub w przypadku katastrof. Postęp w metodach badań drewna i ich interdyscyplinarny zakres umożliwia dzisiaj zgromadzenie wielu ważnych danych nie tylko dotyczących samej konstrukcji, ale historii obiektu i zmian jakie zaszły w środowisku, z którego pozyskany był budulec.
Old wooden structures are integral parts of monuments. These constructions are often insufficiently recognized and documented. Scientific information contained in them is often obliterated or destroyed during renovations or as a result of disasters. The progress of wood research methods and their interdisciplinary scope allows today to collect a lot of important data not only on the construction itself, but also on the history of the object and the changes that have occurred in the environment from which the building material was sourced.
Źródło:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego; 2020, Nr 9; 73--81
2543-6422
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
OCHRONA DZIEDZICTWA ARCHEOLOGICZNEGO W PERU
THE PROTECTION OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF PERU
Autorzy:
Kalicki, Piotr
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538337.pdf
Data publikacji:
2010
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Machu Picchu
ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego w Peru
Środkowoandyjski Krąg Kulturowy
Polska Misja Andyjska
twierdza Sacsayhuaman
Ley General del Patrimonio Cultural de la Nación
Instituto Nacional de Cultura
Narodowy Instytut Kultury
Narodowy Elektroniczny Rejestr Dóbr Wchodzących w Skład Dziedzictwa Kulturowego Narodu
groby kultury Chancay w Cerro Colorado
stanowisko w Pachacamac
Opis:
The article contains an interdisciplinary presentation of the protection of the archaeological heritage of Peru. The author discusses prime cultural and natural factors posing a threat to the relics of ancient civilisations. Special emphasis is placed on dangers associated with man’s activity, which legal norms are capable of effectively counteracting. A depiction of the Peruvian legal state and its comparison with Polish law intends not only to depict solutions serving the protection of archaeological monuments but also to delineate a model of regulating laws protecting the cultural heritage. The key features of the examined legislation include centralisation, preference for state ownership and activity, considerable restrictions of the right of ownership and the civil law circuit of cultural property. The application of the institutions of civil law and the private legal model of regulating the protection of cultural property is a relatively frequent phenomenon. A practical analysis of the functioning of binding legal regulators and their effectiveness in preventing the degradation of cultural heritage made it possible to formulate proposals of legal changes and postulates of undertakings capable of increasing the effectiveness of the law concerned with the protection of cultural property in Peru.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2009, 2; 75-90
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Poland for World Heritage/La Pologne pour le patrimoine mondial, Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, Warszawa 2013
Autorzy:
Olbryś, Mirosław
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/536409.pdf
Data publikacji:
2015
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
konserwacja zabytków
Lista światowego dziedzictwa kulturalnego i naturalnego UNESCO
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2015, 2; 245-250
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Rola Działu Analiz Konserwatorskich w realizacji zadań statutowych Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa
The role of the Conservation Analyses Department in the performance of statutory tasks of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Autorzy:
Jagielska, Elżbieta
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/538298.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Dział Analiz Konserwatorskich
KOBiDZ
Krajowy Ośrodek Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków
NID
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
ekspertyzy konserwatorskie
skreślenie z rejestru zabytków
adaptacja zabytku
rejestr zabytków
CARARE
standard dokumentacji
pomnik historii
Lista Światowego Dziedzictwa UNESCO
Akademia Nieświeska
Opis:
The Conservation Analyses Department was established by the order of the Director of the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments dated 6 June 2010. The Department comprised the Team of Experts and the Conservation Policy Formation Workshop. The Department co-ordinates and supervises work connected with the preparation of opinions and expertises regarding the protection of non-movable and movable monuments for public administration authorities – the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, Voivodeship Offices for Monument Protection and their branches and local government conservators. It carries out its tasks with the help of local divisions representing the National Heritage Board of Poland. The definite majority of issued opinions concerns the evaluation of the level of preservation of the value of historic objects or areas during administrative procedures being conducted by the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage with regard to deletions from the register of monuments. The Conservation Analyses Department co-ordinates the implementation of the procedure for acknowledgement of a historic object as a history monument and participates in work regarding the creation and dissemination of standards of documentation, research and conservation of historic objects. The activity of the Department in the field of protection of historic parks and gardens is particularly worth mentioning. It includes, among others, study and design works carried out in Branicki’s Garden in Białystok from 2006 till 2009 and the preparation of conservation requests and the resulting projects of regeneration of the palace park in Białowieża and the park in Trzebiny. The palace & park layout in Trzebiny is currently administered by the National Heritage Board of Poland – the Local Workshop in Trzebiny. An important task ordered by the Minister of Culture and National Heritage is the management of the regeneration of Muskau Park. Over 20 years’ period of regeneration works is a significant yet still fragmentary process of restoration of the full historical value of the park. The Institute is also responsible for the creation and putting into common use of standards of documentation, elaborations and manuals regarding the protection of cultural heritage that are addressed to a wide group of recipients, an example of which is the Methodological guide to the elaboration of communal monument care programmes. The international co-operation with Eastern states has been carried out by NHBP and its predecessors for many years, including the „Nieśwież Academy” Postgraduate Summer School and cooperation with the Trakai Historical National Park in Lithuania. All activities being handled by the Conservation Analyses Department of the National Heritage Board of Poland are subject and may become subject to modifications, depending on the orders of the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage, the needs of voivodeship monument conservators and other institutions and the emerging topics that must be solved urgently. Currently the Conservation Analyses Department employs 14 persons. They build an interdisciplinary team consisting of a group of historians of art, monument experts – conservators, landscape architects, an architect and a lawyer – persons with a large professional experience and significant achievements.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 101-110
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selected areas and results of the activities of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage for the protection and care of monuments in the years 2015-2019
Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz ochrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Autorzy:
Landmann, Tomasz
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/29551746.pdf
Data publikacji:
2022
Wydawca:
Akademia Wojsk Lądowych imienia generała Tadeusza Kościuszki
Tematy:
National Institute of Cultural Heritage
protection of monuments
Polska
monument
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
ochrona zabytków
Polska
zabytek
Opis:
In the article, the subject of considerations is the effects of actions of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage in selected areas of monument protection and care in the years 2015-2019. The undertaken subject corresponds to the protection of cultural heritage in the context of strengthening the cultural security of the Republic of Poland. The purpose of the considerations is to present the results of the activities of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage in the system of protection and care of monuments in Poland, in the years 2015-2019, taking into account selected areas of task implementation by the cultural institution under study. The analysis is based on statistical data published by the National Institute of Cultural Heritage (hereinafter referred to as NID) in periodic and annual reports on the activities of the institution, in additional reports, as well as on scientific literature on the protection and care of historical monuments. In the article, it was established that NID has carried out numerous activities for the protection and care of monuments, and thus the protection of cultural heritage in the context of strengthening the cultural security of the Republic of Poland. The main areas of activities of NID concerned maintaining records and documentation of monuments, monitoring and counteracting threats to cultural heritage, as well as performance of training and information tasks. Opinions and expertise issued for public administration bodies and the implementation of programmes for the protection and care of monuments were important.
Przedmiotem rozważań w artykule jest problematyka efektów działań podjętych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w wybranych obszarach ochrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019. Podejmowana tematyka koresponduje z ochroną dziedzictwa kulturowego w kontekście wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego RP. Celem rozważań jest przedstawienie rezultatów działań NID w systemie ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami w Polsce w latach 2015-2019, z uwzględnieniem wybranych dziedzin realizacji zadań przez opisywaną instytucję kultury. Analizę oparto na danych statystycznych opublikowanych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w okresowych, rocznych sprawozdaniach z działalności instytucji, dodatkowych raportach, a ponadto na literaturze naukowej z problematyki ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami. W artykule ustalono, że NID realizował liczne działania na rzecz ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami, a tym samym ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego w kontekście wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego RP. Główne obszary działań NID dotyczyły ewidencjonowania i dokumentowania zabytków, monitorowania i przeciwdziałania zagrożeniom dla dziedzictwa kulturowego, a także realizowania zadań szkoleniowo-informacyjnych. Ważne były wydawane opinie i ekspertyzy dla organów administracji publicznej i realizacja programów na rzecz ochrony i opieki nad zabytkami.
Źródło:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces; 2022, 54, 2(204); 196-213
2544-7122
2545-0719
Pojawia się w:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Selected areas and results of the activities of the National Institute of Culture Heritage for the protection and care of monuments in the years 2015-2019 = Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz obrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Wybrane obszary i rezultaty działań Narodowego Instytutu Dziedzictwa na rzecz obrony zabytków i opieki nad zabytkami w latach 2015-2019
Autorzy:
Landmann, Tomasz
Powiązania:
Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces 2022, nr 2, s. 196-213
Data publikacji:
2022
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona zabytków
Zabytki kultury
Artykuł problemowy
Artykuł z czasopisma wojskowego
Opis:
Artykuł dotyczy ochrony dziedzictwa kulturowego i wzmacniania bezpieczeństwa kulturowego Polski, co omówiono na przykładzie działań podjętych przez Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa w latach 2015-2019. Opisano założenie, główne zadania i aspekty prawne działalności NID oraz efekty przeprowadzonych prac dotyczących ochrony zabytków. Przedstawiono dane statystyczne, roczne sprawozdania z działalności i raporty opublikowane przez NID. Aktywność NID dotyczyła głównie ewidencjonowania i dokumentowania zabytków, monitorowania i przeciwdziałania zagrożeniem dla dziedzictwa kulturowego i realizowania zadań szkoleniowo-informacyjnych.
Tabele, wykresy.
Bibliografia, netografia na stronach 210-212.
Dostawca treści:
Bibliografia CBW
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Czytelnicy!
Dear Readers!
Autorzy:
Gawlicki, Marcin
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535844.pdf
Data publikacji:
2008
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona Zabytków
Opis:
For quite some time the Polish conservation milieu has been involved in a lively discussion on the deteriorating state of our cultural heritage, assorted threats, unsatisfactory theoretical interpretations that do not provide answers to many simple questions, and mundane financial problems hampering suitable documentation or professional studies and the conservation of monuments. Against the backdrop of this discussion there have emerged conceptions of organisational and systemic transformations, which, briefly, refer to the direct supervision of the general conservator over the offices of the voivodeship conservators of monuments. Our editorial board has decided to expand this discussion by presenting various views concerning the theoretical aspects of the foundations of the protection of monuments. I regard opinions formulated outside the conservation circles to be of particular importance since they make it possible to view our problems without emulating well-worn schemes and reducing the discussion to a strictly organisational level. Within this context I heartily recommend the text by Dr. Simon Thurley, the head of English Heritage, read during the third annual European Heritage Heads Forum held in May 2008 in Copenhagen. The principles of the protection of historical monuments are simply a codification of the decision-making process, based on a modern assessment of the value of monuments. You will find all the details in an English Heritage publication entitled Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance – try the English Heritage internet site or the library of the National Heritage Board of Poland. Knowledge about the reasons for protecting a historical monument, the basis of this protection, as well as the monument’s particular elements and environment should support the whole process of protection, from recording a given monument in a register, its suitable utilisation and administration to decision making and correctly conducted conservation or adaptation. Any gaps will lead to numerous errors and even the loss of valuable monuments. Many Readers may find the text about the phenomenological definition of the monuments to be of special interest. The study in question makes it possible to view the apparently completed concept of the monument from a wider perspective than the traditional one. Alongside questions dealing with the creation of modern conservation protection and a search for the sources of the definition and phenomenon of the monuments, we also tackle topics associated with the current shape of the Polish register of monuments, its contents and the role, which it should perform in the national system of the protection of the cultural heritage. Within the context of the binding statutory regulations, inclusion into the register, which until now has been the only universally applied form of the protection of monuments, proves to be not only ineffective but also incomplete, and does not reflect the richness and diversity of the Polish cultural heritage. I wish you pleasant reading. Respectfully yours Marcin Gawlicki Director of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2008, 2; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo, drodzy Czytelnicy, Autorzy i Recenzenci „Ochrony Zabytków”!
Dear Sirs and Madams, dear Readers, Authors and Reviewers of the “Ochrona Zabytków”!
Autorzy:
Serafinowicz, Jacek
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/535221.pdf
Data publikacji:
2014
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Ochrona Zabytków
konwencja UNESCO
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
dziedzictwo niematerialne
Lista światowego dziedzictwa UNESCO
Opis:
We present to you another fascicle of jointly created periodical (in the current six-monthly form) – a collective work, which can be, without exaggeration, described as: joint effort. If I were to title it separately, the title would be: Between tangible and intangible heritage – the idea of comprehensive protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage. It sounds elevated, maybe even pompous, however – as we know well – in the global perspective, there are diverse situations, a current example might be the devastated Aleppo, which is, after all, not the only site of crime against cultural heritage. The threads of intangible heritage, in this volume, both from the perspective of up-to-date UNESCO documents and conventions, and from the perspective of “archaeology of notions” and research on intangible heritage of the Polish rural areas, as well as the narratives of collective memory, constitute the first part of the volume. The second part, on the other hand, for a kind of a counterweight, is devoted only to tangible heritage, focusing on the issues of wooden architecture, and strictly speaking, on wooden sacral construction, on both sides of the Polish-Ukrainian border in which we see a tremendous potential for further common research and academic cooperation. The second part of the volume is concluded by an interesting article devoted to framework architecture of Uhlans’ barracks in Toruń. In the third, final part, we present articles of diverse subject matter, a considerable substantive significance, discussing, among others, Polish successes related to entries on the UNESCO’s World Heritage List to which the National Heritage Board of Poland contributed greatly, but also presenting hazards concerning possible further entries, which should not be forgotten, just like we should not forget about people of exceptional merits, whose profiles we recall. Let us return, however, to our reality and our questions about intangible heritage. What is it for an ordinary inhabitant of the country between the Odra River and the Bug River, how does our ordinary compatriot understand them and does he or she have keys to it, or has someone hidden it, to use a euphemism..? It seems there is a long march ahead of us. If today someone asked me about what I believe to be the most important throughout our entire spectrum of the intangible heritage, I would certainly reply: my homeland and my faith. And if I was asked what I would most gladly enter to the intangible heritage list, I would say: all Polish “żurawiejka” poems, even though they might be obscene, including my favourite, which I would not dare to quote. Not so long ago, on the occasion of a full, six-hundredth anniversary of concluding the Horodło Union, Kazimierz Wóycicki from the Eastern Europe Study Centre of the Warsaw University wrote: „We live in the 21st century, and we still think in categories of the 19th century. This happens because great narrations determining the sense of modern nations were created exactly in the 19th century, when the most important thing was defending identity against external impacts. Historiography of remembrance, dealing with social representations of the past, enables gaining a distance to those tales shaped in the 19th century, through a dialogue of narratives” and, at the same time, enables expansion of the methodological scope of research on phenomena related to intangible heritage. Dear Sirs and Madams, to conclude, I would like to give my regards to the entire editorial team, who for a few recent years, working with devotion, perfection and energy, have done truly a lot in the Kraków office – it can be said without a shade of exaggeration that they re-formatted and modernized the way of thinking about our periodical. I would like to thank wholeheartedly, not only on my own behalf, the editor Ms. Olga Dyba, the editorial secretary – Mr. Andrzej Siwek and the editor Mr. Tomasz Woźniak. Dear friends – you are real professionals, and a hard act to follow... Yours respectfully Jacek Serafinowicz Editor-in-Chief
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2014, 1; 3-5
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo!
Ladies and Gentlemen!
Autorzy:
Florjanowicz, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/539138.pdf
Data publikacji:
2013
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
4. Europejskie Forum Dziedzictwa
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Ochrona Zabytków
Europejskie Dni Dziedzictwa
Opis:
Heritage preservation is a process. A process of identifying, researching, documenting, maintening, monitoring, documenting, etc. The process is a timely ordered sequence of changes or conditions occurring one after another. Each process is a function carrier, and functions make up the system. The heritage preservation is not a process that occurs in isolation. Instead, it plays a function important from the perspective of the human environment understood as a system in cultural, environmental, social and economic terms. Caring for the correctness of the protection of monuments, one cannot forget the context, causes and consequences of this process. This edition of “Ochrona Zabytków” (“Protection of Monuments”) reflects upon this. Traditionally, you can find precisely described examples of research and conservation works regarding a number of historic monuments. However, the theme of this edition is the heritage value from the economic perspective. It’s not about a commercial approach to monuments, but about perception and description of the importance of monuments for the modern socio-economic processes. An intelligent usage of heritage resources by man does not have to mean compromising their values. On the other hand, assigning social and economic context to the heritage values significantly increases chances for its preservation. An important voice in the debate on the economic potential of the cultural heritage was the 4th European Heritage Forum which took place in Wrocław in 2011 under the slogan “Value your heritage! The European heritage and economic development”. The conference, which was co-organized by the Council of Europe, the European Commission and the National Heritage Board of Poland, brought together more than 250 experts from dozens of countries around the world. It was one of the official events of the Polish Presidency over the Council of the European Union. It also became a turning point in the European debate on the importance of the heritage to the European economy, especially in times of crisis. At the end of its work, the 4th European Heritage Forum adopted a final declaration which reads as follows: The participants in the 4th European Heritage Forum, held in the city of Wrocław, Poland, on 10-12 October 2011: • recognising the value of heritage to society in this beautiful, historic and multicultural city and in all cities and territories throughout Europe; • noting a continued need in all sectors for a greater understanding of the potential which heritage can offer for quality of life and the needs for its integration in planning for an economically sustainable future; and • fully conscious of the current pressures upon resources, both public and private recommend, in the context of European Heritage Days activities, that: 1. all relevant actors should seek to balance the potential social, cultural and economic benefits when using heritage as a resource; 2. strategies should be developed for evaluating and demonstrating the positive economic and social benefits to local communities of conservation and access to the heritage; 3. a community-focussed approach has the potential to mobilise resources for sustainable heritage development, conservation and access; 4. the EHD programme should focus resources on increasing the European dimension, encouraging exchange, collaboration and cross-border event development, with the object of promoting a vision of a common European heritage. And, finally, recommend that future European Heritage Days be taken forward in the positive spirit and on the basis of our discussions here in Wrocław in a truly collaborative manner, emphasising diversity as a source of strength and not of division and highlighting our shared European heritage as well as our rich local, regional and national heritages. Declaration of Wrocław has become a corner stone laying the foundations for projects at local and European level, the common denominator of which is the search for answers to questions about how we should sustainably use the potential of the historic monuments, as nobody will dispute that it’s well worth doing it. Also the National Heritage Board of Poland has since launched a number of activities in this field: social studies, development of a model of heritage impact on the economy, and many more. A lot of work is still ahead of us, but today I encourage you to read the texts which are a major breakthrough in the way the process of historic preservation is perceived in a broader context, in accordance with the requirements of the twenty-first century. Paulina Florjanowicz Director of the National Heritage Board of Poland
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2013, 1-4; 3-4
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Tytuł:
Szanowni Państwo!
Dear Readers!
Autorzy:
Florjanowicz, Paulina
Powiązania:
https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/537896.pdf
Data publikacji:
2012
Wydawca:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Tematy:
Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa
Krajowy Ośrodek Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków
Ośrodek Dokumentacji Zabytków
Ośrodek Ochrony Zabytkowego Krajobrazu
Ośrodek Ochrony Dziedzictwa Archeologicznego
Opis:
The National Board of Poland, the publisher of the Ochrona Zabytków magazine, was established in 2011, but is already celebrating the 50th anniversary of its activity. How is that possible? The National Board of Poland, formerly the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments, is the legal successor of the Centre for Documentation of Monuments (CDM) – an institution to which the Polish conservation owes very much. CDM has been established by the then Minister of Culture and Art in 1962 and accomplished its tasks successfully for four successive decades. In 2002 the former CDM and the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape were merged to establish the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments (NCRDM), into which the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage was incorporated in 2007. In 2011, by the decision of the Minister of Culture and National Heritage, NCRDM changed its name to the National Heritage Board of Poland. We decided to celebrate this magnificent anniversary with a special issue of our magazine. It will contain information about achievements of the Centre for Documentation of Monuments during 40 years of its existence and about the activities of the Centre for the Protection of Historic Landscape and the Centre for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage, i.e., the institutions on the basis of which NCRDM and later the National Heritage Board of Poland was established. The last jubilee issue of Ochrona Zabytków was published on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of CDM exactly 10 years ago, at the beginning of 2002 (Ochrona Zabytków no. 1, 2002). A few months later, CDM ceased to exist in its then-current structure. Its ideas were continued by the National Centre for Research and Documentation of Monuments and later the National Heritage Board of Poland. However, the current jubilee issue is different from the one published 10 years ago. Successive articles were arranged in a manner showing the continuity of the mission of our institution; articles on historical topics are accompanied by texts of current employees of the National Heritage Board of Poland (NHB), who continue the presented projects, at the same time adapting them to contemporary expectations of recipients and making use of the latest methodology. Anyway, innovation was the trademark feature of CDM – after all, it was one of the first conservation institutions in the world that collected documentation about historic object resources of the entire country in a standardised manner. It is something worth remembering. In the changing reality, we have to adapt the methodology of our activities to challenges of contemporary times, but the mission of CDM that was defined in its statutes 50 years ago remains valid: „to improve the stock-taking of monuments for the rational planning of their reconstruction and conservation”. Obviously, monuments are no longer reconstructed today, but the mission of NHB is still to create the basis for the sustainable preservation of heritage by gathering and disseminating knowledge about historical monuments, by setting standards for their protection and conservation, and by raising the social awareness of Polish cultural heritage in order to preserve it for posterity. The National Heritage Board of Poland acts at the intersection of many different fields of activity of the state and society and, therefore, runs a multitude of projects addressed to diverse target groups. Consequently, it is extremely difficult to pass information about the full scope of our activity to all interested persons. This volume does not contain all articles concerning the entire activity of NHB, either. For instance, the entire area of international co-operation was not covered, including important issues such as the implementation of part of the provisions of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, or expert co-operation with the Council of Europe and the European Commission that has been carried out successfully for a few years. There is also no mention of our activity concerning the support of conservation initiatives in the Ukraine and Belarus or the long-term program of revitalisation of the Muskau Park, which is managed directly by NHB. The role of NHB in the recognition of the most valuable objects as Monuments of History and our intense efforts to create their strong brand are not mentioned, either. Many other areas of NHB’s activity were not covered as well – not because they are less important, but because there was not enough space to write about everything. However, the primary idea of this special issue of Ochrona Zabytków was to present the original tasks of CDM and the manner in which their implementation is continued by NHB today. And the number of these tasks is continuously increasing and there will be many opportunities to write about them, also in this magazine. According to the promise made in the previous issue, Ochrona Zabytków is being transformed into a more interesting magazine that reflects more closely real and current conservation issues. When preparing this special issue, we assumed that each of us had the right to include his own memories and we treat the published texts as authors’ works. This applies particularly to the authors who participated in activities of CDM and other predecessors of NHB and look back on 50 years of achievements from a slightly different perspective. Some of them contain critical remarks about our current activities, which we humbly accept and for which I would like to thank very much here. Articles by current employees of NHB were written according to a completely different principle – they contain no criticism of the past. This is not our role, because we feel that we continue the idea of CDM formulated 50 years ago and, in spite of various twists and turns of history, our task is to pursue this mission and try to fulfil it as best as possible. We do not want to criticise things from the past, but to evolve and adapt our current activities to requirements of contemporary times. I believe that we succeed in doing this and I hope that you have this feeling, too. Finally, let me wish all of you, including former and current employees and collaborators of CDM, CPHL, the Centre for Archaeological Rescue Research, CPAH, NCRDM and NHB, in particular all former directors of those renowned institutions, all the best on the occasion of the jubilee of the 50th anniversary. I would like to thank you for your work, knowledge and passion, because it is the passion, commitment and personal attitude to the tasks being undertaken that connects authors of past successes of CDM with today’s creators of the image of the National Heritage Board of Poland.
Źródło:
Ochrona Zabytków; 2012, 1-2; 3-6
0029-8247
Pojawia się w:
Ochrona Zabytków
Dostawca treści:
Biblioteka Nauki
Artykuł
Wyświetlanie 1-15 z 23

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies