Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

English (EN)·Polski (PL)·Yкраїнський (UK)
Przejdź do strony domowej biblioteki Centralna Biblioteka Wojskowa Link otwiera się w nowym oknie Logo biblioteki Prolib Integro - strona głównaCentralna Biblioteka Wojskowa

Wyszukujesz frazę "Multiple Modernities" wg kryterium: Temat

  Lista filtrów
Wyrównaj
    Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3
    Tytuł:
    Globalization and the Third Research Program of Multiple Modernities
    Autorzy:
    Preyer, Gerhard
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2010380.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2016-06-30
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    multiple modernities
    sociology of membership
    globalization
    creolization
    multiculturalism
    global studies
    postmodern society
    development theory
    collective identities
    hybridization
    Opis:
    Shmuel N. Eisenstadt has fundamentally modified the classical theory of modernization. Over the course of his work, which is connected with the changes of sociological theory since the 1950s, he has executed a turn from the comparative analysis of institutions to the research program of comparative civilizations. The research program of multiple modernities has emerged out of this attentional shift coming from the First Research Program 1986, which led to “multiple modernities” and to the Second Research Program 2003. A key milestone was the critique of the theory of structural differentiation as the main process underlying the sociostructural evolution of societies; this began with The Political Systems of Empires (1963), along with the development of convergence theories of modernization, which have had impact on contemporary sociological theory beginning with that same book. In the meantime, the research program of multiple modernities now continues into the Third Research Program of Multiple Modernities, Membership, and Globalization 2016 and its implementation (Preyer and Sussman, 2016a, b). Firstly, I will show how the program seeks to sketch an updated vision of the theoretical systematization of research on globalization since the 1990s. Secondly, I will go on to sketch the foci of research within the Third Research Program in our era of globalization; finally, I shall outline some consequences of changes in the research situation within sociological theory.
    Źródło:
    Kultura i Edukacja; 2016, 2(112); 21-42
    1230-266X
    Pojawia się w:
    Kultura i Edukacja
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    Shmuel N. Eisenstadt w nowej odsłonie. Wokół książki Varieties of Multiple Modernities. New Research Design
    Shmuel N. Eisenstadt in a new setting. Varieties of Multiple Modernities. New Research Design
    Autorzy:
    Fligel, Anna
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/2197024.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2020-04-06
    Wydawca:
    Akademia Humanistyczno-Ekonomiczna w Łodzi
    Tematy:
    Shmuel N. Eisenstadt
    Prayer G.
    zwielokrotnione nowoczesności
    studia globalne
    koncepcja niedookreślenia
    transglobalność
    transnacjonalizm
    multiple modernities
    global studies
    theory of indeterminacy
    transglobality
    transnationalism
    Opis:
    Badania nad myślą Shmuela N. Eisenstadta (1923–2010) oraz te kontynuujące i rozwijające jego dziedzictwo nieustannie przybierają na sile i to w najrozmaitszych zakątkach świata. Fakt ten nie może dziwić, skoro rezultaty jego własnych obszernych badań uznawane są zazwyczaj za jeden z najważniejszych i najoryginalniejszych produktów w dziedzinie socjologii, filozofii cywilizacji, filozofii kultury, filozofii polityki i społeczeństwa drugiej połowy XX i początku XXI wieku. Wskazane przesłanki skłoniły mnie do napisania tekstu, który z założenia jest artykułem przeglądowym, tj. krytyczną prezentacją kilku istotnych wątków jednej z nowszych książek pisanych z perspektywy teorii Shmuela N. Eisenstadta, zatytułowanej Varieties of multiple modernities. New Research Design (dalej: Varieties). Książka stanowi bardzo ważny wkład do dorobku badań nad myślą izraelskiego socjologa, zarazem znacznie przekraczającą jego dziedzictwo. Jej autorzy podjęli próbę stawienia czoła najbardziej aktualnym zagadnieniom i wydarzeniom otaczającego nas świata. To, czy narzędzia, jakie dostarcza Eisenstadt, pomagają w tego typu przedsięwzięciach pozostawiam już opinii czytelnika Varieties. Książka, jako wynik projektu interdyscyplinarnego, stanowi zapewne ogromne źródło wiedzy, stąd może być inspiracją dla reprezentantów różnych dyscyplin.
    Research on the thought of Shmuel N. Eisenstadt (1923-2010), as well as studies continuing and developing his ideas, is gaining traction in different corners of the world. This fact is not surprising since the results of his own extensive research are usually considered as one of the most important and original products in the field of sociology, philosophy of civilisation, philosophy of culture, as well as the philosophy of politics and society of the mid-20th and early 21st century. This article offers a critical presentation of several important threads of a recent book entitled Varieties of multiple modernities: New Research Design (hereinafter: Varieties) that engages with the theories of Shmuel N. Eisenstadt. This book is a very important contribution to work on the thought of the Israeli sociologist and it moves beyond his ideas. The authors make an attempt to face current issues and events in the world around us. Whether or not the tools provided by Eisenstadt help in this type of endeavour, I leave the readers of Varieties to judge. The book, a result of an interdisciplinary project, is a huge source of knowledge. It can be an inspiration for representatives of various disciplines.
    Źródło:
    Civitas Hominibus. Rocznik filozoficzno-społeczny; 2019, 14; 23-38
    1896-1819
    2391-5145
    Pojawia się w:
    Civitas Hominibus. Rocznik filozoficzno-społeczny
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
    Tytuł:
    O metodologicznych trudnościach badania i opisywania Chin
    Some methodological difficulties in studying and analysing China
    Autorzy:
    Gawlikowski, Krzysztof
    Powiązania:
    https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/1955856.pdf
    Data publikacji:
    2019-12-31
    Wydawca:
    Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
    Tematy:
    honne
    Yoshio Sugimoto
    Karl-Heinz Pohl
    Heilmann
    Axial Age
    Multiple Modernities
    clash of civilizations
    Chiny
    reformy Denga
    metodologia
    eurocentryzm
    Fukuyama
    Huntington
    Eisenstadt
    religia
    prawa człowieka
    demokracja
    wolność
    państwo chińskie
    autorytaryzm
    Opis:
    The study presents various factors which obstacles adequate description and analysis of Chinese realities in Western scholarly literature. The first factor presented in the article is the psychological mechanism of a “mirror”. As Lynn T. White suggested, since the 17th century, that Westerners look at China not through a ‘window’ but through a ‘mirror’, in which their own fears or most treasured ideals are refl ected, not China itself. Hence their descriptions of China refl ect first of all their state of mind. Peter Hays Gries and Stanley Rosen add to this metaphor another one, that of a procrustean bed. According to these authors, contemporary Western scholars procede like ancient Procrustes who made his captives fit his bed cutting their too long limbs or stretching these too short, in order to adapt Chinese realities to the Western schemes. Sebastian Heilmann and Matthias Stepan in order to explain Western mistaken views of China and expectations presented six wrong assumptions concerning developments in China. Their list is controversial, but it is true that on the Western side there are numerous wrong assumptions concerning China and other Asian states. Thus the Chinese realities are described in a wrong way, and the predictions of future developments are also false. The Author put an emphasis on scientific categories and terms elaborated in Europe and the States and considered “universal”, which, however, are not adequate to the Chinese realities. Hence their use results in falsification of descriptions and makes previsions based on them – groundless. He distinguishes two essential kinds of categories and terms borrowed from the West but inadequate to the Chinese realities. The first constitutes the terms which significance does not fit to the Chinese realities, as “language”, “religion”, historical epochs such as “antiquity”, “,Middle Ages”, etc. The second constitutes the terms which meanings involve cultural values. Many of them are difficult to translate into Chinese and they acquire different meanings in the context of Confucian heritage. The Author analyses from this perspective: “human rights”, “democracy” and “freedom”. Western scholars are also often mislead by Chinese sources. The study indicates another factor, which facilitates great misunderstandings. According to the cultural norm of the Confucian civilisation there is a “proper façade” presented in public, behind which there are hidden “internal realities”. Of course, such differences could be detected in each culture, but in highly ritualistic Confucian civilisation this distinction is essential, and both parts constitute “complex realities”, whereas Westerners presume that the façade constitutes a whole and complete reality. The Author presents as an example centralised, unitary Leninist state in Chin that is – in his opinion merely a false “public image”, whereas in reality there operate more or less innumerable quite autonomous units, which in fact are not subordinate. Under such circumstances all decisions must be consulted and negotiated among them, like in a federal system, although it does not operate formally. The Westerners also misleads themselves considering their peculiar civilisation as “universal”, whereas there are various civilisations, which will not amalgamate during the modernisation processes. Hence various societies function and change in their own ways, different from the western schemes and expectations. The study indicates that the West still predominates and presents its civilisation as universal. However, its predomination faces growing resistance and numerous scholars recognise the existence of numerous civilisations, which will also develop in the future. The author enumerates the most significant concepts such as “dialogue among civilisations and cultures” adopted by the United Nations in 1989, Huntington’s warning against imposing western norms on other civilisations, which may result in their ‘clashes’, the concept of the Axial Age, of Multiple Modernities, and so on. The road to an equal status of all civilisations is long and tortuous. The elaboration of universal scientific categories and principles is even more difficult, and it is, perhaps, a task for future generations of Asian scholars.
    Źródło:
    Azja-Pacyfik; 2019, XXII; 50-78
    1643-692X
    Pojawia się w:
    Azja-Pacyfik
    Dostawca treści:
    Biblioteka Nauki
    Artykuł
      Wyświetlanie 1-3 z 3

      Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies